Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Application of FreeStyle Libre 2 for Evaluating Glycemic Variability Characteristics in Patients With Extreme Glucose Metabolism Phenotypes

31. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: Ren qian, Peking University People's Hospital
This cross-sectional study aims to further subdivide diabetes mellitus into more homogeneous subgroups by focusing on extreme glucose metabolism phenotypes, including monogenic diabetes with β cell dysfunction, hyperinsulinemia caused by excessive β cell secretion, and postprandial hypoglycemia phenotypes. By utilizing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology and the FreeStyle Libre 2 glucose monitoring device, this study will evaluate glycemic variability patterns in patients with extreme glucose metabolism phenotypes and perform comparative analyses using existing CGM data from healthy populations and patients with type 2 diabetes in our center's database. The study aims to address current gaps in understanding glycemic variability characteristics under extreme β cell functional states, provide novel dynamic monitoring evidence to support early identification, precise classification, and personalized management of these special metabolic states, and simultaneously screen for biomarkers to enable more accurate disease identification, thereby offering potential avenues for improving personalized treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Diabetes mellitus is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide, affecting individuals regardless of race, sex, or age. Over the past decade, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in China has increased markedly. Statistics indicate that there were 140.9 million adults with diabetes mellitus in China in 2021, and this number is projected to rise to 174.4 million by 2045.

Monogenic diabetes refers to diabetes mellitus caused by mutations in a single gene and accounts for approximately 1%-5% of all diabetes mellitus cases. Monogenic diabetes results from a single pathogenic defect in one of more than 40 genes. Since the type 2 diabetes-like presentation in young individuals was termed maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) by Fajans and characterized by an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, understanding of the phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity of monogenic diabetes has continued to expand. The main categories of monogenic diabetes include MODY, neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM), and syndromic diabetes. In monogenic diabetes, high-penetrance variants predominantly cause severe impairment of β cell development and insulin secretion, leading to diabetes mellitus independent of other risk factors. In recent years, substantial progress has been made in elucidating the genetic defects underlying monogenic diabetes, improving diagnostic accuracy for rare subtypes, deepening understanding of patients' clinical courses, and contributing to the identification of optimal treatment strategies through precision medicine approaches. However, many aspects of this disease remain insufficiently characterized, including characteristic glycemic profiles and objective, quantifiable indicators applicable to clinical differential diagnosis. Therefore, further research is urgently needed.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a multifactorial disease resulting from the combined effects of genetic and environmental factors and accounts for approximately 96% of diabetes mellitus cases worldwide. The pathophysiology of T2DM is characterized by insulin resistance, pancreatic β cell dysfunction, and chronic inflammation. Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance may occur several years before the clinical onset of T2DM. Previous studies have demonstrated that more than 75% of individuals in the United States exhibit increased insulin secretion during oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) despite normal glucose clearance. This finding suggests that in a substantial proportion of the population, hyperinsulinemia may represent the earliest warning signal of metabolic disease risk, even in the presence of normal glucose tolerance. Targeted lifestyle interventions aimed at hyperinsulinemia, such as increased resistance training, nutritional strategies, and improved sleep, have been shown to produce immediate and sustained improvements in insulin resistance. However, within this gray zone spanning the progression from normal glucose tolerance to overt diabetes mellitus, characteristic glycemic profiles have not yet been clearly defined. Therefore, exploring glycemic variability characteristics is essential for elucidating the onset and progression of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as for enabling early intervention.

The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), as the most widely used diagnostic gold standard for assessing glycemic characteristics, employs a standardized 75 g glucose load to evaluate early-phase and second-phase β cell secretory capacity following glucose stimulation. As an artificially constructed experimental simulation, OGTT does not reflect daily physiological conditions and can capture only short-term, single-day glycemic variability, thus failing to represent true blood glucose trajectories. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can dynamically and continuously reflect interstitial fluid glucose levels in real time, providing critical information on the amplitude, frequency, and patterns of glycemic variability that cannot be obtained through traditional point blood glucose testing. CGM has become animportant tool for refined diabetes mellitus management. This technology provides technical support for delineating characteristic glycemic variability patterns under different insulin secretion states.

Accordingly, this study will use CGM to objectively and quantitatively compare glycemic variability parameters and patterns among four groups: patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes versus patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and patients with hyperinsulinemia versus healthy controls. This approach will reveal the effects of extreme β cell function on diurnal glycemic variability patterns and characterize distinctive dynamic glycemic profiles. In addition, this study will screen for biomarkers to facilitate early identification, diagnosis, and treatment of this specific type of diabetes mellitus, while simultaneously deepening understanding of glycemic characteristics in the early stages of insulin resistance and providing a theoretical basis for subsequent precise prevention and intervention.

Primary study objective: To evaluate glycemic variability patterns in patients with extreme glucose metabolism phenotypes, including β-MND, hyperinsulinemia, and postprandial hypoglycemia phenotypes.

Secondary study objective:

  1. To assess differences in blood glucose profiles between individuals with extreme glucose metabolism phenotypes and healthy populations, as well as patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), particularly among comparable T2DM subgroups.
  2. To screen for biomarkers that enable more accurate identification of this disease.

Studientyp

Beobachtungs

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

120

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Probenahmeverfahren

Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe

Studienpopulation

this study will use CGM to objectively and quantitatively compare glycemic variability parameters and patterns among four groups: patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes versus patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and patients with hyperinsulinemia versus healthy controls. This approach will reveal the effects of extreme β cell function on diurnal glycemic variability patterns and characterize distinctive dynamic glycemic profiles.

60 patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes and 60 patients with hyperinsulinemia and normal glucose tolerance who meet the inclusion criteria outlined will be recruited from the endocrinology outpatient clinic of our hospital.

Groups A1 and A2, as well as Groups B1 and B2, will be matched at a 1:1 ratio by age, sex, and BMI. In addition, Groups A1 and A2 will be matched at a 1:1 ratio by HbA1c.

Beschreibung

  1. Inclusion Criteria:

    1. Group A1:

      • Age ≥ 18 years;
      • Patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes confirmed by DNA sequencing or other diagnostic testing.
    2. Group A2:

      • Age ≥ 18 years;
      • Patients with confirmed type 2 diabetes mellitus;
      • Derived from this center's existing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) database.
    3. Group B1:

      • Age ≥ 18 years;
      • Normal fasting plasma glucose (≥ 3.6 and < 6.1 mmol/L) and normal 2-hour plasma glucose during OGTT (≥ 3 and < 7.8 mmol/L);
      • Fasting insulin ≥ 25 µU/mL and/or 2-hour insulin during OGTT greater than 10 times the fasting insulin level.
    4. Group B2:

      • Age ≥ 18 years;
      • Normal glucose tolerance meeting the 2024 ADA criteria: fasting plasma glucose < 5.6 mmol/L, 2-hour plasma glucose during OGTT < 7.8 mmol/L;
      • According to laboratory reference standards, fasting insulin ≥ 2.6 and < 25 µU/mL, and 2-hour insulin during OGTT 5-10 times the fasting insulin level.
      • Derived from this center's existing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) database.
  2. Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Neonates younger than 4 months of age (congenital diabetes);
    2. Pregnancy;
    3. Patients with positive pancreatic autoantibody test results;
    4. Patients with severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases, hepatic disease, or renal disease;
    5. Patients who have participated in other clinical trials.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

Kohorten und Interventionen

Gruppe / Kohorte
Group A : diabetes mellitus group
Group A1 (patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes): 60 cases; Group A2 (patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus): 60 cases
Group B : normal glucose tolerance group
Group B1 (normal glucose tolerance with fasting / postprandial hyperinsulinemia): 60 cases; Group B2 (normal glucose tolerance with normal insulin levels): 60 cases

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
mean blood glucose in mmol/L
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glucose management indicator (GMI) in %
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
highest glucose values in mmol/L
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
lowest glucose values in mmol/L
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
coefficient of variation (CV)
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) in mmol/L
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG) in mmol/L
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
mean of daily differences (MODD) in mmol/L
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
average daily risk range (ADRR)
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
largest amplitude of glycemic excursions (LAGE) in mmol/L
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
high blood glucose index (HBGI)
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
low blood glucose index (LBGI)
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
time in range (TIR) in %
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
time above range (TAR) in %
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
time below range (TBR) in %
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
weight in kilograms
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, and the above indicators were measured only once at the initial enrollment.
weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
The study is a cross-sectional study, and the above indicators were measured only once at the initial enrollment.
height in meters
Zeitfenster: The study is a cross-sectional study, and the above indicators were measured only once at the initial enrollment.
weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
The study is a cross-sectional study, and the above indicators were measured only once at the initial enrollment.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

25. Mai 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

25. Dezember 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

9. Januar 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

14. April 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

26. April 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

4. Mai 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

2. Juni 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

31. Mai 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 2026PHB206-001

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .