Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Evaluation of a Case-management Program for Frequent Emergency Department Users (DAUM)

3 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: CHOUIHED Tahar, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

The DAUM Case-management Program for Frequent Users of the Nancy University Hospital Emergency Department: Evaluation Protocol

The DAUM case-management program for frequent users (FUs) of emergency department was developed to improve FUs identification and management. FUs were eligible if they had four ED visits or more in the previous year, and attended the ED between November, 2022 and October, 2023. Patients were identified in the ED and addressed to the territorial support platform. A personalized health coordination plan which included a care plan (care objectives) and a support plan (social objectives) was co-constructed by the support platform, the patient, their caregiver(s), and their GP. Follow-up assessments at three to six months and at one year evaluated whether individual objectives were achieved. The primary outcomes were participants' mean number of ED visits during their year of participation in the program compared to the previous year, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as the cost per ED visit avoided. Secondary outcomes included reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance indicators.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

153

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Francia
      • Nancy, Francia
        • Nancy University Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults
  • who visited the ED of Nancy University Hospital between November 7th, 2022, and October 6th, 2023
  • with at least four ED visits during the preceding year
  • residing in Nancy or the surrounding urban areas

Exclusion Criteria:

  • homeless patients
  • patient refusal to participate
  • patient's GP refusal to participate

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Case-management program
Patients included in the case-management program
Conductual: Case-management program

FUs patients were identified by the admission nurse through an alert generated by the ED information system. The ED physician explained the DAUM program to the patient and notified the Territorial Support Platform (TSP). The TSP team contacted the patient and his/her GP to present the DAUM program, obtain their agreement to participate and collect additional information.

Once the patient included in the DAUM program, a Personalized Health Coordination Plan (PHCP) was co-constructed by the TSP team, in collaboration with the patient, hi/her GP, and other caregiver(s). The PHCP is divided into a care plan (with care objectives) and a support plan (with social obectives). Once the objectives of the care and support plans were identified for a patient, specific actions and timeframes were established for each objective. Follow-up assessments were conducted at three to six months from the inclusion and at one year.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Effectiveness
Periodo de tiempo: Before-after comparison between the mean number of ED visits during the year of program participation and the mean number of ED visits in the preceding year
Mean number of ED visits among included patients
Before-after comparison between the mean number of ED visits during the year of program participation and the mean number of ED visits in the preceding year
Cost-effectiveness
Periodo de tiempo: One year
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in cost per ED visit avoided
One year

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Indicator Reach 1 - Percentage of patients who consented to participate in the DAUM program among eligible patients
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients who consented to participate in the DAUM program / number of eligible patients] x 100
One year
Indicator Reach 2 - Percentage of patients who consented to participate in the program among patients to whom the program was proposed
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients who consented to participate in the DAUM program / number of patients to whom the DAUM program was proposed] x 100
One year
Indicator Reach 3 - Percentage of patients who effectively participated in the program
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients who effectively participated in the DAUM program (PHCP validated) / number of included patients] x 100
One year
Indicator Adoption 1 - Percentage of patients notified to the TSP by ED physicians
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients notified to the TSP by ED physicians / number of potentially eligible patients (i.e., patients identified as FU who visited the ED during the study period)] x 100
One year
Indicator Adoption 2 - Percentage of patients who had been informed about the program during their ED visit
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients who had been informed about the DAUM program during their ED visit / number of patients to whom the DAUM program was proposed by the TSP] x 100
One year
Indicator Implementation 1 - Percentage of patients notified to the TSP by ED physicians within three days of their ED visit
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients notified to the TSP by ED physicians within three days of their ED visit / number of patients notified to the TSP by ED physicians] x 100
One year
Indicator Implementation 2 - Percentage of patients whose GP was contacted within 48 hours of the notification by an ED physician
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients whose GP was contacted within 48 hours of the notification by an ED physician / number of eligible patients] x 100
One year
Indicator Implementation 3 - Percentage of patients contacted by the TSP team within seven days of the notification by an ED physician
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients contacted by the TSP team within seven days of the notification by an ED physician / number of patients to whom the DAUM program was proposed] x 100
One year
Indicator Implementation 4 - Percentage of patients for whom a PHCP was validated within a month of the first contact between the TSP team and the patient
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients for whom a PHCP was validated within a month of the first contact (between the TSP team and the patient) / number of patients who had a PHCP] x 100
One year
Indicator Implementation 5 - Percentage of patients who benefited from the first actions of the PHCP within two weeks of the PHCP validation
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients who benefited from the first actions of the PHCP within two weeks of the PHCP validation / number of patients who had a PHCP validated] x 100
One year
Indicator Implementation 6 - Percentage of patients with a 3- to 6-month assessment
Periodo de tiempo: 3 and 6 months
[number of patients with a 3-to 6-month assessment / number of patients who had a PHCP validated] x 100
3 and 6 months
Indicator Implementation 7 - Percentage of patients with a 1-year assessment
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients with a 1-year assessment / number of patients not dead or lost to follow-up during the year] x 100
One year
Indicator Implementation 8 - Percentage of patients for whom all the PHCP actions were implemented as planned at the 1-year assessment
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients for whom all the PHCP actions were implemented as planned at the 1-year assessment / number of patients followed-up at 1 year] x 100
One year
Indicator Maintenance R1 - Percentage of patients who consented to participate in the DAUM program among eligible patients
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients who consented to participate in the DAUM program / number of eligible patients] x 100, calculated each month
One year
Indicator Maintenance R2 - Percentage of patients who consented to participate in the program among patients to whom the program was proposed
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients who consented to participate in the DAUM program / number of patients to whom the DAUM program was proposed] x 100, calculated each month
One year
Indicator Maintenance R3 - Percentage of patients who effectively participated in the program
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients who effectively participated in the DAUM program (PHCP validated) / number of included patients] x 100, calculated each month
One year
Indicator Maintenance A1 - Percentage of patients notified to the TSP by ED physicians
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients notified to the TSP by ED physicians / number of potentially eligible patients (i.e., patients identified as FU who visited the ED during the study period)] x 100, calculated each month
One year
Indicator Maintenance A2 - Percentage of patients who had been informed about the program during their ED visit
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients who had been informed about the DAUM program during their ED visit / number of patients to whom the DAUM program was proposed by the TSP] x 100, calculated each month
One year
Indicator Maintenance I1 - Percentage of patients notified to the TSP by ED physicians within three days of their ED visit
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients notified to the TSP by ED physicians within three days of their ED visit / number of patients notified to the TSP by ED physicians] x 100, calculated each month
One year
Indicator Maintenance I2 - Percentage of patients whose GP was contacted within 48 hours of the notification by an ED physician
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients whose GP was contacted within 48 hours of the notification by an ED physician / number of eligible patients] x 100, calculated each month
One year
Indicator Maintenance I3 - Percentage of patients contacted by the TSP team within seven days of the notification by an ED physician
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients contacted by the TSP team within seven days of the notification by an ED physician / number of patients to whom the DAUM program was proposed] x 100, calculated each month
One year
Indicator Maintenance I4 - Percentage of patients for whom a PHCP was validated within a month of the first contact between the TSP team and the patient
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients for whom a PHCP was validated within a month of the first contact (between the TSP team and the patient) / number of patients who had a PHCP] x 100, calculated each month
One year
Indicator Maintenance I5 - Percentage of patients who benefited from the first actions of the PHCP within two weeks of the PHCP validation
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients who benefited from the first actions of the PHCP within two weeks of the PHCP validation / number of patients who had a PHCP validated] x 100, calculated each month
One year
Indicator Maintenance I6 - Percentage of patients with a 3- to 6-month assessment
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients with a 3-to 6-month assessment / number of patients who had a PHCP validated] x 100, calculated each month
One year
Indicator Maintenance I7 - Percentage of patients with a 1-year assessment
Periodo de tiempo: One year
[number of patients with a 1-year assessment / number of patients not dead or lost to follow-up during the year] x 100, calculated each month
One year

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Colaboradores

agence régionale de santé Grand Est
Dispositif d'appui à la coordination de Meurthe-et-Moselle

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

7 de noviembre de 2022

Finalización primaria (Actual)

31 de octubre de 2024

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

31 de octubre de 2024

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

19 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

9 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

9 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 2022_PI_095

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Case-management program

Buscar ensayos similares

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

CROs by country

CROs in Australia

Condiciones

Enfermedades Raras

Intervenciones de drogas

Suplementos dietéticos

Patrocinador / Colaboradores

Localizaciones

Suscribir