- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07130708
- Original Trial
Exploring the Potential of Robotic Telesurgery in Remote Settings
Advancing Humanitarian Healthcare: Exploring the Potential of Robotic Telesurgery in Remote Settings - A Multicentric Prospective Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Celebration, Florida, United States, 34747
- Recruiting
- Adventhealth
-
Principal Investigator:
- Vipul R Patel, MD
-
Contact:
- Research Nurse Manager
- Phone Number: 407-303-4933
- Email: tadzia.harvey@adventhealth.com
-
Contact:
- Marcio Moschovas, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 407-303-4673
- Email: marcio.moschovas.md@adventhealth.com
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Marcio Moschovas, MD, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 - 90
- Male or female
Eligible participants for this telesurgery study must have a clearly defined indication for robotic urologic surgery, specifically:
- Localized Prostate Cancer (ICD-10: C61), appropriate for robotic radical prostatectomy.
OR
-Benign Prostate diseases appropriate for robotic simple prostatectomy (ICD-10: N40) These diagnoses are confirmed by clinical examination, imaging, and/or pathology prior to surgical planning. Patients with vague or unspecified urologic conditions will be excluded to ensure the safety and appropriateness of the surgical intervention.
- Primary diagnosis of urinary system disease and prostate disorders (C61 and N40.1) scheduled to undergo treatment with robotic surgery. These patients don't have access to robotic surgery in their routine and the study will give them the opportunity to have advanced technology and the gold-standard treatment with experts in the field.
- Willing to participate in the study
- Mentally capable of comprehending the study protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who, based on multidisciplinary evaluation (surgical, anesthetic, and medical), are deemed not suitable for robotic surgery due to high perioperative risk. This includes but is not limited to:
- Uncontrolled cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease.
- Severe anesthetic risk classified as ASA Class IV or higher.
- Patients enrolled in another interventional research study that may interfere with surgical safety or outcomes.
- Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the perioperative and follow-up schedule.
Vulnerable populations are excluded from this study, including:
- Minors (under 18 years old)
- Prisoners
- Cognitively impaired or decisional incapacitated individuals
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Exploring the Potential of Robotic Telesurgery in Remote Settings
Telesurgery
|
A robotic surgery for prostate disease via telesurgery, where a highly trained surgeon performs the operation remotely using a secure internet connection.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Outcome Measures (Endpoints)
Time Frame: The measured time frame for this outcome will be measured by the investigator and tech team from the start of the surgical procedure through the stop time of the surgical procedure. Approximately 90 minutes in length.
|
One of the investigator's primary outcome measures is the safety and feasibility of the Microport Medbot Robotic Platform for use in Telesurgery through maintaining a stable connection. The investigator will monitor feasibility through perioperative connectivity assessment provided by the platform. Outcome of Latency- Medbot platform measures in milliseconds. This is monitored by the investigator. Measured in Milliseconds per round trip time (ms/RTT). The acceptable threshold is under 200ms. Robotic Platform Performance Logs- The robotic system itself continuously logs and reports performance metrics, including latency. Dedicated Tech team: Oversees and monitors connection status throughout procedure. |
The measured time frame for this outcome will be measured by the investigator and tech team from the start of the surgical procedure through the stop time of the surgical procedure. Approximately 90 minutes in length.
|
|
Secondary Endpoints
Time Frame: This will be measured by the investigator from the start of the surgical procedure through the completion of the surgical procedure.
|
Investigators assessment of and response to perioperative complications (complications observed will be classified using the Clavien-Dindo Classification with Grades I thru V).
|
This will be measured by the investigator from the start of the surgical procedure through the completion of the surgical procedure.
|
|
Safety and Feasibility: Maintenance of stable connection
Time Frame: The measured time frame for this outcome will be measured by the investigator and tech team from the start of the surgical procedure through the stop time of the surgical procedure. Approximately 90 minutes in length.
|
One of the investigator's primary outcome measures is the safety and feasibility of the Microport Medbot Robotic Platform for use in Telesurgery through maintaining a stable connection. The investigator will monitor feasibility through perioperative connectivity Outcome: Bandwidth and Network Stability- The surgical team monitors bandwidth to ensure a consistent, high-speed internet connection. Bandwidth measured in megabits per second (Mbps). The goal of 100Mbps is recommended. Measurement is made through tracking on data transmission rates reported by the robotic system itself which continuously logs and reports data in real time. Dedicated Tech Team: Oversees and monitors connection status throughout the procedure. |
The measured time frame for this outcome will be measured by the investigator and tech team from the start of the surgical procedure through the stop time of the surgical procedure. Approximately 90 minutes in length.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rocco B, Moschovas MC, Saikali S, Gaia G, Patel V, Sighinolfi MC. Insights from telesurgery expert conference on recent clinical experience and current status of remote surgery. J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 4;18(1):240. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01984-w.
- Reddy SK, Saikali S, Gamal A, Moschovas MC, Rogers T, Dohler M, Marescaux J, Patel V. Telesurgery: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Directions. Ann Surg. 2025 Aug 1;282(2):219-227. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006570. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
- Patel V, Dohler M, Marescaux J, Saikali S, Gamal A, Reddy S, Rogers T, Patel E, Oliva R, Satava R, Moschovas MC. Expanding Surgical Frontiers Across the Pacific Ocean: Insights from the First Telesurgery Procedures Connecting Orlando with Shanghai in Animal Models. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Oct 21;70:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.09.009. eCollection 2024 Dec.
- Dohler M, Saikali S, Gamal A, Moschovas MC, Patel V. The crucial role of 5G, 6G, and fiber in robotic telesurgery. J Robot Surg. 2024 Nov 16;19(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02164-6.
- Moschovas MC, Saikali S, Dohler M, Patel E, Rogers T, Gamal A, Marquinez J, Patel V. Advancing Telesurgery Connectivity Between North and South America: the first Remote Surgery Conducted Between Orlando and Sao Paulo in Animal Models. Int Braz J Urol. 2025 Jan-Feb;51(1):e20240601. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0601. No abstract available.
- Patel V, Moschovas MC, Marescaux J, Satava R, Dasgupta P, Dohler M. Telesurgery collaborative community working group: insights about the current telesurgery scenario. J Robot Surg. 2024 May 31;18(1):232. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01995-7. No abstract available.
- Patel V, Marescaux J, Covas Moschovas M. The Humanitarian Impact of Telesurgery and Remote Surgery in Global Medicine. Eur Urol. 2024 Aug;86(2):88-89. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.029. Epub 2024 May 18.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2294288
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prostate Carcinoma
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterJanssen PharmaceuticaActive, not recruitingCastration-Resistant Prostate Carcinoma | Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma | Stage IV Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Aggressive Variant Prostate Carcinoma | Metastatic Prostate Neuroendocrine Carcinoma | Metastatic Prostate Small Cell CarcinomaUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingMetastatic Prostate Carcinoma | Prostate Adenocarcinoma | Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma | Hormone-Resistant Prostate CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingCastration-Resistant Prostate Carcinoma | Stage IVB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Refractory Prostate Carcinoma | Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate CarcinomaUnited States
-
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas...Novartis; Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials ConsortiumTerminatedCastration-Resistant Prostate Carcinoma | Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma | Stage IV Prostate Cancer AJCC v7 | Prostate Carcinoma Metastatic in the BoneUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingProstate Adenocarcinoma | Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma | Stage IVB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Metastatic Prostate Adenocarcinoma | Oligometastatic Prostate CarcinomaUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedMetastatic Prostate Carcinoma | Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma | Hormone-Resistant Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
Deepak KilariMedical College of Wisconsin; ExelixisNot yet recruitingAggressive Variant Prostate Carcinoma
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health and Science UniversityActive, not recruitingCastration-Resistant Prostate Carcinoma | Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma | Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma | Stage IV Prostate Cancer AJCC v7United States
-
University of WashingtonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedCastration-Resistant Prostate Carcinoma | Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma | Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma | Castration Levels of Testosterone | Stage IV Prostate AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
NRG OncologyNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingProstate Adenocarcinoma | Stage IVB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Prostate Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Oligometastatic Prostate Carcinoma | Prostate Intraductal CarcinomaUnited States, Canada