Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Observation of Respiration Following Regional Anaesthesia With Intrathecal Opioids for Caesarean Section

3 de febrero de 2009 actualizado por: NHS Greater Clyde and Glasgow

Observation of Respiration Following Regional Anaesthesia With Intrathecal Opioids: a Comparison Between Diamorphine and Fentanyl Combined With Postoperative Morphine PCA Using a Carbon Dioxide Tension and Pulse Oximetry Sensor (TOSCA)

Spinal Administration of opioids offers segmental analgesia, but has side effects including pruritus, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, hypotension, and respiratory depression, both early and delayed. Many Centres in the UK now routinely use supplementation of spinal anaesthesia from bupivacaine with intrathecal fentanyl or diamorphine. If Fentanyl is used, this is usually accompanied by connection to a i.v. Morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)-device in the postoperative period, whereas the use of intrathecal diamorphine seems to result in a reduction in post-operative morphine requirements, which has obviated the need for PCA devices in many centres. There has been recent controversy over which opioid is safer to use with regards to the risk of respiratory depression.1,2 The investigators want to investigate, whether intrathecal diamorphine causes less or more post-operative respiratory depression in healthy mothers undergoing elective caesarean section than intrathecal fentanyl plus post-operative morphine PCA.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Descripción detallada

Method:

We will use transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension as our primary outcome measure of respiratory depression. Secondary outcome measures will be the oxygen-saturation, the respiratory rare, neurological status assessed by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the need for administration of naloxone and/or active airway management.

PtCO2 and SpO2 will be measured transcutaneously using the Linde TOSCA 500 Monitoring System, which is a relatively new miniaturized single sensor, that is applied to the earlobe.

There will be 2 study groups.

Group D will be patients at Princess Royal Maternity Hospital in Glasgow, where supplementation with intrathecal diamorphine 300mcg is the current anaesthetic technique of choice.

Group F will be patients at the Queen Mother's Maternity Hospital in Glasgow, where supplementation with intrathecal fentanyl 15mcg plus post-operative morphine PCA is the current anaesthetic technique of choice for elective caesarean section.

Additional postoperative Analgesia will be given as per local guidelines.

We will recruit 40 patients to each group.

Patients will receive verbal and written information prior to written consent before being included.

Information Gathering:

The TOSCA monitor will be connected in recovery following the end of caesarean section (with PCA connection at QMMH). Monitoring will be continuous until 0800hrs the following morning giving approx. 20 hours data for each patient.

Data will then be downloaded to a database for subsequent analysis. We will also note the total dose of morphine used in each patient and any complications that occurred or interventions carried out.

We plan to recruit an SHO on each site to help with information gathering.

Ethics Approval:

Ethics Approval has been obtained by application to the Research Ethics Committee of the Glasgow Royal Infirmary.

Statistical Analysis

For both CO2 and O2 parameters the mean area under the curve (AUC) will be compared between the diamorphine and fentanyl groups using a normal linear model. This will enable the analysis to adjust for any demographic and clinical variables, which are known to influence either of these indicators of respiratory depression.

There is no previous information in the literature on the variability in area under the curve for either CO2 concentration or O2 saturation. Any specification of effect size must therefore be in terms of a number of standard deviations, where the standard deviation is not known.

We assume that the primary endpoint is the measurement of CO2 over a period of 24 hours and that this will be quantified in the analysis using area under the curve (AUC). If we compare the mean AUC between the diamorphine and fentanyl groups using a two sample t-test (with two-sided significance level 5%) then a study including 40 patients per group would have 80% power to detect a mean AUC difference between groups of 0.634 standard deviations and 90% power to detect a mean AUC difference of and 0.851 standard deviations.

Final Statistical Analysis will be carried out in cooperation with Dr Chris Weir from the Robertson Centre for Biostatistics at the University of Glasgow.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

90

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Glasgow, Reino Unido, G4 0SF
        • Princess Royal Maternity Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Femenino

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Elective caesarean section Healthy pregnant women

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1st patient on list
  • ASA I or II
  • BMI <40 at booking
  • Term pregnancy +/- 2 weeks gestation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA>II
  • BMI>40 at booking
  • History of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA)
  • Need for supplementation with intravenous Opioids intraoperatively
  • Conversion to GA

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
D, F

Group D will be patients at Princess Royal Maternity Hospital in Glasgow, where supplementation with intrathecal diamorphine 300mcg is the current anaesthetic technique of choice.

Group F will be patients at the Queen Mother's Maternity Hospital in Glasgow, where supplementation with intrathecal fentanyl 15mcg plus post-operative morphine PCA is the current anaesthetic technique of choice for elective caesarean section.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Periodo de tiempo
transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension
Periodo de tiempo: within the first 24 hours after surgery
within the first 24 hours after surgery

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Periodo de tiempo
oxygen-saturation, respiratory rate, neurological status, need for administration of naloxone and/or active airway management
Periodo de tiempo: within first 24 hours after surgery
within first 24 hours after surgery

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Stephan Dalchow, FRCA, National Health Service

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de octubre de 2007

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de julio de 2008

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de julio de 2008

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

12 de octubre de 2007

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

12 de octubre de 2007

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

16 de octubre de 2007

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

4 de febrero de 2009

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de febrero de 2009

Última verificación

1 de febrero de 2009

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

3
Suscribir