Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Physiotherapy Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women With Frozen Shoulder

28. juli 2026 opdateret af: Sükran Acar, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

The Effects of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women With Frozen Shoulder

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of a physiotherapy program on pain levels, shoulder range of motion, functional status, pain catastrophizing, perceived change, sleep quality, and quality of life in postmenopausal women diagnosed with frozen shoulder, with and without Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT). The findings are expected to contribute to personalized treatment planning for postmenopausal women with frozen shoulder and help fill the gap in current literature.

Studieoversigt

Status

Ikke rekrutterer endnu

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

This study investigates the impact of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) on treatment outcomes in postmenopausal women undergoing a standardized physiotherapy program for frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis).

Participants are divided into two groups based on their current HRT status: postmenopausal women receiving HRT and those not receiving HRT. Both groups participate in the same structured physiotherapy program.

Assessments are conducted at baseline and after the intervention using the following outcome measures:

Primary Outcome Measures: Pain intensity evaluated by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and shoulder pain and disability evaluated by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).

Secondary Outcome Measures: Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) measured by goniometry, sleep quality assessed via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), menopause-specific quality of life measured by the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL), cognitive response to pain evaluated by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and overall treatment perception evaluated by the Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale.

By comparing these parameters, the study aims to elucidate whether systemic HRT modulates pain perception, functional recovery, and general quality of life during physical rehabilitation in postmenopausal women with frozen shoulder.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

56

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

  • Navn: Şükran Acar, Master of Science Candidate
  • Telefonnummer: +905346071963
  • E-mail: acarsukran58@gmail.com

Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup

Studiesteder

    • Kadikoy
      • Istanbul, Kadikoy, Tyrkiet (Türkiye), 34710
        • Centro Reformer Pilates Center
        • Kontakt:
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Şükran Acar, MSc Candidate
        • Underforsker:
          • Derya Çelik, PROF.DR.
        • Underforsker:
          • Çiğdem Yayla Abide, PROF.DR.

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postmenopausal female patients aged 40 to 60 years.
  • Shoulder pain at rest and during activities of daily living lasting for more than 3 months.
  • Clinical diagnosis of Stage I or Stage II frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis).
  • Passive range of motion (ROM) loss of greater than 25% compared to the unaffected shoulder in at least two movement planes (flexion, abduction, internal rotation, or external rotation).
  • Reduced range of motion of less than 50% compared to the unaffected side in at least one movement direction (flexion, abduction, internal rotation, or external rotation).
  • Increased restriction of external and internal rotation during glenohumeral abduction from 45 to 90 degrees.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Passive external rotation range of motion of less than 30 degrees (<30°).
  • Presence of glenohumeral arthritis confirmed by radiography.
  • History or presence of inflammatory joint disease.
  • History of malignancy or active cancer diagnosis.
  • Previous treatment for the current shoulder condition (e.g., physiotherapy and rehabilitation, intra-articular injections, or surgical intervention).
  • Baseline shoulder pain score of less than 3 (<3) on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Ikke-randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: HRT Group
Postmenopausal women diagnosed with primary frozen shoulder who are receiving hormone replacement therapy and undergoing the standardized physiotherapy program.
A standardized and supervised shoulder physical therapy and rehabilitation program delivered face-to-face in a clinical setting by an expert physiotherapist over 12 weeks (2 sessions per week, 50-60 minutes per session), supplemented by a prescribed home exercise program. The program includes patient education, stretching exercises, active-assisted and active range of motion (ROM) exercises, glenohumeral and scapular mobilization, progressive strengthening exercises, and post-treatment cryotherapy. Exercise progression is individualized based on participants' demographic characteristics, pain levels, progressive overload principles, and subjective feedback. Following each session, participants are routinely monitored for any exercise-related adverse effects.
Andre navne:
  • Shoulder Rehabilitation Protocol
  • Physical Therapy and Exercise Therapy
Aktiv komparator: Non-HRT Group
Postmenopausal women diagnosed with primary frozen shoulder who are not receiving hormone replacement therapy and undergoing the standardized physiotherapy program.
A standardized and supervised shoulder physical therapy and rehabilitation program delivered face-to-face in a clinical setting by an expert physiotherapist over 12 weeks (2 sessions per week, 50-60 minutes per session), supplemented by a prescribed home exercise program. The program includes patient education, stretching exercises, active-assisted and active range of motion (ROM) exercises, glenohumeral and scapular mobilization, progressive strengthening exercises, and post-treatment cryotherapy. Exercise progression is individualized based on participants' demographic characteristics, pain levels, progressive overload principles, and subjective feedback. Following each session, participants are routinely monitored for any exercise-related adverse effects.
Andre navne:
  • Shoulder Rehabilitation Protocol
  • Physical Therapy and Exercise Therapy

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change from Baseline in Shoulder Function and Disability Scores using Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)
Shoulder pain and disability will be assessed using the Turkish version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). The index consists of 13 items divided into two subscales: pain (5 items) and disability (8 items). Each item is scored on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. For the pain subscale, 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst imaginable pain". For the disability subscale, 0 indicates "no difficulty" and 10 indicates "so difficult that help is required". Subscale scores and total SPADI scores are calculated, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater pain severity and functional disability.
Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)
Change from Baseline in Shoulder Pain Intensity Scores using Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)
Shoulder pain intensity will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst imaginable pain". Participants will rate their pain levels separately at rest and during movement. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity.
Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change from Baseline in Active and Passive Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM)
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)
Active and passive shoulder range of motion (flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation) will be assessed in degrees using a universal goniometer according to standardized goniometric measurement protocols. Higher degree values indicate better mobility.
Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)
Change from Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) Scores
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)
Health-related quality of life will be evaluated using the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL). The questionnaire consists of 29 items divided into four domains: Vasomotor (3 items), Psychosocial (7 items), Physical (16 items), and Sexual (3 items). Items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all bothered) to 6 (extremely bothered). Domain scores and total scores are calculated, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of menopausal symptoms and lower quality of life.
Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)
Change from Baseline in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Scores
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)
Pain-related catastrophizing thoughts and behaviors will be evaluated using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The 13-item self-report questionnaire assesses three dimensions: Rumination (4 items), Magnification (3 items), and Helplessness (6 items). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("all the time"). Total scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain catastrophizing.
Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)
Overall Patient-Perceived Improvement Measured by 5-Point Global Rating of Change (GROC) Scale
Tidsramme: Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)
Participants' overall perception of improvement or worsening in their shoulder condition will be assessed using a 5-point Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale. The scale ranges from 1 ("much worse") to 3 ("no change") to 5 ("much better"). Higher scores indicate greater perceived overall improvement in shoulder function and symptoms.
Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)
Change from Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Scores
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)
Sleep quality and disturbances over the past month will be evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The 19-item self-report questionnaire generates seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, yielding a global score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher global scores indicate poorer sleep quality, with a total score greater than 5 indicating poor sleep quality.
Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24)

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Efterforskere

  • Studieleder: DERYA ÇELİK, PROF.DR., Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Anslået)

1. september 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

1. juli 2027

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

1. oktober 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

25. juli 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

28. juli 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

30. juli 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

30. juli 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

28. juli 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. juli 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • IUC-oThQlo0H

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

IPD-planbeskrivelse

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because no data-sharing plan was established for this study.

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .