Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria 2.0 (HTN 2)

January 16, 2026 updated by: Mark Huffman, Washington University School of Medicine

Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria Program 2.0

The purpose of the second phase of the Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria (HTN 2.0) Program is to build upon the success of the first phase of the HTN Program (2020-2023), which implemented the WHO HEARTS package across 60 primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria. This program demonstrated significant improvements in hypertension treatment and control. HTN 2.0 will expand implementation of the HEARTS bundle to 5 new states in 5 geopolitical zones in Nigeria (Abia, Delta, Gombe, Jigawa, and Oyo) while also evaluating sustainment of hypertension control in the Federal Capital Territory.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (≥18 years old),
  • Elevated blood pressure (SBP ≥ 140 mmHg or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg) documented or measured by a health care professional (e.g., physician, community health extension worker, or community health officer) on two separate occasions or taking a BP-lowering medication, or a history of hypertension.
  • Pregnant women are eligible for this program, or
  • Cognitively impaired adults are eligible for this program..

Exclusion Criteria:

This program will not include any of the following special populations:

  • Individuals who are not yet adults (minors): i.e. infants, children, or teenagers <18 years old, or
  • Prisoners or other detained individuals.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Primary Health Care Centers
50 primary healthcare centers across five Nigerian states will be selected to implement a hypertension treatment program based on the WHO HEARTS hypertension technical package.
The intervention seeks to the scale-up of the World Health Organization HEARTS package in 50 primary healthcare centers across five Nigerian states using a type II hybrid effectiveness implementation design. Following a 12-month pre-implementation period, centers will transition into a 24-month implementation period that includes state-level training of health workers, non-physician hypertension screening, diagnosis, and treatment, simplified hypertension treatment guidelines, monthly audit and feedback, supply chain strengthening, and a drug revolving fund to improve blood pressure lowering medication accessibility.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Effectiveness Outcome
Time Frame: 36 months
Difference in the 6-month rolling average of hypertension control between the pre-implementation and implementation periods (defined as <140/<90 mm Hg)
36 months
Primary Implementation Outcome
Time Frame: 36 months
Dose of quarterly supportive supervision visits measured by the proportion of observed/expected visits during the implementation period.
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Effectiveness outcome (hypertension treatment)
Time Frame: 36 months
Difference in hypertension treatment in the 6-month rolling average between the pre-implementation and implementation periods
36 months
Secondary Effectiveness Outcomes (mean systolic blood presure)
Time Frame: 36 months
Difference in mean systolic blood pressure in the 6-month rolling average between the pre-implementation and implementation periods
36 months
Secondary Effectiveness Outcome (mean diastolic blood pressure)
Time Frame: 36 months
Difference in mean diastolic blood pressure in the 6-month rolling average between the pre-implementation and implementation periods
36 months
Secondary Implementation Outcomes: Proportion of selected PHCs who participated in baseline hypertension training
Time Frame: 36 months

A = Number of PHCs who participated in baseline hypertension training B = Total number of selected PHCs

Calculation: A ÷ B

36 months
Secondary Implementation Outcome: Proportion of selected PHCs who participated in site initiation training
Time Frame: 36 months

A = Number of PHCs who participated in site initiation training B = Total number of selected PHCs

Calculation: A ÷ B

36 months
Secondary Implementation Outcome: Proportion of selected PHCs who received at least one supportive supervision visit in the past 12 months
Time Frame: 36 months

A = Number of PHCs who received at least one supportive supervision visit in the past 12 months B = Total number of selected PHCs

Calculation: A ÷ B

36 months
Secondary Implementation Outcome: Proportion of selected PHCs who received an audit and feedback report within the past 3-months
Time Frame: 36 months

A = Number of PHCs who received at least an audit and feedback report within the past 3-months B = Total number of selected PHCs

Calculation: A ÷ B

36 months
Secondary Implementation Outcome: Percentage of PHCs with a working blood pressure monitor at the site on the day of assessment
Time Frame: 36 months

A = Number of PHCs with a working blood pressure monitor at the site on the day of assessment (time point: last supervision visit) B = Total number of selected PHCs

Calculation: A ÷ B

36 months
Secondary Implementation Outcome: Percentage of PHCs with blood pressure medicines available on the day of assessment
Time Frame: 36 months

A = Number of PHCs with blood pressure medicines available on the day of assessment (time point: last supervision visit) B = Total number of selected PHCs

Calculation: A ÷ B

36 months
Secondary Implementation Outcome: Percentage of patients with step up indicated who received step up treatment in the last 6-months
Time Frame: 36 months

A = Number of patients who need step up treatment and received it

B = Total number of patients who are registered per month

Calculation: A ÷ B, 6-monthly rolling average rate

36 months
Secondary Implementation Outcome: Number and proportion of adult patients with hypertension who are registered/total number of adult patients with elevated blood pressure within participating PHCs within the past 3 working days
Time Frame: 36 months

A = Total number of adult patients who had high BP visits to the health facility within the given dates

B = Total number of patients visits to the health facility within the given dates

Calculation: A ÷ B

36 months
Secondary implementation Outcome: Monthly proportion of registered patients with appropriate stepped care/total number of registered patients
Time Frame: 36 months

A = Number of patients who need step up treatment and received it

B = Total number of patients who are registered per month

Calculation: A ÷ B, 6-monthly rolling average rate

36 months
Secondary Implementation Outcome: Monthly proportion of registered patients treated with fixed dose combination therapy/total number of patients on treatment
Time Frame: 36 months

A = Number of patients who are treated with fixed dose combination therapy

B = Total number of patients who are treated per month

Calculation: A ÷ B, 6-month rolling average rate

36 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Outcome: between-period (pre-implementation versus implementation) differences in the proportion of serious adverse events
Time Frame: 36 months
Safety Outcome: between-period (pre-implementation versus implementation) differences in the proportion of serious adverse events
36 months
Safety Outcome: between-period (pre-implementation versus implementation) differences in the proportion of adverse events of special interest
Time Frame: 36 months
i.e., clinically ascertained angioedema, syncope, lightheadedness/dizziness, edema, inappropriate medication prescription [e.g., ACE or ARB among patients who are pregnant]
36 months
Safety Outcome: Between-period (pre-implementation versus implementation) differences in the proportion of hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, and acute kidney injury
Time Frame: 36 months
Hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, and acute kidney injury measured in a subset of 5 sites and 250 patients (n=500 total) in both pre-implementation and implementation periods.
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UATH/HREC/PR/557/A2
  • R01HL144708 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual patient data will be shared through NHLBI BioData Catalyst

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within 1 year of study conclusion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to study data will be managed through NHLBI BioData Catalyst.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension (HTN)

Clinical Trials on Implementation of a modified WHO HEARTS Hypertension Treatment Bundle

Subscribe