Body Composition Changes After TIPS and Associated Clinical Outcomes

November 2, 2023 updated by: Oregon Health and Science University

Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Body Composition Changes and Clinical Outcomes After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Creation in Patients With Cirrhosis and Complications of Portal Hypertension Awaiting Liver Transplantation

The purpose of this study is to prospectively assess the impact of TIPS creation on muscle mass and physical function in patients with cirrhosis, and to determine whether these changes correlate with improved outcomes in patients awaiting liver transplantation. Retrospective observational studies have shown improvement in muscle mass and body composition in cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS. The investigators aim to now prospectively study this through a pilot randomized controlled trial tracking patients managed with TIPS creation compared to those managed without TIPS to determine whether these observational findings can be seen in a randomized cohort. The investigators hypothesize that TIPS creation will lead to improved muscle mass, body composition and muscle function within the first 12 months after the procedure compared to a control group without TIPS, and that these changes will improve liver disease outcomes in patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sarcopenia (loss of muscle mass) and frailty (loss of muscle function) have increasingly become recognized as major prognostic factors in predicting morbidity and mortality with several disease states, including cirrhosis. Cirrhosis represents end-stage liver disease and is complicated by a multitude of clinical sequelae, such as variceal hemorrhage, ascites, renal insufficiency, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatopulmonary syndrome, cardiac dysfunction, infection and hepatocellular carcinoma. To date, liver transplantation remains the only prospect for a curative treatment. As the liver is the primary metabolic organ, sarcopenia is prevalent in cirrhosis, afflicting 30-70% of patients. Observational studies have implicated sarcopenia as an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality in all clinical sequelae of cirrhosis. Moreover, sarcopenia and frailty have been shown to increase morbidity and mortality of transplant eligible patients on the liver transplant waitlist, as well as mortality of patients after liver transplant. Given the prevalence of sarcopenia and frailty in this patient population, and the severe clinical impacts, addressing these adverse predictors may have profound implications for the outcomes of patients with cirrhosis.

Cirrhosis often leads to portal hypertension, complications of which include lower extremity edema, ascites, hepatic hydrothorax, variceal bleeding, portal hypertensive gastropathy, portal vein thrombosis, and hepatic encephalopathy. Patients with cirrhosis and complications of portal hypertension are currently managed in several ways in clinical practice:

  • medical management, including diuretics and non-selective beta blocker therapy
  • endoscopic options include variceal banding or glue embolization
  • invasive options include large-volume paracentesis (LVP) or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation.

Since 1988, the Liver Transplant Program at OHSU has been successfully treating waitlisted cirrhotic patients with complications of portal hypertension using a combination of these therapies. TIPS creation, particularly in the current era of stent grafts with a dedicated device for this procedure, has been a part of managing patients with cirrhosis as a bridge to transplant for two decades. Depending on the indication, patients can be treated with a combination of these therapies often with significant overlap. For example, a given patient with portal hypertension and ascites may be managed with diuretics and serial LVP vs. TIPS creation, and a given patient with variceal bleeding may be treated with beta-blockers and endoscopic banding vs. TIPS creation.

Of relevance to the proposed trial, recent observational studies have demonstrated significant reversal of sarcopenia after TIPS creation, and this reversal has been strongly correlated with improved survival and less hepatic encephalopathy. Moreover, the time course of muscle gains has been observed to occur within the first 6 months of TIPS creation, critical for patients awaiting liver transplantation, as benefits would occur during typical transplant waitlist time periods. Thus, TIPS creation may represent a major unmet need to address sarcopenia and frailty in patients with cirrhosis, and represents an intervention with potential to reverse this debilitating condition and improve clinical outcomes. Putative mechanisms for how TIPS creation may improve body composition include decreased congestive enteropathy resulting in improved gut nutrient absorption, decrease in metabolic burden from a hyperdynamic cardiopulmonary status in the setting of fluid overload, improvement in renal function, and changes in the gut microbiome resulting in conversion from a catabolic to an anabolic state. A major gap in knowledge, however, remains whether TIPS creation can directly reverse muscle loss. Furthermore, whether reversal of muscle loss results in improved measures of strength, physical performance and clinical outcomes has not been prospectively studied. In this proposal, the investigators plan to address this major knowledge gap through a pilot prospective randomized controlled trial tracking patients managed with TIPS creation compared to those managed without TIPS to determine whether these observational findings can be seen in a randomized cohort.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

22

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Khashayar Farsad, MD
  • Phone Number: 503-494-7660
  • Email: farsad@ohsu.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Recruiting
        • Oregon Health and Science University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients >18 <99 with cirrhosis wait listed for liver transplantation
  • Evidence of complications of portal hypertension:
  • Ascites or hydrothorax requiring escalation of diuretic medication
  • Persistent ascites or hydrothorax despite diuretic use, or intolerance of diuretic use
  • Gastrointestinal varices and blood loss anemia or history of variceal hemorrhage
  • Portal hypertensive gastropathy and blood loss anemia
  • Chronic portal vein thrombosis requiring recanalization and TIPS for transplant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma or other active malignancy
  • Recurrent overt hepatic encephalopathy
  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy with maximum amplitude (MA) <30 on thromboelastography
  • Bacteremia or sepsis
  • MELD > 25
  • Pregnant
  • Decisionally impaired individuals
  • Need for emergency TIPS creation
  • Patients who do not have acceptable alternatives to TIPS creation to manage their disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TIPS
Patients in this arm will undergo TIPS creation in addition to their current management.
During a TIPS procedure, the interventional radiologist, with the help of x-ray and ultrasound guidance, makes a channel through the liver to connect the portal vein (the vein that carries blood from the digestive organs to the liver) to one of the hepatic vein (three veins that carry blood away from the liver back to the heart) using a special type of needle. The interventional radiologist then replaces the needle with a wire and catheter, and a small tubular device called a stent graft is placed in this channel to keep the pathway open between the two blood vessels.
No Intervention: Standard of care
Patients in this arm will continue to be treated with their current management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body composition changes
Time Frame: Start to 2 years after enrollment
Muscle and fat content as assessed by CT scan
Start to 2 years after enrollment
Short Performance Physical Battery test
Time Frame: Start to 6 months after enrollment
Brief physical test for balance with feet together (seconds), gait speed walking 4 meters (seconds), time to stand from a chair (seconds). These are aggregated together to a unified score.
Start to 6 months after enrollment
Liver Frailty test
Time Frame: Start to 6 months after enrollment
Brief physical test for balance with feet together (seconds), time to stand from a chair (seconds), and grip strength (kilograms of force). These are aggregated together to a unified score.
Start to 6 months after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chronic Liver Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time Frame: Start to 6 months after enrollment
Quality of life assessment using 29 questions regarding experience of various symptoms graded on a scale of 1-7 each, with 1 being worse (all of the time) and 7 being the best (none of the time).
Start to 6 months after enrollment
Overall survival
Time Frame: Start to 2 years after enrollment
Survival time
Start to 2 years after enrollment
Transplant complications
Time Frame: Start to 30 days after transplant
Complications while on transplant waitlist as well as after transplant
Start to 30 days after transplant
Cardiac function
Time Frame: Start to 6 months after enrollment
Right and left ventricular function noted by echocardiography
Start to 6 months after enrollment
Liver function tests
Time Frame: Start to 6 months after enrollment
Serum tests for total bilirubin (mg/dL), albumin (g/dL), sodium (mmol/L), creatinine (mg/dL), international normalized ratio. These values will be combined in the MELD score = 3.78×ln[serum bilirubin (mg/dL)] + 11.2×ln[INR] + 9.57×ln[serum creatinine (mg/dL)] + 6.43, and MELD-Na score = MELD + 1.32 x (137 - Na) - [0.033 x MELD*(137 - Na)]
Start to 6 months after enrollment
Cardiac mass
Time Frame: start to 6 months after enrollment
Myocardial mass as measured by echocardiography
start to 6 months after enrollment
Serum ammonia
Time Frame: start to 6 months after enrollment
serum ammonia level (micromol/L)
start to 6 months after enrollment
Serum glucose
Time Frame: start to 6 months after enrollment
serum glucose level (mg/dL)
start to 6 months after enrollment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stool microbiome genomic assessment
Time Frame: Start to 6 months after enrollment
Stool sample using DNAGenotek Omni-gene Stool collection kit to assess for bacterial complement in stool
Start to 6 months after enrollment
Lipocalin-2 biomarker assessment
Time Frame: Start to 6 months after enrollment
Lipocalin-2 transcription and expression (RNA sequencing/Elisa/Western Blot) in serum samples
Start to 6 months after enrollment
IL-6 biomarker assessment
Time Frame: Start to 6 months after enrollment
IL-6 immunoassay assessment of serum (pg/mL)
Start to 6 months after enrollment
Salivary cortisol biomarker assessment
Time Frame: Start to 6 months after enrollment
salivary cortisol (mmol/L)
Start to 6 months after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcopenia

Clinical Trials on Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) creation

3
Subscribe