Impact of an electronic medium delivery of warfarin education in a low income, minority outpatient population: a pilot intervention study

Krista Heinrich, Katherine Sanchez, Cecilia Hui, Kiara Talabi, Marlena Perry, Huanying Qin, Hoa Nguyen, Amulya Tatachar, Krista Heinrich, Katherine Sanchez, Cecilia Hui, Kiara Talabi, Marlena Perry, Huanying Qin, Hoa Nguyen, Amulya Tatachar

Abstract

Background: Warfarin is classified as a high-alert medication for ambulatory healthcare and safe guards for high-alert medications are necessary, including the practice of mandatory patient education. The high cost of hospitalizations related to adverse events combined with the average bleeding event rate of 7-8% in spite of routine patient education, suggests the importance of new approaches to standardized health education on warfarin. We sought to evaluate the impact of a warfarin educational video using an electronic tablet on patient knowledge and to determine patients' satisfaction with the use of an electronic tablet for educational purposes in outpatient clinics serving a low income, minority population.

Methods: A warfarin educational video delivered on an electronic tablet (iPad) was delivered at two pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics to uninsured patients whose annual income is equal or less than two hundred percent below the poverty level were offered. Patients (n = 18) completed a pre-video and post-video knowledge test on warfarin before and after viewing the warfarin educational video on an electronic tablet and a follow-up test to measure the retention of knowledge and a patient satisfaction survey at 60 days. The primary outcome was change in knowledge test scores. Other outcome measures included adherence rates, adverse events, time in therapeutic INR range, and patient-reported satisfaction scores.

Results: The majority of patients were uninsured men taking warfarin for atrial fibrillation (n = 5). The median scores at post-video knowledge test and follow-up knowledge test were significantly higher than that for the pre-knowledge test (12 (11-12) vs. 10(8-11), p < 0.001). The study group had a 'time in therapeutic INR' range of 56.3%, a rate of adverse events of 24.5%, and a self-reported adherence rate to warfarin of 94.1%. The majority of patients also had positive responses to the patient satisfaction survey.

Conclusions: Patient education delivered via iPad to facilitate knowledge of medication can serve as a useful tool for educating patients about warfarin and warfarin therapy. Use of an electronic medium may be a unique way to provide standard medication education to patients.

Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered with: NCT03650777 ; 9/18/18.

Keywords: Education; Health literacy; Primary care; Technology; Warfarin.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Institute for Safe Medication Practices . ISMP List of High-Alert Medications in Community/Ambulatory Healthcare. 2011.
    1. Weitz J. Blood coagulation and anticoagulant, fibrinolytic, and antiplatelet drugs. In: Brunton L, Chabhner B, Knollmann B, editors. Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of Tterapeutics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011.
    1. Kim MM, Metlay J, Cohen A, Feldman H, Hennessy S, Kimmel S, Strom B, Doshi JA. Hospitalization costs associated with warfarin-related bleeding events among older community-dwelling adults. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(7):731–736. doi: 10.1002/pds.1953.
    1. Briggs AL, Jackson TR, Bruce S, Shapiro NL. The development and performance validation of a tool to assess patient anticoagulation knowledge. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2005;1(1):40–59. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2004.12.002.
    1. Zeolla MM, Brodeur MR, Dominelli A, Haines ST, Allie ND. Development and validation of an instrument to determine patient knowledge: the oral anticoagulation knowledge test. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(4):633–638. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G562.
    1. Shrestha S, Sapkota B, Kumpakha A, Acharya U, Sharma R. Evaluation of patients’ knowledge on warfarin in outpatient pharmacy of a tertiary care cardiac center. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:429. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1416-1.
    1. Wofford JL, Wells MD, Singh S. Best strategies for patient education about anticoagulation with warfarin: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-40.
    1. Health Information Technology Integration. . Accessed 1 May 2016.
    1. Kim JJ, Mohammad RA, Coley KC, Donihi AC. Use of an iPad to provide warfarin video education to hospitalized patients. J Patient Saf. 2015;11(3):160–165. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000062.
    1. Nasser S, Mullan J, Bajorek B. Challenges of older patients’ knowledge about warfarin therapy. J Prim Care Community Health. 2012;3(1):65–74. doi: 10.1177/2150131911416365.
    1. Denizard-Thompson NR, Singh S, Stevens SR, Miller DP, Wofford JL. iPod technology for teaching patients about anticoagulation: a pilot study of mobile computer-assisted patient education. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012;13(1):42–47. doi: 10.1017/S146342361100034X.
    1. Parker RM, Ratzan SC, Lurie N. Health literacy: a policy challenge for advancing high-quality health care. Health Aff. 2003;22(4):147–153. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.4.147.
    1. Simmons LA, Wolever RQ, Bechard EM, Snyderman R. Patient engagement as a risk factor in personalized health care: a systematic review of the literature on chronic disease. Genome Med. 2014;6:13. doi: 10.1186/gm533.
    1. Institute of Medicine . Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2004.
    1. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15(3):259–267. doi: 10.1093/heapro/15.3.259.
    1. Ell K, Katon W, Cabassa LJ, Xie B, Lee PJ, Kapetanovic S, Guterman J. Depression and diabetes among low-income Hispanics: design elements of a socio-culturally adapted collaborative care model randomized controlled trial. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2009;39(2):113–132. doi: 10.2190/PM.39.2.a.
    1. Lopez V, Sanchez K, Killian MO, Eghaneyan BH. Depression screening and education: an examination of mental health literacy and stigma in a sample of Hispanic women. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):018–5516. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5516-4.
    1. American Heart Association . A Patient’s guide to taking warfarin. 2016.
    1. Warfarin [package insert]. Princeton: Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company; 2016.
    1. Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L. A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Educ Behav. 2006;33(3):352–373. doi: 10.1177/1090198105277329.
    1. Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, van der Meer FJ, Briet E. A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost. 1993;69(3):236–239. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1651587.
    1. Palareti G, Legnani C, Guazzaloca G, Lelia V, Cosmi B, Lunghi B, Marchetti G, Poli D, Pengo V. Risks factors for highly unstable response to oral anticoagulation: a case-control study. Br J Haematol. 2005;129(1):72–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05417.x.
    1. Clarkesmith DE, Pattison HM, Lip GYH, Lane DA. Educational intervention improves anticoagulation control in atrial fibrillation patients: the TREAT randomised trial. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074037.
    1. White HD, Gruber M, Feyzi J, Kaatz S, Tse HF, Husted S, Albers GW. Comparison of outcomes among patients randomized to warfarin therapy according to anticoagulant control: results from SPORTIF III and V. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(3):239–245. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.3.239.
    1. Stirratt MJ, Dunbar-Jacob J, Crane HM, Simoni JM, Czajkowski S, Hilliard ME, Aikens JE, Hunter CM, Velligan DI, Huntley K, et al. Self-report measures of medication adherence behavior: recommendations on optimal use. Transl Behav Med. 2015;5(4):470–482. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0315-2.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit