Clinical Trial to Compare Clinical and Functional Results of the Augmentation of Supraspinatus Tears With the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii Tendon

June 14, 2026 updated by: HOSPITAL FRATERNIDAD MUPRESPA HABANA

Use of Long Head of bíceps Brachii Tendon as an Augmentation for Supraspinatus Tears: a Comparative Clinical Trial.

The goal of this clinical trial is to reduce the risk for re-tear in rotator cuff surgeries and improve clinical results in a working age population. The main questions it aims to answer are:

If we can improve surgical results using the long head of the biceps tendon as a graft.

If we can reduce the risk of re-tear using the long head of the biceps tendon as a graft.

Researchers will compare participants with rotator cuff tears with two different surgical techniques to see if their clinical results improve using the long head of the biceps tendon as a graft compared with not using a graft.

Participants will be asked to get enrolled in the study not knowing in which group they will be assigned to by signing a Informed Consent Form and both groups would have the same follow up conditions and treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Active workers.
  • A supraspinatus tear diagnosed in MRI.
  • Modified Rohi equal or over 5 points.
  • Failed conservative treatment (at least 3 months of phisiotherapy) or surgical indication secondary to acute traumatic tear with severe functional limitation.
  • Age between 18 and 65.
  • Long head of the biceps tendon pathology.
  • Able to understand and sign the Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tear of the subscapularis or infraspinatus tendon.
  • Supraspinatus tears <1cm.
  • Lack of long head of the biceps tendon.
  • Rotator Cuff Arthropathy (Hamada >3).
  • Glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rotator Cuff Tear Augmented with Long head of the Biceps Tendon
After the supraspinsatus tendon repair, a piece of the tenotomized long head of the biceps tendon will be obtained and it will be prepared using a device to obtain a plain rectangular shaped graft that will be used to augment the supraspinatus.
After conventional arthroscopic repair of the supraspinsatus with a double row technique, an autologous graft obtained from the long head of the biceps will be used as a Graf to improve biological properties of the supraspinatus tear; aiming to reduce re-tears and to improve Clinical results.
Active Comparator: Rotator Cuff Tear Without Augmentation
After the supraspinatus repair, a piece of the tenotomized long head of the biceps will be obtained but not used as a graft.
A double row technique will be performed arthroscopically.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constant Murley Score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow up at 1 year after surgery
Shoulder specific clinical Score
From enrollment to the end of follow up at 1 year after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ASES score
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year after surgery
American Shoulder and Elbow Score
From enrollment to 1 year after surgery
VAS
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year after surgery
Pain scale
From enrollment to 1 year after surgery
Range of Motion
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year after surgery
Motion
From enrollment to 1 year after surgery
Strenght in abduction
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year after surgery
From enrollment to 1 year after surgery
Re-tear rate
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year after surgery
From enrollment to 1 year after surgery
Satisfaction index
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year after surgery
PASS score
From enrollment to 1 year after surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to return to work
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year after surgery
From enrollment to 1 year after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tear Surgical Repair

Clinical Trials on Augmented supraspinatus repair

Subscribe