Turkish Version of the Brief-BESTest Scale
Investigation of the Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of Brief-BESTest Scale in Stroke Patients
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Descripción detallada
Brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief-BESTest) is a short version of the Balance evaluation systems test (BESTest). Balance assessment systems test (BESTest) The balance assessment systems test developed by Horak consists of 6 sub-sections that evaluate the systems related to balance; 1) biomechanical limitations, 2) stability limit, 3) postural responses, 4) intuitive postural adjustments, 5) sensory orientation and 6) walking. It consists of 36 tests in total. Each question is rated between 0-3. The highest score that can be obtained is 108. Low test scores show that the balance is disturbed. BESTest has been found to be reliable among raters evaluating a cohort of individuals with and without various neurological diagnoses. In studies conducted, it was stated that BESTest is reliable when compared to other scales evaluating balance.
The necessary permissions have been obtained from the authors for Short BESTest, whose validity and reliability features will be tested, and the translation process to Turkish has been completed and the survey has been finalized. The basis for the use of special tools such as the scale is to prove the usability of the tool in the sample group to which it will be applied. The first step for this is the translation stage from the original language to the other language.
At the stage of translation into Turkish, two experts who knew a good level of English translated the questionnaire from English into Turkish. These translations have been translated back into Turkish by two native speakers of English and distant medical subjects. In addition, these translations were re-examined by the researchers and turned into a single form. This form was sent to five specialists in the field, checking the content and compliance with Turkish was evaluated. With the opinion of experts, the scale was finalized.
The study will include individuals over 40 years of age who have been diagnosed with an ischemic or hemorhagic stroke, who applied to the Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Kırıkkale, Pavo, 71000
- Kırıkkale University
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Método de muestreo
Población de estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being 40 years old or older,
- Diagnosis of stroke,
- No cooperation and communication problems
- To be able to walk 10 m independently with or without an auxiliary device
Exclusion Criteria:
- Another neurological or orthopedic problem other than stroke that will affect functionality and balance
- Individuals with advanced contraindications for cardiovascular disease and mobilization will not be included in the study.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Prueba Time Up and Go
Periodo de tiempo: 5 minutos
|
Esta prueba se aplica para evaluar el riesgo de caída y la movilidad. Esta prueba comienza cuando el individuo se levanta de la silla sin recibir el apoyo de los brazos dando la orden de avance mientras está sentado en una silla. Se pide la distancia de 3 metros para regresar y sentarse nuevamente en la silla. El tiempo transcurrido se registra en segundos.
|
5 minutos
|
|
Berg Balance Test
Periodo de tiempo: 15 minutes
|
It is a 14-item scale that evaluates the tasks used in daily life activities.Standing up without support, standing without support, sitting without support, standing up, transfers, standing with feet, standing with legs while standing, reaching out while standing, picking up from the ground, looking back, 360 degree rotation, firm side standing on the stool, one foot standstill and standstill functions are evaluated.Each item is planned between 0-4; 0 is unable to fulfill the task, 4 is to fulfill the task successfully.
The total score of the test is between 0-56.0-20
points: wheelchair dependent, 21-40: assisted walking, 41-56: means independent ambulation.
|
15 minutes
|
|
Functional Reach Test
Periodo de tiempo: 5 minutes
|
Subjects will asked to stand comfortably, to make a fist, and to raise their arm until it was parallel to the yardstick (position 1).
The placement of the end of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will recorded.
Subjects will then asked to reach as far forward as they could without losing their balance (position 2), and the position of the end of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will again recorded.
No attempt will make to control the subject's method of reach, but if he will touch the wall or took a step during the maneuver, that trial will consider invalid and repeated.
|
5 minutes
|
|
10 Meter Walk Tests
Periodo de tiempo: 3 minutes
|
Walking speed are measure by timing subjects over 10 meters with a stopwatch.
To avoid the effects of acceleration and deceleration, measurements take over the middle 10 meters of a 14-meter walkway.
It is repeated 2 times.
|
3 minutes
|
|
Falls Efficacy Scale
Periodo de tiempo: 5 minutes
|
FES is a 10-item scale and these items are; To enter and get out of bed, to sit and stand on the chair, to take a bath or shower, to dress and undress, to lie on the shelves, to walk in the house, to answer the door or phone, to prepare food without lifting heavy objects and to do simple shopping.
Individuals score between 0 (not safe) and 10 (very safe) for each question, and when all scores are summed, a total score between 0 and 100 is obtained.
|
5 minutes
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Director de estudio: Saniye Aydoğan Arslan, Kırıkkale University
- Investigador principal: Kübra Uğurlu, Kırıkkale University
- Investigador principal: Cevher Demirci, Balikesir University
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Franchignoni F, Horak F, Godi M, Nardone A, Giordano A. Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test: the mini-BESTest. J Rehabil Med. 2010 Apr;42(4):323-31. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0537.
- Horak FB, Wrisley DM, Frank J. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Phys Ther. 2009 May;89(5):484-98. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080071. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
- Smith PS, Hembree JA, Thompson ME. Berg Balance Scale and Functional Reach: determining the best clinical tool for individuals post acute stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004 Nov;18(7):811-8. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr817oa.
- Padgett PK, Jacobs JV, Kasser SL. Is the BESTest at its best? A suggested brief version based on interrater reliability, validity, internal consistency, and theoretical construct. Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;92(9):1197-207. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120056. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
- Schmidt S, Bullinger M. Current issues in cross-cultural quality of life instrument development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Apr;84(4 Suppl 2):S29-34. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50244.
- Chinsongkram B, Chaikeeree N, Saengsirisuwan V, Viriyatharakij N, Horak FB, Boonsinsukh R. Reliability and validity of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 2014 Nov;94(11):1632-43. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130558. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
- Bergstrom M, Lenholm E, Franzen E. Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the mini-BESTest in subjects with Parkinson's disease or stroke: a pilot study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012 Oct;28(7):509-14. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2011.653707. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
- O'Hoski S, Sibley KM, Brooks D, Beauchamp MK. Construct validity of the BESTest, mini-BESTest and briefBESTest in adults aged 50 years and older. Gait Posture. 2015 Sep;42(3):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- turkishbriefBESTest
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .