A technology-based intervention to improve safety, mental health and empowerment outcomes for immigrant women with intimate partner violence experiences: it's weWomen plus sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) protocol

Bushra Sabri, Nancy Glass, Sarah Murray, Nancy Perrin, James R Case, Jacquelyn C Campbell, Bushra Sabri, Nancy Glass, Sarah Murray, Nancy Perrin, James R Case, Jacquelyn C Campbell

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) disproportionately affects immigrant women, an understudied and underserved population in need for evidence-based rigorously evaluated culturally competent interventions that can effectively address their health and safety needs.

Methods: This study uses a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) design to rigorously evaluate an adaptive, trauma-informed, culturally tailored technology-delivered intervention tailored to the needs of immigrant women who have experienced IPV. In the first stage randomization, participants are randomly assigned to an online safety decision and planning or a usual care control arm and safety, mental health and empowerment outcomes are assessed at 3-, 6- and 12-months post-baseline. For the second stage randomization, women who do not report significant improvements in safety (i.e., reduction in IPV) and empowerment from baseline to 3 months follow up (i.e., non-responders) are re- randomized to safety and empowerment strategies delivered via text only or a combination of text and phone calls with trained advocates. Data on outcomes (safety, mental health, and empowerment) for early non-responders is assessed at 6 and 12 months post re-randomization.

Discussion: The study's SMART design provides an opportunity to implement and evaluate an individualized intervention protocol for immigrant women based on their response to type or intensity of intervention. The findings will be useful for identifying what works for whom and characteristics of participants needing a particular type or intensity level of intervention for improved outcomes. If found to be effective, the study will result in an evidence-based trauma-informed culturally tailored technology-based safety decision and planning intervention for immigrant survivors of IPV that can be implemented by practitioners serving immigrant women in diverse settings.

Trial registration: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04098276 on September 13, 2019.

Keywords: Depression; Empowerment; Immigrant; Intimate partner violence; PTSD; SMART; Safety planning.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
It’s weWomen plus SMART trial

References

    1. Goncalves M, Matos M. Prevalence of violence against immigrant women: a systematic review of the literature. J Fam Violence. 2016;31(6):697–710. doi: 10.1007/s10896-016-9820-4.
    1. Sabri B, Campbell JC, Messing JT. Intimate partner homicides in the United States, 2003-2013: a comparison of immigrants and non-immigrants. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36(9-10):4735–4757. doi: 10.1177/0886260518792249.
    1. Sabri B, Tharmarajah S, Njie-Carr VPS, Messing JT, Loerzel E, Arscott J, et al. Safety planning with marginalized survivors of intimate partner violence: challenges of conducting safety planning intervention research with marginalized women. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021; 10.1177/15248380211013136.
    1. Sabri B, Nnawulezi N, Njie-Carr V, Messing J, Ward-Lasher A, Alvarez C, et al. Multilevel risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence among African, Asian and Latina immigrant and refugee women: perceived needs for safety planning interventions. Race Soc Probl. 2018;10(4):348–365. doi: 10.1007/s12552-018-9247-z.
    1. Wood SN, Glass N, Decker MR. An integrative review of safety strategies for women experiencing intimate partner violence in low-and middle-income countries. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021;22:168–182. doi: 10.1177/1524838018823270.
    1. Davies J, Lyon E, Monti-Catania D. Safety planning with battered women: complex lives/difficult choices. SAGE Publications; 1998. 10.4135/9781452232034.
    1. Kahraman MS, Bell KM. Safety planning: a vital preliminary step for professionals working with intimate partner violence victims. JCBPR. 2017;6:141–150.
    1. Emezue C, Bloom TL. Protocol: technology-based and digital interventions for intimate partner violence: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Campbell Syst Rev. 2021;17(1):Article e1132.
    1. Freed D, Palmer J, Minchala DE, Levy K, Ristenpart T, Dell N. Digital technologies, and intimate partner violence: a qualitative analysis with multiple stakeholders. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2017;1(CSCW):1–22. doi: 10.1145/3134681.
    1. Debnam KJ, Kumodzi T. Adolescent perceptions of an interactive mobile application to respond to teen dating violence. J Interpers Violence. 2019;36(13-14):6821–6837. doi: 10.1177/0886260518821455.
    1. Emezue C. Digital or digitally delivered responses to domestic and intimate partner violence during COVID-19. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(3):e19831. doi: 10.2196/19831.
    1. Glass NE, Perrin NA, Hanson GC, Bloom TL, Messing JT, Clough AS, et al. The longitudinal impact of an internet safety decision aid for abused women. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(5):606–615. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.014.
    1. Koziol-McLain J, Vandal A, Wilson D, Nada-Raja S, Dobbs T, McLean C, et al. Efficacy of a web-based safety decision aid for women experiencing intimate partner violence: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018;19:e426. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8617.
    1. Anderson EJ, Krause KC, Krause CM, Welter A, McClelland DJ, Garcia DO, et al. Web-based and mHealth interventions for intimate partner violence victimization prevention: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019;1524838019888889(4):870–884. doi: 10.1177/1524838019888889.
    1. Constantino RE, Braxtor B, Ren D, Burroughs JD, Doswell WM, Wu L, et al. Comparing online with face-to-face helpp intervention in women experiencing intimate partner violence. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015;36:430–438. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.991049.
    1. Edwards KM. Intimate partner violence and the rural-urban-suburban divide: myth or reality? A critical review of the literature. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2015;16:359–373. doi: 10.1177/1524838014557289.
    1. Finn J, Atkinson T. Promoting the safe and strategic use of technology for victims of intimate partner violence: evaluation of the technology safety project. J Fam Violence. 2009;24(1):53–59. doi: 10.1007/s10896-008-9207-2.
    1. Brown A, Lopez G, Lopez MH. Digital divide narrows for Latinos as more Spanish speakers and immigrants go online. Washington DC: Pew Research Center; 2016.
    1. Baron LF, Gomez R. Living in the limits: Migration and information practices of undocumented Latino migrants. In: Choudrie J, Islam M, Wahid F, Bass J, Priyatma J, editors. Information and communication technologies for development. IFIP advances in information and communication technology. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 147–158.
    1. Jimenez C. From telephones in rural Oaxaca to mobile phones among Mixtec farm workers in Oxnard, California. New Media Soc. 2011;19:2059–2074. doi: 10.1177/1461444816655098.
    1. Lei H, Nahum-Shani I, Lynch K, Oslin D, Murphy SA. A “SMART” design for building individualized treatment sequences. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;8(1):21–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143152.
    1. Rilet WT, Rivera DE. Methodologies for optimizing behavioral interventions: introduction to special section. Transl Behav Med. 2014;4(3):234–237. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0281-0.
    1. Brown CH, Have TRT, Jo B, Dagne G, Wyman PA, Muthen B, et al. Adaptive design for randomized trials in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30(1):1–25. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100223.
    1. Dutton MA. Empowering and healing battered women. New York: Springer; 1993.
    1. Decker MR, Wood SN, Kennedy R, Hameeduddin Z, Tallam C, Akumu I, et al. Adapting the myPlan safety app to respond to intimate partner violence for women in low- and middle-income country settings: app tailoring and randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):808. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08901-4.
    1. Ford-Gilboe M, Varcoe C, Scott-Storey K, Wuest J, Case J, Currie LM, Glass N, Hodgins M, MacMillan H, Perrin N, Wathen CN. A tailored online safety and health intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence: the iCAN plan 4 safety randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4143-9.
    1. Koziol-McLain J, Vandal AC, Nada-Raja S, Wilson D, Glass NE, Eden KB, McLean C, Dobbs T, Case J. A web-based intervention for abused women: the New Zealand isafe randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1395-0.
    1. Tarzia L, Murray E, Humphreys C, Glass N, Taft A, Valpied J, Hegarty K. I-DECIDE: an online intervention drawing on the psychosocial readiness model for women experiencing domestic violence. Womens Health Issues. 2016;26(2):208–216. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.07.011.
    1. Glass NE, Clough A, Messing JT, Bloom T, Brown ML, Eden KB. Longitudinal impact of the myPlan app on health and safety among college women experiencing partner violence. J Interpers Violence. 2021:088626052199188. 10.1177/0886260521991880.
    1. Sabri B, Njie-Carr VPS, Messing JT, Glass N, Brockie T, Hanson G, Case J, Campbell JC. The weWomen and our circle randomized controlled trial protocol: a web-based intervention for immigrant, refugee, and indigenous women with intimate partner violence experiences. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019;76:79–84. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.11.013.
    1. Saleebey D. The strengths perspective in social work practice. 4. Boston: Pearson Education Inc; 2006.
    1. Cluss PA, Chang JC, Hawker L, Scholle SH, Dado D, Buranosky R, et al. The process of change for victims of intimate partner violence: support for a psychosocial readiness model. Womens Health Issues. 2006;16(5):262–274. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2006.06.006.
    1. Manthey TJ, Knowles B, Asher D, Wahab S. Strengths-based practice and motivational interviewing. Adv Soc Work. 2011;12(2):126–151. doi: 10.18060/959.
    1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Enhancing motivation for change in substance use disorder treatment. Treatment Improvement Protocol TIP 35. 2019. . Accessed 13 Oct 2021.
    1. de Shazer S. Clues: investigating solutions in brief therapy. London: Norton Professional Books; 1998.
    1. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB. The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues. 1996;17(3):283–316. doi: 10.1177/019251396017003001.
    1. Johnson DM, Worell J, Chandler RK. Assessing psychological health and empowerment in women: the personal progress scale revised. Women Health. 2005;41(1):109–129. doi: 10.1300/j013v41n01_07.
    1. Goodman LA, Cattaneo LB, Thomas K, Woulfe J, Chong SK, Smyth KF. Advancing domestic violence program evaluation: development and validation of the Measure of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) Psychol Violence. 2015;5(4):355–366. doi: 10.1037/a0038318.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
    1. Mollica RF, Caspi-Yavin Y, Bollini P, Truong T, Tor S, Lavelle J. The Harvard trauma questionnaire. Validating a cross-cultural instrument for measuring torture, trauma, and posttraumatic stress disorder in Indochinese refugees. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992;180(2):111–116. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199202000-00008.
    1. Myer L, Smit J, Le Roux L, Parker S, Stein DJ, Seedat S. Common mental disorders among HIV-infected individuals in South Africa: prevalence, predictors, and validation of brief psychiatric rating scales. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2008;22(2):147–158. doi: 10.1089/apc.2007.0102.
    1. Murphy SA. An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Stat Med. 2005;24(10):1455–1481. doi: 10.1002/sim.2022.
    1. Nahum-Shani I, Qian M, Almirall D, Pelham WE, Gnagy B, Fabiano GA. Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(4):457–477. doi: 10.1037/a0029372.
    1. Kidwell KM, Postow MA, Panageas KS. Sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial designs in immune-oncology research. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(4):730–736. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1355.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit