Median and Ulnar Nerve Function in Tattoo Artists

March 23, 2026 updated by: Sedanur Güngör, Gazi University

Occupational Hand-Arm Vibration Exposure and Its Effects on Median and Ulnar Nerve Function in Tattoo Artists: A Case-Control Study

This case-control study aims to investigate the effects of occupational hand-arm vibration exposure on median and ulnar nerve functions in tattoo artists. Chronic exposure to vibration generated by tattoo machines may lead to neurosensory impairment, reduced tactile sensitivity, and decreased hand strength. Objective assessments including nerve provocation tests, sensory threshold evaluation, two-point discrimination, vibration perception, grip and pinch strength measurements, and validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires will be used. Findings will be compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This observational cross-sectional case-control study evaluates neurosensory and motor function differences between professional tattoo artists exposed to long-term occupational vibration and healthy controls. Chronic exposure to hand-arm vibration (HAV) has been associated with peripheral neuropathy, entrapment neuropathies, and sensory receptor dysfunction.

Participants will undergo standardized assessment including:

Tinel, Phalen, reverse Phalen, and elbow flexion tests

Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing

Two-point discrimination

Vibration perception testing (30 Hz and 256 Hz)

Grip and pinch strength measurements

Brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire

Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire

The study aims to determine whether occupational vibration exposure is associated with measurable alterations in median and ulnar nerve sensory and motor function.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Professional tattoo artists with at least one year of occupational exposure to vibration and age- and sex-matched healthy individuals.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Professional tattoo artists with at least 1 year of occupational experience (case group)
  • Healthy individuals without occupational vibration exposure (control group)
  • Voluntary participation and provision of informed consent
  • No upper extremity trauma or surgery within the last 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
  • Diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy
  • History of cervical radiculopathy or cervical disc herniation
  • History of upper extremity surgery or injury
  • Presence of rheumatologic or systemic inflammatory diseases
  • Pregnancy
  • Substance or alcohol abuse
  • Engagement in a second occupation involving repetitive hand use or vibration exposure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Tattoo Artists (Vibration-Exposed)
Professional tattoo artists aged 18 years and older with at least one year of occupational exposure to hand-arm vibration generated by tattoo machines. Participants will undergo standardized sensory and motor assessments including nerve provocation tests, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing, two-point discrimination, vibration perception threshold, grip and pinch strength measurements, and validated hand function questionnaires.
Healthy Controls
Age- and sex-matched healthy individuals without occupational vibration exposure and without history of upper extremity trauma, neuropathy, or systemic disease affecting nerve function. Participants will undergo the same standardized sensory and motor assessments as the case group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Threshold
Time Frame: Baseline (single assessment session)
Assessment of light touch sensory threshold using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments applied to the index and little fingers.
Baseline (single assessment session)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Two-Point Discrimination
Time Frame: Baseline (single assessment session)
Minimum distance (mm) at which two points are perceived as separate on index and little fingers
Baseline (single assessment session)
Vibration Perception Duration
Time Frame: Baseline (single assessment session)
Duration (seconds) of vibration perception using tuning fork (30 Hz and 256 Hz)
Baseline (single assessment session)
Grip Strength
Time Frame: Baseline (single assessment session)
Maximal hand grip strength measured using a dynamometer (kg)
Baseline (single assessment session)
Pinch Strength
Time Frame: Baseline (single assessment session)
Lateral and tip pinch strength measured using a pinch gauge (kg)
Baseline (single assessment session)
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline (single assessment session)
Symptom severity and functional status scores (1-5 scale)
Baseline (single assessment session)
Brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline (single assessment session)
Hand function score normalized to a 0-100 scale
Baseline (single assessment session)
Nerve Provocation Test Positivity
Time Frame: Baseline (single assessment session)
Presence of positive findings in Tinel, Phalen, reverse Phalen, and elbow flexion tests
Baseline (single assessment session)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Subscribe