- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05456633
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Spine Surgeries Utilizing Capri Cervical and Thoracolumbar Corpectomy Cage Systems
Multi-Center, Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation for Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Spine Surgeries Utilizing Capri Cervical and Thoracolumbar Corpectomy Cage Systems: Observational Post Market Clinical Follow-Up Study
This is a retrospective and prospective observational, multi center study of subjects who have undergone or will undergo vertebral body replacement surgery in the cervical or thoracolumbar spine utilizing Stryker Capri Corpectomy Cages.
The primary study hypothesis to determine effectiveness, is that the mean improvement in NDI (cervical) or ODI (thoracolumbar) score from baseline meets or exceeds 15-points at 24 months for Stryker Capri Corpectomy Cage systems individually.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Corpectomy procedures are utilized to treat a variety of spinal pathologies including tumor, often as a result of metastatic spine disease, fracture frequently attributed to trauma, osteomyelitis (infection), and degenerative disorders which require reconstruction to achieve decompression of the spinal cord or neural tissues. Patients may present with pain, spinal instability, and neurological deficits. Corpectomy involves a resection or excision of the affected vertebrae and intervertebral disc(s), followed by placement of a vertebral body replacement (VBR) to reconstruct the anterior column of the spine and restore stability and alignment.
Common indications for VBR procedures include spinal instability due to vertebral fractures, vertebral compression fractures, and fractures related to malignancy or infection and control of disease, such as metastatic disease in the spine. Causes of spinal fractures may include falls, sports, and motor vehicle accidents. Spinal tumors are often caused by metastases of the skeletal system, which commonly affect the spine. Additionally, VBR procedures may be considered in response to cervical spondylotic myelopathy which is a progressive degenerative disease and a common cause of cervical spinal cord dysfunction and cervical myelopathy in people over the age of 55. Corpectomy (or vertebrectomy) with reconstruction has become a common surgical procedure used for decompression and reconstruction of the spine. Traditionally, reconstruction has included autograft, allograft, and bone substitutes; however, the use of grafts alone have been reported to lead to complications such as donor site morbidity, high rates of pseudarthrosis, and delayed union. The evolution of corpectomy cages has led to improvements in both clinical and radiographic outcomes. Titanium mesh cages were one of the earliest types of non-graft-based corpectomy cages, providing a biocompatible method of rapidly stabilizing the affected segments, reducing donor site morbidity, and improving outcomes.
This study will examine use of the Capri Corpectomy Cage systems in cervical and/or thoracolumbar cases in the treatment of trauma, tumor, infection (cervical only), or degeneration (cervical only) using static (cervical only) or expandable (cervical and thoracolumbar) cages. Clinical efficacy and safety will be assessed in this post-market study through evaluation of patient outcomes in comparison to baseline, pre-operative conditions.
Capri Corpectomy system implants are VBR devices that are designed in a variety of lengths, widths, and heights to match the patient's anatomy. The caudal and cephalad ends of the implant have teeth which are designed to engage with the vertebral body endplates. The side walls of the implants contain windows that may be used for graft incorporation. Instruments are used for inserting the associated implant components using standard surgical techniques. There are curettes, scrapers, and box chisels for preparing the disc spaces and vertebral body endplates. Insertion instruments are available for inserting the implant. Capri Corpectomy Cage systems are available as cervical static cages (comprised of titanium alloy) and cervical or thoracolumbar adjustable (i.e., expandable) cages (comprised of titanium alloy and cobalt chrome). Devices may be implanted via posterior, anterior, or lateral approaches.
Study Type
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
The sample size for this study will be a total of 126 subjects planned to receive one of the Capri Corpectomy systems mentioned below at up to 20 sites in the United State:
- 42 subjects for Capri Cervical 3D Static
- 42 subjects for Capri Cervical 3D Expandable
- 42 subjects for Capri Thoracolumbar Expandable This sample size allows for up to a 15% loss-to-follow-up at 24 months. The sample size analysis below indicates that N=36 per device are needed for 80% power to meet the a priori performance goal
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Skeletally mature
- Willingness and ability to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow-up requirements
- Willing and able to sign a study specific informed consent form. For fully retrospective enrollments, i.e., subjects that already have 24-month follow-up data available, the Principal Investigator will request a waiver of the written informed consent requirement.
- Has undergone or will undergo VBR in the cervical spine (C2 to T1 in the USA, C3 to C7 outside of the USA) using either Capri Cervical 3D Static OR Capri Cervical 3D Expandable to replace diseased or damaged vertebral bodies due to tumor, trauma (i.e., fracture), or osteomyelitis, or for reconstruction following corpectomy performed to achieve decompression of the spine cord and neural tissues in cervical degenerative disorders -OR- Has undergone or will undergo VBR in the thoracolumbar spine (T1 to L5) using Capri Thoracolumbar Expandable to replace collapsed, damaged, or unstable vertebral bodies due to tumor or trauma (i.e., fracture)
- Score at least 30 points on the ODI or at least 30 points on the NDI at screening (or before surgery for retrospective enrollment) (on a 100-point scale)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of infection, except within the spinal indications for use of this product
- Pregnancy (pregnant at the time of enrollment or intends to become pregnant during the course of the study)
- Metabolic disorders of calcified tissues
- Grossly distorted anatomy
- Inadequate tissue coverage
- Drug / alcohol abuse
- Mental illness such as a psychiatric or cognitive impairment, that in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the study requirements or patient reported outcomes (e.g., Alzheimer's Disease)
- General neurological conditions
- Immunosuppressive disorders
- Subjects with known sensitivities to materials in the device
- Obesity defined as a BMI greater than 30
- Subjects who are unwilling to restrict activities or follow medical advice
- Any condition where the implants interfere with anatomical structures or precludes the benefit of spinal surgery
Biological factors such as smoking, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, use of anticoagulants, etc.
- Subjects that adhere to the specified washout period detailed below can be enrolled: Smoking cessation must occur at a minimum of 4 weeks prior to surgery; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) should be stopped at a minimum of 7 days prior to surgery; Anticoagulants should be stopped at the discretion of the operating surgeon as the washout period varies for each medication
- Trauma subjects that are unable to adhere to the washout period can be enrolled; however, the aforementioned biological factors will need to be documented during data collection
- Prior fusion at the level(s) to be treated
- Incarcerated at the time of study enrollment
- Current participation in an investigational study that may impact study outcomes
- Involved in current or pending spinal litigation or a workman compensation claim
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Capri Cervical 3D Static
Subjects who have undergone or will undergo VBR in the cervical spine (C2 to T1 in the USA, C3 to C7 outside of the USA) to replace diseased or damaged vertebral bodies due to tumor, trauma (i.e., fracture), or osteomyelitis, or for reconstruction following corpectomy performed to achieve decompression of the spine cord and neural tissues in cervical degenerative disorders
|
When used in the cervical spine (C2-T1), CAPRI Static cages are intended for use in skeletally mature patients to replace a diseased or damaged vertebral body caused by tumor, fracture, or osteomyelitis, or for reconstruction following corpectomy performed to achieve decompression of the spinal cord and neural tissues in cervical degenerative disorders.
|
Capri Cervical 3D Expendable
Subjects who have undergone or will undergo VBR in the cervical spine (C2 to T1 in the USA, C3 to C7 outside of the USA) to replace diseased or damaged vertebral bodies due to tumor, trauma (i.e., fracture), or osteomyelitis, or for reconstruction following corpectomy performed to achieve decompression of the spine cord and neural tissues in cervical degenerative disorders
|
When used in the cervical spine (C2-T1), CAPRI Static Expandable cages are intended for use in skeletally mature patients to replace a diseased or damaged vertebral body caused by tumor, fracture, or osteomyelitis, or for reconstruction following corpectomy performed to achieve decompression of the spinal cord and neural tissues in cervical degenerative disorders.
|
Capri Thoracolumbar Expandable
Subjects who have undergone or will undergo VBR in the thoracolumbar spine (T1 to L5) with Capri Thoracolumbar Expandable to replace collapsed, damaged, or unstable vertebral bodies due to tumor or trauma (i.e., fracture)
|
Intended for use to replace a collapsed, damaged, or unstable vertebral body due to tumor and trauma (i.e.
fracture).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean improvement in NDI score
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
Mean improvement in NDI score over baseline that meets or exceeds 15 points (on a 100 point scale) at 24 months (cervical)
|
24 Months
|
Mean ODI improvement
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
Mean ODI improvement over baseline that meets or exceeds 15 points (on a 100-point scale) at 24 months (thoracolumbar)
|
24 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
NDI or ODI
Time Frame: Initial Post-Op to 24 Months
|
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
|
Initial Post-Op to 24 Months
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Initial Post-Op to 24 Months
|
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
|
Initial Post-Op to 24 Months
|
EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ 5D-5L)
Time Frame: Initial Post-Op to 24 Months
|
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
|
Initial Post-Op to 24 Months
|
Fusion or non-union
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
Radiographic Assessments: Effectiveness
|
24 Months
|
Range of motion
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
Radiographic Assessments: Effectiveness
|
24 Months
|
Translational motion
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
Radiographic Assessments: Effectiveness
|
24 Months
|
Disc height
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
Radiographic Assessments: Effectiveness
|
24 Months
|
Surgery Time
Time Frame: During Surgery
|
Clinical Observations
|
During Surgery
|
Anesthesia Time
Time Frame: During Surgery
|
Clinical Observations
|
During Surgery
|
Estimated blood loss
Time Frame: During Surgery
|
Clinical Observations
|
During Surgery
|
Length of hospital stay on day of Surgery / Pre-Discharge
Time Frame: During Surgery
|
Clinical Observations
|
During Surgery
|
Patient Satisfaction at 12 Month
Time Frame: 12 Months
|
Clinical Observations
|
12 Months
|
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
Clinical Observations
|
24 Months
|
Use of pain medication post surgery at all visits
Time Frame: Post surgery - 24 Months
|
Clinical Observations
|
Post surgery - 24 Months
|
Neurological Examination
Time Frame: 12 Months
|
Clinical Observations
|
12 Months
|
Subsidence
Time Frame: 12 and 24 Months
|
X-Ray Safety Assessment
|
12 and 24 Months
|
Device Migration
Time Frame: 12 and 24 Months
|
X-Ray Safety Assessment
|
12 and 24 Months
|
Adjacent Segment Degeneration
Time Frame: 12 and 24 Months
|
X-Ray Safety Assessment
|
12 and 24 Months
|
Device and supplemental fixation breakage
Time Frame: 12 and 24 Months
|
X-Ray Safety Assessment
|
12 and 24 Months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CAS-031
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cervical Spine Injury
-
Julie LeonardRecruitingCervical Spine InjuryUnited States
-
Nicklaus Children's Hospital f/k/a Miami Children...Florida International UniversityCompletedIntubation; Difficult | Cervical Spine InjuryUnited States
-
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University HospitalCompletedDifficult Intubation | Cervical Injury SpineGermany
-
KU LeuvenWithdrawnInjury of Cervical Spine | Cervical Spine FracturesBelgium
-
Kocaeli UniversityCompletedInjury of Cervical SpineTurkey
-
StemCells, Inc.TerminatedStudy of Human Central Nervous System (CNS) Stem Cell Transplantation in Cervical Spinal Cord InjuryCervical Spinal Cord Injury | Spine Injury | Cervical Spine InjuryUnited States, Canada
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephActive, not recruiting
-
Blaz BarunRecruitingWhiplash Injury of Cervical SpineCroatia
-
University of Massachusetts, WorcesterCompleted
Clinical Trials on Capri Cervical Static
-
Goethe UniversityCompletedRandomized Controlled Trial | Fascia | Myofascial | StretchingGermany
-
Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand ParisUnknownMetastatic Cancer | Hematological MalignancyFrance
-
Maharishi Markendeswar University (Deemed to be...Completed
-
Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of CórdobaCompletedMuscular EnduranceBrazil, Spain
-
University of FloridaChildren's Miracle NetworkCompleted
-
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteCompletedNeuromuscular Manifestations
-
Yuksek Ihtisas UniversityCompletedMuscle Stretching ExercisesTurkey
-
Sahachat AueyingsakUnknownCardiovascular Responses in Elderly With Isolated Systolic HypertensionThailand
-
University of California, San FranciscoUniversity of California, Berkeley; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality...CompletedDepression | Diabetes | Physical ActivityUnited States
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedEffects of Percussive Massage Treatment With Theragun on Post Exercise Delayed Onset Muscle SorenessDelayed Onset Muscle SorenessPakistan