H-Wave® Device Stimulation for Post-operative Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery

March 30, 2026 updated by: Electronic Waveform Lab

Efficacy of H-Wave® Device Stimulation for Post-operative Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery: A Prospective, Single-center, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this intent-to-treat study is to evaluate the efficacy of H-Wave Device Stimulation following rotator cuff repair surgery. It is hypothesized that HWDS initiated immediately upon home arrival following rotator cuff repair will not only result in earlier range of motion recovery, but also in better pain relief, medication reduction, sleep quality, and functional recovery. The participants will be randomized into two groups: (a) Routine post-surgical care: standard protocols per procedure, including access to opioid and non-opioid pain medications, (b) Routine post-surgical care plus H-Wave® Device Stimulation (HWDS); and will be followed for 3 months post-surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66211
        • Sano
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew Dagget, DO, MBA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrew Witte, DO, MBA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew Cullen, DO
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • John Swab, DO
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Christopher Eckland, DO
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Daniel Farrell, MS, MD, FAAOS
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64151
        • Sano
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew Dagget, DO, MBA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrew Witte, DO, MBA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew Cullen, DO
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • John Swab, DO
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Christopher Eckland, DO
      • Lee's Summit, Missouri, United States, 64064
        • Sano
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew Dagget, DO, MBA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrew Witte, DO, MBA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew Cullen, DO
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • John Swab, DO
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Christopher Eckland, DO
      • Raymore, Missouri, United States, 64083
        • Sano
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew Dagget, DO, MBA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrew Witte, DO, MBA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew Cullen, DO
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • John Swab, DO
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Christopher Eckland, DO

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of full-thickness, or partial requiring surgical detachment, rotator cuff tear
  2. Primary rotator cuff repair (reattachment), with or without other necessary procedures, (e.g., biceps tenodesis, distal clavicle resection)
  3. Age 18-64 at time of enrollment
  4. Body mass index (BMI) <40 Kg/m2
  5. Females, sexually active and of childbearing age, must be willing to use a reliable form of birth control throughout study duration; Males, sexually active with partners of childbearing age must be willing to use contraceptive measures
  6. Be willing and capable of providing written informed consent to participate in the clinical study based on voluntary agreement, following thorough explanation of subject participation
  7. Be willing and capable of completing subjective evaluations, reading, understanding, and signing written questionnaires and informed consent
  8. Be willing and capable of complying with study-related requirements, procedures, and follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Excluded diagnosis and/or procedure and/or symptoms including infection, tumor, partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (not requiring surgical detachment), or other primary non-rotator cuff tear related shoulder surgery
  2. Morbid obesity with BMI ≥40 Kg/m2
  3. Pregnancy as determined by urine testing (unless surgically sterile or post-menopausal)
  4. Actively breastfeeding or desiring pregnancy during the study
  5. Prior H-Wave® device stimulation use
  6. Use of other home devices (e.g., TENS) within 2 weeks of screening visit
  7. Major psychological or psychiatric disorder
  8. Unresolved major secondary gain issues (e.g., social, financial, or legal) including worker's compensation with attorney representation
  9. Addiction or substance abuse history to opioids, controlled substances, alcohol, or illicit drugs
  10. Injectable steroids within 8 weeks of screening visit
  11. Implanted pacemaker, SCS, or other devices deemed unfit for inclusion by principal investigator
  12. History of progressive neurological disease
  13. History of immunosuppressive medication/treatment or cancer diagnosis within 5 years
  14. History of uncontrolled autoimmune disorders
  15. History of organ or hematologic transplantation
  16. Reported pain in other area(s) and/or medical condition(s) that could interfere with accurate pain reporting, study procedures, or confound study evaluations
  17. Participated in another clinical study or received treatment with any investigational product within 30 days
  18. From a vulnerable population, as defined by the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 45, Part 46, Section 46.111(b) and other local and national regulations, including but not limited to employees (temporary, part- time, full-time) or family members of the research staff conducting the study, or of the sponsor, contract research organization, or IRB/IEC
  19. Has any other condition(s) that, in the investigator's opinion, might indicate that the subject is unsuitable for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Routine post-surgical care plus H-Wave® Device Stimulation (HWDS)
Routine post-surgical care plus H-Wave® Device Stimulation (HWDS)
Active Comparator: Routine post-surgical care
Routine post-surgical care: standard protocols per procedure, including access to opioid and non-opioid pain medications

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Medication Usage
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
Amount of opioids (converted into morphine milligram equivalents) and other polypharmacy will be recorded, and change in usage of pain medications at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be determined.
Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
Change in pain intensity assessed via Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
0-10 Visual Analog Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable) will be used. Change in Pain intensity at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
Change in pain intensity assessed via Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
BPI Pain Items will be used (0- no pain, 10- pain as bad as you can imagine). Change in Pain intensity at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
Change in Function assessed via American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
Patient-reported improvement in functional improvement assessed via ASES. It involves pain and activities of daily living (0- unable to do, 3- not difficult) questionnaire. Change in function at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
Change in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
Patient will report their affected joint and opposite side as a percentage of normal (0 to 100% scale with 100% being normal). Change at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
Change in functional outcomes assessed via University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months and 3 months
UCLA shoulder score records patient-reported date (pain, function and satisfaction) along with clinician-reported findings (range of motion). Scores range from 0 to 35 with a score of 0 indicating worse shoulder function and 35 indicating better shoulder function. Change at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
Baseline, 2 months and 3 months
Change in Sleep Quality assessed via Brief Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
Rated on a scale of 0-21 (Score of 0-5: Good sleeper; >5: Poor sleeper). Change in sleep quality at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Active/Passive Range of Motion (AROM/PROM)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months and 3 months
Clinician will record Active and Passive Range of Motion for both Unaffected and Affected Shoulders. Change at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
Baseline, 2 months and 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Stephen M. Norwood, MD, FAAOS, Orthopaedic Surgeon
  • Principal Investigator: Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA, Sano Orthopaedics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tear Surgical Repair

Clinical Trials on Routine post-surgical care plus H-Wave® Device Stimulation (HWDS)

Subscribe