A Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Mytocel MSK With AMT and PRP Injections in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

March 4, 2026 updated by: Chung Yuh Tzeng, Taichung Veterans General Hospital

Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease, frequently affecting the knee joint. As the cartilage within the joint wears down, the balance between degeneration and regeneration is gradually disrupted, causing pain during joint movement.

Mytocel MSK with AMT (Autologous Micrograft Technology) is an autologous micrograft technology, the first biocompatible solution that can be directly implanted into the joint using the patient's own tissue. It possesses regenerative repair and pain-relieving effects, rapidly improving joint health and alleviating pain and stiffness. It is primarily applied to the musculoskeletal system; this therapy has been proven to have tissue regeneration potential and effectiveness in multiple medical fields. This project will harvest ear cartilage tissue, mechanically separate and precisely filter it to create a Mytocel MSK with AMT cell suspension rich in cartilage precursor cells and mesenchymal stem cell markers (CD44, CD90, CD117), which will then be injected into the knee joint cavity. It is expected to help patients repair cartilage, reduce pain, and improve their quality of life.

PRP is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but its effects are short-lived and require multiple injections. Mytocel MSK with AMT may achieve longer-term and more stable clinical improvement with a single application. This project will use questionnaires and MRI examinations to observe changes in pain, functional recovery, and the degree of cartilage repair before and after treatment. The data will be used to analyze and compare the differences between Mytocel MSK with AMT and PRP treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female participants aged 18 years or older
  • Radiographic diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 1 to 3
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Advanced knee osteoarthritis requiring total knee arthroplasty
  • Diagnosis of autoimmune disease
  • Severe meniscal tear or ligament injury requiring surgical intervention
  • Body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m²
  • Platelet count less than 100,000 per microliter
  • Severe genu varum or genu valgum deformity
  • Intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 3 months prior to screening
  • Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection within 6 months prior to screening
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mytocel MSK with AMT
PRP is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but its effects are short-lived and require multiple injections. Mytocel MSK with AMT may achieve longer-term and more stable clinical improvement with a single application. This project will use questionnaires and MRI examinations to observe changes in pain, functional recovery, and the degree of cartilage repair before and after treatment. The data will be used to analyze and compare the differences between Mytocel MSK with AMT and PRP treatment.
PRP is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but its effects are short-lived and require multiple injections. Mytocel MSK with AMT may achieve longer-term and more stable clinical improvement with a single application. This project will use questionnaires and MRI examinations to observe changes in pain, functional recovery, and the degree of cartilage repair before and after treatment. The data will be used to analyze and compare the differences between Mytocel MSK with AMT and PRP treatment.
Experimental: PRP is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis
PRP is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but its effects are short-lived and require multiple injections.
PRP is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but its effects are short-lived and require multiple injections. Mytocel MSK with AMT may achieve longer-term and more stable clinical improvement with a single application. This project will use questionnaires and MRI examinations to observe changes in pain, functional recovery, and the degree of cartilage repair before and after treatment. The data will be used to analyze and compare the differences between Mytocel MSK with AMT and PRP treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a validated questionnaire assessing pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The total score ranges from 0 to 96, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. The outcome measure will be the change in total WOMAC score from baseline to 52 weeks.
52 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in cartilage thickness on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be performed at baseline and 52 weeks to assess structural changes in knee cartilage. Cartilage thickness will be quantitatively measured and compared between time points.
52 weeks
Change from baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Pain will be assessed using a 10-centimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst imaginable pain. The outcome measure will be the change in VAS score from baseline to 52 weeks.
52 weeks
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a 7-point scale assessing patients' overall perception of improvement after treatment. Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with lower scores indicating greater perceived improvement.
52 weeks
Change from baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) total score at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a validated quality-of-life questionnaire assessing physical and mental health domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status. The outcome measure will be the change in total score from baseline to 52 weeks.
52 weeks
Change from baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) total score at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient-reported questionnaire assessing pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life. In this study, KOOS is scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better knee function and fewer symptoms. The outcome measure will be the change in total KOOS score from baseline to 52 weeks
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AMT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There are currently no plans to provide IPD services

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PRP

Subscribe