Evaluation of Osteopathic Protocol on Rachialgia, Bis (PO2S (2))

June 18, 2026 updated by: Cabinet d'ostéopathie Michel Boeuf

Second Study on the Osteopathic Protocol in 2 Sessions (PO2S) for Patients Suffering From Acute or Subacute Non-specific Back Pain: a Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial

Rachialgia are among the most common reasons for consultation with the general practitioner in Europe. Most of the guidelines recommend spinal manipulation. This study attempts to propose a solution with 2 parts: tests of induced pain that have a greater sensitivity than palpatory tests of movements and a comprehensive musculoskeletal treatment protocol. The objective of this bicentric study is to reevaluate the effectiveness of the two-session osteopathic protocol (PO2S), this time by another osteopath, as part of a multicenter validation program.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Rachialgia, whether it is cervicalgia, chest pain or low back pain, are among the most common reasons for consultation with the general practitioner in Europe.

In 2018, the therapeutic strategies for non-specific acute and subacute spine are diverse based on country clinical practice guidelines. Recommendations are rest or maintenance of normal activity, medications, surgery, psychological support, physiotherapy, acupuncture and manipulations.

Most of the guidelines, notably from Germany, Belgium, France, England and the United States, recommend spinal manipulation. In general, it can be recommended alone, or accompanied by usual care, or integrated into a multimodal treatment program. May be recommended in acute, chronic or not recommended.

The strength of osteopathy is that it tries to understand the musculoskeletal balance as a whole.

However, the differences in recommendations can be explained by the weaknesses of osteopathy, which are related to a technical and methodological problem.

The first technical problem is at the level of osteopathic clinical examination. While much of this clinical examination is based on palpatory tests, there is evidence that these range of motion palpatory tests have low sensitivity regardless of the examiner's experience.

The second methodological problem is the use of protocols. study addresses two major challenges: first, by proposing clinical examination tests based on induced pain, which demonstrate greater sensitivity than traditional palpatory movement tests; and second, by applying a structured and reproducible musculoskeletal treatment protocol. This approach is designed to ensure both reliability and validity, in line with core osteopathic principles, while meeting the standards of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM).

The objective of this bicentric study is to reassess the effectiveness of the Osteopathic Protocol in 2 Sessions (PO2S), as part of a broader multicenter validation process, this time applied by a different osteopath.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South
      • Noumea, South, New Caledonia, 98800
        • Cabinet d'ostéopathie 23 quai Jules Ferry 98800 Nouméa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with acute or subacute cervico-dorsalgia or lumbo-dorsalgia (less than 3 months)
  • Patients who gave their informed consent to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose specific spine is caused by inflammatory, tumor, infectious disease or back trauma in the past 3 months
  • Patients with a history of back surgery and/or vertebral fracture in the past 6 months
  • Patients with a motor disability related to the reason for consultation
  • Pregnant women over six months.
  • Patients not communicating or unable to understand the course of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PO2S - Control
This arm will start with PO2S, followed by Control. The PO2S consists of two sessions of 30 minutes each, one week apart, composed of normalizations of joint, muscular, ligament and visceral dysfunctions . Control is a treatment in 2 sessions that is like PO2S but is not an active osteopathic treatment. A light touch will be made for fictitious normalizations.

PO2S works on the principle that there is a concordance between the author's Preferential Torsion Pattern (PTP) and the rotatory direction of osteopathic dysfunctions.

The PO2S consists of two sessions of 30 minutes each, one week apart. A 13-item clinical examination is performed at the first session. It focuses on caused pain tests, and classifies patients in left or right PTP. During the first session 14 normalizations of joint, muscular, ligament and visceral dysfunctions are performed systematically. During the second session 10 normalizations of joint, muscular, ligament and visceral dysfunctions are performed .

PO2S is an innovative osteopathic protocol for back pain.

Experimental: Control - PO2S
This arm will start with Control, followed by the PO2S. PO2S consists of two sessions of 30 minutes each, one week apart, composed of normalizations of joint, muscular, ligament and visceral dysfunctions . Control is a treatment in 2 sessions that is like PO2S but is not an active osteopathic treatment. A light touch will be made for fictitious normalizations.

PO2S works on the principle that there is a concordance between the author's Preferential Torsion Pattern (PTP) and the rotatory direction of osteopathic dysfunctions.

The PO2S consists of two sessions of 30 minutes each, one week apart. A 13-item clinical examination is performed at the first session. It focuses on caused pain tests, and classifies patients in left or right PTP. During the first session 14 normalizations of joint, muscular, ligament and visceral dysfunctions are performed systematically. During the second session 10 normalizations of joint, muscular, ligament and visceral dysfunctions are performed .

PO2S is an innovative osteopathic protocol for back pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline of pain level after 2 sessions
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks
Pain level will be collected using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (from 0 to 10, where 10 means maximal intensity) before the first session of each protocol and one week after the second session (14 days).
Baseline and 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of pain improvement since previous visit
Time Frame: Week 1 and week 2
The percent improvement will be used to assess the degree of improvement in pain experienced since the first visit. It will be expressed in %, the caregiver asking the patient to quantify the percentage of pain improvement on a virtual scale ranging from 0 for no improvement to 100 for complete pain disappearance.
Week 1 and week 2
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Week 2
The satisfaction score will be used to assess patient satisfaction with treatment and management. It will be calculated on a virtual scale ranging from 0 for zero satisfaction to 10 for a total satisfaction
Week 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PO2S (2)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spine Injuries and Disorders

Clinical Trials on Osteopathic Protocol in 2 Sessions (PO2S)

3
Subscribe