Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Home-Based Wearable rTMS Therapy for Moderate to Severe Depression

19 de agosto de 2026 actualizado por: Shanghai Mental Health Center

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Wearable Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Home-Based Treatment of Depression

Background and Rationale

With rapid economic development and increasing societal pressures, the incidence of neuropsychiatric disorders has risen annually, ranking as the leading cause of disability worldwide and imposing a severe societal burden. Among these, depressive disorders represent a primary contributor. However, the efficacy and accessibility of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for depression face significant challenges. Key limitations include:

Low targeting accuracy with traditional localization methods. Limited clinical penetration of individualized precision paradigms .

In this context, wearable repetitive TMS (wrTMS) technology offers a transformative solution. The rTMS-Tiny device, developed by the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, exemplifies this innovation with the following features:

Battery-powered with a pulse capacity exceeding 8,000 pulses per charge. Ultra-lightweight design: Total system weight <3 kg, coil helmet <2 kg (10% of conventional devices).

Performance parity: Comparable efficacy to standard rTMS systems while enabling protocols like Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT) .

Advantages of rTMS-Tiny Portable Design and Wearable Application Ergonomically optimized helmet allows near-unrestricted daily activities during treatment .

Streamlined Operational Workflow Simplified protocols significantly reduce clinician workload . Enhanced Treatment Tolerability Improved comfort increases treatment completion rates and long-term adherence, directly enhancing therapeutic outcomes .

These advantages enable high-dose, intensive regimens (e.g., SAINT-like protocols) in routine clinical practice .

Scientific Imperative for a Multicenter RCT

A multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) of rTMS-Tiny is clinically and scientifically warranted to:

Test two core hypotheses:

Hypothesis 1: Efficacy of rTMS-Tiny in reducing depressive symptoms. Hypothesis 2: Safety of home-based rTMS-Tiny administration . Generate high-level evidence to advance neuromodulation into an era of precision, personalization, and artificial intelligence-driven therapy .

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

124

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Xiaoyun Guo
  • Número de teléfono: 86-13524600458
  • Correo electrónico: xiaoyunguo@163.com

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Shanghai, Porcelana
        • Shanghai Mental Health Center (SMHC)

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

1. Inclusion Criteria

  1. Demographics Aged 18-65 years, any gender. Minimum education: primary school completion (≥6 years of formal education).
  2. Diagnostic and Severity Requirements Meet DSM-5 criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Current moderate-to-severe depressive episode, defined by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item (HAMD-17) score ≥18 .
  3. Pharmacological Stability Stable antidepressant regimen for ≥4 weeks prior to enrollment, restricted to SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors).

    Treatment-naïve patients permitted if no psychotropic medications used within the prior 4 weeks.

    Mandatory maintenance of the same regimen throughout the study and post-treatment follow-up.

  4. Technical Feasibility Medically eligible for both structural MRI and resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) examinations.

2. Exclusion Criteria

  1. Psychiatric Comorbidities Any concurrent psychiatric diagnosis (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, severe cognitive impairment, epilepsy, mania, psychosis) .
  2. Neurological Structural Abnormalities Structural brain lesions increasing seizure risk or disrupting neural connectivity (e.g., brain tumors, history of stroke).
  3. Systemic Medical Conditions Unstable cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, renal diseases, or active malignancies.
  4. Contraindications to Procedures TMS contraindications: Metallic implants, pacemakers, history of epilepsy. MRI contraindications: Ferromagnetic implants, claustrophobia requiring sedation.
  5. Recent Neuromodulation Therapies Prior ECT (Electroconvulsive Therapy) or rTMS (repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) within 3 months.

History of neurosurgical interventions for depression (e.g., deep brain stimulation).

6)Special Populations Pregnancy, lactation, or planning pregnancy during the study. 7)Medication Instability Planned adjustments to pharmacotherapy during the study period. 3. Withdrawal and Discontinuation Criteria

  1. Participant-Initiated Withdrawal Voluntary withdrawal: Participant withdraws consent (e.g., refusal to risk assignment to sham stimulation group).
  2. Investigator-Initiated Withdrawal Non-compliance with inclusion criteria: Post-randomization discovery of ineligibility (e.g., symptom remission, medication non-adherence).

    Serious Adverse Events (SAEs):

    TMS-related SAEs (e.g., seizure, intractable headache, exacerbated suicidality).

  3. Study Discontinuation

Prespecified Efficacy Stoppage:

Interim analysis at n=30/group showing superiority of active intervention (Cohen's d >0.8) .

Safety-Driven Discontinuation:

Unacceptable risk profile (e.g., recurrent SAEs such as seizures or suicidality).

Loss to Follow-Up:

Trial termination if attrition rate exceeds pre-specified thresholds compromising statistical power (e.g., >20% dropout).

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: rTMS-Tiny Treatment Group

Stimulation protocol using the rTMS-Tiny device with identical parameters to SNT:

Stimulation mode Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) Burst composition: Each burst consists of 3 pulses at 50 Hz Train structure: 10 bursts repeated at 5 Hz per train (total train duration: 2 seconds) Inter-train interval: 8 seconds

Session parameters Pulses per session: 1,800 pulses Session duration: 570 seconds (≈9.5 minutes) Inter-session interval: 50 minutes Daily frequency: 10 sessions per day Weekly schedule: 5 days per week Treatment course: 1 week (total 50 sessions) Total pulses per course: 1,800 pulses/session × 50 sessions = 90,000 pulses

Stimulation protocol using the rTMS-Tiny device with identical parameters to SNT:

Stimulation mode Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) Burst composition: Each burst consists of 3 pulses at 50 Hz Train structure: 10 bursts repeated at 5 Hz per train (total train duration: 2 seconds) Inter-train interval: 8 seconds Session parameters Pulses per session: 1,800 pulses Session duration: 570 seconds (≈9.5 minutes) Inter-session interval: 50 minutes Daily frequency: 10 sessions per day Weekly schedule: 5 days per week Treatment course: 1 week (total 50 sessions) Total pulses per course: 1,800 pulses/session × 50 sessions = 90,000 pulses

Comparador de placebos: rTMS-Tiny Sham Stimulation Group
The key difference lies in the use of a sham stimulation coil instead of the rTMS-Tiny active treatment coil.
The key difference lies in the use of a sham stimulation coil instead of the rTMS-Tiny active treatment coil.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change From Baseline in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Total Score
Periodo de tiempo: T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Depressive symptom severity was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17; total score range, 0-52, with higher scores indicating more severe depression;Treatment Response Rate:≥50% reduction from baseline in HAMD-17 total score;Treatment Remission Rate:Post-treatment HAMD-17 Score < 8)
T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Periodo de tiempo: T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Depressive symptom severity assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), a 10-item clinician-rated scale. The total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 60 (maximum); higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms (worse outcome), and lower scores indicate improvement.
T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) Total Score
Periodo de tiempo: During treT1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month fatment
Depressive symptom severity assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), a 21-item self-report scale. The total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 63 (maximum); higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms (worse outcome), and lower scores indicate improvement.
During treT1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month fatment
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) Total Score
Periodo de tiempo: T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Anxiety symptom severity assessed with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), a 14-item clinician-rated scale. The total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 56 (maximum); higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms (worse outcome), and lower scores indicate improvement.
T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Change in Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) Total Score
Periodo de tiempo: T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Overall psychological distress assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), a 53-item self-report scale (each item rated 0-4),from 0 (minimum) to 212 (maximum). The Global Severity Index (GSI) ranges from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum); higher scores indicate greater psychological distress (worse outcome), and lower scores indicate improvement.
T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Total Score
Periodo de tiempo: T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Insomnia severity assessed with the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), a 7-item self-report scale. The total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 28 (maximum); higher scores indicate more severe insomnia (worse outcome), and lower scores indicate improvement.
T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Total Score
Periodo de tiempo: T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Global cognitive function assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a clinician-administered screening tool covering visuospatial/executive function, attention, language, memory, abstraction, and orientation. The total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 30 (maximum); higher scores indicate better cognitive function (better outcome), and lower scores indicate worsening.
T1 (Baseline )Day 0, prior to the first rTMS session; T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Treatment Participation Rate
Periodo de tiempo: T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Treatment adherence assessed as the participation rate: the number of rTMS treatment sessions actually completed by each participant, expressed as a percentage of the total number of scheduled treatment sessions. Unit of measure: percentage of scheduled sessions completed.
T2 (Mid-peri-procedural period (~Month 6 ±2 weeks)); T3 ( End of peri-procedural period (within 1 week of last session) ); T4 (4-week follow-up); T5 (3-month follow-up); T6 (6-month follow-up)
Treatment Completion Rate (Percentage of Participants Completing the Full Planned rTMS Course)
Periodo de tiempo: At end of the peri-procedural period (within 1 week after the last rTMS session)
Treatment adherence assessed as the completion rate: the percentage of enrolled participants who complete the full planned course of rTMS treatment. Unit of measure: percentage of participants.
At end of the peri-procedural period (within 1 week after the last rTMS session)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Periodo de tiempo: Throughout the peri-procedural period, from the first rTMS session through 1 week after the last session
Safety and tolerability assessed as the number and incidence of participants experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with severity graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 (Grade 1, mild, to Grade 5, death related to the adverse event).
Throughout the peri-procedural period, from the first rTMS session through 1 week after the last session

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Colaboradores

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

20 de agosto de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

30 de mayo de 2028

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

30 de junio de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

13 de julio de 2025

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

19 de agosto de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

20 de agosto de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

20 de agosto de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

19 de agosto de 2026

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • SMHCGXY-3

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .