Peer Mentor Texting

January 23, 2026 updated by: Amritha Subray Bhat, University of Washington

Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Bidirectional Peer - Mentor Text Messaging Intervention to Promote Perinatal Mental Health: A Pilot Randomized Trial

This study tested whether a peer mentor text message program (called the Nurture program) could help support mental health during pregnancy and after birth. In the study, 127 pregnant people in Washington state were randomly placed to in one of two groups: Nurture group - could text with a trained peer mentor and Control group got automated informational text messages. Researchers looked at how much participants used the program and whether it affected symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress related to parenting. Most people in the Nurture group actively used the program. Nearly all responded to their mentor and there was an average of 32 back and forth text conversations. Mentors usually started more conversations than participants did. People using Nurture had lower anxiety six weeks after giving birth compared to the control group. However there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for depression or parenting stress. The findings suggest that having two way text conversations with peer mentors is well received and may help reduce anxiety soon after birth. More research with larger groups is needed to understand the full benefits and how to make the program widely available.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

127

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • University of Washington

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women and other birthing individuals receiving prenatal care within Washington.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe mental illness such as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia and severe substance use disorder based on self report.
  • Severe depression symptomology operationalized as PHQ-9 score 20 or higher.
  • Severe suicidality (a response of "Nearly every day" to question 9, "Over the last 2 weeks, how often have you been bothered by any of the following problems?: Thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way." on the PHQ-9 questionnaire.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intervention
If assigned to Nurture (intervention arm), the participant was matched with a mentor from Nurture based on participants responses in their intake form which asked if there was anything in particular that they wanted support with and if there were characteristics that were important to them to share with their mentor. The mentor sent weekly messages based on a library of prompts. Prompts provided resources on child development, connections to local support agencies, and suggestions for parent-child bonding and parental wellness activities.
If assigned to Nurture (intervention arm), the participant was matched with a mentor from Nurture based on participants responses in their intake form which asked if there was anything in particular that they wanted support with and if there were characteristics that were important to them to share with their mentor. The mentor sent weekly messages based on a library of prompts. Prompts provided resources on child development, connections to local support agencies, and suggestions for parent-child bonding and parental wellness activities.
Active Comparator: Control
Participants receive automated interventional texts
If assigned to the control arm, the participant received automated informational texts throughout the period of participation. Participants could not respond to these texts. Information content that is publicly available such as the Babycenter's pregnancy stage information the Washington State Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF) information packets about infant development and milestones as well as various ways to encourage learning and healthy development was used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in depressive symptoms over time as measured by the PHQ-9
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months postpartum.
Depressive symptoms in pregnancy and postpartum measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire -9 (PHQ-9). Score range 0 to 27, with higher scores meaning worse depression.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months postpartum.
Change from baseline in anxiety symptoms over time, as measured by GAD-7.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months postpartum.
Anxiety during pregnancy and postpartum, measured using the Generalized Anxiety disorder Scale (GAD-7). Score range from 0 to 27 with higher scores meaning worse anxiety
Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months postpartum.
Change from baseline to 9 months in Parenting Stress as measured by the Parenting Stress Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 9 months postpartum.
Parenting Stress measured using the Parenting Stress Scale. An 18 - item self report scale - items represent positive (e.g. emotional benefits, personal development) and negative (demands on resources, restrictions) themes of parenthood. Overall possible scores on the scale range from 18 - 90. The higher the score , the higher the measured level of Parental stress
6 weeks and 9 months postpartum.
Feasibility of enrolment as measured by number of participants enrolled
Time Frame: Baseline
Ability to enroll into the study
Baseline
Intervention engagement as measured by number of messages exchanged
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 months postpartum
Engagement measured by number of messages exchanged
Baseline, 9 months postpartum

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in General Wellbeing over time as measured by the General Wellbeing Schedule
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months postpartum.
Measure of wellbeing, score range 0 - 110, higher scores indicating higher wellbeing.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months postpartum.
Change in Maternal self efficacy from baseline over time as measures by the Self Efficacy in a Nurturing Role questionnaire.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 9 months postpartum.
Parenting self efficacy measured during pregnancy and postpartum, using the Self Efficacy in a Nurturing Role questionnaire.16 items, score range 16 - 112, higher scores represent higher self efficacy.
Baseline, 6 weeks and 9 months postpartum.
Change in wellbeing from baseline to 9 months as measured by the Flourishing scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 months postpartum.
Measure of wellbeing. Score range is 8 to 56, with higher scores representing a person with many psychological resources and strengths.
Baseline and 9 months postpartum.
Social support
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months and 9 months postpartum.

Social support measured using Multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS). The MSPSS a 12-item self-report questionnaire that measures perceived support from family, friends, and significant others.

Score Range 12 to 84, low scores indicating low support and high scores indicating high support.

Baseline, 3 months and 9 months postpartum.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00013616

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe