Feasibility and Acceptability of a Co-produced Intervention to Improve Physical Activity and Motor Competence Amongst Children With Intellectual Disabilities and/or Autism Spectrum Disorder: Movement Matters (MM)

March 3, 2026 updated by: Liverpool John Moores University

Movement Matters: Feasibility of a Pilot Intervention to Improve Physical Activity and Motor Competence Amongst Children With Intellectual Disabilities

The goal of this observational study is to find out whether an intervention designed to improve physical activity levels and movement skills is practical and acceptable for children aged 7-11 years with intellectual disabilities and/or autism spectrum disorder.

The intervention will be designed with input from people with lived experience, including professionals working in schools, physical education, sport, health services, and charities, as well as parents and families. The study will explore whether this type of intervention can be realistically delivered in special educational needs schools as part of their usual day-to-day activities.

The main question the study aims to answer is:

• Is an intervention to improve physical activity and motor skills feasible and acceptable for special educational needs schools?

Participating schools will implement the intervention for six weeks. Several outcomes related to feasibility and acceptability will be measured to understand how well the intervention works in a school setting.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Liverpool, United Kingdom
        • Liverpool John Moores University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pupils within Special Educational Needs and Disability schools in the North-West Region of England

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 7 to 11 years
  • Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) statement indicating a primary diagnosis of intellectual disability and/or Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Independently ambulatory (able to walk without physical assistance) to allow completion of the motor skill testing protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children younger than 7 years or older than 11 years
  • No Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) statement indicating a primary diagnosis of intellectual disability or Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Not independently ambulatory and therefore unable to complete the motor skill testing protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
School Eligibility Rate (Screening Log Assessment)
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of all SEND schools in the target area that meet predefined inclusion criteria, assessed using a school eligibility screening log.
Baseline
Participant Recruitment Rate (Consent Form Return Log)
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of eligible children who return completed parent/carer consent forms, recorded using a consent tracking log.
Baseline
Completion Rate of Motor Competence (BOT-2), Physical Activity (Accelerometry), and Anthropometric (Stature and Body Mass) Measures
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Percentage of recruited participants who complete all baseline and follow-up assessments using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2), Accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X worn on the non dominant wrist for 7-days), stature measured to the nearest 0.1cm and body mass to the nearest 0.1 kg.
Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Loss to Follow-Up Rate (Child-Level Outcome Assessment Completion Log)
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Percentage of recruited participants who do not complete any follow-up assessments, recorded using the study assessment tracking log.
Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Intervention Dose Delivered (Teacher Implementation Log)
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Adherence to the Movement Matters intervention measured using a fidelity checklist completed by teachers
Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Teacher and Coach Acceptability (Post-Training Acceptability Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Study-specific post-training acceptability questionnaire consisting of 5-point Likert scale items assessing satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and appropriateness of the training.
Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Intervention Acceptability (Teacher Post-Intervention Acceptability Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Teacher satisfaction with the intervention measured using a structured post-intervention acceptability questionnaire including 5-point Likert scale items assessing overall satisfaction (not at all satisfied to very satisfied), perceived ease of use, and perceived burden (strongly disagree to strongly agree), as well as open-ended qualitative feedback questions.
Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Physical Activity Levels (Measured by accelerometry)
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Change in physical activity levels from baseline to 6 weeks measured using ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer worn on the non-dominant wrist at baseline and follow-up for 7-days. Physical activity will be quantified as average minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day.
Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Change in Motor Competence (Measured by BOT-2)
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Change in motor competence from baseline to 6 weeks measured using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2). Motor competence is scored according to the BOT-2 manual, first receiving a raw score then converted to point score.
Baseline to the end of intervention at 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Clinical Trials on Movement Matters

Subscribe