A Phase 1/2A, Single Dose Study Of PF-04383119 In Japanese Patients With Moderate To Severe Pain From Osteoarthritis Of The Knee
29. Januar 2021 aktualisiert von: Pfizer
A PHASE 1/2A, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOUBLE BLIND, DOSE-ESCALATION, MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, EFFICACY AND PHARMACOKINETICS, OF A SINGLE INTRAVENOUS DOSE OF PF-04383119 IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE PAIN FROM OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of single IV doses of PF-04383119 in Japanese patients with moderate to severe pain from OA of the knee (Part I).
To evaluate the preliminary analgesic efficacy of PF-04383119 in Japanese patients with moderate to severe pain from OA of the knee in comparison with placebo (Part I and Part II).
Studienübersicht
Status
Status
Abgeschlossen
Bedingungen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Einschreibung
83
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienorte
-
-
Gunma
-
Takasaki, Gunma, Japan, 370-0829
- National Hospital Organization Takasaki General Medical Center
-
-
Kanagawa
-
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan, 210-0852
- Nippon Kokan Clinic
-
-
Kanagawa-ken
-
Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa-ken, Japan, 252-0802
- Fujisawa Shounandai Hospital
-
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa-ken, Japan, 224-0024
- Medical Corporation Yamamoto Kinenkai Yamamoto Kinen Hospital
-
-
Oita
-
Beppu-shi, Oita, Japan, 874-0937
- Nakamura Hospital
-
-
Tokyo
-
Fuchu City,, Tokyo, Japan, 183-8524
- Tokyo Metropolitan Fuchu Hospital
-
Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 106-8581
- FuruKawabashi Hospital
-
Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 108-8639
- Research Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo
-
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 140-0001
- Kitashinagawa Third Hospital
-
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 141-0001
- Oosaki Hospital Tokyo Heart Center
-
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 141-8625
- Kanto Medical Center NTT EC
-
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 162-8655
- International Medical Center of Japan Toyama Hospital
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
35 Jahre bis 75 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Alle
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Japanese Male or female, Age 35-65 (Part 1), Age 35-75 (Part 2)
- Diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee based on American College of Rheumatology criteria
- Knee pain, and radiographic evidence of knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade ≥2) obtained within 1 year of enrollment
- At least one of the following: age >50, morning stiffness <30 minutes in duration, crepitus, and OA of the knee must involve the index tibiofemoral joint and must have present for at least 6 months
- Patients who meet at least one of the following: unwilling to take non-opiate pain medications, or for whom non-opiate pain medications have failed, or are candidates for or seeking invasive interventions such as intraarticular injections, knee arthroplasty, or total knee surgery
- Pain levels as required by the protocol at Screening and Baseline
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis or history of RA, any inflammatory arthritis, gout, Paget's disease or any other disease that in the Investigator's opinion would interfere with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of OA
- Patients with regional pain syndromes suggestive of fibromyalgia or regional pain caused by lumbar or cervical compressions with radiculopathy or at risk of developing radiculopathy.
- Diagnosis or history of fibromyalgia
- Planned surgical procedure during the duration of the study
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Verdreifachen
Anzahl der Arme
6
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / ArmTeilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlungIntervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Placebo-Komparator: Placebo
|
single dose of 10 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 100 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 200 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 25 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 50 mcg/kg IV
single dose of Placebo IV
|
|
Experimental: 100 µg/kg
|
single dose of 10 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 100 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 200 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 25 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 50 mcg/kg IV
single dose of Placebo IV
|
|
Experimental: 200 µg/kg
|
single dose of 10 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 100 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 200 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 25 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 50 mcg/kg IV
single dose of Placebo IV
|
|
Experimental: 10 µg/kg
|
single dose of 10 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 100 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 200 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 25 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 50 mcg/kg IV
single dose of Placebo IV
|
|
Experimental: 25 µg/kg
|
single dose of 10 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 100 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 200 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 25 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 50 mcg/kg IV
single dose of Placebo IV
|
|
Experimental: 50 mcg/kg
|
single dose of 10 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 100 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 200 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 25 mcg/kg IV
single dose of 50 mcg/kg IV
single dose of Placebo IV
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Zeitfenster: Day 1 up to Day 92 for tanezumab 10, 25, 50 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1, 2); Day 1 up to Day 120 for tanezumab 100 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1, 2), 200 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1)
|
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
An SAE was an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Treatment-emergent: events between first dose of study drug and up to Day 1 through Day 120 (Part 1 and 2) were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state
|
Day 1 up to Day 92 for tanezumab 10, 25, 50 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1, 2); Day 1 up to Day 120 for tanezumab 100 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1, 2), 200 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1)
|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Baseline
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Part 1 and Part 2)
|
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall).
It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition.
The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn.
The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory).
Higher score indicated best memory.
|
Baseline (Part 1 and Part 2)
|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Day 1
Zeitfenster: Day 1 (Part 1 and 2)
|
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall).
It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition.
The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn.
The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory).
Higher score indicated best memory.
|
Day 1 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Day 4/5
Zeitfenster: Day 4/5 (Part 1 and 2)
|
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall).
It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition.
The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn.
The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory).
Higher score indicated best memory.
|
Day 4/5 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 1
Zeitfenster: Week 1 (Part 1 and Part 2)
|
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall).
It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition.
The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn.
The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory).
Higher score indicated best memory.
|
Week 1 (Part 1 and Part 2)
|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 2
Zeitfenster: Week 2 (Part 1 and Part 2)
|
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall).
It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition.
The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn.
The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory).
Higher score indicated best memory.
|
Week 2 (Part 1 and Part 2)
|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 3
Zeitfenster: Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)
|
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall).
It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition.
The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn.
The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory).
Higher score indicated best memory.
|
Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 4
Zeitfenster: Week 4 (Part 1 and Part 2)
|
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall).
It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition.
The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn.
The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory).
Higher score indicated best memory.
|
Week 4 (Part 1 and Part 2)
|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 13
Zeitfenster: Week 13 (Part 1 and Part 2)
|
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall).
It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition.
The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn.
The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory).
Higher score indicated best memory.
|
Week 13 (Part 1 and Part 2)
|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 17
Zeitfenster: Week 17 (Part 1 and Part 2)
|
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall).
It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition.
The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn.
The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory).
Higher score indicated best memory.
|
Week 17 (Part 1 and Part 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 1
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 2
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 3
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 4
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 5
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 5 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 5 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline In Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 6
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 6 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 6 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline In Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 7
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 7 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 10 0= extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 7 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline In Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 8
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 9
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 9 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 9 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 10
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 10 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 10 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 11
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 11 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 11 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 12
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 12 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 12 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 13
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 1
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 2
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 3
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 4
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in The Past 24 Hours at Week 5
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 5 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 5 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 6
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 6 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 6 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 7
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 7 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 7 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 8
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 9
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 9 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 9 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 10
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 10 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 10 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 11
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 11 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 11 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 12
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 12 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 12 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 13
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 1
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 2
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 3
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 4
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 5
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 5 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 5 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 6
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 6 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 6 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 7
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 7 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 7 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 8
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 9
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 9 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 9 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 10
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 10 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 10 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 11
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 11 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 11 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 12
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 12 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 12 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 13
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)
|
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity.
Higher score indicated greater pain intensity.
VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
|
Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Version 3.1 (WOMAC 3.1) Subscales Scores at Week 1
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)
|
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions).
Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living.
The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme).
Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions.
Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
|
Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 2
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)
|
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions).
Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living.
The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme).
Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions.
Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
|
Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 4
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)
|
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions).
Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living.
The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme).
Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions.
Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
|
Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 8
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)
|
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions).
Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living.
The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0=none to 100= extreme).
Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions.
Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
|
Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 13
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)
|
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions).
Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living.
The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme).
Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions.
Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
|
Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 17
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 17 (Part 1 and 2)
|
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions).
Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living.
The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme).
Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions.
Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
|
Baseline, Week 17 (Part 1 and 2)
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) - Part 1
Zeitfenster: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) - Part 1
Zeitfenster: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0-infinity)] - Part 1
Zeitfenster: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
AUC (0-infinity) is defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-infinity).
It is obtained from AUC (0-t) plus AUC (t-infinity).
|
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
|
Area Under The Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) - Part 1
Zeitfenster: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
AUClast is defined as the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration.
|
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
|
Volume of Distribution (Vz) - Part 1
Zeitfenster: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
Vz is defined as the the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug.
|
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
|
Volume of Distribution At Steady State (Vss) - Part 1
Zeitfenster: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
Vss is defined as the the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug.
It is the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state.
|
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
|
Systemic Clearance (CL) - Part 1
Zeitfenster: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body.
|
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
|
Mean Residence Time (MRT) - Part 1
Zeitfenster: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
MRT was calculated as area under the moment curve/area under the concentration effect curve.
|
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
|
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) - Part 1
Zeitfenster: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
|
Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusion
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Positive Anti-tanezumab Antibody Test Results
Zeitfenster: Baseline up to Day 120
|
Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
|
Baseline up to Day 120
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Studienbeginn
6. Juni 2008
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss
25. Dezember 2009
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss
25. Dezember 2009
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht
25. April 2008
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
29. April 2008
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
Zuerst gepostet
30. April 2008
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes Update gepostet
21. Februar 2021
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
29. Januar 2021
Zuletzt verifiziert
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. Januar 2021
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- A4091022
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Ja
Beschreibung des IPD-Plans
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g.
protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions.
Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .