Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Amniotic Membrane Composite for Supraspinatus Tendon Repair Augmentation

December 15, 2020 updated by: Dr. Soetomo General Hospital

The Efficacy of Using Allogeneic Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Human Amniotic Membrane (AAdMSC-HAM) Composite for Supraspinatus Tendon Repair Augmentation

This is a non-randomized clinical trial conducted in a single tertiary hospital which investigates the efficacy of allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and human amniotic membrane (AAdMSC-HAM) composite for supraspinatus tendon repair augmentation

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Supraspinatus tendon tear is the most common factor causing shoulder pain, mainly resulting in discomfort and functional deficit in individuals over the age of 35. Supraspinatus tendon repair surgery represents one of the most widely performed types of orthopedic operation. Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding tendon-to-bone healing during the postoperative period. Despite advancements in surgical technique, re-tear of a previously repaired supraspinatus tendon is a fairly common complication, especially in a larger size tear. Such repair technique employing suture anchor devices alone has not yet produced functional results demonstrating both anatomical and biomechanical properties. Therefore, tendon tissue engineering using a combination of scaffolds, cells, and growth factors stimulation offers a potential solution as a biological augmentation in tendon repair.

Human amniotic membrane (HAM) has been widely used as a natural scaffold in tissue engineering due to many of its unique properties such as providing growth factors, cytokines and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases, adequate mechanical strength, and biocompatibility. Whereas, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) constitute one of the adult stem cells that promote replacement and repair of damaged tissue along with normal tissue turnover. These MSCs are seeded to the HAM scaffolds to biologically augment tendon repair, with MSCs acting as cytokines/growth factors to stimulate tissue repair. This approach serves as the foundation to conduct the present study. The investigators aim to investigate the efficacy of using allogeneic adipose-derived MSCs and human amniotic membrane (AAdMSC-HAM) composite for supraspinatus tendon repair augmentation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • East Java
      • Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia, 60286
        • Recruiting
        • Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital/ Department Orthopaedic & Traumatology Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga
        • Contact:
          • Heri Suroto, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

31 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Suffering from complete/total tear of supraspinatus tendon for a duration of fewer than 12 months
  • Diagnosis is established based on clinical condition and ultrasonography or MRI examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with comorbid diseases: Diabetes Mellitus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and other inflammatory diseases.
  • Patients presenting with other related injuries, such as fractures or dislocation around the shoulder joint.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group (Tendon repair)
The control group will undergo tendon repair procedure only (without augmentation)

Tendon repair procedure:

  1. Single senior surgeon (HS) will perform mini-open surgery to decompress the acromioplasty and repair the supraspinatus tendon.
  2. Splicing is achieved by installing screw-type anchors on the insertional footprint of the humeral head greater tuberosity.
  3. Then, double suturing of the supraspinatus tendon is performed.
Experimental: Experimental group (Tendon repair augmented with AAdMSC-HAM composite)
The experimental group will undergo tendon repair procedure augmented with AAdMSC-HAM composite
After double suturing of the supraspinatus tendon, the composite comprising freeze-dried HAM (2 cm x 2 cm x 0.002 cm) and AAdMSC (20 million cells) is placed on the upper surface of the splice and fixed with stitches at all four corners.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Active range of motion (AROM) pre-surgery
Time Frame: Pre-surgery

Shoulder: flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, external rotation, internal rotation.

The tests are performed by two blinded assessor, and expressed in degrees.

Pre-surgery
Active range of motion (AROM) at 12 months follow-up
Time Frame: 12 months

Shoulder: flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, external rotation, internal rotation.

The tests are performed by two blinded assessor, and expressed in degrees.

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain pre-surgery
Time Frame: Pre-surgery Outcome
Measured by visual analogue scales (VAS). Patients are asked to described their level of pain from the scale 0 to 10 (0 indicating no pain, 1-3 indicating mild pain, 4-6 indicating moderate pain, 7-9 indicating severe pain, and 10 indicating the worst, unbearable pain). The lower scores mean a better pain outcome
Pre-surgery Outcome
Pain at follow-up 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Measured by visual analogue scales (VAS). Patients are asked to described their level of pain from the scale 0 to 10 (0 indicating no pain, 1-3 indicating mild pain, 4-6 indicating moderate pain, 7-9 indicating severe pain, and 10 indicating the worst, unbearable pain). The lower scores mean a better pain outcome
12 months
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score pre-surgery
Time Frame: Pre-surgery
DASH score is a self-assessment of symptoms and function of the entire upper extremity comprising 30 items. Each item consists of five levels of answers (1=no difficulty/symptoms, 2=mild difficulty/symptoms, 3=moderate difficulty/symptoms, 4=severe difficulty/symptoms, and 5=extreme difficulty (unable to do)/symptoms). The scores are then used to calculate a scale score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability). Greater DASH scores reflect greater disability (worse outcome).
Pre-surgery
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at follow-up 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
DASH score is a self-assessment of symptoms and function of the entire upper extremity comprising 30 items. Each item consists of five levels of answers (1=no difficulty/symptoms, 2=mild difficulty/symptoms, 3=moderate difficulty/symptoms, 4=severe difficulty/symptoms, and 5=extreme difficulty (unable to do)/symptoms). The scores are then used to calculate a scale score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability). Greater DASH scores reflect greater disability (worse outcome).
12 months
Constant-Murley Score (CS) pre-surgery
Time Frame: Pre-surgery
The scoring system records individual parameters and provides an overall clinical functional assessment. It consists of 4 domains: pain, activities of daily living (ADL), mobility, and power/strength. Pain and ADL are self-assessed, while all other items are assessed by the blinded examiner. A higher score shows a better function (100 as the best), while a lower score shows a worse function (0 as the worst).
Pre-surgery
Constant-Murley Score (CS) at follow-up 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
The scoring system records individual parameters and provides an overall clinical functional assessment. It consists of 4 domains: pain, activities of daily living (ADL), mobility, and power/strength. Pain and ADL are self-assessed, while all other items are assessed by the blinded examiner. A higher score shows a better function (100 as the best), while a lower score shows a worse function (0 as the worst).
12 months
Tear recurrence (re-tear)
Time Frame: Throughout the study duration (12 months), recorded as the first time complained by the patients (i.e. after "n" months).
A systematic review (D'Ambrosi et al., 2019) showed that re-tear rates after rotator cuff repair with scaffolds were 17.97%. We hypothesize that the augmentation using HAM (as scaffold) seeded with AAdMSC would further lower the re-tear rates. We plan to record the recurrence of supraspinatus tendon tear (if any) based on radiographic evaluation with ultrasonography, which will then be confirmed with MRI. Ultrasonography provides an excellent anatomical evaluation of soft tissue which is able to assess any alterations during active locomotion. However, due to its user-dependent nature, we will also confirm the findings with MRI examination. Any grade of re-tear (grade I-III as evaluated by ultrasonography and confirmed with MRI) will be counted in and classified as "re-tear". When the patients do not complain about any symptoms of re-tear, we will record them as "no re-tear".
Throughout the study duration (12 months), recorded as the first time complained by the patients (i.e. after "n" months).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heri Suroto, MD, PhD, Cell and Tissue Bank-Regenerative Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Indonesia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Supraspinatus Tear

Clinical Trials on Tendon repair procedure

Subscribe