Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is an Aerosol-generating Procedure: Proof of Concept Study

June 10, 2020 updated by: CHAN SHANNON MELISSA, Chinese University of Hong Kong
The disease COVID-19 has been classified as pandemic by World Health Organisation (WHO) in March 2020. This poses a risk to healthcare workers. Whether esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a aerosol-generating procedure (AGP) has brought controversy. Multiple international guidelines consider EGD as AGP based on expert consensus. No scientific data has been published regarding this. With a commercially available particle counter, we can differentiate the particle counts of different sizes in different areas of the endoscopy room. An increase from baseline particles of < 5um during or after the procedure would suggest that the procedure is an AGP. The baseline particle counts before and during the procedure are also recorded. The details of the procedure including procedure time and the use of sedation are also documented.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The disease COVID-19 has been classified as pandemic by World Health Organisation (WHO) in March 2020. This poses a risk to healthcare workers. Whether esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a aerosol-generating procedure (AGP) has brought controversy. Multiple international guidelines consider EGD as AGP based on expert consensus. No scientific data has been published regarding this. Currently, the term droplet is often taken to refer to droplets >5 microns (μm) in diameter that fall rapidly to the ground under gravity, and therefore are transmitted only over a limited distance (e.g. ≤1 m). In contrast, the term droplet nuclei refers to droplets ≤5 μm in diameter that can remain suspended in air for significant periods of time, allowing them to be transmitted over distances >1 metre. With a commercially available particle counter, we can differentiate the particle counts of different sizes in different areas of the endoscopy room. An increase from baseline particles of < 5um during or after the procedure would suggest that the procedure is an AGP. With the use of a commercial available particle counter, the number of particles of size (0.3um, 0.5um, 0.7um, 1um, 5um and 1um) are recorded. The baseline particle counts before and during the procedure are also recorded. The details of the procedure including procedure time and the use of sedation are also documented.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients undergoing EGD in the endoscopy unit of Prince of wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong will be included

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients undergoing EGD in the endoscopy unit of Prince of wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong

Exclusion Criteria:

  • EGD cannot be completed due to patient's condition
  • Patients who are unstable and require extra medical attention
  • Patients who refuse
  • Patients who are not fit for consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The increase in particle counts of particle size (0.3um, 0.5um, 0.7um, 1um, 5um, 10um) during the procedure
Time Frame: during the procedure
during the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Procedure time
Time Frame: during the procedure
during the procedure
Use of sedation
Time Frame: during the procedure
during the procedure
Use of continuous suction
Time Frame: during the procedure
during the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020.200

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aerosol-generating Procedure, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Clinical Trials on No intervention, observational study

Subscribe