- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02310854
Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture; RecOnsTruction Or Repair? (ROTOR)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background of the study:
An anterior cruciate ligament rupture is a serious injury to the knee with high probability of the occurrence of dynamic instability, accompanying lesions and early post-traumatic arthrosis. Despite conservative treatment through rehabilitation or ACL reconstruction surgery not all patients do return to their previous activity levels. Moreover degenerative changes, especially early posttraumatic arthrosis, are not counteracted.
In order to optimize the clinical results after ACL surgery, a renewed interest has emerged in healing the patient's own ruptured ACL after attaching. Literature suggests that with the current innovations in surgical repair techniques of (natural) healing of a ruptured ACL may result in similar clinical outcomes in comparison to the gold standard, the ACL reconstruction. In addition, it may even reduce degenerative changes occur in relation to the gold standard. Moreover, the return to daily activities and sports level seems significantly faster than after ACL reconstruction.
The hypothesis is that a suture (suture repair) of a ruptured ACL, combined with a dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, as well as microfracture of the femoral notch, passes, at least equal efficacy in comparison with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings in terms of functional recovery 1 years postoperatively.
The DIS bonding technique will be applied in the current study to surgically repair (suture) the ruptured ACL. DIS is an abbreviation and stands for intraligamentary dynamic stabilization (DIS). DIS has been used in humans and seems to provide a high patient satisfaction, favorable clinical and radiological results. However, to our knowledge, to date, no randomized comparative study has been conducted yet in which the DIS technique is compared with the gold standard, the ACL reconstruction.
Objective of the study:
Primary goal:
Investigate the hypothesis that suture repair of a ruptured vkb, combined with a dynamic intraligamentary stabilization and microfracture of the femoral notch, results in at least equal effectiveness compared with an ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring in terms of functional recovery one year postoperatively in terms of a patient self-reported outcome related to be able to conduct daily and sporting activities.
Secondary objective:
Evaluation of clinical outcomes, self-reported by the patient outcomes, osteoarthritis, rehabilitation time required for return to daily and sporting activities and levels of sporting activity which has returned in patients with status after an ACL rupture and suture repair augmented with a dynamic intraligamentary microfracture and stabilization of the femoral notch in comparison with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the ipsilateral hamstring graft.
Study design:
This study is a single center stratified block randomized controlled trial. Patients with ACL rupture, confirmed by an orthopedic surgeon based on the outpatient history and radiographic images, will be randomized into an experimental ('repair' / DIS) group after inclusion and a control (reconstruction, regular care) group. Patients will be stratified on the level of sport/physical active practice, on the basis of the Tegner score. The Tegner score is an evaluative and inventory questionnaire on which the patient indicates the gravity of his work and/or sports activities. A higher score is associated with a higher level of physical strain/activity . On the basis of the Tegner score patients will be stratified into a 'moderate' physically active stratum (group Tegner score 5-6-7) and 'highly' physically active stratum (group Tegner score 8 -9-10). Stratification based on the degree of physical activity is considered to be important because the extent and severity of physical activity/strain in daily life poses a potential (difference) in risk of re-rupture between the two study arms. In order to minimize potential differences in 'exposure' or 'risk of re-rupture' between the two study groups stratification is relevant.Measurements take place at baseline, peri-operative / immediately after surgery, 6 weeks, 3,6,9 months and 1, 2, 5 and 10 years postoperatively.
Study population: (Physically) active patients from 18 untill 30 years, who has visited the outpatient clinic of the orthopedic surgeon because of a knee injury resulting in a ACL rupture, for whom surgery indication for an ACL reconstruction exists and who can be operated on within three weeks after the onset of the ACL rupture.
Intervention:
n=48 patients will participate in the current study. Patients will be assigned to a suture repair of the ruptured vkb complemented by a dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) and microfracture of the femoral notch or the gold standard, a ACL reconstruction.
Primary study parameters/outcome of the study:
Self-reported functional outcome at one-year follow post surgery measured by the IKDC 2000 subjective scale.
Secundary study parameters/outcome of the study (if applicable):
Secondaire eindpunten: Self-reported functional outcome at one-year follow post surgery measured by the IKDC 2000 subjective scale 6 weeks, 3,6 and 9 months, 2,5 and 10 years post surgery, self-reported disabilities (KOOS), level of physical activity (Tegner), satisfaction (VAS) as well as IKDC physical examination (clinimetretrics) 6 weeks, 3, 6 en 9 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years post surgery; instrumented anteroposterior laxity, leg symmetry index for jump tests as well as isokinetic quadriceps en hamstrings force 6 en 9 months, 1, 2, 5 en 10 years after surgery; radiologic signs of arthrosis 1,2 5 and 10 years post surgery; reruptures of the ACL within 10 years post surgery, classification rupture pattern peroperative.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hengelo, Netherlands, 7555
- Orthopedisch Centrum Oost Nederland /ZGT
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Sportive, active patient (Tegner score =/>5)
- Age above 18 untill 30 years at time of inclusion
- Primary rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament, evidence by history (acute trauma, clicking sensation, swelling within a few hours, instability) and physical examination (positive Lachman, anterior drawer test and/or Pivot shift)
- Primary rupture indicated by MRI
- No associated ligamentuous disorde of the knee, evidenced by history, physical examination, x-ray or MRI)
- Time span between anterior cruciate ligament rupture and operation no longer than 21 days
- Willingness to comply to advised rehabilitation protocol supervised by (NFVS registrated) sports physiotherapist
Exclusion Criteria:
- Infection
- Known hypersensitive response for materials used (Cobalt, chroom, nickel)
- Serieus pre-existing malaligment of leg indicated for surgery
- Tendency for excessive scar tisseu formation, such as arthrofibrosis
- History of previous surgery on leg indicated for surgery
- History of removal of tendon on leg indicated for surgery
- Muscular, neurological or vascular disorders negatively affecting healing or rehabilitation
- Cartilage injury requiring (some kind of) cartilage repair surgery (such as microfracture or cell therapy)
- Arthrosis more dan ICRS grade 2 evidenced by x-ray
- Long(er) term use of relevant medication, such as prednisolon or cytostatica
- Pregnancy
- Know osteoporosis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: ACL Reconstruction
Primary reconstructive surgery of ACL with hamstring autograft (All-inside, Arthrex, Napels, Florida, USA)
|
reconstruction hamstring autograft
Other Names:
|
Experimental: ACL Repair
Primary augmented suture of ACL using Dynamic Intraligament Stabilization (DIS; Mathys Medical Bettlach, Switzerland)
|
augmented suture of acute ACL rupture (<3 weeks after injury)
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
IKDC 2000 subjective knee evaluation form
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months post surgery
|
questionniare/self-reported functional limitations in activitities of daily living and/or sports activities
|
baseline, 12 months post surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
IKDC 2000 subjective knee evaluation form
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
questionnaire/self-reported functional limitations in activitities of daily living and/or sports
|
baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
IKDC 2000 objective knee evaluation form
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
knee physical examination form / clinimetrics
|
baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
questionnaire designed to assess short and long term patient-related ouctome following knee injury on pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation, knee-related quality of life
|
baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
Tegner Activity Level Scale
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
Rating scale to determine the type and intensity of sports/activities
|
baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
Instrumented anteroposterior laxity
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
|
LSI jump-force testing
Time Frame: 6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
leg symmetry index for jump tests as well as isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring force tests
|
6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Reinjuries
Time Frame: up till 10 years post surgery
|
reinjuries or reruptures of the knee
|
up till 10 years post surgery
|
workability
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
questionnaire to assess the patient's workability due to knee injury/knee surgery in order to be able to make an estimation of costs benefits between study arms
|
baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
Classification of type of rupture of the ACL
Time Frame: during surgery
|
The surgeon's opinion regarding the classification of the type of rupture of the ACL peroperative.
|
during surgery
|
Complications associated with knee surgery and/or rehabilitation
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
The complications that occur as a result of the ACL surgery and/or rehabilitation in time.
|
baseline, 6 weeks, 3-6-9-12 months, 2-5-10 years post surgery
|
x-ray knee
Time Frame: 5 and 10 years post surgery
|
x-ray will be taken of the knee in order to be able to determine the degree of arthrosis
|
5 and 10 years post surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: R.A.G Hoogeslag, MD, OCON
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hoogeslag RAG, Brouwer RW, Boer BC, de Vries AJ, Huis In 't Veld R. Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Repair or Reconstruction? Two-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):567-577. doi: 10.1177/0363546519825878.
- Boer BC, Hoogeslag RAG, Brouwer RW, Demmer A, Huis In 't Veld RMHA. Self-reported functional recovery after reconstruction versus repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ROTOR): a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Apr 20;19(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2028-4.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NL5011604414
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
-
Bezirkskrankenhaus SchwazNot yet recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryAustria
-
eMKa MED Medical CenterWroclaw Medical UniversityRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Knee Injuries | Knee Ligament InjuryPoland
-
University of WashingtonCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | ACL Injury | ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureUnited States
-
eMKa MED Medical CenterWroclaw Medical UniversityRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Knee Injuries | Knee Ligament InjuryPoland
-
Miach OrthopaedicsActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoArthritis FoundationCompletedAcute Injury of Anterior Cruciate LigamentUnited States
-
Lynn Snyder-MacklerCompletedAcute Injury of Anterior Cruciate LigamentUnited States
-
Universidad de GranadaCompletedAcute Injury of Anterior Cruciate LigamentSpain
-
Rush University Medical CenterEnrolling by invitationAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryUnited States
-
Miach OrthopaedicsActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryUnited States
Clinical Trials on ACL reconstruction
-
Lars KonradsenUnknown
-
Larissa University HospitalUniversity of ThessalyRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesGreece
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...RecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesChina
-
Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre - FIFA Medical...Enrolling by invitationAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesPortugal
-
Schulthess KlinikRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament TearSwitzerland
-
University of Sao PauloUnknownComplete Tear, Knee, Anterior Cruciate Ligament | Rupture of Anterior Cruciate LigamentBrazil
-
University Medical Centre MariborActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionSlovenia
-
Indonesia UniversityUnknownAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Cartilage Damage | Knee InstabilityIndonesia
-
Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, BellinzonaClinical Trial Unit Ente Ospedaliero CantonaleRecruitingComplete Tear, Knee, Anterior Cruciate LigamentItaly, Switzerland
-
Tampere University HospitalCompleted