- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07501949
H-Wave® Device Stimulation for Post-operative Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery
March 30, 2026 updated by: Electronic Waveform Lab
Efficacy of H-Wave® Device Stimulation for Post-operative Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery: A Prospective, Single-center, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this intent-to-treat study is to evaluate the efficacy of H-Wave Device Stimulation following rotator cuff repair surgery.
It is hypothesized that HWDS initiated immediately upon home arrival following rotator cuff repair will not only result in earlier range of motion recovery, but also in better pain relief, medication reduction, sleep quality, and functional recovery.
The participants will be randomized into two groups: (a) Routine post-surgical care: standard protocols per procedure, including access to opioid and non-opioid pain medications, (b) Routine post-surgical care plus H-Wave® Device Stimulation (HWDS); and will be followed for 3 months post-surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
80
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: William J. Heaney Jr.
- Phone Number: 213-268-2619
- Email: BDshows@h-wave.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Heather Gorman
- Phone Number: 714-951-1917
- Email: hgorman@h-wave.com
Study Locations
-
-
Kansas
-
Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66211
- Sano
-
Contact:
- Becky Jones
- Phone Number: 512-468-8357
- Email: beckyofkansascity@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA
- Phone Number: 816-525-2840
- Email: mdempewolf@sanokc.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Matthew Dagget, DO, MBA
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Andrew Witte, DO, MBA
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Matthew Cullen, DO
-
Sub-Investigator:
- John Swab, DO
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Christopher Eckland, DO
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Daniel Farrell, MS, MD, FAAOS
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64151
- Sano
-
Contact:
- Becky Jones
- Phone Number: 512-468-8357
- Email: beckyofkansascity@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA
- Phone Number: 816-525-2840
- Email: mdempewolf@sanokc.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Matthew Dagget, DO, MBA
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Andrew Witte, DO, MBA
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Matthew Cullen, DO
-
Sub-Investigator:
- John Swab, DO
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Christopher Eckland, DO
-
Lee's Summit, Missouri, United States, 64064
- Sano
-
Contact:
- Becky Jones
- Phone Number: 512-468-8357
- Email: beckyofkansascity@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA
- Phone Number: 816-525-2840
- Email: mdempewolf@sanokc.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Matthew Dagget, DO, MBA
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Andrew Witte, DO, MBA
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Matthew Cullen, DO
-
Sub-Investigator:
- John Swab, DO
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Christopher Eckland, DO
-
Raymore, Missouri, United States, 64083
- Sano
-
Contact:
- Becky Jones
- Phone Number: 512-468-8357
- Email: beckyofkansascity@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA
- Phone Number: 816-525-2840
- Email: mdempewolf@sanokc.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Matthew Dagget, DO, MBA
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Andrew Witte, DO, MBA
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Matthew Cullen, DO
-
Sub-Investigator:
- John Swab, DO
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Christopher Eckland, DO
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of full-thickness, or partial requiring surgical detachment, rotator cuff tear
- Primary rotator cuff repair (reattachment), with or without other necessary procedures, (e.g., biceps tenodesis, distal clavicle resection)
- Age 18-64 at time of enrollment
- Body mass index (BMI) <40 Kg/m2
- Females, sexually active and of childbearing age, must be willing to use a reliable form of birth control throughout study duration; Males, sexually active with partners of childbearing age must be willing to use contraceptive measures
- Be willing and capable of providing written informed consent to participate in the clinical study based on voluntary agreement, following thorough explanation of subject participation
- Be willing and capable of completing subjective evaluations, reading, understanding, and signing written questionnaires and informed consent
- Be willing and capable of complying with study-related requirements, procedures, and follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria:
- Excluded diagnosis and/or procedure and/or symptoms including infection, tumor, partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (not requiring surgical detachment), or other primary non-rotator cuff tear related shoulder surgery
- Morbid obesity with BMI ≥40 Kg/m2
- Pregnancy as determined by urine testing (unless surgically sterile or post-menopausal)
- Actively breastfeeding or desiring pregnancy during the study
- Prior H-Wave® device stimulation use
- Use of other home devices (e.g., TENS) within 2 weeks of screening visit
- Major psychological or psychiatric disorder
- Unresolved major secondary gain issues (e.g., social, financial, or legal) including worker's compensation with attorney representation
- Addiction or substance abuse history to opioids, controlled substances, alcohol, or illicit drugs
- Injectable steroids within 8 weeks of screening visit
- Implanted pacemaker, SCS, or other devices deemed unfit for inclusion by principal investigator
- History of progressive neurological disease
- History of immunosuppressive medication/treatment or cancer diagnosis within 5 years
- History of uncontrolled autoimmune disorders
- History of organ or hematologic transplantation
- Reported pain in other area(s) and/or medical condition(s) that could interfere with accurate pain reporting, study procedures, or confound study evaluations
- Participated in another clinical study or received treatment with any investigational product within 30 days
- From a vulnerable population, as defined by the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 45, Part 46, Section 46.111(b) and other local and national regulations, including but not limited to employees (temporary, part- time, full-time) or family members of the research staff conducting the study, or of the sponsor, contract research organization, or IRB/IEC
- Has any other condition(s) that, in the investigator's opinion, might indicate that the subject is unsuitable for the study
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Routine post-surgical care plus H-Wave® Device Stimulation (HWDS)
|
Routine post-surgical care plus H-Wave® Device Stimulation (HWDS)
|
|
Active Comparator: Routine post-surgical care
|
Routine post-surgical care: standard protocols per procedure, including access to opioid and non-opioid pain medications
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Medication Usage
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
|
Amount of opioids (converted into morphine milligram equivalents) and other polypharmacy will be recorded, and change in usage of pain medications at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be determined.
|
Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
|
|
Change in pain intensity assessed via Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
|
0-10 Visual Analog Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable) will be used.
Change in Pain intensity at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
|
Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
|
|
Change in pain intensity assessed via Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
|
BPI Pain Items will be used (0- no pain, 10- pain as bad as you can imagine).
Change in Pain intensity at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
|
Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
|
|
Change in Function assessed via American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
|
Patient-reported improvement in functional improvement assessed via ASES.
It involves pain and activities of daily living (0- unable to do, 3- not difficult) questionnaire.
Change in function at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
|
Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
|
|
Change in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
|
Patient will report their affected joint and opposite side as a percentage of normal (0 to 100% scale with 100% being normal).
Change at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
|
Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
|
|
Change in functional outcomes assessed via University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months and 3 months
|
UCLA shoulder score records patient-reported date (pain, function and satisfaction) along with clinician-reported findings (range of motion).
Scores range from 0 to 35 with a score of 0 indicating worse shoulder function and 35 indicating better shoulder function.
Change at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
|
Baseline, 2 months and 3 months
|
|
Change in Sleep Quality assessed via Brief Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
|
Rated on a scale of 0-21 (Score of 0-5: Good sleeper; >5: Poor sleeper).
Change in sleep quality at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
|
Baseline, 6-8days, 3-4weeks, 2 months and 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Active/Passive Range of Motion (AROM/PROM)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months and 3 months
|
Clinician will record Active and Passive Range of Motion for both Unaffected and Affected Shoulders.
Change at follow-up visit(s) compared to baseline will be evaluated.
|
Baseline, 2 months and 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Stephen M. Norwood, MD, FAAOS, Orthopaedic Surgeon
- Principal Investigator: Michael J. Dempewolf, DO, MBA, Sano Orthopaedics
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 24, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
March 30, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 3, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 30, 2026
Last Verified
March 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- EWL - 2026/PORCR
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tear Surgical Repair
-
Rush University Medical CenterSmith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedRotator Cuff Tear Repair Anchors
-
Borja Alcobía-Díaz MD, PhDNot yet recruiting
-
University of ValenciaNot yet recruitingRotator Cuff Tear | Rotator Cuff Repair | Rotator Cuff InjuryChile
-
Samsung Medical CenterRecruitingRotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy | Repair of a Cuff TearSouth Korea
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedRotator Cuff Injuries | Supraspinatus Tear | Rotator Cuff Repair RehabilitionEgypt
-
Beijing Jishuitan HospitalEnrolling by invitationFull Rotator Cuff Tear | Microfracture Procedure | Double Raw Repair | Lateral Raw RepairChina
-
Beijing Jishuitan HospitalRecruitingFull Rotator Cuff Tear | Microfracture Procedure | Double Raw RepairChina
-
César Fernández-de-las-PeñasCompletedProximal Humeral Fracture Fixated With PHILOS© Plate | Rotator Cuff Tear Surgical RepairSpain
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityNot yet recruitingRotator Cuff Tears | Partial Tear of Rotator CuffTurkey
-
Gazi UniversityEnrolling by invitationEarly Retears and Clinical Outcomes Following Surgical Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff TearsTurkey
Clinical Trials on Routine post-surgical care plus H-Wave® Device Stimulation (HWDS)
-
RS MedicalAccelerated Care Plus; Research Institute of Health and Science (RIHSE)Completed
-
Minia UniversityCompletedPeriodontitis | Splints | Minimally Invasive Treatment | Stage IV PeriodontitisEgypt