Motor Cortex Stimulation for Post-Stroke Thalamic Pain
A Study on Mechanisms and Predictive Factors of Motor Cortex Stimulation for Post-Stroke Thalamic Pain Based on Multimodal Imaging
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the mechanisms and predictive factors of motor cortex stimulation (MCS) for treating post-stroke thalamic pain, a challenging central neuropathic pain condition. Approximately 25% of patients show no short-term response to MCS, and about 20% experience long-term efficacy decay, yet the underlying analgesic mechanisms remain unclear and objective predictive biomarkers are lacking.
This study aims to answer the following main questions:
How does MCS modulate thalamic pain through the coordinated interaction of structural connectivity, functional network dynamics, and metabolic balance in the brain? What are the distinct neuroimaging characteristics that differentiate short-term non-responders, long-term responders, and those with long-term efficacy decay? Which multimodal imaging biomarkers can reliably predict short-term and long-term MCS efficacy? Participants will undergo a two-stage MCS surgical procedure. In stage I, epidural electrodes are implanted over the motor cortex, followed by a 2-week external trial stimulation. Participants who achieve a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score will proceed to stage II, receiving an implanted pulse generator for long-term stimulation. Those who do not respond in the short term will have the electrodes removed without undergoing stage II implantation.
All participants will complete baseline clinical assessments and multimodal MRI scans (including T1, DTI, resting-state fMRI, and MRS) before surgery. Participants who receive the permanent implant will undergo follow-up clinical evaluations and repeat MRI scans at 3 and 6 months post-surgery.
Researchers will compare imaging features across three outcome groups-short-term non-responders, long-term responders, and long-term decay group-to identify predictive biomarkers. Multimodal imaging data will be integrated using LASSO regression to build prediction models for both short-term screening and long-term efficacy warning.
This research is expected to establish a "mechanism exploration - efficacy prediction - clinical decision" paradigm, providing objective imaging-based evidence to guide patient selection and postoperative management for MCS treatment.
Studienübersicht
Status
Status
Bedingungen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Background and Rationale
Post-stroke thalamic pain is a refractory central neuropathic pain condition that significantly impairs patients' quality of life. Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulatory therapy, yet its clinical application faces two major challenges: approximately 25% of patients show inadequate short-term response during the external trial phase, and about 20% of initial responders experience progressive efficacy decay within six months of permanent implantation. The neural mechanisms underlying MCS analgesia remain incompletely understood, and objective predictors for patient selection and long-term outcome are lacking.
Study Design
This is a prospective, single-arm cohort study conducted at Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China. A total of 200 patients with refractory post-stroke thalamic pain will be enrolled. All participants will undergo a standardized two-stage MCS surgical protocol. The study design incorporates comprehensive clinical assessments and multimodal MRI acquisition at baseline, with longitudinal follow-up at 3 and 6 months post-surgery for patients receiving permanent implants.
Surgical Protocol
The study employs a modified MCS surgical technique. Preoperative planning utilizes multimodal imaging-guided navigation combined with individual functional brain mapping to identify the optimal motor cortex coverage area. Two 8-contact epidural paddle electrodes are implanted in parallel over the primary motor cortex (M1) and adjacent premotor areas through a small craniotomy. Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring, including somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) for central sulcus localization and motor evoked potentials (MEP) for motor area verification, guides precise electrode placement.
The procedure is conducted in two stages. Stage I involves electrode implantation and external trial stimulation. Following a 2-week trial period with programmed stimulation parameters (40 Hz, 200 μs pulse width), short-term response is determined based on a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline. Responders proceed to Stage II for implantation of an internal pulse generator, while non-responders undergo electrode removal without permanent implantation.
Multimodal Imaging Protocol
All participants undergo a comprehensive MRI protocol at baseline (approximately 38 minutes per session), including:
High-resolution 3D T1-weighted imaging for structural segmentation and thalamic volumetric analysis Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with 64 diffusion directions for white matter tractography and pathway integrity assessment Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) for functional connectivity analysis Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) targeting bilateral thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula for quantification of glutamate, GABA, NAA, choline, and creatine concentrations Participants receiving permanent implants undergo repeat MRI scans at 3 and 6 months post-surgery to capture longitudinal changes in structural, functional, and metabolic measures.
Clinical Assessments
Clinical evaluations are conducted at baseline, 2 weeks (end of trial period), and 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Assessments include:
Pain measures: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Quality of life and function: SF-36, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Emotional and cognitive function: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Adverse event and complication monitoring Analytical Framework
The study employs a "structure-function-metabolism" three-dimensional analytical framework to investigate MCS mechanisms:
Structural dimension: Corticothalamic pathway integrity assessed by DTI metrics (FA, MD, RD) and thalamic gray matter volume Functional dimension: Default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN) connectivity dynamics derived from rs-fMRI independent component analysis Metabolic dimension: Glutamate/GABA ratio and other metabolite concentrations in pain-related brain regions Outcome Classification
Participants are categorized into three outcome groups based on their clinical trajectory:
Short-term non-responders: VAS improvement <50% at 2-week trial (no Stage II implantation) Long-term responders: VAS improvement ≥50% at both 2-week trial and 6-month follow-up Long-term decay group: VAS improvement ≥50% at 2-week trial but <50% at 6-month follow-up Predictive Modeling
The study aims to develop two predictive models:
Short-term screening model: Identifying baseline imaging biomarkers that distinguish short-term responders from non-responders, using LASSO-penalized logistic regression with cross-validation Long-term warning model: Among short-term responders, identifying baseline "vulnerability" markers and neuroplasticity indicators associated with 6-month efficacy decay Sample Size and Statistical Plan
Based on preliminary data from 50 prior cases, the expected outcome distribution is: 25% short-term non-responders, 60% long-term responders, and 15% long-term decay. With a target enrollment of 200 participants, the study is adequately powered for group comparisons and predictive factor identification. Statistical analyses include Kruskal-Wallis H test for three-group comparisons, LASSO regression for feature selection, and area under the curve (AUC) for model performance evaluation. Longitudinal changes within groups will be analyzed using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple comparisons will be corrected using false discovery rate (FDR). Sensitivity analyses will be performed using alternative VAS thresholds (≥30%, ≥70%) and bootstrap resampling.
Expected Impact
This research is expected to elucidate the neurobiological mechanisms of MCS analgesia through structural-functional-metabolic integration, identify reliable imaging biomarkers for patient selection, and establish a clinical decision-support framework for personalized MCS therapy in post-stroke thalamic pain.
Studientyp
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Einschreibung
Phase
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
Studienkontakt
- Name: Mingming Zhao, Doctor of Medicine(M.D.)
- Telefonnummer: 86-18600317173
- E-Mail: mingming157@163.com
Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung
- Name: Di Lu, Doctor of Medicine(M.D.)
- Telefonnummer: 86-17865195209
- E-Mail: ludisdu@hotmail.com
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18 and 80 years. Diagnosed with chronic post-stroke central pain with a pain duration of at least 1 year, with stroke localized to the thalamus.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score ≥ 5 at baseline. Poor response to or intolerance of conventional pharmacotherapy for pain. Medically suitable for surgical treatment (no coagulopathy, no infection at surgical site, no severe psychiatric disorders, etc.).
Voluntarily agrees to receive motor cortex stimulation (MCS) treatment. Able to communicate effectively with researchers and willing to comply with all study requirements.
Sufficient cognitive ability to use the patient programmer and patient programmer charger.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of alcohol, drug, or substance abuse or dependence within the past 12 months.
Trigeminal neuralgia or atypical facial pain. Advanced cardiovascular or other systemic disease that precludes surgical intervention.
Prior history of ablative or related intracranial surgery. Presence of other neurological disorders, such as multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, or brain/spinal cord tumors.
Implanted drug pump and/or another implantable device (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, cochlear implant, other neurostimulation systems such as spinal cord stimulator or deep brain stimulator).
Metastatic malignancy or untreated localized malignancy. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, planned pregnancy, or women of childbearing potential without reliable contraceptive measures.
Severe depression or anxiety (as determined by clinical assessment). Any other condition deemed unsuitable for participation by the investigator.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: N / A
- Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Anzahl der Arme
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / ArmTeilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlungIntervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS)
All participants undergo the same two-stage motor cortex stimulation (MCS) surgical protocol.
Stage I involves epidural electrode implantation over the motor cortex, followed by a 2-week external trial stimulation.
Participants who achieve a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score proceed to Stage II for implantation of an internal pulse generator.
Those who do not respond in the short term undergo electrode removal without permanent implantation.
All participants receive programmed stimulation parameters (40 Hz, 200 μs pulse width) during the trial and long-term follow-up.
Postoperative assessments are conducted at 3 and 6 months for those receiving permanent implants.
|
Epidural paddle electrodes implanted over the primary motor cortex (M1) and adjacent premotor areas, connected to an implantable pulse generator.
The system delivers programmed electrical stimulation (40 Hz, 200 μs pulse width) for pain modulation in patients with post-stroke thalamic pain.
Devices used in this study: electrode model L3251 and pulse generator model G122R (provided by Beijing Pins Medical Co., Ltd., China).
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Short-term Response Rate
Zeitfenster: 2 weeks post-stage I surgery (at the end of external trial period)
|
Proportion of participants achieving a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline at the end of the 2-week external trial stimulation period.
|
2 weeks post-stage I surgery (at the end of external trial period)
|
|
Long-term Response Rate
Zeitfenster: 6 months post-surgery
|
Proportion of participants receiving permanent implantation who maintain a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline at 6 months post-surgery.
This outcome is assessed only in participants who achieved short-term response and proceeded to Stage II implantation.
|
6 months post-surgery
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in McGill Pain Questionnaire Short-Form (SF-MPQ) Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
Change in SF-MPQ total score from baseline to each follow-up time point.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Change in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
Change in PCS total score from baseline to each follow-up time point.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Change in SF-36 Quality of Life Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
|
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
|
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
|
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
|
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
|
Longitudinal Changes in Multimodal MRI Biomarkers
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
|
Adverse Event and Complication Rate
Zeitfenster: From enrollment through 6-month follow-up
|
From enrollment through 6-month follow-up
|
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
Zeitfenster: 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Sponsor
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Zuerst gepostet
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes Update gepostet
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- L2608108
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .