Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria: Hypertension Diabetes Integration Study- Formative Aim 3 (HTN2)

May 11, 2026 updated by: Mark Huffman, Washington University School of Medicine

Transforming Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria Using a Type II Hybrid, Interrupted Time Series Design - Aim 3

The purpose of the second phase of the Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria (HTN 2.0) Program is to build upon the success of the first phase of the HTN Program (2020-2023), which implemented the WHO HEARTS package across 60 primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). This program demonstrated significant improvements in hypertension treatment and control. The focus of aim 3 will be evaluating diabetes management through the implementation of the HEARTS-D bundle in 10 PHCs across the FCT that previously participated in the initial HTN Program.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aim 3 Inclusion Criteria:

Patients will be screened for diabetes with symptoms of hyperglycemia or BMI >25 kg/m2 and over the age of 18 years old. Upon first or previous diagnosis, diabetes patients will be registered.

  • Adults (≥18 years),
  • Patients with previous diabetes diagnosis
  • Patients with persistently elevated random glucose >200 mg/dl, fasting glucose >126 mg/dl, or hemoglobin A1c >6.5% on two or more occasions (when available)
  • Patients taking glucose lowering medications
  • Pregnant women are eligible for this program, or
  • Cognitively impaired adults are eligible for this program.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - This program will not include any of the following special populations:

    • Individuals who are not yet adults (minors): i.e. infants, children, or teenagers <18 years old, or
    • Prisoners or other detained individuals.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Primary Health Care Centers in the Federal Capital Territory
10 primary healthcare centers in Nigeria's Federal Capital Territory who previously demonstrated capacity to deliver hypertension care in HTN 1.0.
This study uses an interrupted time series design to compare diabetes screening, diagnosis, treatment, and control across a 12-month pre-implementation period and a 24-month implementation period in 10 primary healthcare centers in Nigeria's Federal Capital Territory. Sites previously demonstrated capacity to deliver hypertension care and will continue hypertension services while expanding to diabetes care through the HEARTS diabetes module (HEARTS-D). Pre-implementation includes registry setup and provision of glucometers without diabetes treatment training. Implementation includes HEARTS-D training, supply provision, expansion of the drug revolving fund to diabetes medicines, and quarterly supportive supervision.
Description: Oral biguanide used as first-line glucose-lowering therapy within the HEARTS-D stepped-care protocol. Dosing per protocol: 500 mg once daily (Step 1), 1000 mg once daily (Step 2), 1000 mg twice daily (Step 3 and Step 4). Supplied through the expanded drug revolving fund during the implementation period.
Oral sulfonylurea used as add-on therapy at Step 4 of the HEARTS-D stepped-care protocol when blood glucose remains uncontrolled on metformin. Starting dose 1 mg once daily, titrated by 1-2 mg to a maximum of 8 mg daily. Supplied through the expanded drug revolving fund during the implementation period.
Point-of-care capillary blood glucose monitor with compatible single-use test strips and lancets, used at participating primary health centers for diabetes screening, diagnosis, and monitoring per WHO HEARTS-D. Glucometers and test strips are provided to all sites during pre-implementation (registry setup) and replenished during implementation through the supply chain and drug revolving fund.
Other Names:
  • Capillary blood glucose meter
  • finger-stick glucose meter
Structured training of CHEWs on the HEARTS-D protocol covering diabetes screening, diagnosis, stepped-care treatment, follow-up, and referral, delivered at the start of the implementation period and reinforced by quarterly supportive supervision visits with audit-and-feedback throughout the 24-month implementation period.
Other Names:
  • Provider training
  • Supportive supervision

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dose of quarterly supportive supervision visits measured by the proportion of observed/expected visits during the implementation period.
Time Frame: 36 months
Primary Implementation Outcome: Description: Dose of quarterly supportive supervision visits measured by the proportion of observed/expected visits during the implementation period.
36 months
Difference in 6-month rolling average diabetes screening in eligible adults (random plasma glucose with hyperglycemia symptoms; fasting plasma glucose if ≥18 y and BMI >25 kg/m²; or HbA1c) per WHO HEARTS-D, pre- vs. implementation
Time Frame: 36 months
Primary effectiveness outcome: The primary outcome will be the difference in the 6-month rolling average of the diabetes screening among eligible patients, screening defined as a random plasma glucose screening among adults with symptoms of hyperglycemia or a fasting plasma glucose among adults > 18 years old and body mass index > 25 kg/m2 in accordance with HEARTS-D, between the pre-implementation and implementation periods. Hemoglobin A1c may also be used if available.
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in 6-month rolling average diabetes treatment (proportion of eligible patients prescribed any glucose-lowering medication) between pre-implementation and implementation periods
Time Frame: 36 months
Secondary Effectiveness Outcome (diabetes treatment): 6-month rolling average of diabetes treatment levels in the pre-implementation and implementation periods.
36 months
Difference in 6-month rolling average blood sugar control (per WHO HEARTS-D: fasting plasma glucose <126 mg/dL, postprandial <160 mg/dL, or HbA1c <7%) between pre-implementation and implementation periods
Time Frame: 36 months
Secondary Effectiveness Outcome (blood sugar control): 6-month rolling average of blood sugar control in the pre-implementation and implementation periods. Control will be defined according to the WHO HEARTS-D module2, specifically: fasting glucose <126 mg/dl, postprandial glucose <160 mg/dl, or HbA1c <7%.
36 months
Difference in 6-month rolling average mean fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) between pre-implementation and implementation periods
Time Frame: 36 months
Secondary Effectiveness Outcomes (mean fasting glucose levels): 6-month rolling average of mean fasting glucose levels in the pre-implementation and implementation periods.
36 months
Proportion of selected primary health centers (PHCs) that participated in baseline diabetes training (A ÷ B; A = PHCs that participated, B = total selected PHCs)
Time Frame: 36 months

Secondary Implementation Outcome:

A = Number of PHCs who participated in baseline diabetes training B = Total number of selected PHCs

Calculation: A ÷ B

36 months
Proportion of selected PHCs that received at least one supportive supervision visit in the past 12 months (A ÷ B; B = total selected PHCs)
Time Frame: 36 months

Secondary Implementation Outcome:

A = Number of PHCs who received at least one supportive supervision visit in the past 12 months B = Total number of selected PHCs

Calculation: A ÷ B

36 months
Proportion of eligible PHCs that received at least one audit-and-feedback report within the past 3 months (A ÷ B)
Time Frame: 36 months

Secondary Implementation Outcome:

A = Number of PHCs who received at least an audit and feedback report within the past 3-months B = Total number of selected PHCs

Calculation: A ÷ B

36 months
Percentage of PHCs with a working blood glucose monitor on-site on the day of assessment (last supervision visit) (A ÷ B)
Time Frame: 36 months

Secondary Implementation Outcome:

A = Number of PHCs with a working blood glucose monitor at the site on the day of assessment (time point: last supervision visit) B = Total number of selected PHCs

Calculation: A ÷ B

36 months
Percentage of PHCs with diabetes medicines available on-site on the day of assessment (last supervision visit) (A ÷ B)
Time Frame: 36 months

Secondary Implementation Outcome:

A = Number of PHCs with diabetes medicines available on the day of assessment (time point: last supervision visit) B = Total number of selected PHCs

Calculation: A ÷ B

36 months
6-monthly rolling average percentage of registered diabetes patients with clinically indicated step-up who received step-up treatment within 6 months (A = patients needing and receiving step-up; B = patients registered per month)
Time Frame: 36 months

Secondary Implementation Outcome:

A = Number of patients who need step up treatment and received it

B = Total number of patients who are registered per month

Calculation: A ÷ B, 6-monthly rolling average rate

36 months
6-monthly rolling average monthly proportion of registered diabetes patients receiving appropriate stepped care, out of total registered patients (A ÷ B)
Time Frame: 36 months

Secondary Implementation Outcome:

A = Number of patients who need step up treatment and received it

B = Total number of patients who are registered per month

Calculation: A ÷ B, 6-monthly rolling average rate

36 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in the proportion of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) between pre-implementation and implementation periods
Time Frame: 36 months
Safety Outcome: between-period (pre-implementation versus implementation) differences in proportions of serious adverse events
36 months
Difference in the proportion of patients with adverse events of special interest (hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, medication allergies, common medication side effects) between pre-implementation and implementation periods
Time Frame: 36 months
Safety Outcome: e.g., hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, medication allergies, common medication side effects in pre-implementation and implementation periods.
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual patient data will be shared through NHLBI BioData Catalyst

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within 1 year of study conclusion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to study data will be managed through NHLBI BioData Catalyst.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabete Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Implementation of program based on WHO HEARTS-D guidelines

Subscribe