Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Home-Based Supportive Care Program for NMIBC Patients Receiving Intravesical Perfusion: Construction and Preliminary Application (NMIBC-HSC)

20. August 2026 aktualisiert von: Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

Construction and Preliminary Application of Home-Based Supportive Care Program for Patients With Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Intravesical Perfusion Therapy

This study focuses on patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who receive intravesical perfusion therapy. Outpatient perfusion treatment is usually short-term and procedure-oriented, so patients often lack continuous, comprehensive support after returning home, and may face physical discomfort, psychological stress and unmet self-management needs during home recovery. This study aims to identify real-world difficulties and needs of patients in home-based recovery, construct a personalized home supportive care program covering physical symptom relief, psychological support and disease management education, and test its preliminary application effect. It is expected to reduce patients' treatment-related discomfort, improve treatment adherence, and enhance their quality of life.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

(1)Identification of Supportive Care Needs for Patients Receiving Postoperative Intravesical Chemotherapy for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (Qualitative Study): Employing a descriptive qualitative research approach based on the Supportive Care Needs Framework, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with patients undergoing postoperative intravesical chemotherapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This systematically explored the authentic care needs of patients across multiple dimensions including physiological, psychological, social, emotional, spiritual, informational, and practical aspects, providing precise evidence for subsequent scheme development.

(2) Summary of Best Evidence for Supportive Care of NMIBC Patients Undergoing Postoperative Intravesical Chemotherapy (Evidence-Based Research): Centered on the core needs identified through qualitative research, an evidence-based nursing research methodology was utilized. Systematic retrieval of domestic and international databases, guideline websites, and evidence-based resource libraries was performed. The retrieved clinical guidelines, expert consensus statements, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and quasi-experimental studies underwent rigorous quality assessment and evidence extraction to formulate a comprehensive summary of best supportive care evidence for this population.

(3) Development of a Supportive Care Scheme for NMIBC Patients Undergoing Postoperative Intravesical Chemotherapy (Delphi Method): Integrating patient needs derived from qualitative research with best evidence from evidence-based research, a draft supportive care scheme was formulated. The Delphi expert consultation method was employed, inviting experts from urology medicine, nursing, and rehabilitation fields to participate in two rounds of consultations. Through calculation of expert positive coefficient, authority coefficient, and Kendall's harmony coefficient, items were screened and revised, ultimately constructing a scientific, systematic, and operable supportive care scheme.

(4) Evaluation of the Feasibility of the Supportive Care Scheme: Following scheme formulation, feasibility evaluation was conducted using NMIBC patients receiving postoperative intravesical chemotherapy attending the outpatient department of a tertiary hospital in Nanjing. Participants were divided into an intervention group (receiving the newly developed supportive care scheme) and a control group (receiving routine outpatient care). During the study, patient recruitment and retention rates, intervention implementation processes, and compliance were observed and recorded. Post-intervention, acceptability of the scheme and perceived implementation burden by both patients and staff were collected to evaluate its feasibility in clinical practice.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

40

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

  • Name: Chunhua Zheng, Bachelor
  • Telefonnummer: +8613584042177
  • E-Mail: 303618002@qq.com

Studienorte

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210001
        • Nanjing First Hospital

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients pathologically diagnosed with NMIBC, who have undergone TURBT and are receiving intravesical perfusion therapy; Aged 18 years old or above; Clear consciousness with basic literacy and communication skills; Expected survival time ≥ 6 months; Voluntary participation with signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients complicated with severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, hepatic or renal dysfunction, or mental disorders; Patients combined with other malignant tumors; Patients with a history of severe allergic reactions or contraindications to intravesical perfusion therapy.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
  • Zuteilung: Nicht randomisiert
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Supportive care program
Establishing a Dedicated Nursing Team: The team consists of one urology specialty nurse (team leader), one attending physician, one rehabilitation therapist, one dietitian, one psychological counselor, and the researchers of this study. All members received uniform protocol training prior to intervention to ensure homogeneity in intervention delivery. This comprehensive supportive care program is implemented for patients undergoing post-operative intravesical therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, encompassing physiological/practical support, informational support, psychological/emotional support, and social/spiritual support, with the aim of enhancing treatment adherence and quality of life.
Establishing a Dedicated Nursing Team: The team consists of one urology specialty nurse (team leader), one attending physician, one rehabilitation therapist, one dietitian, one psychological counselor, and the researchers of this study. All members received uniform protocol training prior to intervention to ensure homogeneity in intervention delivery. This comprehensive supportive care program is implemented for patients undergoing post-operative intravesical therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, encompassing physiological/practical support, informational support, psychological/emotional support, and social/spiritual support, with the aim of enhancing treatment adherence and quality of life.
Aktiver Komparator: Implementing routine urology outpatient infusion nursing
Includes: routine medical history inquiry and verification prior to infusion; monitoring of the patient's vital signs and clinical condition changes during infusion; routine verbal instructions on post-infusion precautions (such as increased water intake and frequent urination) after infusion; distribution of standard outpatient paper educational materials; and simple telephone follow-up in accordance with departmental routine procedures.
Includes: Routine medical history inquiry and verification before infusion; Monitoring of the patient's vital signs and changes in condition during infusion; Routine verbal instructions on precautions after infusion (such as drinking plenty of water and urinating frequently); Distribution of routine outpatient paper educational leaflets; Conducting simple telephone follow-ups in accordance with the department's routine procedures.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Clinical Treatment Adherence
Zeitfenster: 6 months after intervention
Treatment adherence will be evaluated by infusion completion rate,calculated as (actual number of infusions received / total planned infusions prescribed) × 100%.
6 months after intervention

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Bladder-cancer-specific quality of life
Zeitfenster: Baseline、3 months、6 months after intervention
This outcome will evaluate bladder-cancer-specific quality of life using the validated Chinese version of the EORTC-QLQ-NMIBC24 scale. Higher scores correspond to greater symptom burden and worse quality-of-life status.
Baseline、3 months、6 months after intervention
Recruitment rate and infoermed consent rate
Zeitfenster: Baseline
Calculate the proportion of eligible patients who sign informed consent and formally enroll into the study among all screened eligible subjects.
Baseline
Patient Satisfaction and Acceptance
Zeitfenster: 3months after intervention
A self-designed questionnaire with 5 items using 5-point Likert scale is adopted to score patients'satisfaction and acceptance of the supportive care program
3months after intervention
Satisfaction of supportive care needs
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 3 months after intervention, 6 months after intervention
The Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34) is administered at three time points to evaluate changes in patients' supportive care needs between two groups.
Baseline, 3 months after intervention, 6 months after intervention

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. August 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. September 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

20. August 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

20. August 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

24. August 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

24. August 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

20. August 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • KY20260723-09

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .