PRF in Face Care Cream.

January 13, 2026 updated by: Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Application of Liquid Fraction of Platelet-rich Fibrin in Face Care Cream.

The study evaluates the effectiveness of cosmetic preparations containing PRF, conducted through in vivo studies. Material and Methods: The study involved 20 healthy volunteers (aged 20-40) who received three identically packaged creams to be applied to specific facial areas. Formulation 1: base formulation (control), Formulation 2: base formulation with human epidermal growth factor (EGF), and Formulation 3: base formulation with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). Volunteers applied the creams as directed for a period of four weeks. Skin assessments was conducted at baseline (week 0), and at weeks 1, 2, and 4. Trans-epidermal Water Loss (TEWL), skin hydration using corneometry to determine the moisture content of the stratum corneum, skin elasticity using a cutometer to measure the skin's ability to return to its original state after deformation, and dermal bioavailability were measured. EGF concentration in the stratum corneum will be measured using the tape-stripping method followed by HPLC (High-Performance Liquid Chroma-tography) analysis. Results: A significant decrease in TEWL was observed in formulations 2 and 3, indicating improved skin barrier function. Formulation 3 showed the highest increase in skin hy-dration, followed by formulation 2. Both formulations 2 and 3 demonstrated improvements in skin elasticity, with formulation 3 showing the greatest enhancement. EGF concentration in the stratum corneum increased over the four-week period, reaching equilibrium with the product concentration by week four. Con-clusion: The in vivo instrumental compatibility studies confirmed that the new cosmetic formulations containing EGF and PRF are safe and effective for human skin.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • The Greater Poland
      • Poznan, The Greater Poland, Poland, 60-812
        • Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy volunteers with healthy skin, who sign an agreement for study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • systemic diseases, smoking, blood disorders, acute viral infections and skin inflammations, pregnancy, and breastfeeding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Formulation 1
Base formulation
Daily skin application for the following 4 weeks at the same place according to the instruction
Active Comparator: Formulation 2
Formulation with growth factor EGF
Daily skin application for the following 4 weeks at the same place according to the instruction
Experimental: Formulation 3
Formulation with PRF
Daily skin application for the following 4 weeks at the same place according to the instruction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skin elasticity
Time Frame: Baseline
Cutometer
Baseline
Transepidermal water loss
Time Frame: Baseline
Tewameter
Baseline
Skin water content
Time Frame: Baseline
To measure the hydration of skin, an apparatus called a corneometer is used (Corneometer® CM 825 (Courage+Khazaka electronic GmbH)). It allows an accurate, reproducible and objective measurement of the hydration level of the stratum corneum of the skin. It records changes in electrical capacitance, consistent with the water content of the skin.
Baseline
Skin topography
Time Frame: Baseline
Visioscan® VC98 and Visioline® VL650
Baseline
Dermal Bioavailability
Time Frame: Baseline
Tape-Stripping Method
Baseline
Skin water content
Time Frame: After 1 week
To measure the hydration of skin, an apparatus called a corneometer is used (Corneometer® CM 825 (Courage+Khazaka electronic GmbH)). It allows an accurate, reproducible and objective measurement of the hydration level of the stratum corneum of the skin. It records changes in electrical capacitance, consistent with the water content of the skin.
After 1 week
Skin water content
Time Frame: After 2 weeks
To measure the hydration of skin, an apparatus called a corneometer is used (Corneometer® CM 825 (Courage+Khazaka electronic GmbH)). It allows an accurate, reproducible and objective measurement of the hydration level of the stratum corneum of the skin. It records changes in electrical capacitance, consistent with the water content of the skin.
After 2 weeks
Skin water content
Time Frame: After 4 weeks
To measure the hydration of skin, an apparatus called a corneometer is used (Corneometer® CM 825 (Courage+Khazaka electronic GmbH)). It allows an accurate, reproducible and objective measurement of the hydration level of the stratum corneum of the skin. It records changes in electrical capacitance, consistent with the water content of the skin.
After 4 weeks
Transepidermal water loss
Time Frame: After 1 week
Tewameter
After 1 week
Transepidermal water loss
Time Frame: After 2 weeks
Tewameter
After 2 weeks
Transepidermal water loss
Time Frame: After 4 weeks
Tewameter
After 4 weeks
Skin topography
Time Frame: After 4 weeks
Visioscan® VC98 and Visioline® VL650
After 4 weeks
Skin elasticity
Time Frame: After 4 weeks
Cutometer
After 4 weeks
Dermal Bioavailability
Time Frame: After 4 weeks
Tape-Stripping Method
After 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stability Evaluation of cream formulations
Time Frame: Baseline
The stability tests of the formulations were carried out immediately after preparation and after 60 days of storage at 40°C. From the obtained results, the arithmetic mean, and standard deviation were calculated. Each sample was tested three times, and the arithmetic mean, and standard deviation were computed from the results.
Baseline
Stability Evaluation of cream formulations
Time Frame: After 60 days
The stability tests of the formulations were carried out immediately after preparation and after 60 days of storage at 40°C. From the obtained results, the arithmetic mean, and standard deviation were calculated. Each sample was tested three times, and the arithmetic mean, and standard deviation were computed from the results.
After 60 days
pH Measurement of cream formulations
Time Frame: Baseline
The pH of the cosmetic emulsions was measured three times using the EcoSense® pH 10 pH/Temperature Meter, Pen Style (VMR International).
Baseline
pH Measurement of cream formulations
Time Frame: After 12 weeks
The pH of the cosmetic emulsions was measured three times using the EcoSense® pH 10 pH/Temperature Meter, Pen Style (VMR International).
After 12 weeks
Cream Viscosity Measurement
Time Frame: Baseline
The viscosity of the cosmetic emulsions was measured three times using the RC02 rotational viscometer (Rheotec).
Baseline
Light Scattering Stability Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline
Stability analysis of the formulations was performed using the multiple light scattering method with the Turbiscan Lab Expert device (Formulaction SA).
Baseline
Growth Factor Quantification in Cosmetic Formulations
Time Frame: Baseline
The quantification of the growth factor in the obtained cosmetic formulations was conducted using a high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) Varian 920-LC (Agilent Technologies), equipped with an automatic injector and sample feeder. Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies were developed for the analysis of the cosmetic preparations.
Baseline
Stability Testing Points
Time Frame: After 2 weeks
Stability tests for all formulations included four measurement points, analyzing the samples after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of storage in climate chambers. The comprehensive testing ensured that the formulations maintained their desired properties and remained safe and effective for use throughout the study.
After 2 weeks
Stability Testing Points
Time Frame: After 4 weeks
Stability tests for all formulations included four measurement points, analyzing the samples after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of storage in climate chambers. The comprehensive testing ensured that the formulations maintained their desired properties and remained safe and effective for use throughout the study.
After 4 weeks
Stability Testing Points
Time Frame: After 8 weeks
Stability tests for all formulations included four measurement points, analyzing the samples after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of storage in climate chambers. The comprehensive testing ensured that the formulations maintained their desired properties and remained safe and effective for use throughout the study.
After 8 weeks
Stability Testing Points
Time Frame: After 12 weeks
Stability tests for all formulations included four measurement points, analyzing the samples after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of storage in climate chambers. The comprehensive testing ensured that the formulations maintained their desired properties and remained safe and effective for use throughout the study.
After 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Marzena Liliana Wyganowska, Prof., Departament of Periodontology and Oral Mucosa Diseases PUMS

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 8, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PUMS-308/18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 month after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

E-mail contact with corresponding author

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe