- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT07698782
Psychological Distress and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy (Distress RT)
Advanced Cancer Stage and Healthcare Coverage Predict Longitudinal Psychological Distress and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy
The goal of this observational study is to understand the emotional and physical burden (distress) experienced by cancer patients as they go through radiotherapy treatmen. Researchers want to learn what specific problems such as physical symptoms, financial worries, or travel issues most affect a patient's well-being and how those feelings change over the course of several weeks of care.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does high distress lead to negative clinical results, such as missing radiation appointments, significant weight changes, or needing to be admitted to the hospital unexpectedly? Which groups of patients are at the highest risk for severe distress (for example, those with advanced-stage cancer or those using specific types of health insurance)? What are the most common physical, practical, and emotional problems that cause distress during the different phases of treatment?
Participants will:
Complete a survey about their health history and background before treatment begins.
Rate their distress level on a scale of 0 to 10 (using a tool called a Distress Thermometer) and check off specific concerns from a 42-item list each week during their 2 to 8 weeks of radiotherapy.
Complete one final follow-up assessment one month after finishing their radiotherapy treatment.
Studieoversigt
Status
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljeret beskrivelse
Study Rationale and Objective: Psychological distress in cancer patients is a recognized catalyst for negative clinical outcomes, yet it remains under-monitored in many tertiary care settings. This research was designed as a prospective longitudinal study to move beyond single-point prevalence surveys and capture the fluctuating nature of distress throughout the radiotherapy (RT) trajectory. The primary objective was to evaluate the longitudinal patterns of distress and identify independent clinical and socioeconomic predictors that correlate with treatment adherence and unplanned healthcare utilization.
Operational Framework: The study tracked a purposive sample of 374 cancer outpatients across eight distinct assessment phases: Baseline (T0): Pre-treatment assessment of demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical status.
Weekly Monitoring (T1-T8): Real-time tracking of distress levels and symptom accumulation throughout the typical 2- to 8-week RT course.
Follow-up (T9): Post-treatment assessment one month after the completion of radiotherapy.
Multidimensional Assessment: Distress was quantified using the NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT), a 0-10 visual analogue scale, with a score≥4 triggering clinical concern. To identify the specific drivers of this distress, participants utilized a 42-item Problem List covering five critical domains:
Physical: Monitoring the accumulation of RT-related side effects such as fatigue, pain, and changes in appearance.
Practical: Identifying logistical barriers, including financial instability (specifically under the Universal Coverage Scheme), transportation difficulties, and work interference.
Psychological: Tracking anxiety, fear, and sadness. Social/Family: Assessing caregiving burdens and relationship stressors. Spiritual: Exploring concerns regarding faith and the meaning of life. Statistical Focus: The study employed multivariate ordinal logistic regression to isolate independent predictors of distress severity while controlling for age and gender. This rigorous analysis aimed to confirm how clinical factors, such as Advanced Cancer Stage (III-IV), and socioeconomic factors, such as Healthcare Coverage type, significantly increase the risk of high psychological burden. By correlating these predictors with tangible clinical outcomes, including significant weight changes, missed appointments, and unplanned hospital admissions, the study provides an evidence-based rationale for a multidisciplinary, holistic nursing approach in oncology departments.
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiesteder
-
-
Bangkok
-
Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand, 10210
- Chulabhorn Hospital
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
- Voksen
- Ældre voksen
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients diagnosed with cancer who are receiving treatment through radiotherapy.
- Individuals aged 18 years or older.
- Ability to communicate effectively and understand the Thai language.
- Voluntary agreement to participate in the research project.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of emergency medical conditions or a clinical necessity to receive treatment by other methods.
- Inability to attend follow-up monitoring assessments as dictated by the study protocol.
- Participants who request to withdraw from the project during the study period.
- Failure to complete the full course of radiotherapy treatment due to disease progression.
- A physician's diagnosis of a brain or neurological condition that interferes with the patient's ability to perceive or assess their own symptoms.
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Støttende pleje
- Tildeling: N/A
- Interventionel model: Enkelt gruppeopgave
- Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: Longitudinal monitoring of psychological distress in cancer outpatients undergoing radiotherapy
This arm consists of a single purposive cohort of 374 cancer outpatients who are observed across eight distinct phases: a pre-treatment baseline (T0), weekly assessments during the 2-to-8-week radiotherapy course, and a one-month post-treatment follow-up (T2).
The focus of this arm is the naturalistic observation of fluctuating psychological distress levels and their correlation with clinical outcomes such as treatment adherence and unplanned hospitalizations.
|
This study utilizes a standardized longitudinal psychological screening protocol to monitor cancer outpatients across eight distinct phases: a pre-treatment baseline (T0), weekly assessments throughout the 2-to-8-week radiotherapy (RT) course (T1-Tn), and a final follow-up one month post-treatment (T2). Participants are screened using the NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT), a 0-10 visual analog scale for global burden, and a 42-item Problem List that identifies specific stressors across five multidimensional domains: physical, psychological, social/family, practical, and spiritual. This longitudinal framework distinguishes the protocol from standard cross-sectional surveys by capturing the real-time accumulation of side effects and secondary distress peaks occurring mid-treatment. In accordance with the hospital's clinical trigger model, a DT score of ≥ 4 is established as the threshold for clinically significant distress, which facilitates immediate referral to a multidisciplinary team. |
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in psychological distress severity scores as measured by the NCCN Distress Thermometer throughout the radiotherapy course
Tidsramme: Participants are assessed at eight distinct time points: Baseline (T0): Prior to the initiation of radiotherapy. Weekly Monitoring (T1-Tn): Once per week throughout the 2-to-8-week Follow-up (T2): One month after completion
|
The global psychological burden is quantified using the NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT), a single-item visual analog scale ranging from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress).
A score of ≥ 4 is established as the clinical cut-off point, indicating moderate-to-severe distress that warrants multidisciplinary intervention.
|
Participants are assessed at eight distinct time points: Baseline (T0): Prior to the initiation of radiotherapy. Weekly Monitoring (T1-Tn): Once per week throughout the 2-to-8-week Follow-up (T2): One month after completion
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Identification of independent predictors of moderate-to-severe psychological distress
Tidsramme: Analysis is conducted using data collected from the pre-treatment baseline (T0) through the completion of the 2-to-8-week radiotherapy course and the one-month post-treatment follow-up (T2)
|
This outcome measure focuses on isolating specific clinical and socioeconomic variables that significantly increase the risk of a patient reaching a Distress Thermometer (DT) score of ≥ 4. The study utilizes multivariate ordinal logistic regression to evaluate the predictive power of factors such as Cancer Stage (III-IV vs. 0-II), Healthcare Coverage type (Universal Coverage Scheme vs. Civil Servant benefits), and Treatment Intent (Palliative vs. Curative).
By identifying these independent predictors, the research aims to provide a profile for early identification of high-risk individuals who require immediate multidisciplinary intervention
|
Analysis is conducted using data collected from the pre-treatment baseline (T0) through the completion of the 2-to-8-week radiotherapy course and the one-month post-treatment follow-up (T2)
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Sponsor
Efterforskere
- Studieleder: Saengrawee Thanthong, Chulabhorn Royal Academy
Publikationer og nyttige links
Generelle publikationer
- Mitchell AJ, Chan M, Bhatti H, Halton M, Grassi L, Johansen C, Meader N. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: a meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Feb;12(2):160-74. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70002-X. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
- Ownby KK. Use of the Distress Thermometer in Clinical Practice. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(2):175-179. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
- Bussaba P, Sowanna N, Kanchanasurakit S, Lamkham N, Srivichaiwong N, Limsakul T. Survival Time Difference Between High and Low Symptom Burden Considering Physical and Emotional Symptoms Among Terminal Cancer Patients. J Gen Fam Med. 2026 Feb 27;27(2):e70106. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.70106. eCollection 2026 Mar.
- Fabian A, Ruhle A, Domschikowski J, Trommer M, Wegen S, Becker JN, Wurschi G, Boeke S, Sonnhoff M, Fink CA, Kasmann L, Schneider M, Bockelmann E, Treppner M, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Krug D, Nicolay NH; Young DEGRO Group. Psychosocial distress in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: a prospective national cohort of 1042 patients in Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(11):9017-9024. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04837-5. Epub 2023 May 10.
- Bunchuailua W, Kapol N, Krichanchai S, Krongkaew W, Andres EB. Quality of Life Among Thai Patients With Advanced Cancer: Findings From the APPROACH Study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2026 Apr;22(2):308-318. doi: 10.1111/ajco.70037. Epub 2025 Oct 23.
- Paek SC, Meemon N, Wan TT. Thailand's universal coverage scheme and its impact on health-seeking behavior. Springerplus. 2016 Nov 10;5(1):1952. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3665-4. eCollection 2016.
- Park H, Kang D, Lee TH, Oh D. Dynamics in distress and quality of life in patients undergoing radiation therapy: a prospective cohort study. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Apr 14;33(5):379. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09371-3.
- Miroshnychenko A, Rae C, Tsangaris E, Breakey VR, D'Agostino N, Klassen AF. Clinical and Demographic Factors Associated with Distress in Adolescent and Young Adults with Cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2021 Dec;10(6):682-689. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2020.0196. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Nøgleord
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- 039/2564
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivelse
Confidentiality Protocols: The study protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chulabhorn Royal Academy explicitly states that all participant data will be kept strictly confidential and will be presented only as an aggregate overview.
Data Protection: All personally identifiable information has been removed from the final dataset to ensure anonymization.
Data Destruction: In accordance with the ethical considerations defined in the "Methods for maintaining volunteer confidentiality," the investigators have committed to destroying all recording data and deleting the dataset immediately upon the completion of the research project.
Access Restrictions: The protocol specifies that data is stored in a locked secure cabinet accessible only to the primary investigators to prevent unauthorized viewing.
Consequently, there is no plan to share individual participant data (IPD) with outside researchers, as doing so would conflict with the established privacy protections.
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .
Kliniske forsøg med Systematic monitoring
-
Biotronik Japan, Inc.Afsluttet
-
National Institute on Aging (NIA)Afsluttet
-
Bluedrop Medical LimitedAfsluttetDiabetisk fodForenede Stater
-
Medical University of ViennaAfsluttetIkke-traumatisk kompartmentsyndrom i benØstrig
-
Celero Systems, Inc.Afsluttet
-
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di ParmaRegione Emilia-RomagnaAfsluttetDiabetes mellitus, type 1Italien
-
LifeBridge HealthAmerican Heart Association (AHA)AfsluttetKoronararteriesygdom | Hjertefejl | Diabetes mellitusForenede Stater
-
University of Mississippi Medical CenterAfsluttetLungeventilation | KapnografiForenede Stater
-
Singapore General HospitalKK Women's and Children's Hospital; SingHealth PolyclinicsAfsluttet