Magnetotherapy in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Study

February 21, 2026 updated by: Orçun Ünalan, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Magnetotherapy in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Placebo-Controlled, Triple-Arm, Randomized, Double-Blind Study

This study is designed to investigate the effectiveness of low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in individuals diagnosed with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). This double-blind, randomized controlled trial will randomly assign participants into three groups:

Group 1: Active magnetotherapy

Group 2: Placebo magnetotherapy (treatment using an identical device that does not generate a magnetic field)

Group 3: Routine (conservative) treatment group

All participants will receive a standard nighttime wrist splint and a standardized nerve and tendon gliding exercise protocol. Magnetic field applications will be administered five days per week for a total of 15 sessions. Assessments will be conducted at baseline (T0), at the end of treatment (T1 - Week 3), at 1 month (T2), and at 3 months (T3).

The primary outcome measures include the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), pain intensity assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), functional status measured by QuickDASH, median nerve cross-sectional area assessed by ultrasonography, sensory function evaluated using the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, grip strength measured by dynamometry, and clinical test results (Tinel and Phalen tests). Secondary outcomes include sleep quality assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and patient satisfaction.

This study aims to contribute to the scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of magnetotherapy as a non-invasive treatment option for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel at the wrist, resulting in symptoms such as tingling, numbness, pain, and functional impairment in the hand and fingers. According to the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM), the diagnosis is supported electrophysiologically by delayed distal motor or sensory conduction, conduction block, or prolonged response latency of the median nerve. Clinically, CTS presents with paresthesia, pain, numbness, and functional limitations. The condition is more prevalent among middle-aged individuals, particularly office workers, homemakers, and those engaged in repetitive wrist movements. If left untreated, CTS may lead to muscle weakness and a significant decline in quality of life.

Conservative treatment options include nighttime wrist splinting, nerve mobilization exercises, pharmacological therapy, and physical therapy modalities. However, these approaches are generally symptom-oriented and may have limited long-term effectiveness.

Magnetotherapy has emerged as a non-invasive physical therapy modality with minimal side effects. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy has been reported to reduce pain and improve objective nerve function in refractory CTS cases in both short- and long-term follow-up. Nevertheless, scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of magnetotherapy in CTS remains limited, and many existing studies lack robust methodological designs such as placebo control, randomization, and blinding. Therefore, this study aims to contribute to the current literature and strengthen clinical decision-making by providing high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of magnetotherapy in CTS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Istanbul
      • Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye), 34734
        • fatih sultan mehmet research and training hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Orçun Ünalan, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Pınar Akpınar, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged between 18 and 65 years.

Clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) based on physical examination findings, including positive Tinel and/or Phalen tests and hypoesthesia in the 3rd to 5th digits.

Electrophysiologically confirmed mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome based on electromyography (EMG) findings.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed electrophysiologically by electromyography (EMG).

History of previous surgical intervention for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Presence of other peripheral nerve entrapments (e.g., ulnar nerve entrapment, radial nerve entrapment).

Electrophysiologically confirmed polyneuropathy or cervical radiculopathy/cervical discopathy.

Rheumatologic diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus).

Diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2).

Pregnancy.

Presence of electronic implants such as cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant, or implantable defibrillator.

Active acute infection.

History of malignancy.

Receipt of physical therapy or rehabilitation for the wrist or surrounding area within the past 6 months.

Corticosteroid injection to the wrist within the past 6 months.

Hyperthyroidism or adrenal gland hyperfunction.

Open growth plates (epiphyseal plates not closed).

Paroxysmal neurological disorders (e.g., epilepsy).

Myasthenia gravis.

Regular use of pain medications such as pregabalin, duloxetine, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1 (Magnetotherapy Group):
Participants will receive pulsed magnetotherapy five days per week for a total of 15 sessions. Treatment parameters will be 50 Hz frequency, 2-3 mT magnetic field intensity, and 15-20 minutes per session. In addition, participants in this group will use a standard nighttime wrist splint and follow a standardized home exercise program consisting of nerve and tendon gliding exercises.

Participants assigned to this group will receive active pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy administered five days per week for three consecutive weeks, totaling 15 treatment sessions. Each session will last 15-20 minutes. The treatment will be delivered using a clinically approved medical device set at a frequency of 50 Hz and a magnetic field intensity of 2-3 millitesla (mT). The application will be performed in a controlled clinical setting by trained healthcare personnel.

In addition to magnetotherapy, all participants in this group will receive standard conservative treatment, including the use of a neutral-position wrist splint during nighttime and a standardized home-based exercise program consisting of nerve gliding and tendon gliding exercises. Participants will be instructed on proper exercise performance and adherence will be monitored throughout the study period.

Sham Comparator: Group 2 (Placebo Magnetotherapy Group)
Participants will receive treatment using the same device, with identical appearance and session duration; however, the device will not generate a magnetic field (sham mode). Participants in this group will also use a standard nighttime wrist splint and follow the same standardized home exercise program (nerve and tendon gliding exercises).

Participants in this group will undergo a sham magnetotherapy procedure using the same device, with identical appearance, positioning, session duration, and application protocol as the active treatment group. However, the device will be set to a mode that does not generate a magnetic field. This approach is designed to maintain participant blinding and control for placebo effects.

Similar to the active group, participants will receive standard conservative treatment consisting of nighttime wrist splint use and the same standardized nerve and tendon gliding home exercise program. Exercise instructions and compliance monitoring will be identical to those of the active treatment group.

Other: Group 3 (Routine/Conservative Treatment Group)
Participants in this group will use a standard nighttime wrist splint and follow the standardized home exercise program (nerve and tendon gliding exercises). These participants will be placed on a wait-list for magnetotherapy.

Participants in this group will receive standard conservative management only, including nighttime wrist splinting and the standardized home-based nerve and tendon gliding exercise program. No magnetotherapy device will be applied during the study period.

To ensure ethical considerations, participants in this group will be placed on a wait-list and may be offered magnetotherapy after completion of the follow-up assessments. Compliance with splint use and exercise performance will be monitored similarly to the other groups.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom Severity Assessed by Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale is an 11-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing the severity and frequency of carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms. Each item is scored from 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (most severe symptoms). The final score is calculated as the mean of all items, ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and worse clinical outcome.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
Wrist Pain Intensity Assessed by Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
Pain intensity will be measured using a 10-centimeter Visual Analog Scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst imaginable pain." Higher scores indicate greater pain severity and worse outcome.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
Upper Extremity Function Assessed by Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
Upper extremity function will be assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. This 11-item validated questionnaire is scored on a 5-point Likert scale and transformed to a total score ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 0 represents no disability and 100 represents maximum disability. Higher scores indicate worse functional impairment.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
Hand Grip Strength Assessed by Jamar Dynamometer
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
Hand grip strength will be measured using a calibrated Jamar dynamometer and recorded in kilograms (kg). Higher values indicate greater muscle strength and better functional outcome.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
Sensory Function Assessed by Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
Sensory function will be evaluated using the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test. Calibrated monofilaments of different thicknesses are applied to standardized fingertip locations to determine sensory threshold levels. Monofilament values range from lower to higher force levels. Higher threshold values indicate greater sensory impairment, whereas lower threshold values indicate better sensory function.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area Assessed by Ultrasonography
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
The cross-sectional area of the median nerve will be measured at the carpal tunnel inlet using high-resolution ultrasonography. Values are recorded in square millimeters (mm²). Higher cross-sectional area values indicate greater nerve swelling and worse pathological status.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
Clinical Signs Assessed by Tinel and Phalen Tests
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
The presence or absence of positive Tinel and Phalen signs will be recorded. A positive test indicates median nerve irritation. A reduction in the proportion of positive tests indicates clinical improvement.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sleep Quality Assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
Sleep quality will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The total global score ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality and worse outcome.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 3, Month 1, Month 3
Patient Satisfaction Assessed by 5-Point Likert Scale
Time Frame: Week 3 (End of Treatment)
Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction and better perceived treatment outcome.
Week 3 (End of Treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly. All collected data will be de-identified and analyzed for scientific publication purposes only.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe