Psychophysiological Effects of Green Exercise in Outdoor Green vs. Indoor Control (GREEN-OI)

January 23, 2026 updated by: Linjun Liu, Lincoln University College

Psychophysiological Restorative Effects of Green Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Core Purpose: Researchers want to learn if walking in an outdoor green environment helps people recover from mental tiredness and stress better than walking indoors. This study investigates how a 30-minute walk in an outdoor green setting affects the mind and body compared to a 30-minute walk on a treadmill in a room without windows.

The Study Process: The study included 80 healthy young adults between the ages of 18 and 35. Researchers randomly split the participants into two groups.

  1. The Outdoor Green group: Participants walked for 30 minutes on a path in an outdoor green environment.
  2. The Indoor Control group: This group walked for 30 minutes on a treadmill in a windowless room.

What is Being Measured: To understand how the environment helps the brain recover, researchers used a "Sensory-to-Appraisal" model to measure several factors.

  1. Information Harvesting: Researchers used a new tool called the Nature Sensory Sensitivity Index (NSSI). This measures how well participants notice and "capture" sensory details from their surroundings, like the sounds of birds or the textures of plants.
  2. Restorative Feelings: Using the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS), participants reported if they felt the environment helped them "get away" from daily stress and if the setting was interesting or beautiful.
  3. Overall Mood Changes (POMS TMD): Researchers used the Profile of Mood States (POMS) to calculate a Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) score. This helps show if participants feel less tense, angry, or tired, and more energetic after the walk.
  4. Connection to Nature (NR): Researchers measured each participant's Nature Relatedness (NR). This describes how much a person naturally feels connected to the natural world, which may influence how much they benefit from the green walk.
  5. Attention and Thinking: Participants performed a "Digit Span Task" (repeating sequences of numbers) to test if their focus improved.
  6. Physical Stress: The study used objective markers, including salivary cortisol (a stress hormone) and heart rate variability (a measure of how the nervous system relaxes).

Why This Matters: The goal of this research is to see if actively noticing an outdoor green environment (sensory harvesting) is the "key" that unlocks mental recovery. By comparing the Outdoor Green group with the Indoor Control group, this study helps us understand why nature is good for public health and how to design better spaces for stress relief.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study Overview and Theoretical Framework This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to investigate the psychophysiological restorative effects of green exercise. The study is grounded in Attention Restoration Theory (ART) and Stress Recovery Theory (SRT). It specifically tests a "Sensory-to-Appraisal" model, which proposes that the restorative benefits of nature are driven by an initial stage of objective sensory information harvesting, followed by subjective restorative appraisal.

Experimental Design A total of 80 healthy young adults (aged 18-35) were recruited and randomly assigned to one of two groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio.

  1. The Outdoor Green group: Participants performed a standardized 30-minute walk along a pre-defined route in a forest park environment.
  2. The Indoor Control group: Participants performed a 30-minute walk on a treadmill in a controlled laboratory setting (windowless room, neutral environment) at a self-selected moderate pace to match the physical intensity of the outdoor group.

Experimental Procedure The experiment followed a five-stage longitudinal design.

  1. Baseline (T0): Collection of demographic data, Nature Relatedness (NR) scales, and initial physiological/psychological measurements.
  2. Stress Induction: Participants underwent a cognitive stressor to induce mental fatigue and psychological stress.
  3. Intervention (T1): The 30-minute walking intervention in the assigned environment.
  4. Post-Intervention (T2): Immediate post-test measurements including sensory harvesting (NSSI), perceived restorativeness (PRS), and emotional states.
  5. Recovery Monitoring: Follow-up assessment of cognitive function and physiological recovery markers.

Key Measures

  1. Sensory Harvesting: Measured by the Nature Sensory Sensitivity Index (NSSI), a tool designed to quantify the objective capture of environmental stimuli.
  2. Psychological Appraisal: Evaluated via the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS).
  3. Cognitive Function: Assessed through the Digit Span Task (Forward and Backward) to measure working memory and directed attention.
  4. Affective States: Measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) to calculate Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) and self-esteem scales.
  5. Physiological Response: Objective stress recovery was monitored via salivary cortisol levels and Heart Rate Variability (HRV), specifically the RMSSD (Root Mean Square of Successive Differences) to assess parasympathetic activation.

Statistical Analysis The study uses a serial mediation model to analyze how the environment intervention influences restorative outcomes through the sequential mediation of NSSI and PRS. Mixed-model ANOVAs are used to compare between-group differences across time points.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430074
        • Wuhan Technical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy adults aged 18 to 30 years.
  2. University students or individuals with equivalent educational background.
  3. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing.
  4. Willingness to comply with all study procedures and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Physical Health: History of cardiovascular disease, respiratory illness, or chronic pain that may affect Heart Rate Variability (HRV).
  2. Mental Health: Diagnosis of clinical depression, anxiety disorders, or other psychiatric conditions.
  3. Substance Use: Current smokers or individuals with a history of alcohol or drug abuse.
  4. Medication: Recent use of any medications that affect the autonomic nervous system or endocrine function (e.g., steroids, beta-blockers, or hormonal medications) within the past month.
  5. Cognitive/Physical Impairment: Any disability that prevents walking for 30 minutes or completing the Digit Span cognitive task.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Outdoor Green Group
Participants in this arm perform a standardized 30-minute walk at a moderate pace along a pre-defined route in an outdoor green enviroment. This arm focuses on the effects of exposure to natural environmental stimuli.
Participants perform a supervised 30-minute walk at a moderate pace (4.0-5.5 km/h) along a pre-defined 2.5 km loop trail within a suburban forest park. The environment is characterized by high canopy cover (>60%) and diverse natural vegetation. To ensure consistency, all sessions are conducted under stable weather conditions (Temperature: 20-26°C; Humidity: 40-60%). Participants walk individually to prevent social interaction, ensuring the restorative experience is derived solely from the individual-nature interaction.
Active Comparator: Indoor Control Group
Participants walk on a treadmill at a fixed moderate speed (4.0-5.5 km/h) with a 1% incline. This specific incline is used to compensate for the lack of air resistance indoors and to more accurately match the physiological energy expenditure of outdoor ground walking.
Participants perform a 30-minute walk on a treadmill in a windowless indoor laboratory. To ensure consistency with the outdoor environment, the laboratory is climate-controlled with a temperature range of 20-26°C and humidity of 40-60%. The treadmill is set to a fixed moderate speed (4.0-5.5 km/h) with a 1% incline. The 1% incline is specifically applied to compensate for the lack of air resistance indoors and to accurately match the physiological energy expenditure and biomechanical demands of outdoor ground walking. The laboratory walls are neutral-colored to eliminate visual nature stimuli.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Profile of Mood States - Total Mood Disturbance (ΔTMD)
Time Frame: From Baseline (Pre-test) to 30 minutes post-intervention (Post-test)
The POMS TMD is a self-report scale consisting of 6 subscales: Tension, Depression, Anger, Fatigue, Confusion, and Vigor. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (0 = Not at all to 4 = Extremely). The TMD score is calculated as: (Tension + Depression + Anger + Fatigue + Confusion) - Vigor. The final outcome (ΔTMD) is the difference between the post-intervention TMD score and the pre-intervention (baseline) TMD score [ΔTMD = TMD (Post) - TMD (Pre)]. TMD scores range from -120 to 120. A larger negative ΔTMD value indicates a greater reduction in negative emotions and more significant psychological restoration.
From Baseline (Pre-test) to 30 minutes post-intervention (Post-test)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nature Relatedness (NR)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0, before intervention)
This scale assesses the individual's levels of self-identification and connection with the natural world across three specific dimensions: NR-Self (e.g., "I feel that I am a part of nature"), NR-Experience (e.g., "I enjoy being outdoors, even in unpleasant weather"), and NR-Perspective (e.g., "Animals and plants should have rights similar to humans"). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree). The Nature Relatedness (Final Score) is calculated as the average of all item scores. Total scores range from 6 to 30, where higher scores represent a stronger subjective connection and identification with nature.
Baseline (T0, before intervention)
Nature Sensory Sensitivity Index (NSSI)
Time Frame: Immediately after the 10-minute intervention (T1)
The NSSI is a composite index designed to quantify objective and subjective sensory information harvesting across three sections:1. Section A: Free Recall: Participants have 2 minutes to list specific natural details perceived through sight, sound, smell, or touch. The score is the total number of valid natural items recalled.2. Section B: Sensory Recognition: A checklist of sensory items (e.g., fragrance of pine, rustling leaves) where participants tick items actually perceived. The score is the number of correct hits, excluding distractors (e.g., traffic noise).3. Section C: Aesthetic Immersion: A 3-item scale assessing immersion and "oneness" with the environment. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).The final NSSI score is a weighted composite of these three sections. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores indicate a greater volume, accuracy, and depth of sensory stimuli captured during the intervention.
Immediately after the 10-minute intervention (T1)
Change in Perceived Restorativeness Scale (ΔPRS)
Time Frame: From Baseline (T0) to Immediately after the 10-minute intervention (T1)
This scale assesses the participant's subjective perception of the environment's restorative qualities across four dimensions: Being Away, Fascination, Extent, and Compatibility. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Not at all to 5 = Extremely). The final outcome (ΔPRS) is calculated as the difference between the post-intervention score and the pre-intervention baseline score [ΔPRS = PRS (Post) - PRS (Pre)]. The score for this change measure ranges from -4 to 4 (based on the average score difference). A positive ΔPRS indicates an increase in the perceived restorative quality of the environment.
From Baseline (T0) to Immediately after the 10-minute intervention (T1)
Change in Total Digit Span Score (ΔDigit Span)
Time Frame: From Baseline (T0) to immediately after the 30-minute intervention (T2)
This measure assesses the restoration of attention and working memory through two tasks: Digit Span Forward (Part A) and Digit Span Backward (Part B). For each task, participants are tested on span lengths from 3 to 9 digits, with two trials provided for each length. The Total Digit Span Score is the sum of the maximum spans or total successful trials from both tasks (A+B). The total score for this measure ranges from 0 to 18. The final outcome is the change score calculated as [ΔDigit Span = Digit Span (Post) - Digit Span (Pre)]. An increase in the score represents improved cognitive focus and restoration of directed attention.
From Baseline (T0) to immediately after the 30-minute intervention (T2)
Change in Self-Esteem (ΔSelf-Esteem)
Time Frame: From Baseline (T0) to immediately after the 30-minute intervention (T2)
This scale measures the participant's state self-esteem and sense of self-worth based on their feelings "RIGHT NOW". It consists of 4 items assessing self-worth, positive qualities, attitude toward oneself, and self-satisfaction. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (1=Strongly Disagree to 4=Agree). The total self-esteem score ranges from 4 to 16. The final outcome (ΔSelf-Esteem) is calculated as the difference between the post-intervention score and the pre-intervention baseline score [ΔSelf-Esteem = Self-Esteem (Post) - Self-Esteem (Pre)]. The score for this change measure ranges from -12 to 12. A positive ΔSelf-Esteem indicates an improvement in the individual's sense of self-worth following the intervention.
From Baseline (T0) to immediately after the 30-minute intervention (T2)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Heart Rate (ΔHR)
Time Frame: From Baseline (T0) to immediately after the 30-minute intervention (T2)
This measure assesses the physiological stress recovery of participants by monitoring heart rate (measured in beats per minute, bpm). The final outcome is the change in heart rate calculated as [ΔHR = HR (Post) - HR (Pre)]. A decrease in heart rate from T0 to T2 indicates a transition toward parasympathetic nervous system dominance and successful physiological restoration.
From Baseline (T0) to immediately after the 30-minute intervention (T2)
Change in Salivary Cortisol (ΔCortisol)
Time Frame: From Baseline (T0) to immediately after the 30-minute intervention (T2)
This measure assesses the biological stress response by measuring the concentration of cortisol in saliva, which reflects the activity of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis. Saliva samples are collected using a swab and analyzed via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The concentration is typically measured in nmol/L or μg/dL. The final outcome is the change in cortisol levels calculated as [ΔCortisol = Cortisol (T2) - Cortisol (T0)]. A decrease in cortisol concentration indicates a reduction in physiological stress and a successful restorative effect of the environment.
From Baseline (T0) to immediately after the 30-minute intervention (T2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sheng Yan, Wuhan Technical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share individual participant data to protect the privacy of the participants and ensure data security.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Outdoor Green Group

Subscribe