- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07453953
A Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Mytocel MSK With AMT and PRP Injections in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease, frequently affecting the knee joint. As the cartilage within the joint wears down, the balance between degeneration and regeneration is gradually disrupted, causing pain during joint movement.
Mytocel MSK with AMT (Autologous Micrograft Technology) is an autologous micrograft technology, the first biocompatible solution that can be directly implanted into the joint using the patient's own tissue. It possesses regenerative repair and pain-relieving effects, rapidly improving joint health and alleviating pain and stiffness. It is primarily applied to the musculoskeletal system; this therapy has been proven to have tissue regeneration potential and effectiveness in multiple medical fields. This project will harvest ear cartilage tissue, mechanically separate and precisely filter it to create a Mytocel MSK with AMT cell suspension rich in cartilage precursor cells and mesenchymal stem cell markers (CD44, CD90, CD117), which will then be injected into the knee joint cavity. It is expected to help patients repair cartilage, reduce pain, and improve their quality of life.
PRP is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but its effects are short-lived and require multiple injections. Mytocel MSK with AMT may achieve longer-term and more stable clinical improvement with a single application. This project will use questionnaires and MRI examinations to observe changes in pain, functional recovery, and the degree of cartilage repair before and after treatment. The data will be used to analyze and compare the differences between Mytocel MSK with AMT and PRP treatment.
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Chung Yuh Tzeng
- Phone Number: 886-9921375166
- Email: tcy0545@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female participants aged 18 years or older
- Radiographic diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 1 to 3
- Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
- Advanced knee osteoarthritis requiring total knee arthroplasty
- Diagnosis of autoimmune disease
- Severe meniscal tear or ligament injury requiring surgical intervention
- Body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m²
- Platelet count less than 100,000 per microliter
- Severe genu varum or genu valgum deformity
- Intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 3 months prior to screening
- Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection within 6 months prior to screening
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mytocel MSK with AMT
PRP is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but its effects are short-lived and require multiple injections.
Mytocel MSK with AMT may achieve longer-term and more stable clinical improvement with a single application.
This project will use questionnaires and MRI examinations to observe changes in pain, functional recovery, and the degree of cartilage repair before and after treatment.
The data will be used to analyze and compare the differences between Mytocel MSK with AMT and PRP treatment.
|
PRP is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but its effects are short-lived and require multiple injections.
Mytocel MSK with AMT may achieve longer-term and more stable clinical improvement with a single application.
This project will use questionnaires and MRI examinations to observe changes in pain, functional recovery, and the degree of cartilage repair before and after treatment.
The data will be used to analyze and compare the differences between Mytocel MSK with AMT and PRP treatment.
|
|
Experimental: PRP is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis
PRP is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but its effects are short-lived and require multiple injections.
|
PRP is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but its effects are short-lived and require multiple injections.
Mytocel MSK with AMT may achieve longer-term and more stable clinical improvement with a single application.
This project will use questionnaires and MRI examinations to observe changes in pain, functional recovery, and the degree of cartilage repair before and after treatment.
The data will be used to analyze and compare the differences between Mytocel MSK with AMT and PRP treatment.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a validated questionnaire assessing pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
The total score ranges from 0 to 96, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.
The outcome measure will be the change in total WOMAC score from baseline to 52 weeks.
|
52 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in cartilage thickness on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be performed at baseline and 52 weeks to assess structural changes in knee cartilage.
Cartilage thickness will be quantitatively measured and compared between time points.
|
52 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
Pain will be assessed using a 10-centimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst imaginable pain.
The outcome measure will be the change in VAS score from baseline to 52 weeks.
|
52 weeks
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a 7-point scale assessing patients' overall perception of improvement after treatment.
Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with lower scores indicating greater perceived improvement.
|
52 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) total score at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a validated quality-of-life questionnaire assessing physical and mental health domains.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status.
The outcome measure will be the change in total score from baseline to 52 weeks.
|
52 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) total score at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient-reported questionnaire assessing pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life.
In this study, KOOS is scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better knee function and fewer symptoms.
The outcome measure will be the change in total KOOS score from baseline to 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- AMT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on PRP
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityUnknownSevere Non-proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyChina
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionRecruitingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 | Diabetic Retinopathy | Diabetic Macular Edema | Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy | Diabetic Retinopathy Visually ThreateningSweden
-
IBB UniversityCompletedTemporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)Egypt
-
Ankara Universitesi TeknokentCompleted
-
National Defense Medical Center, TaiwanTri-Service General HospitalRecruitingAnkle Sprain 2Nd Degree | Ankle Sprain 3Rd DegreeTaiwan
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakUnknownPeriapical Lesions
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
University of Colorado, DenverTerumo BCTCompletedOsteochondritis DissecansUnited States
-
Ain Shams Maternity HospitalCompleted
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...RecruitingDry Age-related Macular DegenerationItaly