Effect of a Competence Based Medical Education Programme on Training Quality in Intensive Care Medicine. (COBALIDATION)

February 19, 2020 updated by: Alvaro Castellanos Ortega

Effect of a Competence Based Medical Education Programme on Training Quality in Intensive Care Medicine. COBALIDATION TRIAL.

This study evaluates whether the implementation of a competency-based medical education program called CoBaTrICE (Competency Based Training program in Intensive Care in Europe) provides higher levels of competency in comparison with the current official time-based program in Intensive Care Medicine (ICM) in Spain.

The hypothesis will be confirmed or rejected through a multicenter cluster randomized trial of 14 ICU Departments from 14 academic referral hospitals located in Spain. A total of 38 trainees on the 3rd year of the specialization period will be followed during the three years of their specific training period in Intensive Care Medicine. CoBaTrICE (seven hospitals) will be compared with the current official model of training in ICM in Spain (seven hospitals), which is based on exposure to experiences through clinical rotations. The implementation of CoBaTrICE will include the three following essential elements: 1) Training the trainers; 2) Workplace-based assessments; 3)The use of an electronic portfolio.

The level of competency achieved by each participant will be determined by a simulation-based Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) performed at the end of the third year of traning (baseline) and at the end of the 5th year of training period.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Competence Based Medical Education (CBME) stands for a shift in emphasis away from time-based programs, based solely on exposure to experiences such as clinical rotations, in favour of an emphasis on needs-based graduate outcomes authenticity, and learner-centeredness (1). The new paradigm defies the assumption that competence is achieved based on time spent on rotations and instead requires residents to demonstrate competence, what involves performing a significant number of formative assessments (2,3). The CBME model for Intensive Care Medicine (ICM) is called CoBaTrICE (Competency-Based Training in Intensive Care Medicine in Europe) (4), an international partnership of professional organisations and critical care clinicians whose ultimate aims are: to assure a high quality level education in ICM, to harmonize training in ICM without interfering with national specific regulations and to allow for free movement of ICM professionals across Europe (5). CoBaTrICE program used an international grounded approach to defining specialist competencies, and incorporated the views of 1,398 patients and relatives from 70 ICUs in eight EU countries (6). The final program includes 102 competence statements grouped into 12 domains and a definition of the level of expertise required of a safe practitioner at the end of their specialist training. CoBaTrICE has been formally adopted by 15 of 32 countries in Europe with a further 12 planning to do so, Spain is included in this latter group (7,8).

Importance:

CBME is gaining acceptance as a solution to address the challenges associated with the current time-based models of physician training. However, whether CBME programs provide better outcomes than the traditional ones is actually unknown.

Hypothesis:

The implementation of the CoBaTrICE will provide higher levels of competency in comparison with the current official time-based programme in ICM in Spain.

Objectives:

  1. To determine the effect of CoBaTrICE implementation on:

    1. The level of competence achieved by the trainees.
    2. The percentage of critical performance elements.
  2. To identify gaps in performance that could be addressed in future educational interventions.
  3. To investigate the reliability and feasibility of conducting simulation based assessment at multiple sites.
  4. To determine compliance with CoBaTrICE and barriers to an effective implementation.

Design:

A multicenter cluster randomized trial of 14 ICU Departments from 14 academic referral hospitals located in Spain. The participating ICUs are general medical and surgical ICUs accredited to train 2-3 new residents in ICM per year.

Participants:

A total of 38 trainees on the 3rd year of the specialization period (R3) will be followed during the three years of their specific training period in ICM (Stage 2). Enrollment will start on February 1, 2019, and the follow-up will end on May 31, 2021.

Intervention: see the specific item in the protocol section.

Main outcomes and measures (see also the specific item in the protocol section):

To determine the level of competency achieved for each participant, a simulation based OSCE (18-26) will be performed at the end of the 3rd year(baseline) and at the end of the 5th year of training in ICM. The OSCE will be performed simultaneously at four simulation centers (Hospital la Fe, Valencia; Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid; IAVANTE, Granada; and Hospital Clinic, Barcelona). Each participant will perform in five 15-min standardized patient or high-fidelity simulated clinical crisis scenarios.

Rating instruments and guide to rating:

Via a Delphi technique, an independent panel of 10 intensivists subject matter experts (simulation instructors and European Diplome in Intensive Care [EDIC] examiners) will perform the following tasks: 1) to select the competences to be assessed; 2) to design the scenarios; and 3) to define the items of the checklist for each scenario: a) the critical essential performance elements (CEPE), and b) the critical non-essential performance elements (CNEPE) that must be observed and scored in a yes/no format. CEPEs are defined as essential steps or actions in the management which if missed could have an immediate significant impact on morbidity and mortality. CNEPE are also important for the adequate management of the scenario but they do not have an immediate influence on the outcome. The performances will be video recorded (26). All the video recordings will be later rated by two blinded raters, members of the experts panel, using specific checklists which include 25 items with a detailed description of the CEPEs and CNEPEs, the competencies technical (diagnosis and treatment) and non-technical (communication, team leadership, resource management) associated with each item, as well as specific information about what is expected to be done by the trainee. After each video-assessment, the performance of the trainee will be classified in five levels of competency: Level I: The participant completed less than 60% of the CEPEs. The participant needs guidance and direct supervision to perform the activity in all cases. Level II: The participant completed ≥ 60% of the CEPEs but less than 80% of CEPEs. The participant needs guidance and supervision to perform the activity in most of situations. Level III: The participant completed ≥ 80% of the CEPEs but less than 100% of CEPEs. The participant needs some guidance and supervision to perform the activity in complex situations. Level IV: The participant completed 100% of the CEPEs but less than 80% of CNEPEs. The participant can perform the activity under indirect supervision. Level V: The participant completed 100% of the CEPEs and ≥ 80% of the CEPEs.The participant is independent to perform the activity. Finally, raters also will qualify the performance as: poor, pass, good, outstanding.

Measures will include: 1) the percentage of CEPEs observed; 2) the percentage of CNEPEs observed; 3) the overall competency level achieved on a descriptive scale of 1 to 5 (novice to independent practitioner); 4) the qualitative rating given by the raters based on whether the performance is at the level expected according to the predefined level for the year of training.

Standardization of Scenario Delivery (18-22). In order to facilitate reproducible scenario delivery, rules, detailed scripts and a guidebook for each scenario will be created. The scenario script will describe the elements of the simulated clinical environment (e.g., the equipment and medications available), evolution of the patient's condition throughout the crises and the responses to interventions, standardized answers to anticipated participant questions, and criteria that define successful completion of CPEs. Participants will be briefed on relevant mannequin characteristics, basic rules for participating in simulation scenarios, and location and uses of medications, clinical equipment, and other resources. After finishing the OSCE, resident feedback will be asked through a specific satisfaction survey.

Statistical Analysis:

Sample size: A power analysis has been performed in order to determine the minimum sample size required to detect with a power of .95 (α = .05, 1 - β = .95) a medium effect size (f = .30), requiring a minimum sample size of 90 observations (30 residents).

A mixed factorial ANOVA design will be applied on the time factor (R3-R4-R5) with the group factor (intervention vs. control) for the assessment of professional competences considered, applying post-hoc Bonferroni tests to analyze the principal and interaction effects between the two factors.

In order to estimate the effectiveness of CoBaTrICE, the differences between intervention and control group regarding the primary and secondary end points will be analyzed by a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the adjusted odds ratio will be estimated. Simulation experience defined as participation in at least two crisis resource management courses will be included in the analysis.

Development phases of the study:

The first phase of the project will begin by setting up an independent panel of 10 intensivists experts/executors that will perform the tasks mentioned above. After randomizing the hospitals to the experimental group, the tutors of the this group will be trained through a twelve-hour course integrating: 1) a detailed explanation of the principles, structure, and competencies contemplated in the CoBaTrICE program; 2) the basic principles of the formative assessment, techniques applied, and effective feedback; and 4) the use of the electronic portfolio to record the volume and results of the formative assessments and the progress of the trainee.

At the time of recruitment, residents and tutors of the participant ICUs will complete online several anonymous surveys to explore educational environment, engagement and satisfaction, and professional burnout.

The second phase of the study will consist of the CoBaTrICE program implementation and the comparison of the participating residents' levels of performance through the OSCE at specific points in time, which will be the end of R3 (baseline OSCE) and R5. It will determine: a) whether there are significant differences between the level of competencies shown by the residents depending on the type of training; b) whether there are significant differences in the pace of acquiring the competencies in the two types of programs; and c) the most common errors made by the residents through the different training levels and the possible differences between both programs. The tutors involved in the CoBaTrICE group will receive support to overcome barriers and problems found in the implementation of the program and/or in the use of the tools it incorporates. The tutors will be sent an "ad hoc" questionnaire designed to collect their suggestions. A pilot OSCE with local non-participants residents in the trial will be carried out at the simulation Center In Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain, in order to check the feasibility and reliability of the scenarios and the video rating process.The third phase of the study will be devoted to analyzing and publishing the results of the study. Interim analysis will be performed in order to determine the adequate implementation of the program and asses heterogeneity and/or possible bias selection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Alicante, Spain, 03010
        • HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO, ALICANTE
      • Badalona, Spain, 08916
        • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona
      • Granada, Spain, 18014
        • 4. Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves de Granada
      • Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, Spain, 35010
        • Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid.
      • Murcia, Spain, 30120
        • 3. Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41013
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41009
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Macarena de Sevilla
      • Valencia, Spain, 46010
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
      • Valencia, Spain, 46017
        • 7. Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset de Valencia
    • Barcelona
      • Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain, 08208
        • Consorci Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Trainees on the 3rd year of the specialization period in Intensive Care Medicine (ICM) who are developing their training program in a Spanish general medical and surgical ICU Department of an academic referral hospital accredited to train 2 or 3 new residents in ICM per year being 3 residents the highest number per year allowed in Spain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ICU Departments accredited to train less than 2 new residents in ICM per year
  • ICU Departments where CoBaTrICE is being implemented. At present only one hospital in Spain (Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia) is formally implementing CoBaTrICE. As a consequence it has been excluded from the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CoBaTriCE
Implementation of CoBaTrICE. The implementation of CoBaTrICE is based on: 1. Training the trainers; 2. Multiple Workplace-based assessment exercices; 3. The use of an electronic portfolio.
Other: Implementation of CoBaTrICE

The implemention of CoBaTrICE will include the three following essential elements:

  1. Training the trainers. In order to provide high quality feedback to guide development of competence, tutors will receive a course in formative assessment, debriefing techniques, and effective feedback.
  2. Workplace-based assessment (WbA) to promote learning and to guarantee that the predefined competences and skills are effectively acquired. Current Wb observation methods such as mini-clinical examination exercise, direct observation of procedural skills and multisource-feedback 360º will be used.
  3. The use of an electronic portfolio specifically created as a personal collection of training documents that includes the record of formative assessments, activities, and the levels of competence achieved. The portfolio will help monitor progress of trainee's skills development and learning experiences contributing to an effective assessment, self-reflection and control of the learning process.
Other Names:
  • Implementation of a competency-based medical education program
No Intervention: Control
The participants of the control group will follow the current official model of training in ICM in Spain, which is based on exposure to experiences through time-based clinical rotations; a generic report, non-based on formal assessment, about knowledge, technical and nontechnical skills is performed after every clinical rotation, and yearly by the tutor.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The level of competency achieved at the end of the specific training in ICM (5th year)
Time Frame: Three years
The percentage of competences assessed through an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in which level 5 (independent practitioner) was achieved
Three years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of critical performance elements completed in the OSCE.
Time Frame: The two years of CoBaTrICE implementation
Percentage of critical essential performance elements and percentage of critical non-essential performance elements completed in the OSCE.
The two years of CoBaTrICE implementation
The rate of acquisition of competences assessed throughout the two years of CoBaTrICE implementation.
Time Frame: The two years of CoBaTrICE implementation
The number of competences achieved at the end of the 5th year in comparison to the competences showed in the baseline OSCE
The two years of CoBaTrICE implementation
Compliance with CoBaTrICE implementation in the intervention group
Time Frame: The two years of CoBaTrICE implementation
Percentage of CoBaTrICE competences assessed throughout the last two-years specific stage of training in ICM
The two years of CoBaTrICE implementation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Alvaro Castellanos Ortega

Collaborators

European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
Generalitat Valenciana

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: ALVARO CASTELLANOS, PhD, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe de Valencia (IIS La Fe)
  • Study Director: RAFAEL GARCIA ROS, PhD, Cátedra de psicología de la Educación. Universidad de Valencia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COBALIDATION

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Competency-Based Education

Clinical Trials on Implementation of CoBaTrICE

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Pakistan

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe