Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Une étude de JNJ-73763989 + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog chez des participants co-infectés par le virus de l'hépatite B et de l'hépatite D (REEF-D)

24 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Une étude de phase 2, multicentrique, randomisée, en double aveugle, contrôlée par placebo avec traitement actif différé pour étudier l'efficacité, l'innocuité et la pharmacocinétique de JNJ-73763989 + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog chez les participants co-infectés par l'hépatite B et l'hépatite Virus D

Le but de l'étude est d'évaluer l'efficacité du traitement contre le virus de l'hépatite D (VHD) du régime JNJ-73763989 + analogue nucléos (t) ide (NA) par rapport à NA seul.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Statut

Indique le statut de recrutement actuel ou le statut d'accès étendu.
Complété

Les conditions

Les conditions

La maladie, le trouble, le syndrome, la maladie ou la blessure à l'étude. Sur ClinicalTrials.gov, les conditions peuvent également inclure d'autres problèmes liés à la santé, tels que la durée de vie, la qualité de vie et les risques pour la santé.

Intervention / Traitement

Intervention / Traitement

Processus ou action faisant l'objet d'une étude clinique. Les interventions comprennent les médicaments, les dispositifs médicaux, les procédures, les vaccins et d'autres produits expérimentaux ou déjà disponibles. Les interventions peuvent également inclure des approches non invasives, telles que l'éducation ou la modification du régime alimentaire et de l'exercice.

Description détaillée

JNJ-73763989 est un traitement antiviral ciblant le foie pour injection sous-cutanée conçu pour traiter l'infection chronique par le virus de l'hépatite B (VHB) via le mécanisme d'interférence de l'acide ribonucléique. Cette étude de phase 2 est conçue pour évaluer l'innocuité et l'efficacité du JNJ-73763989 chez les patients infectés par le VHB co-infectés par le VHD. L'étude se compose de 2 parties : la partie 1 évaluera l'innocuité, la tolérabilité et l'activité antivirale de JNJ-73763989 + NA tandis que la partie 2 évaluera l'innocuité et l'efficacité du régime JNJ-73763989 + NA dans le traitement de la co-infection VHB/HDV . Chaque partie comprend 3 phases : phase de dépistage (de 4 semaines à 8 semaines maximum), phase d'intervention (144 semaines pour le bras A et 148 semaines pour le bras B) et phase de suivi (48 semaines). La durée de la participation individuelle à l'étude sera comprise entre 196 et 204 semaines. Innocuité et tolérabilité (y compris les événements indésirables [EI] et les EI graves, les évaluations en laboratoire, l'électrocardiogramme [ECG], les signes vitaux, l'examen physique), l'efficacité (y compris l'acide ribonucléique [ARN] du VHD, l'acide désoxyribonucléique [ADN] du VHB et les antigènes) , et la pharmacocinétique sera évaluée tout au long de l'étude.

Type d'étude

Type d'étude

Décrit la nature d'une étude clinique. Les types d'études comprennent les études interventionnelles (également appelées essais cliniques), les études observationnelles (y compris les registres de patients) et l'accès élargi.
Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

Inscription

Le nombre de participants à une étude clinique. L'inscription "prévue" est le nombre cible de participants dont les chercheurs ont besoin pour l'étude.
52

Phase

Phase

L'étape d'un essai clinique étudiant un médicament ou un produit biologique, basée sur les définitions élaborées par la Food and Drug Administration (FDA) des États-Unis. La phase est basée sur l'objectif de l'étude, le nombre de participants et d'autres caractéristiques. Il y a cinq phases : phase précoce 1 (anciennement répertoriée comme phase 0), phase 1, phase 2, phase 3 et phase 4. Non applicable est utilisé pour décrire les essais sans phases définies par la FDA, y compris les essais de dispositifs ou d'interventions comportementales.
  • Phase 2

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • Allemagne
      • Essen, Allemagne, 45147
        • Universitätsklinikum Essen
      • Frankfurt, Allemagne, 60590
        • Universitätsklinikum Johann Wolfgang Goethe- Universität Frankfurt Medizinische Klinik 1
      • Hanover, Allemagne, 30625
        • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
  • Australie
      • Camperdown, Australie, 2050
        • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
      • Footscray, Australie, 3011
        • Western Health
      • Westmead, Australie, 2145
        • Westmead Hospital
  • Brésil
      • Boa Vista, Brésil, 69304015
        • Centro Oncológico De Roraima
      • Manaus, Brésil, 69040-000
        • Fundacao De Medicina Tropical Doutor Heitor Vieira Dourado
      • Porto Velho, Brésil, 76812-329
        • Cepem - Centro de Pesquisa Em Medicina Tropical
  • Chine
      • Beijing, Chine, 100015
        • Beijing Ditan Hospital Capical Medical University
      • Beijing, Chine, 100044
        • Peking University People s Hospital
      • Changchun, Chine, 130021
        • The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University
      • Chengdu, Chine, 610041
        • West China Hospital Sichuan University
      • Chongqing, Chine, 400010
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
      • Guangzhou, Chine, 510515
        • Nanfang Hospital
      • Guangzhou, Chine, 510000
        • Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University
      • Hangzhou, Chine, 310003
        • The First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine
      • Shanghai, Chine, 200040
        • Huashan Hospital Fudan University
  • Espagne
      • Barcelona, Espagne, 8028
        • Hosp Clinic de Barcelona
      • Barcelona, Espagne, 8035
        • Hosp Univ Vall D Hebron
      • Madrid, Espagne, 28041
        • Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre
      • Santander, Espagne, 39008
        • Hosp. Univ. Marques de Valdecilla
  • France
      • Clichy, France, 92110
        • Hôpital Beaujon
      • Lyon, France, 69004
        • Hôpital de la Croix Rousse
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU de Nantes hotel Dieu
      • Paris, France, 75012
        • CHU Hopital Saint Antoine
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • Chu Rennes Hopital Pontchaillou
  • Italie
      • Milan, Italie, 20122
        • Irccs Ospedale Maggiore Di Milano
      • Pisa, Italie, 56124
        • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
      • Rome, Italie, 00161
        • Universita degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza' - Umberto I Policlinico di Roma
      • Torino, Italie, 10126
        • Ospedale Molinette, AO Città della Salute e della Scienza di
  • Japon
      • Bunkyō City, Japon, 113 8519
        • Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital
      • Hiroshima, Japon, 730-8619
        • Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital
      • Iizuka-shi, Japon, 820-8505
        • National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center
      • Ikeda, Japon, 563-8510
        • Ikeda City Hospital
      • Kumamoto, Japon, 860-8556
        • Kumamoto University Hospital
      • Kumamoto, Japon, 862 8655
        • Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital
      • Nagasaki, Japon, 852-8501
        • Nagasaki University Hospital
      • Nagasaki, Japon, 856-8562
        • National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center
      • Nakagami Gun, Japon, 903-0215
        • University of the Ryukyus hospital
      • Okinawa, Japon, 904-2195
        • Nakagami Hospital
      • Suita, Japon, 564-8567
        • Suita Municipal Hospital
      • Suita-shi, Japon, 565-0871
        • Osaka University Hospital
      • Sumida Ku, Japon, 130 8575
        • Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital
  • Nouvelle-Zélande
      • Auckland, Nouvelle-Zélande, 1010
        • New Zealand Clinical Research
  • Royaume-Uni
      • London, Royaume-Uni, SE5 9RF
        • Kings College Hospital
  • Russie
      • Krasnoyarsk, Russie, 660049
        • Krasnoyarsk Regional Center For AIDS And Infectious Diseases Treatment And Prophylaxis
      • Saint Petersburg, Russie, 190103
        • St. Petersburg City Center for AIDS and Infectious Diseases Treatment and Prophylaxis
      • Samara, Russie, 443045
        • Medical Company Hepatolog Ltd
  • Suède
      • Danderyd, Suède, 18288
        • Danderyds Sjukhus
      • Malmö, Suède, 20502
        • Skånes universitetssjukhus
      • Stockholm, Suède, 14186
        • Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset Huddinge
  • Taïwan
      • Kaohsiung City, Taïwan, 80756
        • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung Ho Memorial Hospital
      • Taipei, Taïwan, 10002
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
      • Tiachung, Taïwan
        • China Medical University Hospital
  • Turquie (Türkiye)
      • Istanbul, Turquie (Türkiye), 34098
        • Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty
      • Izmir, Turquie (Türkiye), 35100
        • Ege University Medical of Faculty, Department of Gastroenterology
      • Kocaeli, Turquie (Türkiye), 41001
        • Kocaeli University Medical Faculty
      • Trabzon, Turquie (Türkiye), 61080
        • Karadeniz Teknik University Medical Faculty
  • États-Unis
    • California
      • Redwood City, California, États-Unis, 94063
        • Stanford University School of Medicine
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02114
        • Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General Hospital

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Critère d'éligibilité

Les principales exigences que doivent remplir les personnes qui souhaitent participer à une étude clinique ou les caractéristiques qu'elles doivent avoir. Les critères d'éligibilité comprennent à la fois des critères d'inclusion (qui sont requis pour qu'une personne participe à l'étude) et des critères d'exclusion (qui empêchent une personne de participer). Les types de critères d'éligibilité incluent si une étude accepte des volontaires sains, a des exigences d'âge ou de groupe d'âge, ou est limitée par le sexe.

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 65 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Critère d'intégration:

  • Médicalement stable selon l'examen physique, les antécédents médicaux, les signes vitaux, l'électrocardiogramme (ECG) lors du dépistage
  • Co-infection chronique par le virus de l'hépatite B (VHB) et le virus de l'hépatite D (VHD) avec documentation au moins 6 mois avant le dépistage
  • Pour la partie 1 : ARN de l'hépatite D (ARN du VHD) supérieur ou égal à (>=) 1 000 unités internationales par millilitre (UI/mL) lors du dépistage. Pour la partie 2 : doit avoir des valeurs d'ARN HDV >= 500 UI/mL, et doit avoir des valeurs d'antigène de surface de l'hépatite B (HBsAg) inférieures ou égales à (
  • Alanine aminotransférase (ALT) supérieure à la limite supérieure normale (LSN) mais inférieure à 10 fois (LSN)
  • Indice de masse corporelle (IMC) entre 18,0 et 35,0 kilogrammes par mètre carré (kg/m^2), extrêmes inclus
  • Mesures contraceptives hautement efficaces en place pour les participantes en âge de procréer ou les participants masculins ayant des partenaires féminines en âge de procréer
  • Participants non cirrhotiques et participants atteints de cirrhose compensée (Child Pugh classe A) lors du dépistage (Partie 1) et les participants doivent avoir une absence de cirrhose et une numération plaquettaire >= 140 000 par décilitre (dL) pour l'inscription à la Partie 2

Critère d'exclusion:

  • Preuve d'une infection par le virus de l'hépatite A, C ou E ou preuve d'une immunodéficience humaine, d'une infection par le virus de type 1 (VIH-1) ou par le VIH-2 lors du dépistage
  • Antécédents ou preuves de signes/symptômes cliniques de décompensation hépatique, y compris, mais sans s'y limiter : hypertension portale, ascite, encéphalopathie hépatique, varices œsophagiennes ou toute anomalie de laboratoire indiquant une fonction hépatique réduite telle que définie dans le protocole
  • Preuve d'une maladie du foie d'étiologie autre que le VHB/VHD
  • Signes de carcinome hépatocellulaire (CHC)
  • Anomalies de laboratoire significatives telles que définies dans le protocole lors du dépistage
  • Participants ayant des antécédents de malignité dans les 5 ans précédant le dépistage
  • Rythme sinusal anormal ou paramètres ECG au dépistage tels que définis dans le protocole
  • Antécédents ou arythmie cardiaque actuelle ou antécédents ou signes cliniques d'une maladie cardiaque importante ou instable
  • Participants atteints d'une maladie actuelle ou antérieure pour laquelle, de l'avis de l'investigateur et/ou du promoteur, la participation ne serait pas dans le meilleur intérêt du participant
  • Antécédents ou maladie cutanée cliniquement significative ou éruption médicamenteuse actuelle
  • Participants ayant des allergies connues, une hypersensibilité ou une intolérance au JNJ-3989 ou à ses excipients ou excipients du contenu placebo
  • Contre-indications à l'utilisation de l'entécavir (ETV), du ténofovir disoproxil ou du ténofovir alafénamide (TAF) selon les informations de prescription locales
  • Participants ayant suivi des thérapies interdites par le protocole
  • Participantes enceintes, qui allaitent ou qui envisagent de devenir enceintes pendant leur inscription à cette étude ou dans les 90 jours suivant la dernière dose de l'intervention de l'étude
  • Participants de sexe masculin qui envisagent d'avoir un enfant pendant leur inscription
  • Participants ayant subi ou planifié une intervention chirurgicale majeure (par exemple, nécessitant une anesthésie générale) ou ayant reçu une greffe d'organe
  • Participants vulnérables (exemple, personnes incarcérées, personnes sous mesure de protection légale)

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras

Groupe de participants / Bras

Un groupe ou un sous-groupe de participants à un essai clinique qui reçoit une intervention/un traitement spécifique, ou aucune intervention, selon le protocole de l'essai.
Intervention / Traitement

Intervention / Traitement

Processus ou action faisant l'objet d'une étude clinique. Les interventions comprennent les médicaments, les dispositifs médicaux, les procédures, les vaccins et d'autres produits expérimentaux ou déjà disponibles. Les interventions peuvent également inclure des approches non invasives, telles que l'éducation ou la modification du régime alimentaire et de l'exercice.
Expérimental: Bras de traitement actif immédiat : JNJ-73763989 + NA
Les participants recevront une injection sous-cutanée (SC) de JNJ-73763989 toutes les 4 semaines (toutes les 4 semaines) avec NA (entécavir [ETV], ténofovir disoproxil ou ténofovir alafénamide [TAF]) une fois par jour pendant 144 semaines dans la partie 1 et pendant au moins 96 semaines. dans la partie 2.
Médicament: Ténofovir disoproxil
Le comprimé pelliculé de ténofovir disoproxil sera administré par voie orale.
Médicament: JNJ-73763989
JNJ-73763989 sera administré sous forme d'injection SC.
Autres noms:
  • JNJ-3989
Médicament: Entécavir (ETV) monohydraté
Le comprimé pelliculé d'ETV monohydrate sera administré par voie orale.
Médicament: Ténofovir alafénamide (TAF)
Le comprimé pelliculé de TAF sera administré par voie orale.
Comparateur placebo: Bras de traitement actif différé : Placebo+NA+JNJ-73763989+NA
Les participants recevront un placebo correspondant à l'injection SC de JNJ-73763989 toutes les 4 semaines avec NA (ETV, ténofovir disoproxil ou TAF) une fois par jour pendant 52 semaines, suivi d'une injection SC de JNJ-73763989 toutes les 4 semaines avec NA une fois par jour pendant 96 semaines dans la partie 1 et pendant au moins 48 semaines dans la partie 2.
Médicament: Ténofovir disoproxil
Le comprimé pelliculé de ténofovir disoproxil sera administré par voie orale.
Médicament: JNJ-73763989
JNJ-73763989 sera administré sous forme d'injection SC.
Autres noms:
  • JNJ-3989
Médicament: Entécavir (ETV) monohydraté
Le comprimé pelliculé d'ETV monohydrate sera administré par voie orale.
Médicament: Ténofovir alafénamide (TAF)
Le comprimé pelliculé de TAF sera administré par voie orale.
Médicament: Placebo
Le placebo correspondant au JNJ-73763989 sera administré sous forme d'injection SC.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Principaux critères de jugement

Dans le protocole d'une étude clinique, la mesure de résultat prévue qui est la plus importante pour évaluer l'effet d'une intervention/d'un traitement. La plupart des études cliniques ont un critère de jugement principal, mais certaines en ont plus d'un.
Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Double-blind:Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HDV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) >=2 log10 IU/mL Decline From Baseline or HDV RNA Target Not Detected (TND) in Combination With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Week 48 (Multiple Imputation Approach)
Délai: Week 48
Percentage of participants with hepatitis D virus (HDV) RNA greater than or equal to (>=) 2 log10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) decline from baseline or HDV RNA TND in combination with normal ALT at Week 48 using multiple imputation approach was reported. TND was defined as no traces of HBV RNA were detected/found. Normal ALT was defined as ALT less than (<) upper limit of normal (ULN) with ULN = 34 units per liter (U/L) for female and 43 U/L for male. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1. The multiple imputation approach was derived using a longitudinal multiple regression model to impute missing data.
Week 48
Double-blind: Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL Decline From Baseline or HDV RNA TND in Combination With Normal ALT at Week 48 (Multiple Imputation Approach)
Délai: Week 48
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL decline from baseline or HDV RNA TND in combination with normal ALT at Week 48 using multiple imputation approach was reported. TND was defined as no traces of HBV RNA were detected/found. Normal ALT was defined as ALT <ULN with ULN = 34 U/L for female and 43 U/L for male. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1. The multiple imputation approach was derived using a longitudinal multiple regression model to impute missing data.
Week 48

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Dans le protocole d'une étude clinique, mesure de résultat planifiée qui n'est pas aussi importante que la mesure de résultat principale pour évaluer l'effet d'une intervention, mais qui reste intéressante. La plupart des études cliniques ont plus d'un critère de jugement secondaire.
Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL Decline From Baseline or HDV RNA < Lower Limits of Quantification (LLOQ) at Week 48
Délai: Week 48
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL decline from baseline or HDV RNA < LLOQ at Week 48 was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1. The multiple imputation approach was derived using a longitudinal multiple regression model to impute missing data.
Week 48
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Week 48
Délai: Week 48
Percentage of participants with normal ALT at Week 48 was reported. Normal ALT is defined as ALT <ULN with ULN = 34 U/L for female and 43 U/L for male. The multiple imputation approach was derived using a longitudinal multiple regression model to impute missing data.
Week 48
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Seroclearance at Week 48
Délai: Week 48
Percentage of participants with HBsAg seroclearance at Week 48 was reported. HBsAg seroclearance was defined as HBsAg negativity (quantitative HBsAg level <LLOQ) based on the assay used.
Week 48
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With >=2 Kilopascal (kPa) Reduction From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) Assessed by Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE) (FibroScan) at Week 48
Délai: Week 48
Percentage of participants with >=2 kPa reduction from baseline in LSM assessed by VCTE (fibroscan) at Week 48 was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Week 48
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL Decline From Baseline or HDV RNA TND in Combination With Normal ALT
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL decline from baseline or HDV RNA TND in combination with normal ALT was reported. TND was defined as no traces of HBV RNA were detected/found. Normal ALT is defined as ALT <ULN with ULN = 34 U/L for female and 43 U/L for male. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1. The multiple imputation approach was derived using a longitudinal multiple regression model to impute missing data.
Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL Decline From Baseline or HDV RNA TND in Combination With Normal ALT
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL decline from baseline or HDV RNA TND in combination with normal ALT was reported. TND was defined as no traces of HBV RNA were detected/found. Normal ALT is defined as ALT <ULN with ULN = 34 U/L for female and 43 U/L for male. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1. The multiple imputation approach was derived using a longitudinal multiple regression model to impute missing data.
Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL Decline From Baseline in Combination With Normal ALT
Délai: Week 48 and FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL decline from baseline in combination with normal ALT was reported. Normal ALT is defined as ALT <ULN with ULN = 34 U/L for female and 43 U/L for male. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Week 48 and FU Week 24
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL Decline From Baseline in Combination With Normal ALT
Délai: Week 48 and FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL decline from baseline in combination with normal ALT was reported. Normal ALT is defined as ALT <ULN with ULN = 34 U/L for female and 43 U/L for male. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Week 48 and FU Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA TND in Combination With Normal ALT
Délai: Week 48 and FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA TND in combination with normal ALT was reported. Normal ALT is defined as ALT <ULN with ULN = 34 U/L for female and 43 U/L for male. TND was defined as no traces of HBV RNA were detected/found. The multiple imputation approach was derived using a longitudinal multiple regression model to impute missing data.
Week 48 and FU Week 24
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA TND in Combination With Normal ALT
Délai: Week 48 and FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA TND in combination with normal ALT was reported. TND was defined as no traces of HBV RNA were detected/found. Normal ALT was defined as ALT <ULN with ULN = 34 U/L for female and 43 U/L for male. The multiple imputation approach was derived using a longitudinal multiple regression model to impute missing data.
Week 48 and FU Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL Decline From Baseline or HDV RNA TND
Délai: Week 48 and FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL decline from baseline or HDV RNA TND was reported. TND was defined as no traces of HBV RNA were detected/found. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Week 48 and FU Week 24
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL Decline From Baseline or HDV RNA TND
Délai: Week 48 and FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL decline from baseline or HDV RNA TND was reported. TND was defined as no traces of HBV RNA were detected/found. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Week 48 and FU Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL Decline From Baseline
Délai: Week 48 and FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL decline from baseline was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Week 48 and FU Week 24
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL Decline From Baseline
Délai: Week 48 and FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL decline from baseline was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Week 48 and FU Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA TND
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA TND was reported. TND was defined as no traces of HBV RNA were detected/found.
Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HDV RNA TND
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HDV RNA TND was reported. TND was defined as no traces of HBV RNA were detected/found.
Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT
Délai: FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with Normal ALT was reported. Normal ALT was defined as ALT <ULN with ULN = 34 U/L for female and 43 U/L for male.
FU Week 24
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT
Délai: FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with Normal ALT was reported. Normal ALT was defined as ALT <ULN with ULN = 34 U/L for female and 43 U/L for male.
FU Week 24
Parts 1 and 2: Time to Reach HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL Decline From Baseline or HDV RNA TND
Délai: Placebo + NA: From Day 1 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: From Day 1 up to Week 192
Time to reach HDV RNA >=2 log10 IU/mL decline from baseline or HDV RNA TND was planned to be reported. It is defined as the number of days between the date of first study intervention intake and the date of the first occurrence of HDV RNA >= 2 log10 IU/mL decline or HDV RNA TND, whichever event is first (that is, minute [the date of the first HDV RNA >= 2 log10 IU/mL decline, date of the first time HDV RNA is TND] - the date of first study intervention intake + 1). TND was defined as no traces of HBV RNA were detected/found. The multiple imputation approach was derived using a longitudinal multiple regression model to impute missing data.
Placebo + NA: From Day 1 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: From Day 1 up to Week 192
Part 1: Change From Baseline in HDV RNA
Délai: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48
Change from baseline in HDV RNA was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline (Day 1), Week 48
Part 2: Change From Baseline in HDV RNA
Délai: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48
Change from baseline in HDV RNA was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline (Day 1), Week 48
Part 1: Change From Baseline in ALT
Délai: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48, FU Week 24
Change from baseline in ALT was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline (Day 1), Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 2: Change From Baseline in ALT
Délai: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48, FU Week 44
Change from baseline in ALT was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline (Day 1), Week 48, FU Week 44
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Délai: Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Percentage of participants with TEAEs was reported. An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study intervention. TEAE were all AEs with a start date on or after the first administration of study treatment or any ongoing event that worsens in severity, intensity or frequency after the first administration of study treatment.
Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Délai: Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Percentage of participants with TESAEs was reported. SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TESAE were all SAEs with a start date on or after the first administration of study treatment or any ongoing event that worsens in severity, intensity or frequency after the first administration of study treatment.
Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Worst Treatment-emergent Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Tests: Chemistry
Délai: Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Percentage of participants with worst treatment-emergent abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests: chemistry was reported. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) criteria as follows: Grade 1 - Mild, Grade 2 - Moderate, Grade 3 - Severe, and Grade 4 - Potentially life threatening. Only Grade 3 and Grade 4 abnormalities were considered worst and are reported. Only those laboratory parameters for which at least one participant had an abnormality are reported in this outcome measure. ALT: Alanine Aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate Aminotransferase; SGPT: serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase; SGOT: serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase.
Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Worst Treatment-emergent Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Tests: Hematology
Délai: Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52
Percentage of participants with worst treatment-emergent abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests: hematology was reported. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the DAIDS criteria as follows: Grade 1 - Mild, Grade 2 - Moderate, Grade 3 - Severe, and Grade 4 - Potentially life threatening. Only Grade 3 and Grade 4 abnormalities were considered worst and are reported. Only those laboratory parameters for which at least one participant had an abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.
Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Worst Treatment-emergent Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Tests: Urinalysis
Délai: Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Percentage of participants with worst treatment-emergent abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests: urinalysis was reported. Urinalysis included parameters: Glycosuria, Hematuria, and Proteinuria. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the DAIDS criteria as follows: Grade 1 - Mild, Grade 2 - Moderate, Grade 3 - Severe, and Grade 4 - Potentially life threatening. Only Grade 3 and Grade 4 abnormalities were considered worst and are reported.
Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Worst Treatment-emergent Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Tests: Urine Chemistry
Délai: Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Percentage of participants with worst treatment-emergent abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests: urine chemistry was reported. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the DAIDS criteria as follows: Grade 1 - Mild, Grade 2 - Moderate, Grade 3 - Severe, and Grade 4 - Potentially life threatening. Only Grade 3 and Grade 4 abnormalities were considered worst and are reported.
Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Worst Treatment-emergent Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Tests: Renal Biomarkers
Délai: Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Percentage of participants with worst treatment-emergent abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests: renal biomarkers was reported. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the DAIDS criteria as follows: Grade 1 - Mild, Grade 2 - Moderate, Grade 3 - Severe, and Grade 4 - Potentially life threatening. Only Grade 3 and Grade 4 abnormalities were considered worst and are reported.
Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Worst Treatment-emergent Abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram
Délai: Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Percentage of participants with worst treatment-emergent abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram was reported. Only those parameters were reported where at least one participant had abnormality. Worst ECG abnormalities were determined based on investigator's discretion. bpm: beats per minute; ms: milliseconds; QTcF: QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Fridericia; QTc: Corrected QT Interval.
Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Worst Treatment-emergent Abnormalities in Vital Signs
Délai: Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144
Percentage of participants with worst treatment-emergent abnormalities in vital signs (pulse rate, supine systolic blood pressure). Vital signs abnormalities were graded according to the DAIDS criteria as follows: Grade 1 - Mild, Grade 2 - Moderate, Grade 3 - Severe, and Grade 4 - Potentially life threatening. Only Grade 3 and Grade 4 abnormalities were considered worst and are reported. Only those laboratory parameters for which at least one participant had an abnormality are reported in this outcome measure. Only those parameters were reported where at least one participant had abnormality. Abn: abnormal
Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination
Délai: Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Percentage of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination was reported. Vital signs abnormalities were graded according to the DAIDS criteria as follows: Grade 1 - Mild, Grade 2 - Moderate, Grade 3 - Severe, and Grade 4 - Potentially life threatening.
Placebo + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 148, FUP Phase: Week 148 up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: DB Phase: Week 0 up to Week 52, OL Phase: Week 52 up to Week 144; FUP Phase: Week 144 up to Week 192
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Seroclearance
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HBsAg seroclearance was reported. HBsAg seroclearance is defined as the quantitative HBsAg < LLOQ.
Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 1: Change From Baseline Over Time in HBsAg
Délai: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48, FU Week 24
Change from baseline over time in HBsAg was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline (Day 1), Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 2: Change From Baseline Over Time in HBsAg
Délai: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48, FU Week 24
Change from baseline over time in HBsAg was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline (Day 1), Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 1: Change From Baseline Over Time in Hepatitis B Virus e Antigen (HBeAg)
Délai: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48, FU Week 24
Change from baseline over time in HBeAg was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline (Day 1), Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 2: Change From Baseline Over Time in HBeAg
Délai: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48, FU Week 24
Change from baseline over time in HBeAg was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline (Day 1), Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 1: Change From Baseline Over Time in Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA)
Délai: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 48 , 136, EOS (FU Week 48)
Change from baseline over time in HBV DNA was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 48 , 136, EOS (FU Week 48)
Part 2: Change From Baseline Over Time in HBV DNA
Délai: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 48, 112, EOS (FU Week 48)
Change from baseline over time in HBV DNA was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 48, 112, EOS (FU Week 48)
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Levels Below/Above Different Cut-offs
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HBsAg levels below/above different cut-offs was reported. HBsAg values (IU/mL) were <1,000, <100, <10, <1, and <0.05 IU/mL (i.e, <LLOQ). LLOQ value is 0.05 IU/mL.
Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Levels Below/Above Different Cut-offs
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HBsAg levels below/above different cut-offs was reported. HBsAg values (IU/mL) were <1,000, <100, <10, <1, and <0.05 IU/mL (i.e, <LLOQ). LLOQ value is 0.05 IU/mL.
Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Levels Below/Above Different Cut-offs
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HBeAg levels below/above different cut-offs was reported. Cut-offs were >= 0.5 log10 IU/mL, >= 1.0 log10 IU/mL, >= 2.0 log10 IU/mL, and >= 3.0 log10 IU/mL.
Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Levels Below/Above Different Cut-offs
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HBeAg levels below/above different cut-offs was reported. Cut-offs were >= 0.5 log10 IU/mL, >= 1.0 log10 IU/mL, >= 2.0 log10 IU/mL, and >= 3.0 log10 IU/mL.
Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA Levels Below/Above Different Cut-offs
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HBV DNA levels below/above different cut-offs (<LLOQ and <2000 IU/mL) was reported. For HBV DNA, LLOQ is 20 IU/mL.
Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA Levels Below/Above Different Cut-offs
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HBV DNA levels below/above different cut-offs (<LLOQ and <2000 IU/mL). For HBV DNA, LLOQ is 20 IU/mL
Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 1: Time to Reach HBsAg <1 IU/mL Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Délai: Placebo + NA: From baseline up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: From baseline up to Week 192
Time to reach HBsAg <1 IU/mL based on Kaplan-Meier estimate was reported. Time to first occurrence of the HBsAg <1 IU/mL is defined as the number of days between the date of first study intervention intake and the date of the first occurrence of the HBsAg <1 IU/mL. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Placebo + NA: From baseline up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: From baseline up to Week 192
Part 2: Time to Reach HBsAg <1 IU/mL Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Délai: Placebo + NA: From baseline up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: From baseline up to Week 192
Time to reach HBsAg <1 IU/mL based on Kaplan-Meier estimate was reported. Time to first occurrence of the HBsAg <1 IU/mL is defined as the number of days between the date of first study intervention intake and the date of the first occurrence of the HBsAg <1 IU/mL. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Placebo + NA: From baseline up to Week 196; JNJ-3989 + NA: From baseline up to Week 192
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA Virologic Breakthrough
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HBV DNA virologic breakthrough was reported. Virologic Breakthrough was defined as confirmed on-treatment HBV DNA increase by >1 log10 IU/mL from nadir or confirmed on-treatment HBV DNA level >200 IU/mL in participants who had HBV DNA level <LLOQ of the HBV DNA assay.
Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA Virologic Breakthrough
Délai: Week 48, FU Week 24
Percentage of participants with HBV DNA virologic breakthrough was reported. Virologic Breakthrough was defined as confirmed on-treatment HBV DNA increase by >1 log10 IU/mL from nadir or confirmed on-treatment HBV DNA level >200 IU/mL in participants who had HBV DNA level <LLOQ of the HBV DNA assay.
Week 48, FU Week 24
Parts 1 and 2: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-3976
Délai: Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-3976 were reported. Participant wise data is reported as n<3.
Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Parts 1 and 2: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-3924
Délai: Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-3924 was reported. Participant wise data is reported as n<3.
Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Parts 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC[0-24h]) of JNJ-3976
Délai: Predose up to 24 hours post dose on Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC[0-24h]) of JNJ-3976 were reported. Participant wise data is reported as n<3.
Predose up to 24 hours post dose on Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Parts 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC[0-24h]) of JNJ-3924
Délai: Predose up to 24 hours post dose on Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC[0-24h]) of JNJ-3924 were reported. Participant wise data is reported as n<3.
Predose up to 24 hours post dose on Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Parts 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Time (AUC[0-last]) of JNJ-3976
Délai: Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to Last Quantifiable Time (AUC[0-last]) of JNJ-3976 were reported. Participant wise data is reported as n<3.
Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Parts 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Time (AUC[0-last]) of JNJ-3924
Délai: Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to Last Quantifiable Time (AUC[0-last]) of JNJ-3924 were reported. Participant wise data is reported as n<3.
Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With >=2 Kilopascals (kPa) Reduction From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) Assessed by Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE; FibroScan)
Délai: Baseline, EOS (FU Week 48)
Percentage of participants with >=2 kPa reduction from baseline >=2 kPa in liver stiffness measurement (LSM) assessed by VCTE (fibroScan) was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline, EOS (FU Week 48)
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With >=2 kPa Reduction From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) Assessed by VCTE (FibroScan)
Délai: Baseline, EOS (FU Week 48)
Percentage of participants with >=2 kPa reduction from baseline in liver stiffness measurement (LSM) assessed by VCTE (FibroScan) was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline, EOS (FU Week 48)
Part 1: Change From Baseline in LSM Over Time Assessed by VCTE (FibroScan)
Délai: Baseline, Week 48, FU Week 24
Change from baseline in LSM over time assessed by VCTE (FibroScan) was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline, Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 2: Change From Baseline in LSM Over Time Assessed by VCTE (FibroScan)
Délai: Baseline, Week 48, FU Week 24
Change from baseline in LSM over time assessed by VCTE (FibroScan) was reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study intervention on Day 1.
Baseline, Week 48, FU Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Sustained HDV Response Off-treatment Post End of JNJ-3989 Treatment
Délai: JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Percentage of participants with sustained HDV response Off-treatment post end of JNJ-3989 treatment was reported. A JNJ-3989 off-treatment sustained HDV response is defined by having HDV RNA TND during the FU phase after stopping JNJ-3989 regardless of continuing NA treatment.
JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Sustained HDV Response Off-treatment Post End of JNJ-3989 Treatment
Délai: JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Percentage of participants with sustained HDV response Off-treatment post end of JNJ-3989 treatment was reported. A JNJ-3989 off-treatment sustained HDV response is defined by having HDV RNA TND during the FU phase after stopping JNJ-3989 regardless of continuing NA treatment.
JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HDV Relapse Post End of JNJ-3989 Treatment
Délai: JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Percentage of participants with HDV relapse post end of JNJ-3989 treatment was reported. Off-treatment HDV relapse is defined as: 1. In participants with HDV RNA <LLOQ (i.e., 630 IU/ml) at EOT: Confirmed increase in HDV RNA of > 1 log10 IU/mL above the LLOQ JNJ-3989 off-treatment. 2. In participants with HDV RNA >LLOQ at EOT: Confirmed increase in HDV RNA of > 1 log10 IU/mL from EOT HDV RNA value JNJ-3989 off-treatment.
JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HDV Relapse Post End of JNJ-3989 Treatment
Délai: JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Percentage of participants with HDV relapse post end of JNJ-3989 treatment was reported. Off-treatment HDV relapse is defined as: 1. In participants with HDV RNA <LLOQ (i.e., 630 IU/ml) at EOT: Confirmed increase in HDV RNA of > 1 log10 IU/mL above the LLOQ JNJ-3989 off-treatment. 2. In participants with HDV RNA >LLOQ at EOT: Confirmed increase in HDV RNA of > 1 log10 IU/mL from EOT HDV RNA value JNJ-3989 off-treatment.
JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Sustained HBV Response Off-treatment Post End of JNJ-3989 Treatment
Délai: JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Percentage of participants with sustained HBV response off-treatment post end of JNJ-3989 treatment was reported.
JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With HBV Flare (Virologic, Biochemical, and Clinical) Post End of Treatment
Délai: JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Percentage of participants with HBV flare (Virologic, biochemical, and clinical) post end of treatment was reported. Off-treatment is defined as the time period as the periods when the participants do not receive any of the study interventions (JNJ-3989/placebo and NA). Virologic flare is for participants who are off-treatment and had HBV DNA < LLOQ at the last observed point on all study treatments, and categorized based on the confirmed (i.e., two consecutive values) peak HBV DNA above any of the three thresholds: 20000 IU/mL, 2000 IU/mL and 200 IU/mL. Biochemical HBV flare is defined as a confirmed ALT and/or AST>=3*ULN and >=3* nadir (i.e. lowest value observed up to the time point of meeting the biochemical flare criteria). An HBV clinical flare occurs either when an HBV virologic flare and off-treatment HBV biochemical flare overlap in time or when a HBV biochemical flare starts within 4 weeks following the end of an HBV virologic flare.
JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With HBV Flare (Virologic, Biochemical, and Clinical) Post End of Treatment
Délai: JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48
Percentage of participants with HBV flare (Virologic, biochemical, and clinical) post end of treatment was reported was reported. Off-treatment is defined as the time period as the periods when the participants do not receive any of the study interventions (JNJ-3989/placebo and NA). Virologic flare (Derivation 1) is for participants who are off-treatment and had HBV DNA < LLOQ at the last observed point on all study treatments, and categorized based on the confirmed (i.e., two consecutive values) peak HBV DNA above any of the three thresholds: 20000 IU/mL, 2000 IU/mL and 200 IU/mL. Biochemical HBV flare is defined as a confirmed ALT and/or AST>=3*ULN and >=3* nadir (i.e. lowest value observed up to the time point of meeting the biochemical flare criteria). An HBV clinical flare occurs either when an HBV virologic flare and off-treatment HBV biochemical flare overlap in time or when a HBV biochemical flare starts within 4 weeks following the end of an HBV virologic flare.
JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA): Post end of treatment (Week 144) up to FU Week 48; Placebo + NA: Post end of treatment (Week 148) up to FU Week 48

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Parrainer

L'organisation ou la personne qui lance l'étude et qui a autorité et contrôle sur l'étude.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Les enquêteurs

Les enquêteurs

Un chercheur impliqué dans une étude clinique. Les termes associés incluent chercheur principal du site, sous-chercheur du site, directeur de l'étude, directeur de l'étude et chercheur principal de l'étude.
  • Directeur d'études: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

Début de l'étude

La date réelle à laquelle le premier participant a été inscrit à une étude clinique. La date de début "prévue" de l'étude est la date qui, selon les chercheurs, sera la date de début de l'étude.
17 septembre 2020

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

Achèvement primaire

La date à laquelle le dernier participant à une étude clinique a été examiné ou a reçu une intervention pour recueillir les données finales pour le critère de jugement principal. Que l'étude clinique se soit terminée conformément au protocole ou qu'elle ait été terminée n'affecte pas cette date. Pour les études cliniques avec plus d'un critère de jugement principal avec des dates d'achèvement différentes, ce terme fait référence à la date à laquelle la collecte de données est terminée pour tous les critères de jugement principaux. La date d'achèvement primaire "prévue" est la date qui, selon les chercheurs, sera la date d'achèvement primaire de l'étude.
19 octobre 2023

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

Achèvement de l'étude

La date à laquelle le dernier participant à une étude clinique a été examiné ou a reçu une intervention/un traitement pour recueillir les données finales pour les mesures de résultats primaires, les mesures de résultats secondaires et les événements indésirables (c'est-à-dire la dernière visite du dernier participant). La date d'achèvement de l'étude "prévue" est la date qui, selon les chercheurs, sera la date d'achèvement de l'étude.
5 mars 2025

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

Première soumission

La date à laquelle le promoteur de l'étude ou l'investigateur a soumis pour la première fois un dossier d'étude à ClinicalTrials.gov. Il y a généralement un délai de quelques jours entre la première date de soumission et la disponibilité du dossier sur ClinicalTrials.gov (la première date publiée).
28 août 2020

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

La date à laquelle le promoteur de l'étude ou l'investigateur soumet pour la première fois un dossier d'étude conforme aux critères d'examen du contrôle qualité (CQ) de la National Library of Medicine (NLM). Le promoteur ou l'investigateur peut avoir besoin de réviser et de soumettre un dossier d'étude une ou plusieurs fois avant que les critères d'examen du CQ du NLM soient remplis. Il incombe au promoteur ou à l'investigateur de s'assurer que le dossier de l'étude est conforme aux critères d'examen du NLM QC.
1 septembre 2020

Première publication (Réel)

Première publication

La date à laquelle le dossier d'étude a été disponible pour la première fois sur ClinicalTrials.gov après la fin de l'examen du contrôle qualité (CQ) de la National Library of Medicine (NLM). Il y a généralement un délai de quelques jours entre la date à laquelle le promoteur de l'étude ou l'investigateur a soumis le dossier de l'étude et la première date de publication.
2 septembre 2020

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

Dernière mise à jour publiée

La date la plus récente à laquelle les modifications apportées à un dossier d'étude ont été mises à disposition sur ClinicalTrials.gov. Il peut y avoir un délai entre le moment où les modifications ont été soumises à ClinicalTrials.gov par le promoteur ou l'investigateur de l'étude (la date de soumission de la dernière mise à jour) et la date de publication de la dernière mise à jour.
22 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

La date la plus récente à laquelle le promoteur de l'étude ou l'investigateur a soumis des modifications à un dossier d'étude qui sont conformes aux critères d'examen du contrôle qualité (CQ) de la National Library of Medicine (NLM). Il incombe au promoteur ou à l'investigateur de s'assurer que le dossier de l'étude est conforme aux critères d'examen du NLM QC.
24 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

Dernière vérification

La date la plus récente à laquelle le promoteur de l'étude ou l'investigateur a confirmé que les informations sur une étude clinique sur ClinicalTrials.gov étaient exactes et à jour. Si une étude avec un statut de recrutement de recrutement ; pas encore de recrutement ; ou actif, aucun recrutement n'a été confirmé au cours des 2 dernières années, le statut de recrutement de l'étude est indiqué comme inconnu.
1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

Identifiants ou numéros d'identification autres que le numéro NCT qui sont attribués à une étude clinique par le sponsor de l'étude, les bailleurs de fonds ou autres. Ces numéros peuvent inclure des identifiants uniques d'autres registres d'essais et des numéros de subvention des National Institutes of Health.
  • CR108868
  • 2020-001249-37 (Numéro EudraCT)
  • 73763989HPB2004 (Autre identifiant: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)
  • 2023-506763-33-00 (Identificateur de registre: EUCT number)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

La politique de partage des données des sociétés pharmaceutiques Janssen de Johnson & Johnson est disponible sur www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency.

Comme indiqué sur ce site, les demandes d'accès aux données de l'étude peuvent être soumises via le site du projet Yale Open Data Access (YODA) à l'adresse yoda.yale.edu

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Oui

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Paramètres des cookies

Nous utilisons des cookies pour nous assurer de vous offrir la meilleure expérience sur notre site Web. Pour plus de détails, lisez attentivement notre Politique de confidentialité et de cookies. ...>>>Vous pouvez modifier vos préférences ou retirer votre consentement à tout moment en supprimant les cookies de votre site Web ou de votre ordinateur comme décrit dans la politique. Veuillez l'accepter et choisir vos préférences en cochant les cases correspondantes dans la section "Gérer les paramètres" ci-dessous. Veuillez lire attentivement nos Conditions d'utilisation avant de continuer à utiliser une partie de ce site Web.
«Gérer les paramètres