The Effect of Resistance to Participant-Supported Reaching on Workspace of the Hand in Severe Chronic Stroke
Studienübersicht
Status
Status
Bedingungen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Einschreibung
Phase
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, Vereinigte Staaten, 60611
- Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Paresis confined to one side, with substantial motor impairment of the upper limb
- Absence of motor impairment in the unimpaired limb
- Absence of severe concurrent medical problems (e.g. cardiorespiratory impairment, changes in management of hypertension)
- Absence of any acute or chronic painful condition in the upper extremities or spine
- Absence of hemineglect
- Capacity to provide informed consent.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Grundlegende Wissenschaft
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Vervierfachen
Anzahl der Arme
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / ArmTeilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlungIntervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Viscous Resistance & Abduction Loading
The intervention for the experimental group entails practicing reaching utilizing the robotic device, ACT3D, with the experimental element of horizontal viscosity in combination with abduction loading.
|
All participants will undergo 8 weeks of reaching practice in the ACT3D.
Frequency and duration will be matched at three 1.5-hour sessions per week.
All reaching practice will include abduction (gravity) loading standardized to the participant's motor abilities.
The experimental group intervention will also include a horizontal viscous resistant element similar to pushing the arm through molasses.
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Abduction Loading
The intervention for the active comparison group entails practicing reaching utilizing the robotic device, ACT3D, with only abduction loading.
|
All participants will undergo 8 weeks of reaching practice in the ACT3D.
Frequency and duration will be matched at three 1.5-hour sessions per week.
All reaching practice will include abduction (gravity) loading standardized to the participant's motor abilities.
The experimental group intervention will also include a horizontal viscous resistant element similar to pushing the arm through molasses.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Peak Endpoint Reaching Velocity
Zeitfenster: Pre-test (Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention) to post-test (Within one week of the final intervention session) & post-test to 3-month follow-up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
We will quantify peak endpoint reaching velocity with a robotic device, ACT3D, when a participant with stroke reaches as fast as they can toward an outward target under various abduction (gravity) loading conditions.
This measure will serve as the primary measure for changes in dynamic multi-joint strength.
|
Pre-test (Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention) to post-test (Within one week of the final intervention session) & post-test to 3-month follow-up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
|
Change in Reaching Work Area
Zeitfenster: Pre-test (Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention) to post-test (Within one week of the final intervention session) & post-test to 3-month follow-up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
We will quantify total reaching work area (combined shoulder and elbow range of motion) with a robotic device, ACT3D, under various abduction (gravity) loading conditions.
This measure will serve as the primary measure changes in dynamic multi-joint range of motion.
|
Pre-test (Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention) to post-test (Within one week of the final intervention session) & post-test to 3-month follow-up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment
Zeitfenster: Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Qualitative and clinical assessment of general motor impairment of arm following stroke.
|
Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
|
Rancho Los Amigos Functional Test for the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity
Zeitfenster: Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Qualitative and clinical assessment of activity limitation (function) of the arm following stroke.
|
Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
|
Stroke Impact Scale
Zeitfenster: Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Structured interview to assess all domains of the ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) in individuals following stroke.
|
Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
|
Motor Activity Log
Zeitfenster: Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Structured interview assessing the individual with stroke's perception of difficulty in the context of arm function during a variety of activities of daily living.
|
Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Sponsor
Mitarbeiter
Mitarbeiter
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JP. Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: neuroscientific implications. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Nov;183(2):215-23. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1029-6. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
- Ellis MD, Sukal-Moulton T, Dewald JP. Progressive shoulder abduction loading is a crucial element of arm rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Oct;23(8):862-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968309332927. Epub 2009 May 19.
- Ellis MD, Sukal T, DeMott T, Dewald JP. Augmenting clinical evaluation of hemiparetic arm movement with a laboratory-based quantitative measurement of kinematics as a function of limb loading. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(4):321-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968307313509. Epub 2008 Mar 8.
- Ellis MD, Acosta AM, Yao J, Dewald JP. Position-dependent torque coupling and associated muscle activation in the hemiparetic upper extremity. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Feb;176(4):594-602. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0637-x. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
- Ellis MD, Holubar BG, Acosta AM, Beer RF, Dewald JP. Modifiability of abnormal isometric elbow and shoulder joint torque coupling after stroke. Muscle Nerve. 2005 Aug;32(2):170-8. doi: 10.1002/mus.20343.
- Ellis MD, Carmona C, Drogos J, Dewald JPA. Progressive Abduction Loading Therapy with Horizontal-Plane Viscous Resistance Targeting Weakness and Flexion Synergy to Treat Upper Limb Function in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Front Neurol. 2018 Feb 19;9:71. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00071. eCollection 2018.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
Zuerst gepostet
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)
Letztes Update gepostet
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- H133G110245
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .