A Clinical Study of Connective Tissue Graft and Enamel Matrix Derivative in the Treatment of Intrabony Periodontal Defects (CTG + EMD)

November 16, 2025 updated by: Phạm Đình Thiên Khải

Efficacy of Connective Tissue Graft Wall Technique and Enamel Matrix Derivative in the Regenerative Treatment of Intrabony Periodontal Defects: A Prospective Clinical Study

This clinical study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of periodontal regenerative surgery using the connective tissue graft (CTG) wall technique combined with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in patients who have intrabony periodontal defects. The purpose is to determine whether this combined approach can enhance both bone regeneration and soft-tissue stability compared with the patient's initial condition.

Eligible participants will receive periodontal surgery in which a connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivative are applied to the defect site. The study will monitor clinical improvements such as attachment gain, reduction in pocket depth, bone fill observed on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and stability of the gingival margin and soft-tissue thickness. Clinical parameters (probing depth and attachment level) are recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Gingival and hygiene parameters (recession, gingival thickness, plaque, and bleeding scores) are assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Radiographic bone outcomes are measured at baseline and 6 months, and early wound healing is assessed at 1 and 2 weeks.

The main goal is to assess whether CTG + EMD treatment provides predictable periodontal regeneration, improved tissue stability, and better esthetic outcomes for patients with periodontitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, single-group interventional clinical trial conducted at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City to evaluate the effectiveness of the connective tissue graft (CTG) wall technique combined with enamel matrix derivative (EMD, Emdogain®, Straumann) in the regenerative treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. The study included 17 patients diagnosed with stage III-IV periodontitis who presented with radiographically confirmed intrabony defects suitable for regenerative therapy.

All participants received treatment following a standardized periodontal surgical protocol. After local anesthesia, a split-thickness vestibular releasing flap was prepared to allow coronal advancement, with external reflection of the papilla at the defect site. Thorough degranulation and root surface debridement were performed using ultrasonic and hand instruments. The root surface was conditioned with 24% EDTA gel for 2 minutes, rinsed with saline, and then enamel matrix derivative was applied onto the root surface and into the defect. A palatal connective tissue graft harvested using the four-incision technique was de-epithelialized, trimmed to span the papillae, and sutured to the buccal flap to form a stable soft-tissue wall. The flap was coronally advanced and secured with horizontal mattress and interrupted sutures to achieve tension-free primary closure.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes are evaluated at multiple time points.

Clinical parameters: probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.

Soft-tissue and hygiene parameters: gingival recession (buccal and interproximal), gingival thickness, full-mouth plaque score (FMPS), and full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months.

Radiographic parameters: infrabony defect depth, buccal bone dehiscence, suprabony component, and defect angle measured on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at baseline and 6 months.

Early wound healing: assessed at 1 and 2 weeks using the Early Healing Index (EHI).

The study was conducted at the Department of Periodontology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, between June 2024 and August 2025. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (Approval No. 716/HĐĐĐ-ĐHYD, dated June 13, 2024). All participants provided written informed consent before enrollment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ho Chi Minh City
      • Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 700000
        • University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City - Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults ≥18 years old who can provide written informed consent.
  • Diagnosis of stage III-IV periodontitis (2017 World Workshop).
  • Completed initial non-surgical periodontal therapy with good plaque control.
  • Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) ≤20% and full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) ≤20%.
  • Presence of ≥1 intrabony periodontal defect with an intrabony component ≥3 mm, confirmed clinically and radiographically.
  • Probing pocket depth (PPD) at the study site ≥6 mm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic conditions or medications that could affect periodontal healing (e.g., diabetes mellitus, immunodeficiency, bisphosphonates, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants).
  • Current smokers or former heavy smokers.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Teeth with untreated endodontic lesions or non-vital status; furcation involvement class II-III.
  • Untreated occlusal trauma or tooth mobility grade II-III.
  • Third molars.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Connective Tissue Wall + Enamel Matrix Derivative
Periodontal regenerative surgery using a connective tissue graft (CTG) "soft-tissue wall" combined with enamel matrix derivative (EMD, Emdogain®) under a minimally invasive flap design.
After flap elevation and thorough degranulation/root debridement, a palatal connective tissue graft is harvested with the four-incision technique, de-epithelialized, and adapted to the buccal flap to create a stable soft-tissue wall.
Other Names:
  • Connective Tissue Graft Wall Technique
Split-thickness vestibular releasing flap with external papilla reflection to allow coronal advancement and preserve blood supply.
Thorough degranulation and root surface debridement using ultrasonic and hand instruments; intraoperative recording of defect depth and morphology.
Conditioning of the root surface with 24% EDTA gel for 2 minutes, rinsing, followed by application of enamel matrix derivative (EMD; Emdogain®) to the root surface and into the intrabony defect.
Combination of horizontal mattress and interrupted sutures to achieve tension-free primary closure.
875/125 mg orally, twice daily for 5 days, prescribed as postoperative antibiotic therapy.
400 mg orally, three times daily for 5 days, prescribed for postoperative pain and inflammation control.
0.12% solution, twice daily for 2 weeks, prescribed for chemical plaque control.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) Gain
Time Frame: Baseline 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery
Change in clinical attachment level measured at the treated intrabony periodontal defect, measured with UNC-15 probe and acrylic stent. The CAL is recorded as the distance from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the base of the periodontal pocket. Unit: millimeters (mm). Negative change = gain (better).
Baseline 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery
Recession Interproximal (RECi)
Time Frame: Baseline, one month, 3 months, 6 months
Distance from the cusp tip or incisal edge to the interproximal gingival margin, measured in millimeters, to evaluate changes in papillary and proximal soft tissue level after treatment. Unit: millimeters (mm). Higher = worse.
Baseline, one month, 3 months, 6 months
Radiographic Intrabony Defect Fill (mm)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months post-surgery
Change in vertical depth of the intrabony periodontal defect measured on CBCT at the treated site. Linear distance from the alveolar crest to the base of the defect along the root surface is recorded; greater positive values indicate more defect fill. Unit: millimeters (mm). Positive fill = better.
Baseline and 6 months post-surgery
Recession Buccal (RECb)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery
Distance from the cusp tip or incisal edge to the buccal gingival margin (zenith point), measured in millimeters, to evaluate changes in papillary and proximal soft tissue level after treatment. Unit: millimeters (mm). Higher = worse.
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery
Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Distance from gingival margin to base of pocket with UNC-15 probe and stent. Negative change = reduction (better).
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gingival Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Buccal gingival thickness measured mid-facially using probe transparency method as described by Kan et al. (2003). Unit: categorical (thin / thick). Thick = better.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Early Healing Index (EHI)
Time Frame: 1 week, 2 weeks post-surgery
Early wound healing quality assessed according to Wachtel (2003) index. Unit: ordinal scale (1-5). 1 = best, 5 = worst.
1 week, 2 weeks post-surgery
Full-Mouth Plaque Score (FMPS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
Percentage of tooth surfaces with visible plaque after probing, assessed according to O'Leary et al. (1972). Unit: percentage (%). Lower = better.
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
Full-Mouth Bleeding Score (FMBS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
Percentage of tooth surfaces with bleeding after probing, assessed according to O'Leary et al. (1972). Unit: percentage (%). Lower = better.
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
Defect Angle
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months.
Calculated as the angle formed between the root surface and bone crest at the defect site on CBCT images. Unit: degrees (°). Descriptive.
Baseline and 6 months.
Buccal Bone Dehiscence
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months.
Vertical distance from CEJ to the most apical part of buccal bone crest measured on CBCT to assess buccal bone resorption. Unit: millimeters (mm). Lower = better.
Baseline, 6 months.
Suprabony Component
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
Distance from CEJ to alveolar bone crest measured on CBCT; indicates vertical bone loss height. Unit: millimeters (mm).
Baseline, 6 months
Infrabony Defect Depth
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
Distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the base of the defect measured on CBCT; used to calculate defect depth. Unit: millimeters (mm). Descriptive
Baseline, 6 months
Sex/Gender
Time Frame: At baseline
Male and Female
At baseline
Age
Time Frame: At baseline
Adults, 18 years and older. Unit: years
At baseline
Defect Depth at Surgery
Time Frame: At surgery
Distance from bonecrest to base of defect measured intraoperatively in mm
At surgery
Number of Remaining Bony Walls
Time Frame: At surgery and baseline
Number of residual bony walls at the intrabony defect, assessed intraoperatively. This classification follows the standard defect morphology description used by Tonetti et al. (1993, 1996). A lower number of walls indicates a less favorable prognosis, while a higher number indicates better regenerative potential.
At surgery and baseline
Defect Location
Time Frame: At baseline
Categorical (Maxilla / Mandible).
At baseline
Tooth Type
Time Frame: At baseline
Categorical (Incisor / Canine / Premolar / Molar).
At baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontal Diseases

Clinical Trials on Connective Tissue Graft (CTG) Wall Technique

Subscribe