Optimizing Portal Hypertension With TIPS and Interval Metabolic Surgery for Advanced Liver Disease (OPTIMAL)

December 20, 2025 updated by: Sobia N. Laique, The Cleveland Clinic

OPTIMAL Trial: Optimizing Portal Hypertension With TIPS and Interval Metabolic Surgery for Advanced Liver Disease

Cirrhosis is a form of advanced liver disease that can lead to serious complications, especially when combined with severe obesity. Many patients with cirrhosis also develop a condition called clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), which is increased pressure in the veins of the liver. CSPH raises the risk of life-threatening events like internal bleeding and liver failure. Unfortunately, treatment options for people who have both cirrhosis and severe obesity are very limited, especially when portal hypertension is present.

This study, called the OPTIMAL Trial, is a randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate whether combining two procedures improves health outcomes in this high-risk population. The first procedure, called TIPS (Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt), is a minimally invasive treatment that reduces pressure in the liver by creating a pathway for blood to flow more easily. The second procedure is sleeve gastrectomy, a form of metabolic (bariatric) surgery that helps patients lose weight and improve related conditions like diabetes.

The study will compare two groups:

  1. One group will receive TIPS followed by sleeve gastrectomy (TIPS+SG).
  2. The other group will receive medical weight management (standard non-surgical care, including diet, lifestyle changes, and weight loss medications).

All participants will have severe obesity and cirrhosis with CSPH but will not have decompensated liver disease (such as large amounts of fluid in the abdomen, a history of variceal bleeding, or recent liver failure). Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups.

The main goal of the study is to determine whether the combination of TIPS + SG improves quality of life and leads to greater weight loss compared to medical therapy alone. The study will also monitor for any complications from either the procedures or the medical treatment.

Participants will be followed for 6 months after their treatment starts, with periodic assessments of their physical health, liver function, and overall well-being. Some participants may also be followed for a longer period to assess long-term outcomes.

This study hopes to provide high-quality evidence for a novel, stepwise treatment strategy that may help people with obesity and liver disease live longer, healthier lives. If successful, it could change how advanced liver disease and obesity are managed together, especially in patients who currently have few safe and effective options. All study care is provided at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Obesity and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) are now among the leading global causes of cirrhosis. Up to one-third of individuals with cirrhosis also have class II or III obesity, which exacerbates portal hypertension, accelerates liver disease progression, and can limit eligibility for liver transplantation. Metabolic (bariatric) surgery is an established treatment that induces sustained weight loss and improves metabolic and hepatic outcomes. However, the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) increases the risks of surgery, including intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hepatic decompensation. Small retrospective studies suggest that placing a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) before surgery may reduce these risks by decompressing the portal venous system. To date, no prospective randomized trial has evaluated this approach.

The OPTIMAL Trial (Optimizing Portal Hypertension with TIPS and Interval Metabolic Surgery for Advanced Liver Disease) is a single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial designed to determine whether a staged strategy using TIPS followed by sleeve gastrectomy improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL), weight loss, and safety in patients with cirrhosis, severe obesity, and CSPH compared to medical management alone.

The trial will enroll 70 adults aged 18 to 70 years with a body mass index (BMI) between 35 and 70 kg/m², biopsy-proven or elastography-confirmed cirrhosis, and objective evidence of CSPH. Inclusion criteria include Child-Pugh class A or B liver function, MELD 3.0 score <=15, and platelet count >= 50,000 /µL. Key exclusion criteria include decompensated cirrhosis, defined as moderate-to-large volume ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or patients undergoing liver transplant evaluation. Patients with a history of variceal hemorrhage or small-volume ascites may still be eligible. Other exclusions include MELD 3.0 > 15, portal vein thrombosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, prior metabolic surgery, pregnancy, active substance use, untreated psychiatric illness, and severe cardiopulmonary disease that would preclude surgery or anesthesia.

After informed consent, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two arms. The intervention group will undergo TIPS placement, aiming for at least a 50 percent reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) or a final HVPG less than 12 mmHg, followed by sleeve gastrectomy approximately 4 to 6 weeks later. The control group will receive structured lifestyle counseling and, when clinically indicated, FDA-approved pharmacologic therapies for weight management and diabetes.

Follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months will assess weight, vital signs, adverse events, and MELD 3.0 laboratory values. Liver Doppler ultrasound will be performed in the intervention group to assess TIPS patency per standard of care. Both groups will complete the SF-36 survey to evaluate health-related quality of life. The primary outcome is the change in SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes include percentage of total body weight loss, incidence of serious liver-related complications such as hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, and acute-on-chronic liver failure, as well as changes in SF-36 scores at 1 and 3 months. Exploratory outcomes include changes in MELD 3.0 parameters (bilirubin, albumin, INR, sodium, and creatinine); proportion of participants achieving 5% to 25% weight loss; changes in BMI, waist circumference, and body composition; changes in glucose and HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes; proportion meeting HbA1c targets (<6.5% without medications, <7% overall); and changes in cardiovascular and diabetes medication use.

Following randomization, all patients who receive TIPS or start nonsurgical management will be analyzed based on the intention-to-treat plan. Furthermore, patients who undergo TIPS placement but not sleeve gastrectomy for any reason, such as the development of de novo portal vein thrombosis, development of de novo acute renal failure, or persistent esophageal varices, will not be included in the per-protocol (on treatment) analysis.

This trial will generate the first prospective data evaluating whether a combined approach of portal pressure reduction and metabolic surgery can safely and effectively improve quality of life, metabolic control, and liver-related outcomes in patients with cirrhosis, severe obesity, and CSPH.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Awwab F Hammad, MD
  • Phone Number: +1 216 444 5022
  • Email: hammada4@ccf.org

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Recruiting
        • Cleveland Clinic Main Campus
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sobia Laique, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ali Aminian, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Candidate for general anesthesia.
  2. Age 18-70 years at consent.
  3. BMI 35-70 kg/m² at first study visit.
  4. Eligible for sleeve gastrectomy per ASMBS/IFSO 2022 guidelines.
  5. Insurance coverage for metabolic surgery.
  6. Current or prior anti-obesity medication use permitted.
  7. Liver cirrhosis confirmed by biopsy or non-invasive assessment.
  8. Clinically significant portal hypertension (HVPG ≥ 10 mm Hg, or esophagogastric varices / portal-hypertensive gastropathy, or imaging evidence of collaterals/dilated portal vein).
  9. Able and willing to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures.
  10. Women of child-bearing potential: negative urine pregnancy test at screening and randomization and agreement to reliable contraception for 2 years.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Prior bariatric/metabolic surgery (except removed devices ≥ 3 months earlier).
  2. Prior complex foregut surgery.
  3. History of solid-organ transplant.
  4. Severe pulmonary disease (FEV1 < 50 % predicted).
  5. Significant cardiac or atherosclerotic disease with planned re-vascularization within 12 months.
  6. ASA class IV or V uncompensated cardiopulmonary disease.
  7. Left-ventricular ejection fraction < 25 % or MI/unstable angina/stroke/heart surgery/coronary stent within 6 months.
  8. Hiatal hernia > 7 cm or LA grade C/D erosive esophagitis.
  9. Active Crohn's disease.
  10. Severe psychiatric illness, dementia, active psychosis, history of suicide attempt, or alcohol/substance abuse within 12 months.
  11. Pregnant, breastfeeding, planning pregnancy, or not using adequate contraception.
  12. Malignancy within the prior 12 months (except non-melanoma skin cancer).
  13. Life expectancy < 2 years in investigator's judgment.
  14. Investigational therapy within 3 months.
  15. Acute pancreatitis ≤ 90 days.
  16. Portal vein thrombosis at screening.
  17. Decompensated cirrhosis (moderate/large ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or listed for liver transplant); small ascites or prior variceal bleed allowed.
  18. Total bilirubin > 3 mg/dL, INR > 1.7, or platelets < 50 000/µL (within 1 month).
  19. Significant alcohol intake (> 14 units/week women, > 21 units/week men) within the prior 12 months.
  20. eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m² or on dialysis (within 1 month).
  21. AIDS.
  22. Unable to understand study or give consent.
  23. Plans to move more than 3 hours from Cleveland within 6 months.
  24. Previous randomization in this trial.
  25. Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, places the subject at undue risk.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TIPS + Sleeve Gastrectomy
Participants first undergo transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement (target HVPG < 12 mmHg or ≥ 50 % reduction). After portal pressure stabilization-ideally 4-6 weeks, allowed ≤ 6 months-they receive laparoscopic or robotic sleeve gastrectomy. Standard peri- and post-operative care, plus routine lifestyle counseling, are provided.
Fluoroscopically guided placement of a covered stent creating a portosystemic shunt between hepatic and portal veins. Goal: ≥ 50 % HVPG reduction or final HVPG < 12 mmHg. Conducted 4-6 weeks (≤ 6 months allowed) before bariatric surgery; standard post-TIPS surveillance ultrasound and EGD to confirm patency and variceal resolution.
Other Names:
  • TIPS
Longitudinal resection of ~80 % of stomach via laparoscopic or robotic approach, preserving pylorus. Performed after successful TIPS once portal pressures stabilize (< 6 months post-TIPS). Standard peri-operative care, micronutrient supplementation, and bariatric follow-up per ASMBS guidelines.
Other Names:
  • SG
Regular sessions with a registered dietitian or equivalent (in-person or virtual) focusing on adherence to a reduced-calorie diet, structured physical-activity regimen, and behavior-change strategies. Counseling occurs throughout the 6-month study period and is considered standard care for this patient population.
Other Names:
  • Dietary modification
  • Exercise counseling
  • Behavioral weight-loss coaching
Active Comparator: Best-Option Medical Weight Management
Participants will follow an individualized, clinician-directed medical weight loss program that includes dietary and physical activity counseling, behavior modification strategies, and best available anti-obesity pharmacotherapy (e.g., GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual incretin agonists, first generation AOMs).
Regular sessions with a registered dietitian or equivalent (in-person or virtual) focusing on adherence to a reduced-calorie diet, structured physical-activity regimen, and behavior-change strategies. Counseling occurs throughout the 6-month study period and is considered standard care for this patient population.
Other Names:
  • Dietary modification
  • Exercise counseling
  • Behavioral weight-loss coaching
Clinician-selected, evidence-based anti-obesity medications (AOMs) used at the treating provider's discretion. Agents may include incretin-based therapies (e.g., Semaglutide, Tirzepatide) or other FDA-approved AOMs such as Topiramate or Phentermine. Dosing and titration follow standard labeling; no specific drug is mandated. The study assesses the overall class effect of pharmacotherapy rather than any single agent.
Other Names:
  • Topiramate
  • GLP-1 receptor agonist
  • Phentermine
  • Incretin Mimetics

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score From Baseline to 6 Months
Time Frame: At 6 months after treatment initiation (Day 0 = TIPS placement date or start of medical management).
Difference between baseline and 6-month SF-36 PCS score (0-100 scale; higher values = better physical health-related quality of life). Positive change denotes improvement.
At 6 months after treatment initiation (Day 0 = TIPS placement date or start of medical management).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Total Body-Weight Loss (%TBWL) at 6 Months
Time Frame: At 6 months after treatment initiation
%TBWL = ((baseline weight - 6-month weight) ÷ baseline weight) × 100.
At 6 months after treatment initiation
Incidence of Serious Complication Composite Within 6 Months
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after treatment initiation
Proportion of participants experiencing ≥ 1 of the following: severe hepatic encephalopathy (requiring hospitalization/intubation/TIPS revision), variceal hemorrhage, acute-on-chronic liver failure, deep intra-abdominal infection, severe sepsis, blood transfusion, pulmonary embolism, initiation of dialysis, or death.
Up to 6 months after treatment initiation
Change in SF-36 Physical Component Score From Baseline to 1 Month
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month
Differences in SF-36 Physical Component Score at one month versus baseline (higher = better physical health-related quality of life).
Baseline and 1 month
Change in SF-36 Mental Component Score From Baseline to 1 Month.
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month.
Differences in SF-36 Mental Component Score at one month versus baseline (higher = better mental health-related quality of life).
Baseline and 1 month.
Change in SF-36 Physical Component Score From Baseline to 3 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Differences in SF-36 Physical Component Score at three months versus baseline (higher = better physical health-related quality of life).
Baseline and 3 months
Change in SF-36 Mental Component Score From Baseline to 3 Months.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months.
Differences in SF-36 Mental Component Score at three months versus baseline (higher = better mental health-related quality of life).
Baseline and 3 months.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in HbA1c (%)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months (Week 24) after treatment initiation
Mean absolute change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c, percent) between baseline and each follow-up visit
Baseline and 6 months (Week 24) after treatment initiation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sobia Laique, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Cirrhoses

Clinical Trials on Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS)

3
Subscribe