It's WeWomen Plus Intervention for Health, Safety and Empowerment (IWWP)

June 23, 2025 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

An Adaptive Intervention to Improve Health, Safety and Empowerment Outcomes Among Immigrant Women With Intimate Partner Violence Experiences

This study evaluates the impact of adaptive technology-based intervention (online, text and phone) "weWomenPlus" on safety, mental health and empowerment of abused immigrant women.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Intimate partner violence (IPV) disproportionately affects immigrant women. However, immigrant women remain an understudied and underserved population in need for evidence-based rigorously evaluated culturally competent interventions that address the health and safety needs of immigrant women. This study used a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) design to rigorously evaluate an adaptive culturally informed intervention tailored to needs of immigrant women with IPV experiences. For the first stage randomization, participants were randomly assigned to a personalized online intervention or the standard online safety information/usual care control arm and safety, mental health and empowerment outcomes were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months follow up. For the second stage randomization, women who did not report significant improvement in safety (i.e., reduction in IPV) and in empowerment from baseline to follow up points (i.e., non-responders) were re- randomized to the augmented intervention components (text only or a combination of text and phone) developed in the formative phase. Data on outcomes (safety, mental health and empowerment) were assessed at 6 and 12 months of re- randomization. By re-randomizing participants, the study assessed the relative effectiveness of two strategies for augmentation (text only or a combination of text and phone) on safety, mental health and empowerment outcomes among the non-responders of the online interventions. In addition, the study compared the non-responder group of women to the responder group of the online interventions to determine if the strategies of augmentation brought the non-responders to the level of responders on safety, mental health and empowerment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1265

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Johns Hopkins University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Experiences of intimate partner violence within the past one year
  • Foreign born immigrant woman
  • 18-64 years of age
  • Can access and use internet and phone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No experience of intimate partner violence within the past one year
  • US born
  • Younger than 18 or older than 64
  • Cannot access or use internet or phone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: WeWomen Plus Text messaging only
For second stage randomization, the text messaging intervention will follow-up with non-responder group of immigrant women (those who did not improve in intervention or control arms above) on their enactment of tailored (tailored to the DA Score and priorities) safety plan provided in the online weWomen intervention or non-tailored (standard list of resources) safety recommendations provided in the usual care control arm
The WeWomen Plus intervention is a technology based (online, text and phone)culturally tailored intervention designed to reduce the risk of future intimate partner violence or a homicide, improve mental health and increase empowerment of abused immigrant women.
Experimental: WeWomen Plus Text messaging and phone
Second stage randomization will involve both text (described above) and phone calls for non-responder group of women in intervention or control arm. The phone calls will draw from motivational interviewing adapted for abused women, solution focused therapy and a strengths perspective to discuss women's safety concerns and other needs, and strategies to strengthen social support networks
The WeWomen Plus intervention is a technology based (online, text and phone)culturally tailored intervention designed to reduce the risk of future intimate partner violence or a homicide, improve mental health and increase empowerment of abused immigrant women.
Experimental: Personalized Online Intervention
For first stage randomization, women in the personalized online intervention group receive the online safety planning intervention informed by culturally specific danger assessment (DA) tool.
The WeWomen Plus intervention is a technology based (online, text and phone)culturally tailored intervention designed to reduce the risk of future intimate partner violence or a homicide, improve mental health and increase empowerment of abused immigrant women.
No Intervention: Online usual care or Standard Online Safety Information
Women in the Standard Online Safety Information received the non-DA informed usual safety planning resources modeled on national and state domestic violence online resources, but not provided with immediate and visual feedback to their level of danger or a tailored safety planning.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Severity of Physical and Sexual Intimate Partner Violence as Assessed by the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (1st month), 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The adapted version of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2; Straus, 1996) was used to measure the severity and frequency of abusive or violent acts in intimate partner relationships. The CTS2 subscales included physical aggression, injury, psychological aggression, and sexual coercion. Response categories ranged from 0=never to 4=very frequently. Total scores ranged from 0-164, with higher scores indicating greater frequency and severity of intimate partner violence experiences. Items were scored using the severity-times-frequency weighted score method as recommended by Straus (1996). Change scores were calculated as the differences between baseline CTS-2 total scores and follow-up scores at each time point (3, 6, and 12 months).
Baseline (1st month), 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to assess depression symptoms over the past two weeks based on DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder. Each of the 9 items was scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Total scores were computed by summing all items, ranging from 0-27. Higher scores indicated more severe depression symptoms (1-4=minimal, 5-9=mild, 10-14=moderate, 15-19=moderately severe, 20-27=severe depression). Change scores were calculated as the differences between baseline PHQ-9 total scores and follow-up scores at each time point (3, 6, and 12 months).
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Symptoms of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as Assessed by the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Past week PTSD symptoms were measured using the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, a 16-item scale with response options that ranged from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). Mean scores across all 16 items were calculated for each participant. Higher scores indicated more severe PTSD symptoms, with scores greater than 2.5 indicating clinically significant PTSD symptoms. Change scores were calculated as the differences between baseline mean scores and the follow-up mean scores at each time point (3, 6, and 12 months).
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Overall Empowerment as Assessed by the Personal Progress Scale-Revised
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The Personal Progress Scale-Revised was used to measure empowerment across multiple domains including positive self-evaluation, self-esteem, emotional regulation, gender-role and cultural identity awareness, self-efficacy, self-care, problem-solving, and assertiveness skills. Participants rated 28 items on a 7-point scale from 1 (almost never) to 7 (almost always). Total scores were calculated by summing all items, ranging from 28-196, with higher scores indicating greater empowerment. Change scores were calculated as the differences between baseline total scores and follow-up scores at each time point (3, 6, and 12 months).
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Empowerment Related to Safety as Assessed by the Measure of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The MOVERS scale was used to measure empowerment within the safety domain, including safety-related goal development, self-efficacy beliefs, and knowledge of support resources. Participants rated 13 items on a 5-point scale from 1 (never true) to 5 (always true). Mean scores across all 13 items were calculated for each participant. Higher scores indicated greater safety-related empowerment. Change scores were calculated as the differences between baseline mean scores and follow-up mean scores at each time point (3, 6, and 12 months).
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bushra Sabri, Johns Hopkins University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 29, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 29, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00224324
  • R01MD013863-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Study Data/Documents

  1. Study Protocol
    Information identifier: 10.1186/s12889-021-11930-2

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Violence, Domestic

Clinical Trials on WeWomen Plus technology based intervention

Subscribe