Virtual Reality as a Tool for Training Public Speaking Skills in Higher Education Students

January 30, 2026 updated by: Lamia BETTAHI, University of Liege

Virtual Reality as a Tool for Training Public Speaking Skills in Higher Education Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

According to the scientific literature, public speaking (PS) is an important skill for students to master. However, a large proportion of students do not feel comfortable speaking in public. PS anxiety impacts oral communication (i.e., voice and fluency). These changes can affect speaker's academic and professional success, as well as his credibility. Performing a high-quality PPP with confidence is therefore rarely an innate skill, but fortunately it can be trained and improved. Therefore, training PS skills in representative settings is crucial but often challenging for PS professionals (e.g., speech therapists, vocologists, coaches).

This project examines how oral communication skills training including simulations in virtual reality (VR) supports the acquisition of effective oral PS skills. Using acoustic analyses, outcomes from participants in the intervention group (N = 40) will be compared with those of a wait-list control group (N = 40) to determine whether significant differences emerge in filled pauses, speech rate, and vocal intonation during PS. Changes in PS self-efficacy will also be assessed. Regarding secondary outcomes, the study will evaluate changes in self-reported and physiological PS anxiety, as well as self-reported confidence as a speaker. Finally, self-perceived vocal effort during PS will be examined.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present study is a randomized wait-list control trial, i.e. participants are randomly assigned to either the group that receives the intervention directly or the group that receives the intervention after a waiting period. First, both groups will receive a 1-hour session of information on general advice about PS (indirect method). Then the participants in the experimental group will receive three 1-hour sessions of voice and fluency training with VR practice moments for a period of 3 weeks (direct method). The control wait-list group will first wait for 3 weeks and then get the direct method training. The investigators will collect data from all participants in the first week (before the start of intervention for the experimental group), fourth week (right after the intervention for the experimental group and right before the first intervention session for the control group) and seventh week (three weeks after the intervention for the experimental group and right after the intervention for the control group).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Liège
      • Liège, Liège, Belgium, 4000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Higher education student
  • Speaking french fluently

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hearing impairment
  • Voice or fluency disorder at the time of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Arm
  • Indirect method: one information session on general advice about PS
  • Direct method: three sessions of PS training including VR simulations over a course of 3 weeks.
• General information and advice on PS
• Learning effective PS oral skills using speech therapy exercises (e.g., modeling, audiovisual feedback) and VR simulations
Other: Wait-list control arm
  • Indirect method: one information session on general advice about PS
  • Delayed direct method: after a waiting period of three weeks, three sessions of PS training including simulations over a course of 3 weeks.
• General information and advice on PS
• Learning effective PS oral skills using speech therapy exercises (e.g., modeling, audiovisual feedback) and VR simulations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Filled pauses
Time Frame: Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Measurements of participants' filled pauses (percentage of the total number of syllables produced) when PS in VR
Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Speech rate
Time Frame: Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Measurements of participants' speech rate (in syllables per second) when PS in VR
Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Voice intonation
Time Frame: Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Acoustic measurements of participants' voice variation (in semitones) when PS in VR
Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
PS self-efficacy
Time Frame: Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Questionnaire on self-efficacy in PS
Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported PS anxiety
Time Frame: Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Self-assessment of perceived anxiety using the Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDS)
Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Physiological PS anxiety
Time Frame: Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Measurements of participants' heart rate (in bpm) when PS in VR
Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Self-reported confidence as a speaker
Time Frame: Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Self-assessment of confidence as a speaker using the Personal Report of Confidence as a Speaker (PRCS) short-form questionnaire
Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Self-perceived vocal effort
Time Frame: Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7
Self-assessment of perceived vocal effort using the Adapted BORG Category Ratio (CR-10) physical exertion scale
Week 1(baseline), 4 and 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe