Tato stránka byla automaticky přeložena a přesnost překladu není zaručena. Podívejte se prosím na anglická verze pro zdrojový text.

Home-Based Wearable rTMS Therapy for Moderate to Severe Depression

19. srpna 2026 aktualizováno: Shanghai Mental Health Center

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Wearable Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Home-Based Treatment of Depression

Background and Rationale

With rapid economic development and increasing societal pressures, the incidence of neuropsychiatric disorders has risen annually, ranking as the leading cause of disability worldwide and imposing a severe societal burden. Among these, depressive disorders represent a primary contributor. However, the efficacy and accessibility of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for depression face significant challenges. Key limitations include:

Low targeting accuracy with traditional localization methods. Limited clinical penetration of individualized precision paradigms .

In this context, wearable repetitive TMS (wrTMS) technology offers a transformative solution. The rTMS-Tiny device, developed by the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, exemplifies this innovation with the following features:

Battery-powered with a pulse capacity exceeding 8,000 pulses per charge. Ultra-lightweight design: Total system weight <3 kg, coil helmet <2 kg (10% of conventional devices).

Performance parity: Comparable efficacy to standard rTMS systems while enabling protocols like Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT) .

Advantages of rTMS-Tiny Portable Design and Wearable Application Ergonomically optimized helmet allows near-unrestricted daily activities during treatment .

Streamlined Operational Workflow Simplified protocols significantly reduce clinician workload . Enhanced Treatment Tolerability Improved comfort increases treatment completion rates and long-term adherence, directly enhancing therapeutic outcomes .

These advantages enable high-dose, intensive regimens (e.g., SAINT-like protocols) in routine clinical practice .

Scientific Imperative for a Multicenter RCT

A multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) of rTMS-Tiny is clinically and scientifically warranted to:

Test two core hypotheses:

Hypothesis 1: Efficacy of rTMS-Tiny in reducing depressive symptoms. Hypothesis 2: Safety of home-based rTMS-Tiny administration . Generate high-level evidence to advance neuromodulation into an era of precision, personalization, and artificial intelligence-driven therapy .

Přehled studie

Postavení

Zatím nenabíráme

Podmínky

Intervence / Léčba

Typ studie

Intervenční

Zápis (Odhadovaný)

124

Fáze

  • Nelze použít

Kontakty a umístění

Tato část poskytuje kontaktní údaje pro ty, kteří studii provádějí, a informace o tom, kde se tato studie provádí.

Studijní kontakt

Studijní místa

      • Shanghai, Čína
        • Shanghai Mental Health Center (SMHC)

Kritéria účasti

Výzkumníci hledají lidi, kteří odpovídají určitému popisu, kterému se říká kritéria způsobilosti. Některé příklady těchto kritérií jsou celkový zdravotní stav osoby nebo předchozí léčba.

Kritéria způsobilosti

Věk způsobilý ke studiu

  • Dospělý
  • Starší dospělý

Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky

Ne

Popis

1. Inclusion Criteria

  1. Demographics Aged 18-65 years, any gender. Minimum education: primary school completion (≥6 years of formal education).
  2. Diagnostic and Severity Requirements Meet DSM-5 criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Current moderate-to-severe depressive episode, defined by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item (HAMD-17) score ≥18 .
  3. Pharmacological Stability Stable antidepressant regimen for ≥4 weeks prior to enrollment, restricted to SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors).

    Treatment-naïve patients permitted if no psychotropic medications used within the prior 4 weeks.

    Mandatory maintenance of the same regimen throughout the study and post-treatment follow-up.

  4. Technical Feasibility Medically eligible for both structural MRI and resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) examinations.

2. Exclusion Criteria

  1. Psychiatric Comorbidities Any concurrent psychiatric diagnosis (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, severe cognitive impairment, epilepsy, mania, psychosis) .
  2. Neurological Structural Abnormalities Structural brain lesions increasing seizure risk or disrupting neural connectivity (e.g., brain tumors, history of stroke).
  3. Systemic Medical Conditions Unstable cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, renal diseases, or active malignancies.
  4. Contraindications to Procedures TMS contraindications: Metallic implants, pacemakers, history of epilepsy. MRI contraindications: Ferromagnetic implants, claustrophobia requiring sedation.
  5. Recent Neuromodulation Therapies Prior ECT (Electroconvulsive Therapy) or rTMS (repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) within 3 months.

History of neurosurgical interventions for depression (e.g., deep brain stimulation).

6)Special Populations Pregnancy, lactation, or planning pregnancy during the study. 7)Medication Instability Planned adjustments to pharmacotherapy during the study period. 3. Withdrawal and Discontinuation Criteria

  1. Participant-Initiated Withdrawal Voluntary withdrawal: Participant withdraws consent (e.g., refusal to risk assignment to sham stimulation group).
  2. Investigator-Initiated Withdrawal Non-compliance with inclusion criteria: Post-randomization discovery of ineligibility (e.g., symptom remission, medication non-adherence).

    Serious Adverse Events (SAEs):

    TMS-related SAEs (e.g., seizure, intractable headache, exacerbated suicidality).

  3. Study Discontinuation

Prespecified Efficacy Stoppage:

Interim analysis at n=30/group showing superiority of active intervention (Cohen's d >0.8) .

Safety-Driven Discontinuation:

Unacceptable risk profile (e.g., recurrent SAEs such as seizures or suicidality).

Loss to Follow-Up:

Trial termination if attrition rate exceeds pre-specified thresholds compromising statistical power (e.g., >20% dropout).

Studijní plán

Tato část poskytuje podrobnosti o studijním plánu, včetně toho, jak je studie navržena a co studie měří.

Jak je studie koncipována?

Detaily designu

  • Primární účel: Léčba
  • Přidělení: Randomizované
  • Intervenční model: Paralelní přiřazení
  • Maskování: Dvojnásobek

Zbraně a zásahy

Skupina účastníků / Arm
Intervence / Léčba
Experimentální: rTMS-Tiny Treatment Group

Stimulation protocol using the rTMS-Tiny device with identical parameters to SNT:

Stimulation mode Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) Burst composition: Each burst consists of 3 pulses at 50 Hz Train structure: 10 bursts repeated at 5 Hz per train (total train duration: 2 seconds) Inter-train interval: 8 seconds

Session parameters Pulses per session: 1,800 pulses Session duration: 570 seconds (≈9.5 minutes) Inter-session interval: 50 minutes Daily frequency: 10 sessions per day Weekly schedule: 5 days per week Treatment course: 1 week (total 50 sessions) Total pulses per course: 1,800 pulses/session × 50 sessions = 90,000 pulses

Stimulation protocol using the rTMS-Tiny device with identical parameters to SNT:

Stimulation mode Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) Burst composition: Each burst consists of 3 pulses at 50 Hz Train structure: 10 bursts repeated at 5 Hz per train (total train duration: 2 seconds) Inter-train interval: 8 seconds Session parameters Pulses per session: 1,800 pulses Session duration: 570 seconds (≈9.5 minutes) Inter-session interval: 50 minutes Daily frequency: 10 sessions per day Weekly schedule: 5 days per week Treatment course: 1 week (total 50 sessions) Total pulses per course: 1,800 pulses/session × 50 sessions = 90,000 pulses

Komparátor placeba: rTMS-Tiny Sham Stimulation Group
The key difference lies in the use of a sham stimulation coil instead of the rTMS-Tiny active treatment coil.
The key difference lies in the use of a sham stimulation coil instead of the rTMS-Tiny active treatment coil.

Co je měření studie?

Primární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Change From Baseline in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Total Score
Časové okno: T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Depressive symptom severity was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17; total score range, 0-52, with higher scores indicating more severe depression;Treatment Response Rate:≥50% reduction from baseline in HAMD-17 total score;Treatment Remission Rate:Post-treatment HAMD-17 Score < 8)
T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)

Sekundární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Časové okno: T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Depressive symptom severity assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), a 10-item clinician-rated scale. The total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 60 (maximum); higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms (worse outcome), and lower scores indicate improvement.
T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)

Další výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Change in Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) Total Score
Časové okno: During treT1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month fatment
Depressive symptom severity assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), a 21-item self-report scale. The total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 63 (maximum); higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms (worse outcome), and lower scores indicate improvement.
During treT1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month fatment
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) Total Score
Časové okno: T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Anxiety symptom severity assessed with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), a 14-item clinician-rated scale. The total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 56 (maximum); higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms (worse outcome), and lower scores indicate improvement.
T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Change in Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) Total Score
Časové okno: T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Overall psychological distress assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), a 53-item self-report scale (each item rated 0-4),from 0 (minimum) to 212 (maximum). The Global Severity Index (GSI) ranges from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum); higher scores indicate greater psychological distress (worse outcome), and lower scores indicate improvement.
T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Total Score
Časové okno: T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Insomnia severity assessed with the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), a 7-item self-report scale. The total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 28 (maximum); higher scores indicate more severe insomnia (worse outcome), and lower scores indicate improvement.
T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Total Score
Časové okno: T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Global cognitive function assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a clinician-administered screening tool covering visuospatial/executive function, attention, language, memory, abstraction, and orientation. The total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 30 (maximum); higher scores indicate better cognitive function (better outcome), and lower scores indicate worsening.
T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Treatment Participation Rate
Časové okno: T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Treatment adherence assessed as the participation rate: the number of rTMS treatment sessions actually completed by each participant, expressed as a percentage of the total number of scheduled treatment sessions. Unit of measure: percentage of scheduled sessions completed.
T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Treatment Completion Rate (Percentage of Participants Completing the Full Planned rTMS Course)
Časové okno: At end of the peri-procedural period (within 1 week after the last rTMS session)
Treatment adherence assessed as the completion rate: the percentage of enrolled participants who complete the full planned course of rTMS treatment. Unit of measure: percentage of participants.
At end of the peri-procedural period (within 1 week after the last rTMS session)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Časové okno: Throughout the peri-procedural period, from the first rTMS session through 1 week after the last session
Safety and tolerability assessed as the number and incidence of participants experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with severity graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 (Grade 1, mild, to Grade 5, death related to the adverse event).
Throughout the peri-procedural period, from the first rTMS session through 1 week after the last session

Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé

Zde najdete lidi a organizace zapojené do této studie.

Sponzor

Spolupracovníci

Publikace a užitečné odkazy

Osoba odpovědná za zadávání informací o studiu tyto publikace poskytuje dobrovolně. Mohou se týkat čehokoli, co souvisí se studiem.

Obecné publikace

Termíny studijních záznamů

Tato data sledují průběh záznamů studie a předkládání souhrnných výsledků na ClinicalTrials.gov. Záznamy ze studií a hlášené výsledky jsou před zveřejněním na veřejné webové stránce přezkoumány Národní lékařskou knihovnou (NLM), aby se ujistily, že splňují specifické standardy kontroly kvality.

Hlavní termíny studia

Začátek studia (Odhadovaný)

20. srpna 2026

Primární dokončení (Odhadovaný)

30. května 2028

Dokončení studie (Odhadovaný)

30. června 2028

Termíny zápisu do studia

První předloženo

13. července 2025

První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality

19. srpna 2026

První zveřejněno (Aktuální)

20. srpna 2026

Aktualizace studijních záznamů

Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)

20. srpna 2026

Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality

19. srpna 2026

Naposledy ověřeno

1. srpna 2026

Více informací

Termíny související s touto studií

Další identifikační čísla studie

  • SMHCGXY-3

Plán pro data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)

Plánujete sdílet data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)?

NE

Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty

Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA

Ne

Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA

Ne

produkt vyrobený a vyvážený z USA

Ne

Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .