Nuevo Amanecer: Promoting the Psychosocial Health of Latinas
Studienübersicht
Status
Status
Bedingungen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Studientyp
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Einschreibung
Phase
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
California
-
Multiple Locations, California, Vereinigte Staaten
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Self-identifies as Latina
- Diagnosed with Stage 0, I, II, or III in the prior month
- Primarily Spanish-speaking, or Spanish monolingual
- Aged 18 or older
- Diagnosed in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, San Francisco or Santa Clara counties, California.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous cancer diagnosis except for non-melanoma skin cancer
- Terminal illness
- Stage IV breast cancer (distant metastasis)
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Single
Anzahl der Arme
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / ArmTeilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlungIntervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Peer Support Program
Nuevo Amanecer is the peer support program.
Participants receive the peer support program as soon as possible after randomization.
|
Andere Namen:
|
|
Kein Eingriff: Wait-list Control
Waits six months, and at the end of the six months is offered the option of participating in the peer support program.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Physical Well-being a Subcale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B)
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
FACT-B was used as the breast cancer-specific quality-of-life measure. FACT-B consists of 5 subscale scores pertaining to 4 well-being dimensions (physical, social-family, emotional, functional) and additional breast cancer concerns. A total overall score is the sum of all subscales. Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. Psychometric analysis in our Spanish-speaking Latina sample resulted in modifications to FACT-B: physical well-being subscale. Of 7 items, 1 was dropped because it was conceptually different from other items on that scale. Modified subscale was scored by summing items. Possible score ranges for physical well-being were 0-24. Higher scores indicated greater well-being. |
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Social/Family Well-being a Subcale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B)
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
FACT-B was used as the breast cancer-specific quality-of-life measure. FACT-B consists of 5 subscale scores pertaining to 4 well-being dimensions (physical, social-family, emotional, functional) and additional breast cancer concerns. A total overall score is the sum of all subscales. Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. Psychometric analysis in our Spanish-speaking Latina sample resulted in modifications to FACT-B: social/family well-being subscale. Of 7 items, 2 were dropped because the items were conditional on having a partner (resulting in lots of missing data). Modified subscale was scored by summing items. Possible score ranges for social/family well-being were 0-20. Higher scores indicated greater well-being. |
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Emotional Well-being a Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B)
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
FACT-B was used as the breast cancer-specific quality-of-life measure. FACT-B consists of 5 subscale scores pertaining to 4 well-being dimensions (physical, social-family, emotional, functional) and additional breast cancer concerns. A total overall score is the sum of all subscales. Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. Psychometric analysis in our Spanish-speaking Latina sample resulted in modifications to FACT-B: emotional well-being subscale. Of 6 items, 1 was dropped because of low item-scale correlations and it was conceptually different from the other items on that scale (only positively worded item on the scale). Modified subscale was scored by summing items. Possible score ranges for emotional well-being were 0-20. Higher scores indicated greater well-being. |
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Breast Cancer Concerns a Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B)
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
FACT-B was used as the breast cancer-specific quality-of-life measure. FACT-B consists of 5 subscale scores pertaining to 4 well-being dimensions (physical, social-family, emotional, functional) and additional breast cancer concerns. A total overall score is the sum of all subscales. Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. Psychometric analysis in our Spanish-speaking Latina sample resulted in modifications to FACT-B: breast cancer concerns subscale. Of 7 items, 2 were dropped because of low item-scale correlations and were conceptually different from the other items on that scale. Modified subscale was scored by summing items. Possible score ranges for emotional well-being were 0-28. Higher scores indicated greater well-being. |
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Enjoyment of Life a Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B)
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
FACT-B was used as the breast cancer-specific quality-of-life measure. FACT-B consists of 5 subscale scores pertaining to 4 well-being dimensions (physical, social-family, emotional, functional) and additional breast cancer concerns. A total overall score is the sum of all subscales. Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. Psychometric analysis in our Spanish-speaking Latina sample resulted in modifications to FACT-B: functional well-being subscale. Of 7 items, 3 were dropped because items were conceptually different and did not converge psychometrically with the other items on that scale; the remaining 4 items were specific to enjoyment of life, thus we renamed the subscale to "Enjoyment of Life". Modified subscale was scored by summing items. Possible score ranges for enjoyment of life were 0-16. Higher scores indicated greater well-being. |
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Total Score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B)
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
FACT-B was used as the breast cancer-specific quality-of-life measure. FACT-B consists of 5 subscale scores pertaining to 4 well-being dimensions (physical, social-family, emotional, functional) and additional breast cancer concerns. A total overall score is the sum of all subscales. Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. Psychometric analysis in our Spanish-speaking Latina sample resulted in modifications to each of the FACT-B subscale. The total overall score is based on the sum of modified subscales (see above primary outcomes for modifications to subscales). Possible score ranges for the total overall score were 0-108. Higher scores indicated greater well-being. |
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Anxiety a Subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
BSI was used to measure general symptoms of distress.
BSI consists of 3 scale scores pertaining to general symptoms of distress (anxiety, depression, somatization).
Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit, and 4=extremely.
Scores were the mean of nonmissing items.
Possible score ranges for anxiety were 0-4.
Higher scores indicated more distress.
|
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Depression a Subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
BSI was used to measure general symptoms of distress.
BSI consists of 3 scale scores pertaining to general symptoms of distress (anxiety, depression, somatization).
Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit, and 4=extremely.
Scores were the mean of nonmissing items.
Possible score ranges for depression were 0-4.
Higher scores indicated more distress.
|
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Somatization a Subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
BSI was used to measure general symptoms of distress.
BSI consists of 3 scale scores pertaining to general symptoms of distress (anxiety, depression, somatization).
Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit, and 4=extremely.
Scores were the mean of nonmissing items.
Possible score ranges for somatization were 0-4.
Higher scores indicated more distress.
|
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Breast Cancer-Specific Distress of the Intrusive Thoughts Scale
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
Breast cancer-specific distress was measured with the 7 item Intrusive Thoughts Scale (anchored to the breast cancer experience), a subscale of the revised Impact of Event Scale (RIES).
Response options were 0=not at all, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, and 3=often.
Using the published scoring algorithm, items were summed after recoding responses to 0, 1, 3, and 5. Possible score ranges were 0-35.
Higher scores indicate greater distress.
|
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Sponsor
Mitarbeiter
Mitarbeiter
Ermittler
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Steven Gregorich, PhD, University of California, San Francisco
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Bonilla J, Alhomsi A, Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Ortiz C, Samayoa C, Torres-Nguyen A, Palomino H, Coleman V, Urias A, Gonzalez N, Cervantes SA, Duron Y, Napoles AM. Sharing research results with Latina breast cancer survivors who participated in a community-engaged behavioral RCT study: a descriptive cross-sectional survey study. Trials. 2022 Jan 8;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05945-8.
- Bonilla J, Escalera C, Santoyo-Olsson J, Samayoa C, Ortiz C, Stewart AL, Napoles AM. The importance of patient engagement to quality of breast cancer care and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study among Latina breast cancer survivors in rural and urban communities. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Feb 9;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01200-z.
- Chacon L, Santoyo-Olsson J, Samayoa C, Alhomsi A, Stewart AL, Ortiz C, Escalera C, Napoles AM. Self-Efficacy for Coping with Breast Cancer Treatment Among Spanish-Speaking Latinas. Health Equity. 2021 Apr 26;5(1):245-252. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0152. eCollection 2021.
- Napoles AM, Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Ortiz C, Garcia-Jimenez M. Evaluating the Implementation of a Translational Peer-Delivered Stress Management Program for Spanish-Speaking Latina Breast Cancer Survivors. J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):875-884. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1202-y.
- Napoles AM, Ortiz C, Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Gregorich S, Lee HE, Duron Y, McGuire P, Luce J. Nuevo Amanecer: results of a randomized controlled trial of a community-based, peer-delivered stress management intervention to improve quality of life in Latinas with breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 2015 Jul;105 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e55-63. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302598. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
- Napoles AM, Santoyo-Olsson J, Ortiz C, Gregorich S, Lee HE, Duron Y, Graves K, Luce JA, McGuire P, Diaz-Mendez M, Stewart AL. Randomized controlled trial of Nuevo Amanecer: a peer-delivered stress management intervention for Spanish-speaking Latinas with breast cancer. Clin Trials. 2014 Apr;11(2):230-8. doi: 10.1177/1740774514521906. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
Zuerst gepostet
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes Update gepostet
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 15BB-1300
- 15BB-1301 (Andere Zuschuss-/Finanzierungsnummer: California Breast Cancer Research Program)
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .