Multi-Agent Collaborative ADR Prediction With Human-Machine Decision Comparison

September 2, 2026 updated by: Hongmei Jing, Peking University Third Hospital

Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Adverse Drug Reaction Prediction: Evidence-Based Verification and Human-Machine Decision Comparative Study

This study develops a multi-agent collaborative prediction model to forecast adverse drug reactions using real-world clinical medical records. It validates model performance via evidence-based data and compares decision outputs between the AI model and clinical physicians, aiming to improve early identification of drug adverse events. Only de-identified historical medical data will be analyzed; no new clinical interventions will be conducted, with no additional risks to participants.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This observational study first retrospectively collects desensitization cases related to adverse drug reactions to construct a predictive model, and then prospectively enrolls patients to evaluate model efficacy and conduct comparative research with expert blind assessment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Peking University Third Hospital
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University Third Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study includes two types of research subjects:

Retrospective de-identified adverse drug reaction (ADR) medical records: A total of 253 ADR consultation cases covering anti-infectives, cardiovascular agents, anti-tumor drugs, central nervous system drugs and digestive system drugs. Each case contains complete medical history, medication records, ADR occurrence process and clinical outcome data, as well as at least one clinically confirmed definite ADR event.

Clinical evaluators: 20 licensed physicians or pharmacists holding intermediate or higher professional titles, with clinical pharmacy practice and regular participation in hospital ADR monitoring and consultation work.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cases shall involve drug categories including anti-infectives, cardiovascular agents, anti-tumor drugs, central nervous system drugs, digestive system drugs, etc. Each case must contain at least one definite adverse drug reaction (ADR) event, with complete supporting documentation (medical history, medication history, ADR occurrence process, and clinical outcome).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cases with incomplete supporting documentation lacking medical history, medication history, ADR occurrence process or clinical outcome.
  • Cases only with suspected or possible ADRs without definite clinical confirmation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Coverage rate of known ADRs
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
Up to 8 weeks
Objective question accuracy
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Concordance rate of predicted unknown ADRs
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
Up to 8 weeks
Expert-rated subjective answer quality
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Subgroup differences in ADR recognition coverage rate
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Inter-rater consistency
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Subgroup differences in answer quality score
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Rater acceptance scale score
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 19, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 19, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 19, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LLSC-2026288

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe