Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Tirzepatide in Thrombectomy-Treated Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Trial (TOPAZ)

24. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: yifang zhu

Effect of Tirzepatide on Functional Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Blinded Outcome Assessment Trial

Acute ischemic stroke caused by blockage of a large artery in the brain is one of the leading causes of death and long-term disability worldwide. For patients with this type of stroke, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), a procedure that removes the blood clot and restores blood flow to the brain, has become the standard treatment. However, even when blood flow is successfully restored, many patients continue to experience disability because of ongoing brain injury caused by inflammation, oxidative stress, and damage to brain cells after the stroke.

This study aims to evaluate whether tirzepatide, a medication that activates both glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) pathways, can improve recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion who receive thrombectomy. Tirzepatide is currently approved for the treatment of conditions such as type 2 diabetes and obesity. Previous studies have shown that tirzepatide can improve blood sugar control, reduce body weight, and provide beneficial effects on cardiovascular health. Laboratory studies and early clinical evidence suggest that medications targeting GLP-1 and GIP pathways may also have protective effects on the brain by reducing inflammation, protecting brain cells, improving blood vessel function, and supporting recovery after stroke.

In this study, eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by blockage of a major brain artery will be randomly assigned to receive either tirzepatide plus standard stroke care or standard stroke care alone. Participants will receive two subcutaneous injections of tirzepatide: the first dose before the thrombectomy procedure and the second dose 7 days after the procedure. The study will include multiple hospitals and will use independent assessment of outcomes to ensure reliable evaluation of treatment effects.

The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether early treatment with tirzepatide can improve functional recovery 90 days after stroke, measured by the patient's ability to perform daily activities and live independently. The study will also evaluate whether tirzepatide is safe in patients with acute ischemic stroke by monitoring adverse events, complications, and other clinical outcomes.

The findings from this study may provide important evidence for a new treatment approach to improve recovery after thrombectomy and reduce disability among patients with severe ischemic stroke.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

1.1 Stroke Burden Approximately 2.4 million new stroke cases occur annually in China, resulting in about 1.1 million deaths each year. More than 11 million people are currently living with stroke, and the incidence, prevalence, and mortality rates continue to rise, with an increasing trend toward younger age groups. Stroke has become the leading cause of death and disability in China, imposing a substantial burden on patients, families, and society as a whole.

Among all stroke subtypes, acute ischemic stroke (AIS) accounts for approximately 70%-80% of cases. Patients with concomitant large vessel occlusion (LVO) experience the most severe neurological deficits. Although some patients are eligible for intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), only 26.5% achieved functional independence at 90 days, while the 90-day mortality rate remains as high as 18.9%, making AIS-LVO one of the greatest challenges in stroke management.

1.2 Endovascular thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion The cornerstone of treatment for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) is rapid recanalization of the occluded artery to salvage the ischemic penumbra. Since 2015, five landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including MR CLEAN, EXTEND-IA, and SWIFT PRIME, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, have demonstrated the efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with AIS-LVO, representing a revolutionary breakthrough in stroke care.

Subsequently, a pooled meta-analysis published in The Lancet in 2016 showed that EVT achieved a 90-day favorable functional outcome rate of 46.0%, representing a 2.71-fold increase compared with standard medical therapy, further confirming the substantial clinical benefit of thrombectomy.

The DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trials further extended the EVT treatment window to 24 hours after symptom onset. These studies demonstrated that, among carefully selected patients with salvageable ischemic penumbra identified by advanced imaging, EVT significantly improved clinical outcomes even when performed 6-24 hours after stroke onset. More recently, the BAOCHE and ATTENTION trials extended the proven benefits of EVT to posterior circulation stroke. Consequently, EVT has received the highest level of recommendation in international stroke guidelines.

To promote stroke prevention and treatment, the National Health Commission of China established the National Stroke Prevention and Control Committee, aiming to advance and expand access to evidence-based stroke interventions, including EVT. Early thrombectomy during the acute phase of stroke plays a critical role in reducing disability and mortality, thereby alleviating the societal burden of stroke.

1.3 Factors influencing outcomes after reperfusion therapy Although approximately 90% of patients achieve successful reperfusion (mTICI 2c-3) following EVT, only 40%-45% attain favorable functional outcomes at 90 days. Nearly half of patients remain severely disabled or die despite successful recanalization.

Recent studies have identified multiple factors associated with poor outcomes after reperfusion therapy, including advanced age, multiple comorbidities, poor collateral circulation, distal microthrombosis and microvascular dysfunction, stress hyperglycemia, inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, hemorrhagic transformation, and cerebral edema. Therefore, interventions targeting multiple pathophysiological pathways may further improve outcomes following EVT.

Several studies have investigated strategies aimed at improving microcirculatory dysfunction, reducing inflammation, and providing neuroprotection before or after thrombectomy. Some of these studies have demonstrated promising neuroprotective effects and improved clinical outcomes.

1.4 Neuroprotective effects of GLP-1/GIP dual receptor agonists after stroke Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors are widely expressed in pancreatic β-cells, the heart, vasculature, kidneys, immune cells, and the central nervous system. GLP-1 receptor agonists exert glucose-lowering and metabolic regulatory effects through multiple mechanisms, including enhancement of glucose-dependent insulin secretion, improvement of insulin resistance, suppression of chronic inflammation, modulation of lipid metabolism, and promotion of weight loss.

Importantly, GLP-1 receptor agonists can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and directly act on the central nervous system. Their neuroprotective effects include inhibition of neuronal apoptosis, suppression of neuroinflammation, reduction of oxidative stress, preservation of mitochondrial function, enhancement of synaptic plasticity and cognition, and protection of cerebral vasculature and the neurovascular unit.

Experimental studies using middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) models in diabetic db/db mice have demonstrated that GLP-1 analogues, including exendin-4 and liraglutide, reduce oxidative stress and inflammation, improve cerebral microcirculation, and activate the p-Akt/p-eNOS signaling pathway. Exendin-4 also partially reverses MCAO-induced motor dysfunction, cognitive impairment, and urinary dysfunction.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is another major incretin hormone. GIP receptors are expressed in pancreatic β-cells, adipose tissue, the heart, vascular endothelium, immune cells, and the central nervous system. GIP receptor agonists enhance insulin secretion, promote β-cell survival, improve insulin resistance, reduce chronic inflammation, and facilitate weight control through improved lipid handling and redistribution.

Like GLP-1 receptor agonists, GIP receptor agonists can directly act on the brain, exerting anti-apoptotic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and mitochondrial protective effects while preserving BBB integrity and neurovascular unit function.

Given these complementary mechanisms, GLP-1/GIP dual receptor agonists simultaneously activate both signaling pathways and may provide synergistic benefits in glycemic control and neuroprotection compared with single-receptor agonists.

A recent preclinical study investigated the role of tirzepatide in repairing BBB injury after ischemic stroke. Using both MCAO mouse models and oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) cellular models, investigators demonstrated that tirzepatide improved neurological function, reduced BBB permeability, and increased expression of the tight-junction protein Claudin-1. Mechanistic analyses suggested that these effects were mediated through activation of the C/EBP-α/Claudin-1 signaling pathway, thereby maintaining BBB integrity.

Accumulating evidence indicates that GLP-1 receptor agonists have become first-line glucose-lowering agents with benefits extending beyond glycemic control. These benefits include substantial weight loss, reduced risks of coronary heart disease and stroke, and lower rates of heart failure hospitalization. Clinical studies further suggest that GLP-1/GIP dual receptor agonists achieve cardiovascular outcomes comparable to those of GLP-1 receptor agonists while providing superior glycemic control and weight reduction.

BBB disruption, hyperglycemia-related injury, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and neuronal apoptosis are recognized as major mechanisms underlying secondary brain injury after successful recanalization in AIS-LVO. Both GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonists can cross the BBB and exert multiple neuroprotective effects, including glucose lowering, anti-inflammatory and antioxidative actions, BBB preservation, inhibition of neuronal apoptosis, and enhancement of synaptic plasticity. Moreover, the two pathways may exert synergistic neuroprotective effects.

A recent randomized study involving 140 patients with AIS-LVO compared semaglutide (0.5 mg administered before thrombectomy and during the first postoperative week) with standard care. The semaglutide group achieved a 10% higher rate of excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) at 90 days without significant safety concerns. More recently, the GALLOP-2 trial suggested that semaglutide administered before EVT and again on day 7 after thrombectomy increased the proportion of patients achieving an excellent 90-day functional outcome by 15.3% compared with controls. These findings suggest that early administration of a GLP-1/GIP dual receptor agonist, through its comprehensive multi-target neuroprotective mechanisms, may substantially improve outcomes in patients with AIS-LVO following successful reperfusion.

Therefore, there is an urgent need for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early GLP-1/GIP dual receptor agonist therapy in patients with AIS-LVO after successful recanalization.

Tirzepatide, the investigational drug in the present study, is a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist. Multiple high-quality randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that tirzepatide provides glycemic control and weight reduction superior or non-inferior to GLP-1 receptor agonists such as semaglutide, with an excellent safety profile. These findings have been published in leading journals including The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, and JAMA. Tirzepatide is currently approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea.

The SUMMIT trial enrolled 731 obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), who were randomized to tirzepatide (up to 15 mg weekly) or placebo for at least 52 weeks. Tirzepatide significantly reduced the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure (9.9% vs. 15.3%), corresponding to a 38% relative risk reduction.

Similarly, the SURMOUNT-5 trial randomized 751 adults with obesity but without type 2 diabetes to receive tirzepatide (10 or 15 mg weekly) or semaglutide (1.7 or 2.4 mg weekly) for 72 weeks. Tirzepatide demonstrated superior reductions in body weight and waist circumference.

Collectively, tirzepatide and related agents have accumulated substantial evidence supporting their efficacy and safety in populations with diabetes, obesity, heart failure, and stroke, with treatment durations extending up to 72 weeks and favorable safety profiles.

For patients with acute ischemic stroke, "time is brain," and rapid initiation of neuroprotective therapy is crucial. Starting tirzepatide at 2.5 mg and waiting four weeks before escalation to 5 mg may delay the therapeutic window. Therefore, we referenced a Phase I clinical study published in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, in which patients with type 2 diabetes received tirzepatide 5 mg as the initial dose for eight weeks. No serious adverse events or treatment discontinuations due to adverse events occurred, and all adverse events were mild to moderate and reversible, supporting the acceptable safety of a 5-mg starting dose.

Based on these findings and the need for rapid therapeutic effects in acute ischemic stroke, the present study will use 5 mg as the initial dose. We propose a multicenter, randomized, controlled, blinded-endpoint trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two subcutaneous doses of tirzepatide in patients with anterior-circulation AIS-LVO, administered before thrombectomy and on day 7 after the procedure. This strategy has the potential to further improve functional outcomes in patients undergoing EVT for acute ischemic stroke.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

430

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

    • Jiangsu
      • Suzhou, Jiangsu, China, 215004
        • The Second Afliated Hospital of SooChow University
        • Kontakt:
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Age >18 years and ≤80 years;
  2. Acute ischemic stroke with imaging-confirmed anterior large vessel occlusion at:

    • Terminal ICA,
    • M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery, or
    • Dominant M2 segment;
  3. NIHSS score between 6 and 25 prior to randomization;
  4. Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 6-10 before randomization;
  5. Time from symptom onset (or last known well) to planned endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours;
  6. Pre-stroke mRS score of 0-1;
  7. Patients presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset are eligible for direct EVT. Patients presenting between 6 and 24 hours after symptom onset must undergo advanced imaging demonstrating a salvageable perfusion mismatch and meet the DEFUSE-3 criteria: an infarct core volume <70 mL, a mismatch volume >15 mL, and a mismatch ratio >1.8;
  8. Written informed consent provided by the participant or a legally authorized representative.

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:

  1. Posterior-circulation large vessel occlusion stroke;
  2. Receipt of intravenous thrombolysis prior to randomization;
  3. Simultaneous bilateral anterior-circulation occlusions or concurrent anterior- and posterior-circulation occlusions;
  4. Intracranial hemorrhage on baseline CT or MRI, including subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracerebral hemorrhage; evidence of large established infarction, defined as:

    • ASPECTS <6,
    • Ischemic core volume ≥70 mL on CTP, or
    • Infarction involving >1/3 of the middle cerebral artery territory;
  5. Active bleeding within the previous month (e.g., gastrointestinal, genitourinary, or retinal hemorrhage), major organ surgery or biopsy within 14 days before stroke onset, or known bleeding diathesis;
  6. Refractory hypertension despite treatment, defined as persistent systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg;
  7. Severe hepatic or renal impairment, including:

    • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m²,
    • Serum creatinine >200 μmol/L,
    • Child-Pugh Class C or higher liver disease,
    • Recurrent unexplained hypoglycemia;
  8. Blood glucose <2.7 mmol/L or >22.2 mmol/L; platelet count <80 × 10⁹/L; or international normalized ratio (INR) >1.7;
  9. Previous use of GLP-1 receptor agonists or GIP receptor agonists, or known hypersensitivity to these agents;
  10. Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or diagnosis of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 (MEN2);
  11. History of severe anxiety or depression prior to stroke onset;
  12. Severe underlying disease with life expectancy <1 year, such as advanced malignancy;
  13. Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  14. Participation in another clinical trial.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Tirzepatide Intervention Group
Participants will receive two subcutaneous injections of tirzepatide: the first administered before EVT and the second administered 7 days after EVT, in addition to standard medical care
Participants will receive two subcutaneous injections of tirzepatide (5 mg each): the first administered before EVT and the second administered 7 days after EVT, in addition to standard medical care
Andere Namen:
  • Mounjaro
Participants will receive EVT and standard medical care without tirzepatide.
Aktiver Komparator: Control Group
Participants will receive EVT and standard medical care without tirzepatide.
Participants will receive EVT and standard medical care without tirzepatide.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
The primary efficacy outcome: Proportion of patients achieving an excellent functional outcome
Zeitfenster: 90 ± 7 days after randomization
A excellent functional outcome is defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 90 days. The Modified Rankin Scale ranges from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates no symptoms, 1 indicates symptoms without significant disability, 2 indicates slight disability, 3 indicates moderate disability, 4 indicates moderately severe disability, 5 indicates severe disability, and 6 indicates death. Higher scores indicate worse functional outcomes.
90 ± 7 days after randomization
The primary safety outcome: All-cause mortality
Zeitfenster: 90 ± 7 days
death from any cause within 90 days
90 ± 7 days

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
The secondary efficacy outcome: Distribution of mRS scores at 90 days after randomization
Zeitfenster: 90 ± 7 days
Ordinal Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) analysis. The Modified Rankin Scale ranges from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates no symptoms, 1 indicates symptoms without significant disability, 2 indicates slight disability, 3 indicates moderate disability, 4 indicates moderately severe disability, 5 indicates severe disability, and 6 indicates death. Higher scores indicate worse functional outcomes.
90 ± 7 days
The secondary efficacy outcome: Proportion of patients achieving an good functional outcome
Zeitfenster: 90 ± 7 days
A good functional outcome is defined as an Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days after randomization.
90 ± 7 days
The secondary safety outcome: Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH)
Zeitfenster: within 48 hours after thrombectomy
defined by the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification within 48 hours after thrombectomy
within 48 hours after thrombectomy

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Early neurological improvement
Zeitfenster: 7 ± 2 Days
Early neurological improvement defined as a reduction of ≥4 points in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from baseline to 7 days. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. The NIHSS ranges from 0 to 42, with 0 indicating no neurological deficit and higher scores indicating more severe neurological impairment. Higher scores indicate worse neurological outcomes.
7 ± 2 Days
Recanalization rate of the target LVO vessel
Zeitfenster: at 7 days after EVT or hospital discharge
Defined as the proportion of patients with successful recanalization of the target occluded vessel at 7 days after EVT or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first, among those achieving successful reperfusion after EVT (final mTICI score ≥2b).
at 7 days after EVT or hospital discharge
Health-related quality of life
Zeitfenster: 90 ± 7 days
Assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. The EQ-5D-5L assesses five health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated on a 5-level scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates no problems and 5 indicates extreme problems or inability to perform the activity. Higher scores indicate worse health status.
90 ± 7 days
Early neurological deterioration
Zeitfenster: within 48 hours after randomization
Early neurological deterioration defined as an increase of ≥4 points in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score within 48 hours after randomization.
within 48 hours after randomization
any intracranial hemorrhage
Zeitfenster: within 48 hours after EVT
any intracranial hemorrhage on CT or MRI scan
within 48 hours after EVT
All-cause mortality within 7 days after randomization
Zeitfenster: within 7 days after randomization
defined as death from any cause
within 7 days after randomization
serious adverse events
Zeitfenster: 90 ± 7 days
serious adverse events within 90 days
90 ± 7 days
Hypoglycemic events
Zeitfenster: within 7 days after randomization
random blood glucose <2.7 mmol/L within 7 days after randomization.
within 7 days after randomization

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Guodong Xiao, MD.PhD, The Second Afliated Hospital of SooChow University

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

10. August 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Mai 2028

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Juli 2028

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

17. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

24. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

29. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

29. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

24. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • JD-LK2026069-A01

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .