Effect of Different Cavity Designs on the Clinical Performance of 3D- Printed Resin Composite Partial-Coverage Restorations in Vital Molars

June 19, 2026 updated by: Lilly Assem Mousa Ahmed, Cairo University

Effect of Different Cavity Designs on the Clinical Performance of 3D- Printed Resin Composite Partial-Coverage Restorations in Vital Molars With Complex Cavities: An 18 Month Randomized Clinical Trial

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of different cavity designs on the clinical performance of 3D-printed resin composite partial-coverage restorations in vital molars with complex cavities over an 18-month follow-up period.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Despite these material advancements, growing evidence indicates that cavity preparation design exerts a greater influence on the clinical performance of indirect restorations than material selection alone. However, current evidence regarding preparation design is predominantly derived from in vitro studies and remains inadequately validated under clinical conditions, particularly in vital molars. Although recent randomized clinical trials have begun to address this gap, available data remain limited and largely confined to endodontically treated teeth. Therefore, a rigorously designed randomized clinical trial is warranted to evaluate the influence of different cavity preparation designs on the clinical performance of indirect restorations in vital molars.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients aging 20-45 years.
  2. Healthy males and females
  3. Patients with good oral hygiene
  4. Patients presenting with at least one eligible permanent molar requiring a partial-coverage restoration.
  5. Patients willing and able to attend scheduled follow-up visits for 18 months.
  6. Permanent maxillary or mandibular molars.
  7. Vital teeth with a positive response to cold thermal testing.
  8. Complex Large or severely compromised cavities resulting from primary or secondary caries (ICDAS 5 or 6) and/or replacement of large defective restorations with at least 2 missing cavity walls requiring overlay restorations
  9. Well-formed and fully erupted in normal functional occlusion with natural antagonist and adjacent teeth.
  10. Absence of any radiographic, periodontal or periapical changes.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with general/systemic illness.
  2. Pregnant or lactating females.
  3. Concomitant participation in another research study.
  4. Inability or unwillingness to comply with study visits and procedures.
  5. Heavy bruxism or other parafunctional habits
  6. Known allergic reactions against any components of the used materials
  7. Patients receiving orthodontic treatment.
  8. Poor oral hygiene or high caries activity.
  9. Non vital teeth.
  10. Hypersensitive teeth.
  11. Teeth with prior endodontic treatment.
  12. Teeth with spontaneous pain or signs/symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.
  13. Teeth with advanced periodontal disease or mobility.
  14. Teeth with a history of direct or indirect pulp capping procedure.
  15. Teeth with vertical root fractures or cracked tooth syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Anatomical cavity design preparation
Following caries excavation and removal of defective restorations, cavity preparations will be carried out according to the accepted principles of adhesive overlays. The cavity walls will be prepared with 6-12° internal axial wall divergence using blue-coded tapered round-end diamond burs (Komet, USA) and subsequently finished using extra-fine yellow-coded tapered round-end diamond burs (#368EF, Komet, USA). The thickness of potentially maintainable cusps will be assessed using a dental caliper (Diamonds Surgical Instruments, Pakistan). Weakened or undermined cusps (less than 2 mm thickness) will be reduced using the same diamond burs to create an anatomical occlusal reduction following the natural tooth morphology, with a reduction of 2 mm.
Cavity preparation design for adhesive restoration
Active Comparator: Butt joint cavity design preparation
The cavity walls will be prepared with 6-12° internal axial wall divergence using blue-coded tapered round-end diamond burs (Komet, USA) and subsequently finished using extra-fine yellow-coded tapered round-end diamond burs (#368EF, Komet, USA). The thickness of potentially maintainable cusps will be assessed using a dental caliper (Diamonds Surgical Instruments, Pakistan). The occlusal reduction design, where weakened or undermined cusps will be reduced using a wheel stone (#909, Komet, USA) to create a flat butt-joint occlusal design with a uniform occlusal reduction of 2 mm. Additional reduction will be performed when necessary, and the available interocclusal clearance will be verified using a graduated periodontal probe in maximum intercuspation and eccentric movements.
Cavity preparation design for adhesive restoration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fracture
Time Frame: 18 Months
Modified USPHS Ryge Criteria (Ordinal scoring system)
18 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, wear/anatomic form, secondary caries and surface texture
Time Frame: 18 Months
Modified USPHS Ryge Criteria (Ordinal scoring system)
18 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Effect of Cavity Designs

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Clinical Performance

Clinical Trials on Anatomical cavity design preparation

Subscribe