- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07458828
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Hydrolyzed Keratin Peptide Powder on Hair Health
March 4, 2026 updated by: Dong-A Pharmaceutical
Oral Hydrolyzed Keratin Peptide Powder Improves Hair Quality and Scalp Barrier Function: A 24-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Hydrolyzed Keratin Peptide Powder in promoting hair health in adult with mild to moderate hair damage, compared to a placebo control.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
120
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, South Korea
- Global Medical Research Center Co., Ltd.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female, aged 19 to 60 years
- Subjects with glossy scores between 1 and 3 points on the visual assessment classification and with a total hair damage score of less than 18 points based on exposure to risk factors
- Subjects who will refrain from perms or hair coloring, excluding haircuts, during the clinical study period
- Subjects who have agreed to participate in this clinical trial prior to its commencement and have signed the written informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with hair loss conditions such as androgenetic alopecia, alopecia areata, telogen effluvium, or cicatricial alopecia at Visit 1
- Subjects who have taken oral dutasteride or finasteride within 6 months prior to Visit 1
- Subjects who have consumed health functional foods (e.g., biotin) or general foods that may affect the human application study within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1
- Subjects who have applied topical steroid preparations to the scalp for one month prior to Visit 1
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding or planning pregnancy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: DAP-HAI-403
250mg/capsule (Hydrolyzed Keratin Peptide Powder 500mg/day)
|
Each subject takes two capsules per day for 24 weeks.
Each capsule contains DAP-HAI-403 250mg.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
250 mg/capsule (500 mg/day as placebo)
|
Each subject takes two capsules per day for 24 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The change of hair elasticity
Time Frame: Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
Elasticity is measured using a Universal Testing Machine (UTM) at a stretching rate of 2 cm/min, and the mean tensile resistance prior to breakage was recorded.
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
|
The change of hair luster
Time Frame: Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
Hair luster is evaluated using visual grading (5-point scale), glossymeter (mean value ), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM、 12-point scale ).
Both visual grading and glossymeter indicate better outcomes with higher scores.
For SEM, lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
|
The change of Self-evaluated satisfaction
Time Frame: Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
Participants assessed their satisfaction of overall changes from baseline across 7 questions, rating perceived satisfaction on a 10-point scale (1 = not at all, 10 = very much).
|
Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The change of Hair diameter
Time Frame: Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
Hair diameter is evaluated by phototrichogram device (Folliscope 5.0) at 50× magnification.
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
|
The change of Hair density
Time Frame: Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
Hair density is measured using Folliscope 5.0 at 14× magnification.
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
|
The change of Hair root volume
Time Frame: Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
Hair root volume was quantified using I Max-plus image analysis software by measuring the angle (°) between the parting's origin and its highest lateral points-smaller angles after treatment indicated improved root lift and volume.
|
Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
|
The change of Scalp moisture
Time Frame: Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
Scalp moisture is measured using the DermaLab Hydration Pin Probe.
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
|
The change of Scalp TEWL
Time Frame: Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
Scalp TEWL is assessed using a Tewameter TM Nano.
A lower score indicates better outcomes.
|
Change of the week 24 from baseline
|
|
The change of Self-improvement evaluation
Time Frame: Week 24
|
Participants were asked to complete a self-evaluation questionnaire regarding their overall improvement in the study across 5 questions, rating perceived improvement on a 10-point scale (1 = no improvement, 10 = marked improvement).
|
Week 24
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 23, 2024
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 21, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
August 12, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 4, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
March 9, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 9, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 4, 2026
Last Verified
February 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- DAP-HAI-403
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.