Effect of Ondansetron on Patient Tolerance, Efficacy and Endoscopist Workload in Unsedated Endoscopy for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

January 2, 2026 updated by: DONG WU, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether intravenous ondansetron can improve patient tolerance and reduce discomfort during unsedated emergency esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does pre-procedural administration of ondansetron improve patient cooperation during emergency EGD?
  • Does it improve endoscopic field visibility and improve the success rate of initial endoscopic hemostasis?
  • Does it reduce the operator's perceived workload or stress?

Researchers will compare patients who received intravenous ondansetron with patients who received placebo to see if ondansetron can reduce patient discomfort and improve patient cooperation, therefore improve the quality of the procedure.

Participants will receive either intravenous ondansetron and dyclonine hydrochloride mucilage or intravenous saline and dyclonine hydrochloride mucilage prior to the endoscopic procedure.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of suspected or confirmed upper gastrointestinal bleeding with an indication for emergent endoscopic intervention.
  • Capability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of any contraindication to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
  • Concurrent severe primary diseases of the respiratory, cardio-cerebrovascular, renal, central nervous, or hematologic systems.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Presence of neuropsychiatric disorders, including severe depression or severe anxiety.
  • Presence of a known history of cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Allergic to dyclonine hydrochloride or ondansetron.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: control
Intravenous administration of 8 ml saline 0.5-1h prior to endoscopic procedure and gurgle 10 ml dyclonine hydrochloride viscous solution (0.01 g/mL) 15 min prior to the endoscopic procedure.
Experimental: intravenous ondansetron
Intravenous administration of 8 mg ondansetron 0.5-1h prior to endoscopic procedure and gurgle 10 ml dyclonine hydrochloride viscous solution (0.01 g/mL) 15 min prior to the endoscopic procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient cooperation
Time Frame: from the beginning to the end of the endoscopic procedure
evaluated by the endoscopist in numeric rating scale, 0 stands for not good at all, 10 stands for completely satisfied.
from the beginning to the end of the endoscopic procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
gagging intensity of patient
Time Frame: from the beginning to the end of the endoscopic procedure
gagging intensity of patient evaluated by the endoscopist, in numeric rating scale, 0 means none, 10 means extremely intense.
from the beginning to the end of the endoscopic procedure
visualization quality
Time Frame: During the endoscopic procedure.
Overall endoscopic visualization was evaluated at 4 locations including (i) gastric fundus, (ii) corpus, (iii) antrum, and (iv) duodenal bulb. The score is rated in the following criteria: 0, less than 25% of the surface was visible; 1, 25%-75% visible; and 2, more than 75% visible. The total score range was 0-8.
During the endoscopic procedure.
Success rate of initial endoscopic hemostasis
Time Frame: from the beginning to the end of the endoscopic procedure
the proportion of patients in each group who achieved hemostasis with a single endoscopic intervention
from the beginning to the end of the endoscopic procedure
Proportion of patients needing repeat endoscopy within 72 hours
Time Frame: from the time of the endoscopic procedure to 3 days after the endoscopic procedure.
The proportion of patients who underwent a repeat upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for suspected rebleeding within 72 hours following the completion of the initial endoscopic procedure.
from the time of the endoscopic procedure to 3 days after the endoscopic procedure.
Recurrence of UGIB in 7 days
Time Frame: from the day of the procedure to 7 days after it
The proportion of patients in whom hemostasis was initially achieved by endoscopy, but who subsequently experienced recurrent bleeding within 7 days. Recurrent bleeding is defined by the occurrence of any of the following: hematemesis, melena, hematochezia, hemodynamic instability, or endoscopic confirmation of recurrent bleeding at the original site.
from the day of the procedure to 7 days after it
endoscopist workload
Time Frame: From the beginning to the end of the endoscopic procedure
Self-assessed by the endoscopist immediately after the procedure. It is measured across six dimensions-mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, effort, performance, and frustration/anxiety-using a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale for each, where 0 represents "very low" and 100 represents "very high".
From the beginning to the end of the endoscopic procedure
adverse event
Time Frame: from the beginning of the intervention to 1 week after the endoscopic procedure.
Any adverse medical event occurring during the endoscopic procedure, regardless of its relationship to the study medication.
from the beginning of the intervention to 1 week after the endoscopic procedure.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Clinical Trials on intravenous ondansetron

Subscribe