Tato stránka byla automaticky přeložena a přesnost překladu není zaručena. Podívejte se prosím na anglická verze pro zdrojový text.

Intravenous Thrombolysis With Tenecteplase Plus Thrombectomy Versus Thrombectomy Alone In Patients With A Large Ischemic Stroke: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (IVT-ALL-IN) (IVT-ALL-IN)

18. května 2026 aktualizováno: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Stroke is a frequent and severe disease worldwide, representing the second leading cause of death and the leading cause of acquired disability. Over the last thirty years, reperfusion therapies have transformed the prognosis of ischemic stroke. For patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVOS) and a small- to moderate-sized irreversibly injured tissue (core), the recommended treatment consists of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) followed by mechanical thrombectomy (MT). However, for the fifth of LVOS patients with large core, MT has demonstrated its effectiveness, but the benefits of prior IVT remain unclear. In fact, no randomized trial has compared IVT+MT and MT alone in this population.

Tenecteplase is increasingly replacing alteplase for LVOS due to two key advantages. First, it is administered as a single intravenous bolus, which speeds up treatment and transfers. Second, it improves reperfusion and functional outcomes in LVOS patients without large core. Emerging real-world evidence with tenecteplase reports lower rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage than alteplase, suggesting superior overall efficacy. To date, no randomized trial has explored the benefit of tenecteplase in LVOS patients with large core.

The IVT ALL IN trial is a French multicenter open randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups (IVT with tenecteplase followed by MT [IVT+MT] vs MT alone) and blinded endpoint assessment following a PROBE design. Its main objective is to assess which treatment strategy between IVT+MT and MT alone has a superior efficacy in terms of 3-month good functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score ≤ 3 at 3 months, for LVOS patients with large core of the anterior circulation. Our trial will provide high-level evidence on the optimal reperfusion treatment strategy for LVOS patients with large ischemic core, who currently still have a low likelihood of achieving a favorable neurological outcome.

Přehled studie

Postavení

Zatím nenabíráme

Podmínky

Detailní popis

The IVT ALL IN trial is a French multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups and blinded endpoint assessment following a PROBE design. Patients will be randomized between two treatment groups: the IVT with tenecteplase followed by MT group (IVT+MT; experimental group) or the MT alone group (control group). Randomization will be minimized on center, core size (very large [ASPECTS 2-3] versus large [ASPECT 4-5] infarcts) and treatment time window (within 4.5 hours vs others).

We plan to include 486 adult patients with a pre-stroke mRS ≤ 1 presenting an anterior circulation LVOS eligible to MT within 24 hours of onset, or unknown onset with a DWI-FLAIR mismatch, with a large core defined as:

  • ASPECTS 2-5 or a core volume between 70 and 130 ml on MRI or perfusion CT for patients with process times compatible with IVT administration within 4.5 hours of onset or unknown onset with process times compatible with IVT administration within 4.5 hours of last seen well or unknown onset with a DWI-FLAIR mismatch
  • ASPECTS 2- 5 with a core volume ≤ 70 ml and core/perfusion mismatch > 1.2 for patients with process times compatible with IVT administration within 4.5 and 9 hours of onset, defined as the mid-point between last known to be normal and symptoms constatation in case of unknown onset

The primary endpoint is the rate of good functional outcome (independent ambulation) at 3 months defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-3.

In the six recently published trials comparing MT to best medical management for LVOS patients with large ischemic cores, rates of 3-month independent ambulation (mRS ≤ 3) range from 30% to 47% with a weighted average around 38%. In the first 5 RCTs that focused on the benefit of MT in LVOS, the minimal difference observed with MT was 13%. With these assumptions and for a global alpha risk of 0.05, a power of 0.8 and a bilateral test, the total number of patients to randomize would be 486 patients (243 in each arm) to increase the rate of good functional outcomes from 38% in the control group to 51% in the experimental group accounting for 5% of lost to follow-up and considering one interim analysis and the final analysis using a Lan and Demets method with an O'Brien & Fleming type alpha risk expenditure function We plan a sequential analysis of the primary outcome with 2 analyses: one interim analysis after the evaluation of the primary outcome for one third of the planned number of participants randomized, and a final analysis at the end of the study (end of follow-up of the last randomized participant). This sequential analysis is planned to be able to stop the trial in case of a large difference between the 2 groups or for futility if the conditional power is too low. It is planned according to the Lan & DeMets approach with a control of alpha risk according to the method of O'Brien & Flemming.

Typ studie

Intervenční

Zápis (Odhadovaný)

486

Fáze

  • Fáze 3

Kontakty a umístění

Tato část poskytuje kontaktní údaje pro ty, kteří studii provádějí, a informace o tom, kde se tato studie provádí.

Studijní kontakt

Studijní záloha kontaktů

Studijní místa

      • Aix-en-Provence, Francie, 13100
        • CH Pays d'Aix - Site d'Aix-en-Provence
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Silvia DI EGGE
      • Besançon, Francie, 25030
        • CHU Besançon
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Guillaume CHARBONNIER
      • Bordeaux, Francie, 33076
        • CHU Bordeaux - Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Igor SIBON
      • Brest, Francie, 29609
        • CHU Brest - Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Serge TIMSIT
      • Bron, Francie, 69500
        • HCL - Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Tae-Hee CHO
      • Caen, Francie, 14000
        • CHU Caen Normandie
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Marion BOULANGER
      • Corbeil-Essonnes, Francie, 91106
        • Ch Sud Francilien
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Nicolas CHAUSSON
      • Créteil, Francie, 94000
        • AP-HP - Hôpital Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Aymeric WITTWER
      • Dijon, Francie, 21079
        • Chu Dijon Bourgogne
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Yannick BEJOT
      • Gonesse, Francie, 95500
        • CH Gonesse
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Eric MANCHON
      • Grenoble, Francie, 38043
        • CHU Grenoble Alpes - Site Nord
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Olivier DETANTE
      • Le Chesnay, Francie, 78000
        • CH Versailles - Hôpital André Mignot
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Fernando PICO
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Francie, 94275
        • AP-HP - Hôpital Bicêtre
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Laura VENDITTI
      • Lille, Francie, 59000
        • CHU Lille - Hôpital Roger Salengro
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Lucie DELLA SCHIAVA
      • Limoges, Francie, 87042
        • CHU Limoges - Hopital Dupuytren
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Francisco MACIAN-MONTORO
      • Marseille, Francie, 13005
        • AP-HM - Hôpital de la Timone
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Laurent SUISSA
      • Montpellier, Francie, 34295
        • CHU Montpellier - Hôpital Saint-Eloi
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Caroline ARQUIZAN
      • Nancy, Francie, 54035
        • CHRU Nancy - Hôpital Central
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Sébastien RICHARD
      • Nantes, Francie, 44093
        • CHU Nantes - Hopital Nord Laënnec
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Benoit GUILLON
      • Nice, Francie, 6000
        • CHU Nice - Hôpital Pasteur
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Barbara CASOLLA
      • Paris, Francie, 75019
        • Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Michael OBADIA
      • Paris, Francie, 75013
        • Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Gaspard GERSCHENFELD
      • Paris, Francie, 75018
        • AP-HP - Hôpital Bichat
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Philippa LAVALLEE
      • Paris, Francie, 75010
        • AP-HP - Hôpital Lariboisiere-Fernand Widal
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Elodie BERTHET
      • Paris, Francie, 75014
        • GH Paris Saint-Joseph - Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Benjamin MAYER
      • Paris, Francie, 75014
        • GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences - Hôpital Sainte-Anne
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Guillaume TURC
      • Perpignan, Francie, 66046
        • CH Perpignan
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Denis SABLOT
      • Poitiers, Francie, 86000
        • CHU Poitiers - Hôpital de La Milétrie
      • Reims, Francie, 51100
        • CHU Reims - Hôpital Maison Blanche
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Solène MOULIN
      • Rennes, Francie, 35033
        • CHU Rennes - Hopital Pontchaillou
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Stéphane VANNIER
      • Rouen, Francie, 76031
        • CHU Rouen - Hôpital Charles-Nicolle
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Florian BASILLE
      • Saint-Denis, Francie, 93200
        • CH Saint-Denis - Hôpital Delafontaine
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Carole HENRY
      • Saint-Etienne, Francie, 42055
        • CHU Saint-Etienne - Hôpital Nord
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Pierre GARNIER
      • Strasbourg, Francie, 67098
        • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg - Hôpital de Hautepierre
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Valérie WOLFF
      • Suresnes, Francie, 92150
        • Hopital Foch
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Bertrand LAPERGUE
      • Tours, Francie, 37000
        • CHRU Tours - Hôpital Bretonneau
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Marco PASI

Kritéria účasti

Výzkumníci hledají lidi, kteří odpovídají určitému popisu, kterému se říká kritéria způsobilosti. Některé příklady těchto kritérií jsou celkový zdravotní stav osoby nebo předchozí léčba.

Kritéria způsobilosti

Věk způsobilý ke studiu

  • Dospělý
  • Starší dospělý

Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky

Ne

Popis

Inclusion criteria :

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • mRS ≤ 1 before stroke
  • Anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke eligible to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) within 24 hours of onset or unknown onset with a DWI-FLAIR mismatch
  • Large core defined either as:

    • ASPECTS 2-5 or a core volume between 70 and 130 ml on MRI or perfusion CT for patients with process times compatible with IVT administration within 4.5 hours of onset or unknown onset with process times compatible with IVT administration within 4.5 hours of last seen well or unknown onset with a DWI-FLAIR mismatch
    • ASPECTS 2- 5 with a core volume ≤ 70 ml and core/perfusion mismatch > 1.2 for patients with process times compatible with IVT administration within 4.5 and 9 hours of onset, defined as the mid-point between last known to be normal and symptoms constatation in case of unknown onset
  • Written informed consent signed by the patient or the trustworthy person / family member / close relative, or inclusion in case of emergency (to note, written informed consent will be signed by the patient (if needed, by trustworthy person, family member or close relative) as soon as possible (article 35 of the European regulation N°536/2014))

Exclusion criteria :

  • Anterior circulation stroke with a distal occlusion not eligible to MT

    • Posterior circulation stroke
    • Pregnancy or breastfeeding woman
    • Any contraindication to IVT, based on the Metalyse SmPC and the latest AHA/ASA guidelines on IVT (Prabhakaran et al. Stroke. 2026), other than those related to the NIHSS score upper limit, infarct size and symptoms-to-onset time, such as (but not limited to):

      • Persistent incapacity to lower blood pressure under 185/110 mmHg
      • Respiratory or hemodynamic failure
      • Externalized bleeding
      • Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of its excipients
      • Hypersensitivity to gentamicin (a trace residue from the manufacturing process
      • Known haemorrhagic diathesis
      • Bacterial endocarditis, pericarditis
      • Acute pancreatitis
      • Significant impairment of hepatic function, including hepatic failure, cirrhosis, portal hypertension (oesophageal varices) and progressive hepatitis
      • Active ulcerative gastrointestinal disease
      • Neoplasia associated with an increased risk of haemorrhage
      • Known bleeding disorders, such as thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100 G/L) or severe coagulopathy (INR > 1.7, activated partial thromboplastin time > 40s or prothrombin time > 15s) either currently or within the last 3 weeks
      • Treatment with effective doses of oral anticoagulants (e.g. vitamin K antagonists with an INR > 1.7)
      • Any history of intracerebral neoplasm
      • History of intracranial / spinal surgery or acute spinal cord injury within 3 months
      • Recent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within 3 months
      • Major non-central nervous system surgery, biopsy of a parenchymal organ or significant trauma within the last 10 days
      • Recent moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
      • Known arterial or venous malformation, except unruptured intracranial aneurysm
      • History of intracerebral haemorrhage within 3 months
      • Known cerebral amyloid angiopathy
      • History of acute ischaemic stroke within 3 months
  • Any contra-indication to MT:

    • Contra-indication to femoral, radial or humeral arterial puncture
    • Allergy to iodinated contrast media
    • Known Renal insufficiency at inclusion time (confirmed biologically by a creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min calculated with the Cockcroft-Gault formula)

      • Anticipated life expectancy of less than 3 months
      • Participation in another interventional clinical trial evaluating a health product or any randomized clinical trial
      • Absence of affiliation to National French social security system
      • Under legal protection measure (tutorship or curatorship) and patient deprived of freedom

Studijní plán

Tato část poskytuje podrobnosti o studijním plánu, včetně toho, jak je studie navržena a co studie měří.

Jak je studie koncipována?

Detaily designu

  • Primární účel: Léčba
  • Přidělení: Randomizované
  • Intervenční model: Paralelní přiřazení
  • Maskování: Žádné (otevřený štítek)

Zbraně a zásahy

Skupina účastníků / Arm
Intervence / Léčba
Experimentální: IVT with Tenecteplase followed by MT
Intravenous administration of Tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg, maximum 25 mg) followed by mechanical thrombectomy
Intravenous administration of Tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg, maximum 25 mg) followed by mechanical thrombectomy (MT)
Aktivní komparátor: Active Comparator: MT alone
Mechanical thrombectomy alone
Mechanical thrombectomy alone

Co je měření studie?

Primární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Rate of good functional outcome (independent ambulation) at 3 months
Časové okno: 3 months

defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-3. mRS scores will be determined by certified raters unaware of the treatment arm or baseline characteristics of the individual patient by in person interview or, if not possible, by telephone.

The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) measures degree of disability/dependence after a stroke.

Scores range from 0 to 6 (death)

3 months

Sekundární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Early neurological improvement.
Časové okno: D1

Defined as a ≥ 8-points decrease of the NIHSS score or a NIHSS score ≤ 1 at day 1.

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a questionnaire to evaluate neurologic outcome and degree of recovery for patients with stroke.

Scores range from 0 to 42 (worse)

D1
3-month functional independence rate
Časové okno: 3 months
Defined as a 3-month mRS score of 0-2
3 months
Distribution of 3-month mRS scores
Časové okno: 3 months
Ordinal analysis 3-month functional outcome
3 months
One-year independent ambulation rate
Časové okno: 1 year
Defined as a 1-year mRS score of 0-3.
1 year
One-year functional independence
Časové okno: 1 year
Defined as a 1-year mRS score of 0-2.
1 year
Mean change in infarct volume from baseline at day 1
Časové okno: Day 1
Defined as (day 1 volume) - (baseline volume).
Day 1
Early neurological worsening.
Časové okno: Day 1
Defined as a ≥ 4-point increase on the NIHSS score within 24 hours due to the stroke itself.
Day 1
Intracerebral hemorrhage.
Časové okno: Day 2
Intracerebral hemorrhage defined according to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification.
Day 2
Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
Časové okno: Day 2
Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage defined according to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification.
Day 2
3-month mortality rate.
Časové okno: 3 months
All-cause mortality.
3 months
1-year mortality rate.
Časové okno: 1 year
All-cause mortality.
1 year
Medico-economic study.
Časové okno: 1 year
Incremental cost utility ratio analysis.
1 year
Successful recanalisation rates
Časové okno: Day 1
Defined as a modified Treatment In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) scores of 2b50/2b67/2c/3 on the first angiographic run, after the first pass and at the end of the procedure
Day 1
Excellent recanalisation rates
Časové okno: Day 1
Defined as a modified Treatment In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) scores of 2c/3 respectively on the first angiographic run, after the first pass and at the end of the procedure
Day 1
Complete recanalisation rates
Časové okno: Day 1
Defined as a modified Treatment In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) scores of 3 respectively on the first angiographic run, after the first pass and at the end of the procedure
Day 1
Adverse events
Časové okno: 3 months
Type, frequency and severity of adverse events
3 months
Serious adverse events
Časové okno: 3 months
Type, frequency and severity of serious adverse events
3 months

Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé

Zde najdete lidi a organizace zapojené do této studie.

Vyšetřovatelé

  • Ředitel studie: Gaspard GERSCHENFELD, MD, PhD, APHP

Termíny studijních záznamů

Tato data sledují průběh záznamů studie a předkládání souhrnných výsledků na ClinicalTrials.gov. Záznamy ze studií a hlášené výsledky jsou před zveřejněním na veřejné webové stránce přezkoumány Národní lékařskou knihovnou (NLM), aby se ujistily, že splňují specifické standardy kontroly kvality.

Hlavní termíny studia

Začátek studia (Odhadovaný)

15. června 2026

Primární dokončení (Odhadovaný)

1. července 2029

Dokončení studie (Odhadovaný)

1. července 2029

Termíny zápisu do studia

První předloženo

18. května 2026

První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality

18. května 2026

První zveřejněno (Aktuální)

22. května 2026

Aktualizace studijních záznamů

Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)

22. května 2026

Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality

18. května 2026

Naposledy ověřeno

1. května 2026

Více informací

Termíny související s touto studií

Plán pro data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)

Plánujete sdílet data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)?

ANO

Popis plánu IPD

The procedures carried out with the French data privacy authority (CNIL, Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés) do not provide for the transmission of the database, nor do the information and consent documents signed by the patients.

Consultation by the editorial board or interested researchers of individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification may nevertheless be considered, subject to prior determination of the terms and conditions of such consultation and in respect for compliance with the applicable regulations.

Časový rámec sdílení IPD

Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years following article publication. Requests out of these time frame can also be submitted to the sponsor

Kritéria přístupu pro sdílení IPD

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

Typ podpůrných informací pro sdílení IPD

  • PROTOKOL STUDY
  • MÍZA
  • ICF

Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty

Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA

Ne

Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA

Ne

Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .

Klinické studie na Intravenous administration

Předplatit