- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07318662
Efficacy and Safety of HMAs Combined With Venetoclax Versus HMAs Alone in ND Int-and H-risk MDS or CMML
January 4, 2026 updated by: Du Xin, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Efficacy and Safety of HMAs Combined With Venetoclax Versus HMAs Alone in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Intermediate-/High-Risk MDS and CMML : A Retro-prospective, Multicenter Observational Cohort Study
The aim of this study is to observe and analyze the clinical efficacy of Venetoclax+HMAs regimen in the treatment of newly diagnosed higher-risk MDS and CMML cases, and to compare the efficacy of venetoclax +HMAs regimen with that of HMAS regimen alone, in order to provide a normative scheme and basis for clinical use.
Study Overview
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
224
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510000
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Adults aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed myelodysplastic agenda syndrome (MDS)and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)according to the 2016WHO or 2022 WHO criteria
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years old, male or female;
- MDS or CMML diagnosed by the 2016 or 222 WHO criteria, with a sustained survival of at least 12 weeks;
- received more than two cycles of Venetoclax plus HMAs or HMAs alone without prior disease specific or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell therapy (before initiating Venetoclax or HMAs, Medications such as hydroxyurea were allowed to reduce the white-cell count to 1.0×109 per liter or less.) ;
- bone marrow blast cell count (BM blast > 5%) or IPSS-R score > 3 (intermediate risk, high risk, very high risk);
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2;
- complete case information could be obtained.
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria;
- inability to obtain complete case information or to follow protocol steps or follow up on time;
- other conditions considered by the investigators to be unsuitable for inclusion.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Venetoclax+HMAs
treatment group, the intervention is the use of Venetoclax(400mg,QD, 1-14d)
|
Previous phase Ib studies have fully demonstrated that venetoclax combined with HMAs is well tolerated in patients with MDS or CMML.
Patients treated with VEN/AZA had a higher chance of SCT after remission and a higher survival benefit
|
|
Standard treatment(HMAs)
The control group,Azacitidine(75mg/m2 ,QD, sc,d1-d7)or Decitabine(15mg/m2, q8h-q12h, d1-d3 or 20mg/m2,qd, d1-d5)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
overall response rate
Time Frame: After the first cycles treatment(Day1, Month2)
|
CR+mCR+PR+HI
|
After the first cycles treatment(Day1, Month2)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
IWG2023 Composite response rate
Time Frame: After the first cycles treatment(Day1, Month2 )
|
CR+CR-L+CRh+CRequ
|
After the first cycles treatment(Day1, Month2 )
|
|
overall survival
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Refers to the time from the start of treatment to the patient's death or last follow-up.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Blood transfusion dependence
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Change in proportion of transfusion dependence from the start of treatment
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
adaverse event rate
Time Frame: Up to 1 years after the last subject enrolled.
|
Grade 3-4 adverse events
|
Up to 1 years after the last subject enrolled.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 30, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 4, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
January 6, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 6, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 4, 2026
Last Verified
November 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- GDPH-2024-MDS-1.2
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.