Efficacy and Safety of HMAs Combined With Venetoclax Versus HMAs Alone in ND Int-and H-risk MDS or CMML

January 4, 2026 updated by: Du Xin, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Efficacy and Safety of HMAs Combined With Venetoclax Versus HMAs Alone in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Intermediate-/High-Risk MDS and CMML : A Retro-prospective, Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

The aim of this study is to observe and analyze the clinical efficacy of Venetoclax+HMAs regimen in the treatment of newly diagnosed higher-risk MDS and CMML cases, and to compare the efficacy of venetoclax +HMAs regimen with that of HMAS regimen alone, in order to provide a normative scheme and basis for clinical use.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

224

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510000
        • Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed myelodysplastic agenda syndrome (MDS)and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)according to the 2016WHO or 2022 WHO criteria

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years old, male or female;
  2. MDS or CMML diagnosed by the 2016 or 222 WHO criteria, with a sustained survival of at least 12 weeks;
  3. received more than two cycles of Venetoclax plus HMAs or HMAs alone without prior disease specific or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell therapy (before initiating Venetoclax or HMAs, Medications such as hydroxyurea were allowed to reduce the white-cell count to 1.0×109 per liter or less.) ;
  4. bone marrow blast cell count (BM blast > 5%) or IPSS-R score > 3 (intermediate risk, high risk, very high risk);
  5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2;
  6. complete case information could be obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria;
  2. inability to obtain complete case information or to follow protocol steps or follow up on time;
  3. other conditions considered by the investigators to be unsuitable for inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Venetoclax+HMAs
treatment group, the intervention is the use of Venetoclax(400mg,QD, 1-14d)
Previous phase Ib studies have fully demonstrated that venetoclax combined with HMAs is well tolerated in patients with MDS or CMML. Patients treated with VEN/AZA had a higher chance of SCT after remission and a higher survival benefit
Standard treatment(HMAs)
The control group,Azacitidine(75mg/m2 ,QD, sc,d1-d7)or Decitabine(15mg/m2, q8h-q12h, d1-d3 or 20mg/m2,qd, d1-d5)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall response rate
Time Frame: After the first cycles treatment(Day1, Month2)
CR+mCR+PR+HI
After the first cycles treatment(Day1, Month2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IWG2023 Composite response rate
Time Frame: After the first cycles treatment(Day1, Month2 )
CR+CR-L+CRh+CRequ
After the first cycles treatment(Day1, Month2 )
overall survival
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Refers to the time from the start of treatment to the patient's death or last follow-up.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Blood transfusion dependence
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in proportion of transfusion dependence from the start of treatment
through study completion, an average of 1 year
adaverse event rate
Time Frame: Up to 1 years after the last subject enrolled.
Grade 3-4 adverse events
Up to 1 years after the last subject enrolled.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GDPH-2024-MDS-1.2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe