Effect of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery assisted with enhanced recovery after surgery on colorectal cancer: study protocol for a single-arm trial

Xuehua Zhang, Gaohua Li, Xiaojing Li, Zhenye Liang, Xiaoliang Lan, Tingyu Mou, Zhenzhao Xu, Jie Fu, Mingyi Wu, Guoxin Li, Yanan Wang, Xuehua Zhang, Gaohua Li, Xiaojing Li, Zhenye Liang, Xiaoliang Lan, Tingyu Mou, Zhenzhao Xu, Jie Fu, Mingyi Wu, Guoxin Li, Yanan Wang

Abstract

Background: Studies have proved that the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol can significantly improve the recovery course of patients during the perioperative period. The application of minimally invasive surgery is a critical component of ERAS protocol. Single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery (SILS plus one) could achieve further minimally invasive surgical results than conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). The objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SILS plus one with ERAS protocol in colorectal cancer.

Methods: This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, single-arm trial. A total of 120 eligible patients with colorectal cancer will receive SILS plus one followed by the ERAS management during the perioperative period. The primary endpoint is postoperative hospital stay. The secondary endpoints include rehabilitative rate of the fourth postoperative day, postoperative medical cost, postoperative pain score, postoperative recovery indexes, inflammatory immune response indexes, compliance with ERAS measures, 6 min postoperative walking test (6MWT), hospital readmissions, and early postoperative complications.

Discussion: This trial will be the first to evaluate the short-term outcomes of SILS plus one assisted with ERAS protocol for patients with colorectal cancer and will provide valuable clinical evidence on the benefit of the combination of these two techniques, hopefully, to provide patients with more safe, economic, feasible, and rapid surgery and perioperative strategies.

Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry, NCT0426829. Registered February 15, 2020 (https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04268290).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00426829 NCT04268290 NCT00426829 NCT04268290.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); laparoscopic surgery; single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery (SILS plus one); study protocol.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-1361). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

2021 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart. ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; 6MWT, 6 min postoperative walking test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Single-incision multichannel device.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Trocars and instrument positions for SILS plus one. (A) Trocars and instrument position for left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy or rectectomy. (B) Trocars and instrument positions for right hemicolectomy. SILS plus one, single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery.

References

    1. Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Vleugels JLA, et al. Colorectal cancer. Lancet 2019;394:1467-80. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0
    1. Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ 2001;322:473-6. 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473
    1. Li Q, Du L, Lu L, et al. Clinical Application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Perioperative Period of Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019;29:178-83. 10.1089/lap.2018.0708
    1. Ren L, Zhu D, Wei Y, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program attenuates stress and accelerates recovery in patients after radical resection for colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2012;36:407-14. 10.1007/s00268-011-1348-4
    1. Wang J, Luo Y, Wang Q, et al. Evaluation of the application of laparoscopy in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastric cancer: a Chinese multicenter analysis. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:543. 10.21037/atm-20-2556
    1. Feng F, Li XH, Shi H, et al. Fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy could improve postoperative recovery of low-risk rectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dig Dis 2014;15:306-13. 10.1111/1751-2980.12142
    1. Munk-Madsen P, Eriksen JR, Kehlet H, et al. Why still in hospital after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme? Colorectal Dis 2019;21:1438-44. 10.1111/codi.14762
    1. Zhao JH, Sun JX, Gao P, et al. Fast-track surgery versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2014;14:607. 10.1186/1471-2407-14-607
    1. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2013;37:259-84. 10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0
    1. Shida D, Tagawa K, Inada K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for colorectal cancer in Japan. BMC Surg 2015;15:90. 10.1186/s12893-015-0079-0
    1. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:477-84. 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70221-7
    1. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224-9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5
    1. Watanabe J, Ota M, Fujii S, et al. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy. Br J Surg 2016;103:1276-81. 10.1002/bjs.10212
    1. Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK, et al. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2012;26:2729-34. 10.1007/s00464-012-2262-z
    1. Kang BM, Park SJ, Lee KY, et al. Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Can Be Performed Safely and Appropriately for Colon Cancer: Short-Term Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2017;27:501-9. 10.1089/lap.2016.0467
    1. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study. Am J Surg 2012;204:115-20. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.005
    1. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1471-4.
    1. Wang Y, Liu R, Zhang Z, et al. A safety study of transumbilical single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015;16:539. 10.1186/s13063-015-1067-5
    1. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories . ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:111-7. 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13. 10.1097/
    1. National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Available online:
    1. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 2009;250:177-86. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181afde41
    1. Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, et al. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 2010;29:434-40. 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.01.004
    1. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3061-8. 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758
    1. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group ; Buunen M, Veldkamp R, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:44-52. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3
    1. Arezzo A, Passera R, Scozzari G, et al. Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2013;27:1485-502. 10.1007/s00464-012-2649-x
    1. Theophilus M, Platell C, Spilsbury K. Long-term survival following laparoscopic and open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis 2014;16:O75-81. 10.1111/codi.12483
    1. Pędziwiatr M, Małczak P, Mizera M, et al. There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 2017;21:595-604. 10.1007/s10151-017-1662-4
    1. Li J, Kong XX, Zhou JJ, et al. Fast-track multidisciplinary treatment versus conventional treatment for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study. BMC Cancer 2019;19:988. 10.1186/s12885-019-6188-x
    1. Xu D, Li J, Song Y, et al. Laparoscopic surgery contributes more to nutritional and immunologic recovery than fast-track care in colorectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2015;13:18. 10.1186/s12957-015-0445-5
    1. Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH, et al. Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2012;255:216-21. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824336e2
    1. Kang BM, Kim HJ, Kye BH, et al. Multicenter, randomized single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery (SIMPLE) trial in colon cancer: an interim analysis. Surg Endosc 2018;32:1540-9. 10.1007/s00464-017-5842-0
    1. Maggiori L, Tuech JJ, Cotte E, et al. Single-incision Laparoscopy Versus Multiport Laparoscopy for Colonic Surgery: A Multicenter, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2018;268:740-6. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002836
    1. Yu H, Shin JY. Short-term outcomes following reduced-port, single-port, and multi-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: tailored laparoscopic approaches based on tumor size and nodal status. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016;31:115-22. 10.1007/s00384-015-2399-z
    1. Wang Y, Deng H, Mou T, et al. Short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2019;33:840-8. 10.1007/s00464-018-6350-6
    1. Lim SW, Kim HJ, Kim CH, et al. Umbilical incision laparoscopic colectomy with one additional port for colorectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 2013;17:193-9. 10.1007/s10151-012-0900-z
    1. Kawamata F, Homma S, Minagawa N, et al. Comparison of single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection with conventional laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg 2014;38:2716-23. 10.1007/s00268-014-2642-8
    1. Song JM, Kim JH, Lee YS, et al. Reduced port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes: comparative study with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg Treat Res 2016;91:195-201. 10.4174/astr.2016.91.4.195
    1. Liu R, Wang Y, Zhang Z, et al. Assessment of treatment options for rectosigmoid cancer: single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, and conventional laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2017;31:2437-50. 10.1007/s00464-016-5244-8

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit