Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Optimization of Lumbar Sensory Stimulation Parameters in Office Workers With Chronic Low Back Pain (LSS-OPT)

30. August 2026 aktualisiert von: Peemongkon Wattananon, Mahidol University

Effects of Different Lumbar Vibration Parameters on Somatosensory Cortical Responses in Office Workers With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Crossover Study

This study aims to determine the optimal parameters of lumbar sensory stimulation in office workers with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Participants will attend two laboratory sessions. The first session will characterize baseline clinical and sensorimotor function using clinical assessments, transcranial magnetic stimulation, functional near-infrared spectroscopy during unstable sitting, inertial measurement units, decomposition electromyography, and rehabilitative ultrasound imaging. The second session will use a randomized within-participant crossover design in which participants receive eight combinations of lumbar vibration frequency, amplitude, and direction while bilateral primary somatosensory cortex hemodynamic responses are continuously measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. The primary objective is to identify vibration parameters that produce a favorable and consistent cortical response while meeting predefined comfort, safety, and technical criteria.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Phase II is an experimental laboratory study designed to optimize the neurophysiological parameters of lumbar sensory stimulation in office workers with chronic nonspecific low back pain. The primary objective is to determine which combination of vibration frequency, amplitude, and direction produces the most favorable cortical response in the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1), while meeting predefined safety, comfort, and technical criteria.

Participants will complete two laboratory visits separated by approximately 48-72 hours. The two visits have different purposes and are not intended to constitute a pre- and post-intervention comparison.

Visit 1: Baseline clinical and sensorimotor characterization During the first visit, participants will undergo clinical and neurophysiological assessments to characterize their baseline clinical and sensorimotor profiles. Clinical assessments will include pain intensity, low back pain-related disability, work-related musculoskeletal discomfort, movement-control testing, tactile acuity, and pressure pain threshold.

Corticospinal excitability will be assessed using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), with motor-evoked potentials recorded from the lumbar multifidus and erector spinae muscles. Somatosensory cortical and postural responses will be assessed during unstable sitting using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) over the bilateral S1 together with inertial measurement units (IMUs). Participants will also perform a repeated loaded forward-bending task while lumbar multifidus motor-unit behavior is recorded using decomposition electromyography (dEMG) and trunk movement is recorded using IMUs. Finally, lumbar multifidus morphology and contractile response will be assessed using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) at rest and during contralateral arm lifting.

The measurements obtained during Visit 1 are intended to characterize individual baseline sensorimotor function and to permit exploratory analyses of associations between clinical characteristics, corticospinal excitability, cortical responses, postural control, motor-unit behavior, lumbar multifidus contractile response, and responses to lumbar sensory stimulation. These measurements are not intended to serve as pre-intervention values for an acute pre-post comparison with Visit 2.

Visit 2: Randomized within-participant vibration-parameter optimization During the second visit, participants will undergo the vibration-fNIRS parameter-optimization experiment. Participants will lie prone in a relaxed position while an eight-channel fNIRS system records hemodynamic responses over the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex. A customized vibration apparatus will be positioned over the bilateral lumbar multifidus region.

Each participant will receive all eight vibration conditions generated from a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial combination of two vibration frequencies, two vibration amplitudes, and two stimulation directions. The order of the eight conditions will be randomized by computer for each participant to minimize systematic order effects. Randomization therefore applies to the sequence of stimulation conditions within each participant rather than allocation of participants to separate study arms.

Each vibration condition will be applied for 1 minute. A 5-minute passive rest period will be provided between successive vibration conditions to minimize fatigue and potential carryover effects and to allow the hemodynamic response to return toward baseline before the next condition.

The primary neurophysiological outcome will be the baseline-corrected change in oxygenated hemoglobin concentration (ΔHbO) in the bilateral S1 measured using fNIRS during each vibration condition. Secondary fNIRS outcomes will include changes in deoxygenated hemoglobin and total hemoglobin concentrations, peak oxygenated hemoglobin response, time to peak response, and area under the oxygenated hemoglobin response curve.

The effects of vibration frequency, amplitude, and direction, including their interactions, on the primary fNIRS outcome will be evaluated using a linear mixed-effects model with participant treated as a repeated or random effect. Condition order, testing period, baseline response, and preceding condition may be considered to evaluate potential sequence or carryover effects.

The optimal vibration parameters will not be selected solely on the basis of the largest cortical response. Parameter selection will integrate the magnitude and consistency of the bilateral S1 hemodynamic response with predefined criteria related to participant comfort, biomechanical safety, technical stability and performance of the stimulation apparatus, and suitability for subsequent incorporation into a wearable sensory stimulation belt. The selected parameters will subsequently be used in the Phase III randomized controlled trial.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

36

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

    • Changwat Nakhon Pathom
      • Salaya, Changwat Nakhon Pathom, Thailand, 73170
        • Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University
        • Kontakt:
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Peemongkon Wattananon, PhD
        • Unterermittler:
          • Apinkarn Jaroenlarp, PhD Candidate
        • Unterermittler:
          • Preeyajit Anukulpipat, BSc
        • Unterermittler:
          • Nguyen The Minh Hung, BSc
        • Unterermittler:
          • Kent Fhilip Aseron, BSc

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Office workers who currently sit for at least 6 hours per workday.
  • Age 20-60 years.
  • Chronic nonspecific low back pain for at least 3 months.
  • Current pain intensity of at least 2/10 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of seizure for either the subject or any family member
  • Implanted pacemaker
  • Contraindications for TMS and fNIRS, including open wound, infection, lesions, arteriosclerosis, history of hemophilia, or demand-type pacemaker
  • Acute cerebral hemorrhage
  • History of major spinal surgery, fracture, or traumatic injury to the lumbar spine.
  • Evidence of neurological deficits (e.g., radiculopathy, loss of sensation, or motor weakness in lower limbs).
  • Diagnosis of systemic inflammatory conditions (e.g., Ankylosing Spondylitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis).
  • Allergy to adhesives or history of severe skin sensitivity to vibration/mechanical pressure.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2 (to ensure clarity of RUSI, dEMG, and fNIRs signal quality).
  • Pregnancy (due to changes in spinal biomechanics and hormones)

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
  • Zuteilung: N / A
  • Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Vibration parameter
A customized vibration apparatus will deliver controlled mechanical stimulation over the bilateral lumbar multifidus region. Participants will receive eight randomized combinations of vibration frequency, amplitude, and direction. Each condition will be delivered for 1 minute, followed by a 5-minute passive rest period.
A customized vibration apparatus will deliver controlled mechanical stimulation over the bilateral lumbar multifidus region. Participants will receive eight randomized combinations of vibration frequency, amplitude, and direction. Each condition will be delivered for 1 minute, followed by a 5-minute passive rest period.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in oxygenated hemoglobin concentration in bilateral primary somatosensory cortex
Zeitfenster: During each 1-minute vibration condition relative to its corresponding pre-stimulation baseline during the single Phase II parameter-optimization session.
Baseline-corrected change in oxygenated hemoglobin concentration (ΔHbO) recorded from the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex using an eight-channel functional near-infrared spectroscopy system during lumbar vibration.
During each 1-minute vibration condition relative to its corresponding pre-stimulation baseline during the single Phase II parameter-optimization session.

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in deoxygenated hemoglobin concentration in the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex
Zeitfenster: During each vibration condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline during the Phase II parameter-optimization session
Deoxygenated hemoglobin concentration (ΔHHb) will be recorded from the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex using an eight-channel functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) system. The outcome will be expressed as the baseline-corrected change in HHb during each lumbar vibration condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline
During each vibration condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline during the Phase II parameter-optimization session
Change in total hemoglobin concentration in the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex
Zeitfenster: During each vibration condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline during the Phase II parameter-optimization session
Total hemoglobin concentration (ΔHbT), calculated from oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin signals, will be recorded from the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex using fNIRS. The outcome will be expressed as the baseline-corrected change in HbT during each lumbar vibration condition
During each vibration condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline during the Phase II parameter-optimization session
Peak oxygenated hemoglobin response in the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex
Zeitfenster: During each vibration condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline during the Phase II parameter-optimization session
The maximum baseline-corrected increase in oxygenated hemoglobin concentration (peak ΔHbO) within the predefined response window will be determined for each vibration condition. Left and right S1 responses may also be summarized separately and bilaterally
During each vibration condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline during the Phase II parameter-optimization session
Area under the oxygenated hemoglobin response curve in the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex
Zeitfenster: During each vibration condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline during the Phase II parameter-optimization session
The area under the curve (AUC) of the baseline-corrected oxygenated hemoglobin response will be calculated over the predefined response window for each vibration condition to quantify the magnitude and duration of the S1 hemodynamic response
During each vibration condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline during the Phase II parameter-optimization session
Corticospinal excitability of the lumbar multifidus measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Zeitfenster: During Visit 1 of Phase II, prior to the vibration-parameter optimization session
Corticospinal excitability will be assessed using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation with surface EMG recording from the lumbar multifidus.
During Visit 1 of Phase II, prior to the vibration-parameter optimization session
Corticospinal excitability of the lumbar erector spinae measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Zeitfenster: During Visit 1 of Phase II, prior to the vibration-parameter optimization session
Corticospinal excitability will be assessed using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation with surface EMG recording from the lumbar erector spinae.
During Visit 1 of Phase II, prior to the vibration-parameter optimization session
Change in oxygenated hemoglobin concentration during unstable sitting
Zeitfenster: During each sitting condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline in visit 1.
Cortical hemodynamic responses over the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex will be recorded using fNIRS during unstable sitting with eyes open and eyes closed.
During each sitting condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline in visit 1.
Postural-control response during unstable sitting
Zeitfenster: During each vibration condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline in visit 1
Postural-control behavior will be quantified during unstable sitting using inertial measurement units positioned at L1, S1, and the unstable chair.
During each vibration condition relative to the immediately preceding resting baseline in visit 1
Lumbar multifidus motor-unit behavior during loaded forward bending
Zeitfenster: During the loaded forward-bending assessment at baseline in Visit 1.
Motor-unit behavior of the bilateral lumbar multifidus will be assessed using decomposition electromyography during repeated 45° trunk flexion-extension while holding a load equivalent to 5% of body weight.
During the loaded forward-bending assessment at baseline in Visit 1.
Lumbar multifidus contractile response measured by rehabilitative ultrasound imaging
Zeitfenster: During the baseline assessment in Visit 1
Lumbar multifidus thickness will be measured at rest and during contralateral arm lifting using B-mode rehabilitative ultrasound imaging at the L4-L5 level.
During the baseline assessment in Visit 1

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Peemongkon Wattananon, PhD, Mahidol university

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Januar 2027

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Dezember 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Dezember 2028

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

25. August 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

30. August 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

3. September 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

3. September 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

30. August 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • Sensory-Stimulation-Phase-II

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .