Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Single-Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic-Assisted Radical Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Single-Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic-Assisted Radical Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Multicenter, Prospective, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
Studienübersicht
Status
Status
Bedingungen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Einschreibung
Phase
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
Studienkontakt
- Name: Xian Shen, PhD
- Telefonnummer: +86 139 6888 8872
- E-Mail: shenxian1120@126.com
Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung
- Name: Qiantong Dong, PhD
- Telefonnummer: +86 13676449760
- E-Mail: dongqt2021@wmu.edu.cn
Studienorte
-
-
-
Beijing, China
- Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital
-
Kontakt:
- Guoxin Li
-
Chongqing, China
- PLA Army Characteristic Medical Center
-
Kontakt:
- Fan Li
-
-
Hebei
-
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
- The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University
-
Kontakt:
- Qun Zhao
-
-
Shandong
-
Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University
-
Kontakt:
- Leping Li
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325000
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-85 years, irrespective of sex.
- Histologically confirmed primary gastric adenocarcinoma based on endoscopic biopsy.
- The primary tumor is located in the middle or distal third of the stomach, or at another site considered amenable to radical distal gastrectomy. Preoperative evaluation indicates that robot-assisted radical distal gastrectomy is technically feasible and that an R0 resection is anticipated. Patients who have received standard neoadjuvant therapy may also be eligible if reassessment confirms fulfillment of the above surgical criteria.
- Clinical stage cT1-3N0-1M0 according to the 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer, as assessed by gastroscopy and contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, with endoscopic ultrasonography, abdominal magnetic resonance imaging, or diagnostic laparoscopy performed when clinically indicated. Preoperative assessment should indicate that R0 resection can be achieved by distal gastrectomy, with no evidence of adjacent organ invasion or distant metastasis.
- No history of other malignancies within the preceding 5 years, except for adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical carcinoma in situ, or other malignancies with a similarly negligible risk of recurrence.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I-III.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0-1.
- Adequate major organ function, with preoperative assessment confirming fitness for general anesthesia and robot-assisted radical distal gastrectomy.
- Subjects voluntarily participate in the study, fully understand the trial protocol and provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m².
- Previous gastrectomy, or a history of major upper abdominal surgery considered likely to substantially compromise the feasibility or safety of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy, such as complex hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery or surgery involving the esophagogastric junction. Previous uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or similar procedures are not, in principle, considered exclusionary.
- Tumor-related acute obstruction, active major hemorrhage, or perforation requiring emergency surgery.
- Preoperative confirmation of synchronous multiple gastric cancers or remnant gastric cancer, or the presence or history within the preceding 5 years of another active malignancy that may interfere with study treatment or assessment of study endpoints.
- Preoperative assessment indicating that radical distal gastrectomy is oncologically or technically inappropriate, including anticipated requirement for total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy, combined esophagectomy, or any other procedure other than distal gastrectomy.
- Preoperative evaluation or diagnostic laparoscopy demonstrating definite invasion of adjacent organs requiring en bloc multivisceral resection; distant metastasis, including peritoneal, hepatic, pulmonary, osseous, or distant lymph-node metastasis; or positive peritoneal lavage cytology.
- Standard preoperative evaluation indicating that the patient is not currently an appropriate candidate for upfront radical distal gastrectomy and requires initiation or continuation of neoadjuvant therapy or other antineoplastic treatment.
- Concomitant disease requiring an additional surgical procedure at the time of radical gastrectomy that may substantially affect operative duration, perioperative safety, postoperative recovery, or assessment of the primary endpoint.
- Pregnancy or lactation, or planned pregnancy during the study period.
- Severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal dysfunction; severe coagulation abnormalities; uncontrolled infection; or any other medical condition considered to preclude safe administration of general anesthesia or surgical treatment.
- Inability to provide valid informed consent because of cognitive impairment, psychiatric or mental status abnormalities, or other reasons, or inability to comply with protocol-specified treatment and follow-up procedures.
- Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, renders the patient unsuitable for participation in the study.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Anzahl der Arme
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / ArmTeilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlungIntervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Single-Port Robotic Gastrectomy Group
Participants randomized to this group will undergo single-port robot-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer according to the predefined study protocol
|
Participants assigned to this intervention will undergo robot-assisted radical distal gastrectomy using a single-port surgical approach.
The surgical procedure will be performed according to the predefined study protocol.
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Multi-Port Robotic Gastrectomy Group
Participants randomized to this group will undergo conventional multi-port robot-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer according to the predefined study protocol
|
Participants assigned to this intervention will undergo robot-assisted radical distal gastrectomy using a multi-port surgical approach.
The surgical procedure will be performed according to the predefined study protocol.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Technical Success of the Randomly Assigned Robotic Surgical Approach
Zeitfenster: At the end of surgery
|
Technical success is defined as completion of the protocol-specified gastrectomy, lymph node dissection, and gastrointestinal reconstruction using the robotic surgical approach assigned at randomization.
In the single-port group, technical success requires completion using the single-port robotic system without conversion to multi-port robotic surgery, conventional laparoscopic surgery, or open surgery, and without any unplanned additional port beyond those permitted by the protocol.
In the multi-port group, technical success requires completion using the multi-port robotic system without conversion to conventional laparoscopic surgery or open surgery.
Failure to complete the assigned robotic procedure because of participant-related, operative, or device-related reasons will be classified as technical failure.
The prespecified noninferiority margin is -10 percentage points.
|
At the end of surgery
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Operative Time
Zeitfenster: Intraoperative
|
Total duration of the surgical procedure, recorded in minutes according to the protocol-defined timing criteria.
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Robotic Docking Time
Zeitfenster: Intraoperative
|
Duration required for robotic docking, recorded in minutes according to the protocol-defined timing criteria.
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Robotic Console Time
Zeitfenster: Intraoperative
|
Duration of robotic console operation, recorded in minutes according to the protocol-defined timing criteria.
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Intraoperative Blood Loss
Zeitfenster: Intraoperative
|
Estimated volume of blood loss during surgery, recorded in milliliters.
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Intraoperative Complications
Zeitfenster: Intraoperative
|
Intraoperative complications will be recorded and graded according to the Satava classification system.
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Percentage of Participants With R0 Resection
Zeitfenster: At completion of postoperative pathological assessment, within 30 days after surgery
|
R0 resection is defined as complete tumor resection with no microscopic residual tumor at the resection margins, as determined by postoperative pathological examination.
|
At completion of postoperative pathological assessment, within 30 days after surgery
|
|
Number of Lymph Nodes Retrieved
Zeitfenster: At completion of postoperative pathological assessment, within 30 days after surgery
|
Total number of lymph nodes retrieved and identified during postoperative pathological examination.
|
At completion of postoperative pathological assessment, within 30 days after surgery
|
|
Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes
Zeitfenster: At completion of postoperative pathological assessment, within 30 days after surgery
|
Total number of pathologically confirmed metastatic lymph nodes identified during postoperative pathological examination.
|
At completion of postoperative pathological assessment, within 30 days after surgery
|
|
Overall postoperative complications
Zeitfenster: From the end of surgery through 30 days after surgery
|
Any postoperative complication occurring from the end of surgery through postoperative Day 30 will be recorded according to the predefined study protocol and graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification.
|
From the end of surgery through 30 days after surgery
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clavien-Dindo Grade III or Higher Postoperative Complications
Zeitfenster: From the end of surgery through 30 days after surgery
|
Severe postoperative complications are defined as postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade III or higher.
|
From the end of surgery through 30 days after surgery
|
|
Specific surgery-related complications
Zeitfenster: From the end of surgery through 30 days after surgery
|
Prespecified surgery-related complications include anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding or stenosis, duodenal stump leakage, pancreatic fistula or postoperative pancreatitis, intra-abdominal bleeding, intra-abdominal infection or abscess, bile leakage, chylous or lymphatic leakage, delayed gastric emptying, postoperative ileus or bowel obstruction, internal hernia, bowel perforation or ischemic necrosis, and wound complications requiring clinical intervention.
|
From the end of surgery through 30 days after surgery
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Unplanned Reoperation Within 30 Days After Surgery
Zeitfenster: Within 30 days after surgery
|
Percentage of participants requiring an unplanned surgical reoperation for any postoperative reason within 30 days after the index surgery.
|
Within 30 days after surgery
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Unplanned Readmission Within 30 Days After Surgery
Zeitfenster: Within 30 days after surgery
|
Percentage of participants requiring an unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days after the index surgery.
|
Within 30 days after surgery
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Die Within 30 Days After Surgery
Zeitfenster: Within 30 days after surgery
|
All-cause mortality occurring within 30 days after the index surgery.
|
Within 30 days after surgery
|
|
Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Estimated Marginal Mean Resting VAS Pain Score Across Postoperative Days 1-3
Zeitfenster: Postoperative Days 1 through 3
|
This is the prespecified primary outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy, which is planned to include 140 participants from the parent randomized trial.
Resting postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on postoperative Days 1, 2, and 3 according to a standardized assessment procedure.
For the primary analysis, a linear mixed-effects model for repeated measures will be applied, adjusting for pre-specified confounding factors including study site.
It will estimate the overall mean resting VAS score across postoperative Days 1-3 for each group, together with the between-group difference and its 95% confidence interval.
Higher VAS scores indicate greater pain intensity.
The prespecified superiority hypothesis evaluates whether the overall resting VAS pain level across postoperative Days 1-3 is lower in the single-port group than in the multi-port group.
|
Postoperative Days 1 through 3
|
|
Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Resting VAS Pain Score at 6 Hours After Surgery
Zeitfenster: 6 hours after surgery
|
This is a prespecified supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy.
Resting postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6 hours after surgery according to the standardized assessment procedure.
Higher VAS scores indicate greater pain intensity.
|
6 hours after surgery
|
|
Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Resting VAS Pain Score on Postoperative Day 1
Zeitfenster: Postoperative Day 1
|
This is a prespecified time-point-specific supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy.
Resting postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on postoperative Day 1 according to the standardized assessment procedure.
VAS scores on postoperative Day 1 will be analyzed separately to compare pain intensity between the single-port and multi-port groups.
Where appropriate, estimated marginal means and the between-group difference at postoperative Day 1 will be derived from the prespecified linear mixed-effects model.
Multiplicity adjustment will be applied according to the prespecified statistical analysis plan.
Higher VAS scores indicate greater pain intensity.
This analysis is supportive of the primary longitudinal analysis and does not constitute a separate confirmatory superiority hypothesis.
|
Postoperative Day 1
|
|
Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Resting VAS Pain Score on Postoperative Day 2
Zeitfenster: Postoperative Day 2
|
This is a prespecified time-point-specific supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy.
Resting postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on postoperative Day 2 according to the standardized assessment procedure.
VAS scores on postoperative Day 2 will be analyzed separately to compare pain intensity between the single-port and multi-port groups.
Where appropriate, estimated marginal means and the between-group difference at postoperative Day 2 will be derived from the prespecified linear mixed-effects model.
Multiplicity adjustment will be applied according to the prespecified statistical analysis plan.
Higher VAS scores indicate greater pain intensity.
This analysis is supportive of the primary longitudinal analysis and does not constitute a separate confirmatory superiority hypothesis.
|
Postoperative Day 2
|
|
Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Resting VAS Pain Score on Postoperative Day 3
Zeitfenster: Postoperative Day 3
|
This is a prespecified time-point-specific supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy.
Resting postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on postoperative Day 3 according to the standardized assessment procedure.
VAS scores on postoperative Day 3 will be analyzed separately to compare pain intensity between the single-port and multi-port groups.
Where appropriate, estimated marginal means and the between-group difference at postoperative Day 3 will be derived from the prespecified linear mixed-effects model.
Multiplicity adjustment will be applied according to the prespecified statistical analysis plan.
Higher VAS scores indicate greater pain intensity.
This analysis is supportive of the primary longitudinal analysis and does not constitute a separate confirmatory superiority hypothesis.
|
Postoperative Day 3
|
|
Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Analgesia
Zeitfenster: From the end of surgery through postoperative Day 3
|
This is a prespecified secondary or supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy.
Rescue analgesia is defined as additional analgesic treatment administered because of inadequate pain control beyond the protocol-specified routine postoperative analgesic regimen.
The proportion of participants requiring at least one rescue analgesic intervention during the prespecified postoperative observation period will be recorded and compared between the single-port and multi-port groups.
This outcome does not have a separate confirmatory superiority hypothesis.
|
From the end of surgery through postoperative Day 3
|
|
Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Cumulative Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Morphine Milligram Equivalents
Zeitfenster: From the end of surgery through postoperative Day 3
|
This is a prespecified secondary or supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy.
All postoperative opioid analgesics administered during the prespecified observation period will be recorded.
Individual opioid doses will be converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME) using a prespecified standardized conversion method, and cumulative MME will be calculated for each participant to allow quantitative comparison of postoperative opioid requirements between the single-port and multi-port groups.
This outcome does not have a separate confirmatory superiority hypothesis.
|
From the end of surgery through postoperative Day 3
|
|
Total Abdominal Wall Incision Length
Zeitfenster: At the end of surgery
|
Total abdominal wall incision length will be calculated as the sum of the lengths of all abdominal surgical incisions and recorded in centimeters according to the standardized study assessment procedure.
This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare abdominal wall trauma between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups.
It is also included as a prespecified supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy.
|
At the end of surgery
|
|
Maximum Length of a Single Abdominal Wall Incision
Zeitfenster: At the end of surgery
|
The length of the longest individual abdominal wall surgical incision will be measured in centimeters according to the standardized study assessment procedure.
This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare the extent of abdominal wall trauma between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups.
It is also included as a prespecified supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy.
|
At the end of surgery
|
|
Time to First Postoperative Flatus
Zeitfenster: Up to 30 days after surgery
|
Time to first postoperative flatus is defined as the time from the end of surgery to the first passage of flatus and will be recorded in hours.
This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare early postoperative gastrointestinal recovery between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups.
|
Up to 30 days after surgery
|
|
Time to First Postoperative Defecation
Zeitfenster: Up to 30 days after surgery
|
Time to first postoperative defecation is defined as the time from the end of surgery to the first postoperative bowel movement and will be recorded in hours.
This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare early postoperative gastrointestinal recovery between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups.
|
Up to 30 days after surgery
|
|
Time to First Postoperative Ambulation
Zeitfenster: Up to 30 days after surgery
|
Time to first postoperative walking lasting more than 5 minutes is defined as the time from the end of surgery to the first postoperative walking episode lasting more than 5 minutes and will be recorded in hours.
Brief standing or walking episodes lasting 5 minutes or less will not be considered as meeting this outcome.
This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare early postoperative functional recovery between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups.
It is also included as a prespecified supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy.
|
Up to 30 days after surgery
|
|
Time to First Postoperative Oral Intake
Zeitfenster: Up to 30 days after surgery
|
Time to first postoperative oral intake is defined as the time from the end of surgery to the first postoperative oral intake of liquid, soft food, or regular food and will be recorded in days.
This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare early postoperative recovery between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups.
|
Up to 30 days after surgery
|
|
Time to Meeting Discharge Criteria
Zeitfenster: Up to 30 days after surgery
|
Time to meeting discharge criteria is defined as the time from the end of surgery until the participant meets all prespecified discharge criteria.
These criteria include stable vital signs without fever; recovery of gastrointestinal function with adequate oral intake and no requirement for intravenous nutritional support; ability to ambulate independently without significant discomfort; and satisfactory wound and drainage status with laboratory findings considered clinically acceptable according to the study protocol.
This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare early postoperative recovery between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups.
|
Up to 30 days after surgery
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Sponsor
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Zuerst gepostet
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes Update gepostet
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- KY2026-423
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .