Mental Fatigue and Performance in Young Soccer Players

May 13, 2025 updated by: Ersan Arslan, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Investigation of the Effects of Mental Fatigue on Physical Performance and Perceived Psychophysiological Reactions in Young Soccer Players: A Field Based Study

The study employed a randomized, parallel-group, between-subjects design in which participants were assigned to either the MF+ or MF- condition and completed a single testing session accordingly. All test sessions were conducted on synthetic turf pitches and comprised three stages of testing, which included assessments of aerobic and anaerobic endurance, jumping, agility, and balance. During the familiarization session, players were briefed on the study procedures, practiced the main tasks, and became accustomed to the equipment and environment used during the intervention. During the MF+ session, prior to each physical testing stage, participants completed a 30-minute Color-word Stroop task (CST) to induce MF. To minimize external influence, players were not prompted or verbally encouraged during testing. Immediately, after each session, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE 6--20) were recorded using the category-level Borg scale (29), and enjoyment was assessed using the exercise enjoyment scale, a bipolar instrument consisting of eight items scored on a 1-7 Likert scale.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study employed a randomized, parallel-group, between-subjects design in which participants were assigned to either the MF+ or MF- condition and completed a single testing session accordingly. Players were recommended to sleep for at least 7-8 hours, refrain from exercising at moderate to high intensity, and avoid consuming alcoholic or caffeinated beverages during the 24 hours before the intervention. Indoor and outdoor temperatures (25-28°C) and humidity levels (35-40%) were kept consistent across all intervention sessions. All test sessions were conducted on synthetic turf pitches and comprised three stages of testing, which included assessments of aerobic and anaerobic endurance, jumping, agility, and balance. During the familiarization session, players were briefed on the study procedures, practiced the main tasks, and became accustomed to the equipment and environment used during the intervention. During the MF+ session, prior to each physical testing stage, participants completed a 30-minute Color-word Stroop task (CST) to induce MF. Four color words (red, blue, green, and yellow) were randomly printed, and participants were required to verbally name the color of each word. During the control (MF-) session, prior to each physical testing stage, participants watched emotionally neutral documentaries for 30 minutes. Each testing session began with a standardized 15-minute warm-up, consisting of 5 minutes of low- to moderate-intensity running followed by 10 minutes of upper- and lower-extremity-specific dynamic stretching, mobility exercises, and change-of-direction drills. To minimize external influence, players were not prompted or verbally encouraged during testing. Immediately, after each session, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE 6--20) were recorded using the category-level Borg scale, and enjoyment was assessed using the exercise enjoyment scale, a bipolar instrument consisting of eight items scored on a 1-7 Likert scale.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokat, Turkey, 6000
        • Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Universty

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being healthy
  • Male soccer players
  • Willing to maintain the intervention for all sessions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being under 14 years old
  • Having a chronic disease
  • Contraindications for exercise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Mental Fatigue (MF+)
During the MF+ session, before each physical testing phase, participants completed a 30-min Colour Word Stroop task (CST) to trigger
During the MF+ session, before each physical testing phase, participants completed a 30-min Colour Word Stroop task (CST) to trigger MF. The paper-based version of the CST was completed in quiet rooms following the same protocol as in previous studies. This prolonged cognitive task was reported to require sustained attention and automatic response inhibition and effectively induced MF through cognitive manipulation. ThyIt had ben Four colour words (red, blue, green and yellow) were randomly printed and participants were asked to verbalise the colour of each word.
Other: Control (MF-)
Control
During the control session, before each physical testing phase, participants watched emotionally neutral documentaries for 30 min.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aerobic performance assessment
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of measurement at 1 day
The test consisted of shuttle runs between two landmarks placed 20 metres apart, and athletes were required to complete a short active recovery period by running or walking within 10 seconds after each shuttle run. The testing protocol typically includes a standardised warm-up followed by progressive shuttle runs until exhaustion. The distance travelled or the level reached before exhaustion is used to measure performance. The test was carried out on an artificial turf field according to the recommended procedures.
From baseline to the end of measurement at 1 day
Countermovement jump performance assessment
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of measurement at 1 day
Countermovement jump tests with arms free (CMJf) tests were used to test the performance of the players in the vertical jump test. Each player's CMJf jump height was measured via Optojump photoelectric cells (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). To ensure proper recovery and reduce fatigue, players were given a passive rest period of 2 minutes between consecutive trials in the same jump test. In addition, there was a rest period of 5 min between the different jump tests.
From baseline to the end of measurement at 1 day
Agility performance assessment
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of measurement at 1 day
Players completed three Zig-Zag agility tests with a ball (ZZwB) on a synthetic turf field. Each set was followed by a 3-minute recovery period, and the fastest time recorded from all sets was considered to be the performance of the test. The ZZwB trail comprises four 5-meter sections designed at 100° angles. In a previous study by Mirkov et al. (34), a coefficient of variation of 21.12%, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.81 and 0.84, and typical measurement errors of 0.21 and 0.098 were reported for ZZwB.
From baseline to the end of measurement at 1 day
Balence performance assessment
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of measurement at 1 day
The Y balance test was used for balance measurements. Before the test, the length of both legs of each player was measured via a standard tape measure from the anterior superior iliac spine to the most distal medial malleolus in the supine position. The test, consisting of three different directions of movement (anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral), was used to assess dynamic balance with a single-leg stance while reaching these directions. After six trials on each foot for familiarization, each player performed three successful reaches 15 s apart. After the test, the composite score (CS) was calculated via the following formula (37): CS = [(maximum anterior reach + maximum posteromedial reach + maximum posterolateral reach)/(leg length × 3)] × 100.
From baseline to the end of measurement at 1 day
Anaerobic Endurance assessment
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of measurement at 1 day
A three-corner run test (TCRT) was used to assess the speed and anaerobic endurance of the players. After the start signal, the players ran to a flagpole 80 m away from the start. The players then turned to the left side and ran to a flagpole, 20 m away from flagpole. After that, the players returned to flagpole 82.4 m from the start. Finally, turning to the right, the players ran to finish line and crossed the line to end the test.
From baseline to the end of measurement at 1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UGaziosmanpasa-3

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Fatigue

Clinical Trials on MF+

Subscribe